Published April 28, 2026, 9 a.m.
9am John Tatar - Lawful Defense Tatar Tuesday with John Tatar. Studying the Constitution. Know the law and use the law - using the law to defend yourself. All things Constitution and Lawful Process. Tatar Tuesday with John Tatar 10am Mike - Mike Bambas will be talking about the citizen's rights and process of holding to the law. We will be taking the Trading with the Enemy Act, as well as, other lawful practices not followed by our government including a lawful path to convict political criminals of concrete violations of acts leading to treason X/Twitter: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1YxNrZYyPdbxw Rumble: https://rumble.com/v7940ua-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-4282026-lawful-defense-and-pro-se-mike.html https://rumble.com/v7940q8-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-4282026-lawful-defense-and-pro-se-mike.html Odysee: https://odysee.com/@BrandenburgNewsNetwork:d/bnn-2026-04-28-lawful-defense-and-pro-se-mike:1 BNN Live: https://Live.BrandenburgNewsNetwork.com Guests: Donna Brandenburg, John Tatar, Pro Se Mike
Good morning and welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg. It's the twentieth day of April twenty twenty-six and welcome to the show today. First off, we're going to start out with John Tater and let me get my screen adjusted here at nine o'clock with Lawful Defense and then at ten o'clock, Mike, Pro Se Mike and we'll be talking Pro Se and it's it changes every day. You never know what's going to come up because When you start dealing with the law and the court system, it's always changing. It's always complicated. And it's a way to try to figure out how to outsmart their theft. So because we all know that that's what's going on. So morning. Morning, John. How you doing? I'm good. I'm good. Good. Good. So what's happening in John world? Raining and nasty outside, but I'm still good. There you go. I started out in the barn this morning, so I was there about six thirty and started things out right, got all the horses out and such, which is a nice way for me to start out the day. So there you go. I've been seeing a lot in the news here. I went down to Florida, got to meet with some very, very interesting people that are down there by CENTCOM. And it was interesting. Lots and lots going on down there and lots to talk about, lots to deal with. But the biggest thing right now is this assassination attempt, alleged assassination attempt on President Trump. I really don't believe anything I see anymore, at least how anybody frames it, because there's too many things that don't make sense to me about the whole entire situation. So, and then furthermore, watch, you know, your point was we talked a few minutes before we got on this morning. To your point, how many people are talking, protest, let's go crazy, let's act like a bunch of idiots in the street, as they laugh at us. But what's your thoughts on this whole subject? Well, I'm not quite sure it was an alleged attempt. I pretty much think it was a full-fledged attempt because the rhetoric that the Democrats, and let's not only say the Democrats, let's call them the left liberals, the left liberals are pushing is violence, is protest, is assassination, is nasty stuff. These people are sick in their mind because what they have in this country exists nowhere else in the world. They don't have freedom of speech or the press. Look what they're doing in Europe right at the moment. They're removing people's ability to speak freely. They charge them and they fine them and they jail them if they speak against the government. Here we have an opportunity to speak against the government, but we have people that are so far off the rails, foul language, foul ideas, just wanting to create havoc and wanting to create riots. These people, first of all, if you say something publicly, you say something on the public airways that incites any form of riot, you should be arrested. You cannot do that. Then I'm wondering why they even consider that to behave that way, because they have more freedom in this country than they have anywhere as far as the freedom of speech and the right to their arms and so on and so forth. And they're railing against this government that is trying to hold the republic together, maybe because they don't understand what the republic is. and how it's supposed to work and how it's supposed to benefit the people, not the government. Here we have an organization, the democracy that they're trying to push, the Democrats are trying to push. Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is tyranny over a period of time. It'll take rights away from people. It'll take duties away from people. It'll take jobs away from people. It'll destroy your income in economy because they have the right to vote in as it's. Fifty one percent of the people vote. Take your rights away from you. very easily but in a republic that can't be done so i'm missing something here let's get it what puts these people on the far um i don't even know if you want to call them left off the off the rails i guess What's really amazing is that people don't understand that a democracy is the least stable form of government because it's mob rule. They not only have the force, but they've got the numbers that can overthrow democracy. pretty much anything so they oh i don't like their color of red because it reminds me of and then put some fill in the fill in the blank and then all of a sudden they can get rid of that they can say oh we don't like this person or that person bam that category of people is gone there's no rights it doesn't protect the the rights of the individual or the the minority interests, which the Republic does. So I don't know if everybody understands that, but they've been trying to push this democracy nonsense, and we don't have a democracy. We have some democratic processes, like a local election falls under that category. say if you're voting for somebody in your township or something, that's kind of a democratic process because the one who gets the most votes wins. But that is not, that's only one instance, but the rest of the government is done through the process of electing representatives, a republic, republican form of government. We have to stop. We have to watch the terminology nowadays because it's, as I've said in the past, If you control the narrative, you control what's going on in the country. If you control the language, you control the narrative. And the Democrats, and I hate to pick on them, but they need to be picked on. The left, let's put it that way, those people that want to destroy this country and bring it into a socialist country, those people are... using the language such as a democracy, such as overreach of government, such as, let's see, what are some of the other terms that they use? There's a ton of them out there that do not fit in what the republic is all about. And we have a problem when we don't understand the language. That's why, you know, we spent some time going over Norton versus Shelby County in the past because the language there is the language of the Republic. De jure, de facto, usurpation. But it all stems back to the intelligence of the public. Does the public really and can the public really have a true or can the public really have a true republic? Do they deserve it? And in a lot of cases, I'm saying they don't deserve it. They don't understand it. They don't deserve it. They can't control their own life. They're racing up and down the streets. They're swearing at people. They're abusing their neighbors one way or the other. They don't deserve a republic because they can't control themselves. And in a republic, you are your own government. You personally are the government. You control yourself, self-reliance, self-governing, self-educated, and we have a lot of people out there that don't understand that, can't figure it out. Well, with great freedom comes great responsibility. Anytime you're given a gift, there's a responsibility that comes with that gift to not only protect that gift by doing, and the way you protected this by doing the right thing every single time. not using it to take advantage of other people. And I'm not quite sure that we're in a good spot for integrity anymore, but that needs to come back. And I think that if we all take responsibility and say it starts with me and how I conduct myself and whether I'm willing to run for office to replace these guys, how we're going to step up to do it is participation. It's not sitting back and watching other people do all the work. You know, we have a new process coming on board by our government called Operation Ghost Rider. Did you hear about that? No, I didn't. Operation Ghost Rider is on its way, and these are going to be totally unmarked police cars cruising around, and they're going to nab people that are not paying attention to their driving, looking at their telephone, doing whatever and being distracted and they're going to yank them over and give them a ticket. Really? This is a new form of revenue enhancement for the state and for the cities. Where's the victim? I mean, there's the question. If somebody is doing that, where is the victim? I get they're trying to be preventative, but they can allege anything at that point in time. Well, that's right. That's the, that's the, uh, what was that pre pre-crime? Remember the pre-crime movie? Yeah. Same thing. Pre-crime. Uh, we're going to pre-crime these people that are looking on their telephone because that might be looking on their telephone as a, uh, GPS device because they don't have a GPS in their car. So they may be using that as a, and I'm not giving them excuses. for looking at your telephone while you're driving because you really need to have your eyes on the road and you really need to be paying attention. But glancing at your phone for a moment or two to figure out where you're going is not critical depending upon how many people are on the roadway too. If you're crowded, you certainly don't want to be doing that. But if you're the one alone on the road, Glancing at your phone shouldn't be an issue. However, we do have an electronic situation in our country right now where they provide this stuff for you on the telephone, where they provide all of this distractions on the telephone, and then they say, don't be distracted. That's kind of an oxymoron, I would say. It seems to be. Yeah. Uh, if, if the GPS and, you know, I, I years ago, I didn't have a GPS, it didn't exist. And so I relied upon a map or I relied upon knowing where I was going, uh, and directions. I understood directions. Somebody said, go three miles, turn left on such and such a street, and then go another mile and turn right. I understood that that was that's directions. But now a lot of people don't have either the mindset or the ability to follow a direction of that nature. So, you know, we're all getting lazier and lazier. Resort to something like a GPS in your car. Well, if your GPS doesn't talk to you and you've got to glance at it all the time, that's a problem. So it's part of the technology issue that the government has put us in, the government and technologists put us in, but people still have to be responsible for their actions. And it goes back to, if you want to live in a republic, you've got to be responsible for, and there are consequences for your behavior. Well, there's a few things that have changed since I was a kid, right? And you're a little older than me, so I'm sure there's more things that you've seen that have changed that are a little disturbing. But I don't really know when the goal was to play all the time, you know, to play. When we were kids, it's like my husband and I had this discussion the other day about the younger guys that are working with him. And he had a pretty, pretty good, pretty good little talk with one of them. And he said, he said, why, why don't you want to get married? Why don't you want to get to know people before you start a relationship? Why do you, why don't you want to get to know people and maybe start a family, have kids and that sort of thing? And the answer resoundingly was, why would I do that? because that becomes a position where you're responsible. And maybe you'd have a better relationship if you actually knew the people you were hanging out with instead of just using them. And honestly, that's what I see the culture going into is it's more about using people for whatever a person wants. Instead of being there to actually care for people, you know, you can't get in a relationship that's temporary. And I mean, temporary, like one night type thing, you know, you can't get into that without looking at and say, you're just using people. It's disturbing to me, you know. And it's more disturbing is that they don't even understand that they're using people when they do that. And they think it's OK just because it's culturally become acceptable. But where's the stability? Like if you're going to have kids, you know, you're going to mess around. You're probably going to get pregnant at some point in time. It's it's it's the probability is high because God made us to reproduce. So but what happens if you have kids then? And they have no stability because there was no time put into building a structure to support them. I don't understand it, I guess. I agree with you. I also hear the stories of a lot of people that are, you know, up in age. In fact, I was at Costco a few days ago in the parking lot waiting for my wife to come out. And I saw this guy. He must have been. He must have been. in his late seventies, pushing the buggies, you know, pushing the the baskets back into the store. And I'm saying, what did he do all of his life for the thirty, seventy years that at this age he has to be doing that kind of work? I'm missing something somewhere. because either he was brought up with the intention that you know i'm going to live from paycheck to paycheck and there are people on the street that are doing exactly the same thing they don't they didn't plan for the future they didn't plan for anything uh it was just kind of helter skelter life and uh this and you want you want to build a republic around these kind of people that that can't quite put it together to make it i know there's there's those that have bad situations in their life uh ford motor company or or a big company closes down that promised them retirement and that company closes down and therefore there's no retirement i get that And so there are people that are that are left on a lurch. But there are a lot of people out there that have not planned for anything. They're just there. They exist there. And to your point, it's like I've talked to a lot of people about prepping and just being being prepared in case there's a glitch in the system, like the toilet paper nonsense that we went through and people lost their minds. It's like, oh, no, didn't have two extra rolls in the house. I mean, this is ridiculous, right? And such. But the point being is that if you actually care about people around you, you don't prepare for yourself. You prepare for the community that you're in. It's not all about a single person because If that's all that people prepare for, that's a pretty pathetic statement on their character. If they don't look around them and say, wow, if things went poorly, I'm going to be prepared so I don't see this person, this person, this person hurt or die because of lack of provisions. And so I just don't understand it. You know, you know what I mean? So like when, when I got the chickens, I bought the thing, I got the chickens and I started chickens because I, and I had, I was up to one hundred and thirty at one point time. We've had some of them age out. So we're going to have to replenish the supply here a little bit, which isn't a big deal. But the, I got them so that I could give eggs away to my neighbors in case they there was a problem. And so what I end up doing now is that I've got a, you know, I've got a lot of eggs and I give them to my workers and, and neighbors and whoever needs them and just trying to be helpful. And it doesn't take that much to be helpful to actually care about the people around you. The opportunities are always there to make a difference in other people's lives. Whether you bring a meal to somebody who's sick, do you know the neighbors enough to even know if they're sick or, Or having a baby and they need some extra help. Or a mom, a single mom, that is struggling. I have a person in my life right now that's in that category. She doesn't really have anywhere to go. And she's got a four-year-old. we've been trying to figure out how what the best way is to to you know help her and and she's struggling and there's people all around us every single day that are in that category all you got to do is open your eyes and say wow there's an older person they sit there alone maybe i should go over there and visit with them for a little while so that they've got some something in their life and start a project with them so it's there's purpose to it give them some good news cheer people up smile and look in their eyes i mean i mean the list is like from here to taiwan and back of what we can do to help people So let's talk about the electorate. The other thing we were talking about is being qualified to serve. There's different levels. I mean, anybody can help. Anybody can look at things and go, that's wrong. I guess I'm going to jump in and help. But let's talk about another subject you wanted to talk about, which is an educated electorate and the delegates. Yes. The way our system is set up is that we have delegates. Delegates are those people that are supposed to be in touch with the community. Yeah, they're supposed to talk to their neighbors, the people, right? Yeah, but I don't even know. My delegates never sent me anything or came over or talked to me or anything like that. I don't even know who the delegate is. And I'm new to the neighborhood, so I'm not going to blame her or him at this point in time that He's not doing his job, but his job, if he wants to do that job as a delegate, he has to go around and see the people and talk to the people and know what the people want. That's his job. He's supposed to delegate, delegate his our wishes to the people in office. And then we have these people that come in. I'm going to run for election and the delegate has no idea what a republic is has no idea what a constant what the constitution is because they didn't read it they never read it they don't understand it and so the they vote on somebody based on what oh he looks cute oh he's a pretty good oh it's a good looking woman oh i'd rather look at her than look at you kind of thing um they speak well they have a good he has a good presence in in the public you know he's but they're not looking at who the person is or what the person really believes in, what his background is. Does he understand what the Republic is? Does he understand the duties of that particular office that he's voting that person into? Does he understand that stuff? And if the delegate doesn't get it, then they put in morons such as- I'm going to go to the Democratic Party because they put Obama in. Obama was not a natural born citizen. In fact, Obama wasn't even a citizen as far as I'm concerned. The fact that he was born in Hawaii, if he really was, and that's a lie. The fact that he might have been born in America doesn't make him a citizen of this country. It certainly doesn't make him a... A natural born citizen of this country. And he should have never had the opportunity to run for president. Yet the Democrats put him in. And because the Democratic Party put him in, the delegates of the Democratic Party put him in. When Texas ran up against them in a court, they said, you don't have any standing here. You can't argue about the other states because they're not connected with you in Texas. They can do what they want to do. But the problem is that Obama should have never got to that position. Obama is a criminal. And everybody should have known that off the top of their head. If you're going to run for office, you have to have the criteria that's required to run for office, and he didn't. and he didn't, and he didn't. There's reasons why we have laws, and that's to create order. And when we don't follow those laws that were set down by the founders, and we stick to the code, stick to the code. They've already been through all of this. They knew how things were going to go at fault because they just left it with Britain. And so when somebody has a catastrophic failure and they figure out how to get out of it, that's the person I want to listen to, not the person that is putting all of these, flowery words or what we should be doing that are emotional hooks to people to get them to go in stupidville real quick, you know, that that's a problem. But one of the things that I think we should consider here is that we don't really know if he was voted in because our elections are rigged. And the more we see this, the more that we can see that it is that our entire government has been infiltrated at every point in And and I kind of like to see what you think about this little little thought here. I kind of think that instead of the Democrats and the Republicans, I'm not sure if the Democrat Party is the Democrat Party anymore. If they're straight up socialist communists that have infiltrated and then brought their poisonous, their poisonous weapons. usurpation with them to take the United States and remove all freedoms. When I look at all the treaties we've been going through and the unconstitutional agreements we've made, international agreements and such, it sure feels like the United States had an absolute coup to take it over. And the label they used was the Democrats. But it's also through the Republicans. It's through the whole system. I mean, it's like systemic corruption that just kind of crept into everything. I don't know if he was actually voted in honestly or not because our elections are rigged. But he should have never been a delegate or never been a candidate. So it goes all the way back to the delegates of the Democratic Party. He should have never got to the position where he could run. And that's what we have in our situation right now. We have delegates who do not know the candidates, do not know what they represent, and some of the delegates themselves may be socialists. Let's ask this, even if the delegates are in place, what is the recourse? How do you hold people accountable, no matter where you fall on the map? of people who are politically active or community active or voters. What is the best way to hold people accountable? Because until I started fighting in the court system, and that's pretty questionable too, because we don't have any judges in the court system here really, not in Michigan, they're all administrators. They're all criminal. Every single one of them needs to be replaced. And they are really article three judges, but they're criminals. Okay. Look at how they run unopposed. How can you have an entire slate of judges that run fricking unopposed unless they all get together in the back room, started sipping bourbon or something and decided, okay, you run for that. You run for that. You run for that high five break. You know, the team's in place. Well, once upon a time, I talked to an attorney, this very question. And the attorney told me, and this was a long time ago, and I don't even remember who the attorney was. The attorney said that he cannot run for judgeship in his district because that's a sitting judge that's running for his seat again. Right. They all cooperate in the bar. The bar is nothing but a private membership mafia and they protect each other. That's where we have to go. We have to get rid of the bar. But you can't get rid of the bar if you continually run to the attorney every time you think you have a legal problem and you don't understand the legal end of it. So that's why I don't hire attorneys because they're all criminals. They're not for you. You're a client. You're just like a tire on a car. If it works, it works. If you blow a flat, that's the way it goes. It doesn't matter to the attorney if he wins or loses. What matters is that he gets paid. So the attorneys are criminals themselves. And the judicial system in America, and Michigan especially, but not Michigan only, is set up to have the attorneys make money no matter which way they win. If they win a case or lose a case, they're making money. And that's the whole game here. And it's the love of money. These attorneys are out there for the love of money, man. They got to make their pound of flesh off of the people because they do not provide any kind of proper service or any kind of... help or servicing to the public. All they do is they're there to make money, cashier, cash register, and the courts are the same. So the judges are just glorified attorneys that learn how to cheat on the system, and they're just doing the same thing on the bench. But they got a little more power now. Nothing different with it. So the legal system has to be flushed and start over. And until we get rid of the bar, or at least to take the teeth out of the bar, saying if you want to become a bar member, that's a membership card to prove that you're qualified, that you've gone through school and stuff like that. Okay. but not that you're the only one that can practice in a court of law. Anybody can be in a court of law. I should be able to represent anybody. And I really, I think if I came down to it and I had to, I would fight that battle against the bar because the bar doesn't really have a license to practice law. The bar only is a membership of the judicial system and you're not in it basically. But it goes back to the delegates. I'm still saying the delegates are the ones that have to understand. And the problem is, how do we pick a delegate? Nobody wants to run to be a delegate. And those that run to be delegates, all you need is one or two votes and you're in. And then you make a decision for the country. For the president or for the vice president or for your local political public functionaries, you make that decision who should be on the ballot to run. And then you look at the ballot as a private citizen and you say, geez, we got two morons. Which is the less of the two morons that we want to vote for? That's not the way this country should be run, not the way this country needs to be run. Well, I got to tell you, I had a conversation the other day with somebody who really enlightened me further on how things actually are working behind the scenes. Now, I don't agree with this process. I don't agree with it at all, okay? I don't like conniving. I don't like the games. I don't like any part of how this is played. But if people saw how much conniving and game playing is going on behind the scenes, strategic game playing in order to get who they want in and who they can, and I quote, make them do whatever I tell them to do or destroy them. I was just like, wow, this is such a horrible, horrible system that this has turned into. And the people that float to the top or the consultants or whatever, I'm not kidding you. The person that's in the seat is not in control. They find somebody who is a willing puppet that... They have, and the other word was leverage. They all use leverage over them to get them to jump the exact way they want them to. And I find that to be a little disturbing because once again, it cuts out we the people, it takes the choices away rather than giving us the vote to vote in somebody that we really believe in will do what will be in the best interest of the country and such. No, they don't do that. They do it. in order to install people who will jump when they tell them to jump for whatever issue that they see and deem fit it's a little disturbing i'm like i'm immediately disqualified from a lot of that sort of thing because i won't lie for anyone and I don't like playing games. I detest games. I'd rather have it go right straight up the middle and spike the football. You know, it's like I'm not going to I'm not going to screw around with with manipulating people in order to to get to that end zone, you know. Bad, bad analogy for football, but you know what I mean? I'm a lot more direct than that. And I think that if people stopped playing games with each other and actually were real and got to the point and stopped worshiping other people's opinions of them or what they're going to get out of being liked and or, you know what I mean? I mean, a certain part of that is important and we all really want that, but it's more important to do the right thing in non-ideal circumstances instead of just trying to jump back into the bunch of opinion lemmings. That's a problem. Well, again, I say that I don't know how to correct the delegate situation. I've been at this since the early eighties, actually seventies, mid seventies, trying to educate the public. And, you know, even when I was teaching school, I was doing my best to educate the public. In some cases, it was middle school that I was teaching. In some cases, the programming or the courses that I was teaching was industrial arts or something like that, that really didn't fit in. So I could throw my barbs out there every so often. But educating the public has been something I've been been at for a long time. In fact, a lot of people that are in our group on Wednesday nights, we're out there trying to educate the public. And this is thirty, forty years later. I'm not sure we've got fifty percent of the public educated, even twenty percent of the public educated as to what the whole purpose of this world is all about. people come on this planet, they get born, they live on this planet, and it's all about me, me, me, me, me, taking care of themselves. But they don't understand that what politics is all about, politics is the control of you, whether you like it or not. If you're not involved and engaged in politics, you're being ran by your nose by the politicians, the public functionaries. Because they're the ones that are pulling the strings on you. If they're not pulling the strings on you, by laws that they're making laws. They are by your finances. They're taxing you, taxing your property, taxing everything around you. So they keep you broke. So you're working your tail off trying to make ends meet so you can live in a house and own a car or not sleep in your car because that's your only means of living is in your vehicle or on the street. So The politics is what's so critically important in our country, in our government, because if we elect the wrong people, which we have been doing for, you know, what, two hundred and fifty years, electing the wrong people in office and by putting these local politicians in office, all they do is tax and spend your money. They say, you don't know how to control your life. We're going to do that. We're going to have this ghost patrol out there because you can't be responsible when you're driving a vehicle. This kind of nonsense going on constantly everywhere, anywhere and everywhere. It's absolutely crazy. There's another thing that I don't understand. I don't understand how they constantly raise and they manipulate the values of our homes constantly. It's like the money, the currency is being manipulated. Then they charge us taxes on more than what we spent on the property. And then they tax us again when we sell it. So we're getting double taxed. on things constantly in this nation. And what do they do with it? I don't know. We've got more leering centers and all of this ghost nonsense going on. We give it to the Somalis in Minnesota. Yeah, and then they money launder it back to the politicians and the people that are pulling their strings. I don't get it. But when I look at how they tax our property, our houses and such, the way they're taxing it is just, it's criminal because they just say, oh, we've determined that your house is now worth this amount of money. So we're raising your taxes for that. I didn't know that you could prepay taxes on what, you know what I mean? The whole thing is just completely screwy besides it's unconstitutional. But adding more legislation to deal with it is always going to end poorly. We have to go back. We have to go back to what worked and what was the intention instead of adding something that's going to have things hidden in it. Because it always does. They always hide things in it that usually works opposite of what they say they're going to do. But they put the bait out there and people bite on it. That brings me to a... funding called kafra do you ever hear kafra i have okay now but explain it to everybody because i'm sure there's a lot of people that don't don't know what it is comprehensive uh accounting i'm not quite sure the acronym count comprehensive see a accounting I'm not sure. I'm not sure what the acronym is at the moment. But CAFRA is supposedly an account, a hidden account from the public that each government agency, each government body, which is supposed to be Republican in form, has to hide money. So they're constantly broke because they dump that money into the CAFRA account. And of course, the budgets they end up always on a shortfall on the budget. So it's an illegal accounting system as far as I'm concerned, but they've been doing this for a very long time. The rumor has it that there's enough money in CAFRA to fund Michigan for the next century without us paying another nickel in taxes. Is that true or not? I don't know. I'm not in that position to tell that it is, but the rumor is that it is. That's that. And we elect politicians or public functionaries to go into office and to do their job, but they're all on the idea of the CAFRA accounts and none of the public functionaries that I know ever talk about it. I've heard this through other people that have actually done research on this CAFRA account. So the point of it is if they're taking money from us and if you consider a thousand dollars per person in Michigan as a tax, maybe even it's gotta be three or four times that, how much money is going into Lansing? Significant amount of money. It's just like the account that they have to pay off and they keep it all hidden that they pay off sexual and harassment type through that account, and nobody ever sees it. So I'm going to read an actual definition for it. The CAFR account isn't the type of bank account. It refers to property or funds seized by the federal government under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of two thousand. It's essentially a forfeiture case involving assets that the government believes are connected to criminal activity, even if no one has been charged. I think there's another meaning for it, too. No, I don't think that's correct. That's not correct. I think I'm looking at the wrong one right now. That is a different CAF. Jerry Day, look him up. He's the one that I just read, just heard of. story about the CAFR accounts. And I've heard it before. When I was running for governor, I had a few connections with people that actually did the research on the CAFR accounts. And I would have made it public had I got into office. But of course, I didn't. Okay, well, I'm not going to need help here in a quick search, so I'd like to dig into it before I talk about something. But it's the hidden money that they do and the different accounts that they use to hide things. It's sort of like the whole issue with dark... dark money and the funds and that sort of thing that come from different, there's all kinds of ways for them to hide money, including the fact that we have ghost voters, ghost students, ghost kids in childcare, ghost people in elder care facilities and such. I don't think the population is where they say it is. One of my friends told me, and he's in the military and an area of military intelligence, and he said that you're going to be surprised. People will be surprised that China probably doesn't have nearly as many people in it as they say they do. It's sort of a fake. You know, they're head faking us. So they're under six hundred million. Probably said it's probably somewhere between four hundred and six hundred million, which makes me wonder how far off the population in the united states is because i think it's i think it's far off too c-a-f-r comprehensive yeah hang on a minute comprehensive annual financial report but anyway we don't have to do that we could come out and cover that on another day But I agree that the stories that we hear, especially, you know, about the Russians years and years ago, when they were riding these big missiles down their parade fields showing, you know, this is Khrushchev's time. and Brezhnev around them when they were showing all of these spectacular, huge missiles that they were going to shoot. A lot of them were telephone poles dressed up as missiles. They weren't really missiles. We were handled a bill of goods to create the Cold War, to create the problems that we had during that period of time that any time now they're going to have a We're going to have these nuclear weapons flying back and forth between the United States and Russia. All of that was a lie to keep the industrial war complex in operation, because that's where the money was. When you fire a bullet, a bullet's, what, a dollar fifty, if you're using a, maybe it's more than that now, but a dollar fifty a bullet, per bullet, per soldier, one bullet. uh how many millions of bullets get fired at that we're just talking about something small arms we're not talking about uh rockets and and you know half a million dollar rocket no big deal just shoot it up america will pay for it and that's but you know with the funny money system that's going to come to an end when we get rid of the banking system and the funny money and the fake currency that we live with A lot of this will go away. But until we do that, if you take a look from nineteen thirteen, when the Federal Reserve Bank came into power, conflicts rose. We had all kinds of conflicts from nineteen thirteen on World War Two, World War One, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Keep on ongoing because the industrial war complex made billions of dollars. on billions of fake money, but nonetheless, we had to labor for that money. So in that regard, it's not fake, but they made slaves out of all of us. Vietnam War, and we can go on and on and on with how much money all of these uh wars cost the united states not only in in physical dollars or paper money but in lives and people did you see that in the news that president trump fired all or nearly all of the members of the national science Board on April, twenty-four. The NSB is the independent board established by Congress in nineteen fifty that oversees and sets policy for the National Science Foundation, the key U.S. agency funding basic scientific research, roughly nine billion dollars annually. It typically has twenty four to twenty five members serving staggered six year terms who advise the President, Congress and the National Science Foundation. The board members received a brief email on Friday afternoon, April twenty four, stating on behalf of President Trump that their positions were terminated effective immediately. No explanation was provided. Reports say that all twenty two to twenty four current members being affected. Good. I thought that was interesting. So scientific organizations and universities and some lawmakers have expressed concern, viewing it as disruptive to their independent money laundering scientific oversight. You know, think about that. I mean, you know, you can insert the words in of what's really going on here, but that's the truth. You know, let's go ahead and put some more shrimp on treadmills and that kind of nonsense where we're watching single moms that say, that can't that can't make it trying to raise their children or families or dads that are paying off these ridiculous court fees do you ever did you ever know anybody who got caught in a system of paying child support especially if they have like an ex-spouse from hell that wants to just make their life miserable due to like retribution of some kind of, some kind of weird thing. I, I, I don't understand this because it always trickles back to the kids. It's like, okay, people stop being, stop being ignorant, you know, do the right thing. But yeah, we all get annoyed at a lot of things. And sometimes you just got to be able to push that off at the side, put it in the, yeah, I'm annoyed basket, but not going to act on any of it and just get it off your chest and be done with it. You know, some things you just can't change and you got to deal with it. This brings me to one of my next points, actually part of what you're talking about with the court system and with people that are getting railroaded because they hire attorneys. Ninety nine percent of those people going into divorce hire attorneys or they don't know the law or they don't understand what's going on. And first of all, if you're getting into a relationship with somebody, you've got to know what what what that's all about. I mean, you just can't kind of I like this person and therefore I'm going to get married to this person without knowing more about that person. Uh, and that goes for both men and women that, uh, end up in a relationship. And then five years later or ten kids later, they want a divorce because they couldn't seem to make the ends meet. It's not about living your life the best way you personally can for yourself. It's living together in a community with your family, if you have a family, husband, wife, whatever, that you try to make those things work between you. You got to kind of work. What did they say? relationship is the toughest ship ever sailed. That's a good quote right there. So I had a very interesting teacher in high school, and we were in a philosophy class. It was a philosophy class. And the one bit of wisdom he gave all of us that were in there who were high school students was, remember, if you're going to get in a relationship with somebody, you should see them coming in from the rain, without makeup on, sick, and sitting on a toilet. You know, just to the point of you're not always going to see people in their best light. And you have to realize when you get in a relationship, let's just say you get hurt. If you're in it for, you know, if you're in it for life, you're going to walk through that person through all kinds of cool stuff and bad stuff and whatever. But it's stuff that you share and you can look back on together and And you're building a history and you're building memories together and you get all the inside jokes that are going on. And, you know, after a while, you don't even have to say it. And you can look at the other person and you know what the other person exactly is thinking. And it's it's kind of magical. You know, when you can when you get into a relationship and you stick with it, it becomes very, very magical. And it's wonder it's a wonderful thing. to be able to have somebody to count on because you care about them and they care about you as much as you care about them. It's a very beautiful thing. I wanted to show you that the Michigan Court of Claims dismissed another lawsuit with prejudice because of standing and sovereign immunity. And it was against Jocelyn Benson. And so that was an honorable... James Robert Redford, who at this moment in time, it was a good lawsuit, too, that they okayed an API that's outside of the Michigan law. They okayed it to register voters, and they allowed Rock the Vote to register voters in conflict with Michigan law. And you want to know what the response was? The response was, well, we approved it. It's okay. It's like... You approved it. You just got to go in there and approve it. Stamp of approval. We're going to do this. That's not what the law says. And so once again, totally unaccountable, doing whatever they want and spitting in our faces after they do it. So once again, I got to interject here. The Court of Claims in Michigan does not exist. The Court of Claims in Michigan was an act. norton says to cover their own brains too norton says that an act cannot exist as law uh or a department cannot exist under an act so you want to help help me sue to remove it well we could do that the the the the court of claims or just stay out of the court of claims Because the Court of Claims is the court that the government controls. To cover their own tails when they commit crime. You cannot win in the Court of Claims in Michigan, and you cannot win with a Title XLII, Nineteen Eighty-Three civil rights case. Cannot win those cases. I don't know how many times I've said that to my group and to anybody that's out there listening. Those two formats are not for the public. They're for the government. They're to protect the government. Well, honestly, I think we should roll the judge in on this one too and sue the judge as well as all of them is go back in and this is crazy. The judge is sitting in a position that doesn't exist. He's collecting money from the government that doesn't exist. He's, I mean, I don't know. You could call him the Department of Short Hair. He's the Department of Irrelevance. It doesn't exist. And anybody that files a claim in the court of claims, I would have told them up front that it wasn't going to go anywhere. Same with what's-his-face, that attorney that went after the election ballots a few years ago. I can't think of his name. He went into the court of claims and we told them the court of claims is not a court to take this battle to. It's a district court and you sue the individual. You can't sue the department. The departments are protected. They're protected by all kinds of laws and Supreme Court decisions and state Supreme Court decisions and appellate court decisions. They're all protected. You can't win. You want to see what the ignorant idiots in Byron Township just did? Lynn just sent me something, and it said, odd even outdoor water restriction notice for May one. Now, this is in an area that has lots of water that they drained three billion gallons of water and killed twenty five of our wells. Now they're saying that starting May one through through June fifteen, we are implementing odd even outdoor watering restrictions for residences and business in the city on the city of Wyoming's water system, which includes Byron Township. Screw you people. That's what I'm going to say. They have overbuilt this area so much because they're all builders and developers that now they're trying to tell us that we don't have water because of their incompetence, stupidity, greed, and criminality. Yep. This is incredible. Screw them. Do the protest, drain them right down to nothing and see what happens. You know, I'm kind of like, I'm kind of like, feel like that with the taxes and everything else. Screw them. You know how many people I know right now that are going to do a tax protest this year? They're just not going to pay. Yeah. They're not going to pay it. There's a bunch of people that I know right now that are just saying, screw it. I'm not paying. Good. I don't think it's a bad thing. It's like maybe it's time for us just to wage a little bit of a protest here on their stupidity. It's like, well, maybe we should shut their water off for a while like they did the rest of us when they ruined the water supply here. Let's see how they like it. Maybe a restriction of water for when they all go to jail for breaking the law. Well, I hate to call this party to an end, but I do have to leave by about ten, or whatever. So bring Mike on and make him take over. Yeah, I got Mike on here. Well, thanks for being on today, John. Let me at least throw your banner up here. Hang on a minute. It might take me a second. I have skills, but it takes me a little bit. Remember, court of claims and Title XLII are not to help the public. They're to help the government. And anybody that's out there fighting those battles should know that by now. And if they're not, I don't know. There you go. All right. Well, there's how you get a hold of John. We're going to be on Tuesday and Wednesday night. Contact us. Go to magnificentrepublic.com. Look up our logo to get involved and join us at the meetings. There you go. All right, sir. Welcome, Mike. I'm going to go to a fifty seven second break here and we will be right back and I'll see you next day, John. And I'll see you in just a minute here, Mike. Yeah, everybody. Good morning and welcome to the second hour of Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg and it's the twenty eighth day of April twenty twenty six. I'm here with Mike, a man, a national, a legend. I don't know about a legend, but first part first part's correct. How are you doing? Haven't seen you in a while. I know. You know, I had a staff change at the barn. And so when you have large animals and you don't have a culture that actually has a lot of people in it that know how to farm or do animals, there's a learning curve there. and so i for the last two months i've been going to the barn most morning and training new people and such and i think we've got everybody more or less uh trained up in all different situations of of large animal care which uh it is it is a thing you know a lot of people will say oh yeah i've been around horses and i'm like okay uh you rode two at a at the fair maybe in one of the pony circles or you went out trail riding once right And I think it's kind of amusing. It's a good start. I'm not saying that. But when you're having to actually handle them and move them around and move them from stall to stall, or if you've got a medical issue with them, say like colic or whatever else, you have to be able to understand how to get them to do the things you want them to do. So like a horse only, only behaves and only cooperates because they want to, they outweigh us all by at least four to five times, four times, if you're real small, you know, but I mean, and, and you know what I mean? So it's like the only, they only pay attention because they want to, you've given them enough incentive to want, or, uh, Or they understand the boundaries and you've established dominance as far as saying, no, you're not going to kick me. I had one last week. He was really funny. I should post a picture of this because it is actually hilarious. I'll post it when you start talking. But they got their shots because I do do shots, some shots for the horses, because if they get something like strangles, they're going to die. They're going to have a problem. They get real swollen around their head and they can suffocate. So there's some things that we do vaccinate for, for the horses, and that's one of them. And so, but at any rate, he was feeling bad and pouting and feeling sorry for himself. He's one of my stallions. And so I went, I went in the stall because I wanted to rewrap his leg, one of his legs I always keep wrapped. Cause he blew a tendon years ago. So I went in there and he was like, no, you know, just no. And then he turned around and he put his back, his back end to me, which is in horse language. It's like, leave me alone or I'm going to kick you. And so that didn't really work too well for him. I chased him around the stall a little bit. and made sure that he had to work a little bit to be ornery so that he decided that it was much easier just to let me put the halter on so I could take a look at him and make sure he was okay. That's exactly what you do. If a horse is behaving badly and we're out on the trail, I make them run circles because they hate running circles. you know tuck their head in and just make them go in circles until they're like oh okay we're done with this right make them work because they're generally kind of lazy right so anyhow he was he was like okay but anyhow there were some new people in the barn and i don't hit i don't hit horses i don't do anything like that that's not that's not how you handle a horse that's all the western nonsense nobody who's actually a horse person handles horses that way okay So at any rate, I got them out in the, the one, one gal that was there as a, um, is a equine anesthetist. She does anesthesia on horses and she's, she's wonderful. And then there was a new gal there and they were kind of, they were kind of watching how I handle horses, which I'm, I'm pretty good at handling horses and, uh, and, uh, kind of amazed at how quickly I got them turned around and, and, uh, willing, you know, being okay with being checked out because I knew he didn't feel good. But that's kind of what you do, you know? That's good. Now we apply that strategy, that methodology on our public functionaries. I do it. I actually, you know, it's one of the things you can do with people too. And it's, it's a nice, it's a nice way to do it. But if you, if you need to have somebody stop doing something that they're threatening to hurt you or they're going after you, you've got to make them move their feet. And that's the key in all things. I had one person that came up to me in a meeting, and he thought he was going to be the big dog in the room. He was a corporate dog. bad guy. That's the only thing I can say. And so he came over to me and I'm standing there and he kept gesturing towards me like this to try to get me to move. And I just put my arms behind my back and I'm like, you touch one fiber on my shirt, gesturing to my chest And I swear to God, you're going to hit the ground and it's going to you're going to hit that ground so fast. You don't even know which way is up, you know. But yeah, you can you can use things like that. Make them move their feet a little bit here. I'll put this up. You're going to see him. He's like holding his head. And he just he was actually like, Mom, I don't feel good. He's so funny. So, well, motivation, that's a good, good, good topic for today. Yeah, I love it. We're going to talk about motivation in various ways. And listening to you and John earlier, I heard, you know, people are, you know, are tired of paying the taxes. Well, they should stop paying taxes. One, it's voluntary. Two, we don't have debtor's prison, so you can't be sent to jail for failure to pay a debt. Except they do that. Here's the important part. Moms. Article IV, Section IV mandates, requires, no exceptions, that public functionaries are to guarantee us a Republican form of government, and they're not doing it. They have failed because they have violated the guarantee. Let me stop you a minute. That is regret. That is regret for being a jerk on his face. And give me a hug, Mom. So, yeah, stop paying taxes because here it is. They violated the social contract. They're in breach of contract. So, yes, we should all stop paying taxes. What are they going to do about it? If everybody stops, what are they going to do about it? Nothing. There's nothing they can do. Did you see that the head of, I got to remember this now, the head of the, let me look it up so I don't misquote anything, but the head of the IRS, that position has been missing for approximately since, August of last year, but been vacated by permanent placement since May six of this year, which they can't really do, but they did it, which tells me that in the dismissal of all the National Science Foundation, the board, this is a big deal. It really is. Let me see if I can find it because I posted it. Well, they're bringing in the second string. OK, they're bringing in the next string. They're bringing in first strings. second string they put in first to burn through it yeah but here's the thing they still gotta act as jury no matter what uh the first string that was up or second string however you want to term it um they weren't acting really de jure in all their capacity and so yeah we we need to escalate these things we need to move it to the next level and going back to what you and john were talking about earlier john brought up about uh the the uh ghost what was it, the ghost riders or whatever, the unmarked cops. Here's the thing. If a police car does not have the proper insignias on it, it must identify itself as a law enforcement type vehicle. If it does not. How do we know who these people are? It could be the UN that's jumping in here. Oh, the secretary of the Navy also was fired and they replaced him. Okay. So there's a lot. There's actually a lot going on. It's kind of interesting. I'll find it. Hang on. Stick with me, guys. Keep going. So they wanted to have this hands free crap going on. OK. And so, well, you know, I've had the the occasion to ride in the back of a police car at times. And guess what? Those cops are on their cell phones constantly. They're chit-chatting on the radio. Where's their attention being placed there? They're distracted behind the wheel of that car. So if they're gonna put this into place, I said, we better make sure that we stake out all the donut shops to make sure that the cops aren't trying to eat their Krispy Kremes behind the wheel as they go down and cruise down the road. So what determines distraction? you know, turning on your windshield wipers, you know, trying to talk to your kids in the back seat. What if a doctor were to receive a phone call on an emergency call regarding a patient? Oh, I'm sorry, I'm not allowed to answer my phone and diagnose the problem. So the patient, what, dies because I can't answer the phone? I'm sorry, but, you know, you might as well take out the radios, take out all the GPS instruments, take out all the technology out of the cars, put a steering wheel and a gas pedal and a brake in there, and that's it. Because everything else is a distraction. What about the regulators in the cars? Somebody said to me one time, well, I think it's a good idea to have regulators in the cars so you can't go over the speed limit. And I said, so what happens if somebody's chasing you, a bad guy in your family? And you can't get away because you can't break the speed limit. I'm telling you, somebody goes after my family. I'd be driving a hundred miles down the, down the highway and hoping a cop pulls me over to get some help at that point in time. You know, it's like, it's like, this is, this is a dangerous, a dangerous spot to get into to make these overriding rules possible. that are basically being driven by the insurance industry. And it's all about the money. Okay, here you go. The IRS commissioner position, the agency's top Senate confirmed leadership is currently vacant. Status as of late April, the office has been formally vacant since March six, And Treasury Secretary Scott Besant previously served as acting commissioner starting August, eight, twenty twenty-five, hits a two hundred and ten day limit under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act expired on March six. He no longer holds the acting commissioner title, but continues to perform functions and duties as the role as Treasury Secretary, a long standing workaround used by both parties and vacant positions. So I'm sitting here going, okay, this, the commissioner of the, of the IRS leads of the internal revenue leads the IRS oversees tax collection and enforcement reports to the treasury secretary. Well, it kind of looks to me like they're breaking down the IRS. So those people who are not paying taxes, I don't know, you might have a, you might get a pass on this. It's hard to say. Well, I know a lot of people that don't pay taxes. They don't even file for taxes. Okay. There's nothing happening to them. So everybody's been brainwashed and says, okay, when you sign that tax form, you're contracting with them. That's a contract. Why would you contract with them? Let me ask you this. Okay, here's another stupid question. Okay, so if we're having taxes taken out of paychecks and such, why is it anybody has to file taxes at all, a tax report? Why would people file the taxes at all? Wouldn't the government already know what you did? Why are you paying income tax? Right. Well, I mean, but even one step past that, if we did pay and we had the employer take our stuff out, why isn't the burden on the IRS instead of us proving what we did by filing this and creating another industry, the tax industry? Because they put in administrative rules enforced as laws. Okay, here's the APA again. Yeah, that has you convinced that you are guilty until you prove your innocence. The IRS accuses you of something and you have to prove your innocence. No, no, no, no, no, no. They're trying to fabricate a default situation is what they're trying to do. They're trying to get you to screw up. They're trying to get you to admit, oh, crap, I didn't do my tax returns correctly. I didn't do my filing script. I didn't do my deductions correctly. They're trying to create the default. And everybody is hoodwinked into believing that that's how the system works. It isn't. Stop consenting to their crap. Wake up, people. You don't make an income. You get reimbursed for your time. And that is not taxable. Yeah, it's incredible to see how far things have gone. And I just read something that just came out on Byron Township. They're telling us that we have water restrictions on starting May one because these morons overbuilt the area and didn't have any infrastructure in to do so to give the advantage to the developers. This thing should be stopped immediately until they get prepared to do it, but they don't do that. They just keep building because they're getting paid, and we're the ones that suffer because of it. I hate these developers. I hate them with a passion. You know, file an injunction to stop them. Yeah, but the problem is that the court system just drags it out and dismisses it with prejudice. They did it the last time I filed one. You file for an injunction to cease and desist until the water situation is resolved. Guess what happens on day one when they go into court? As soon as they open their mouth, their attorney opens their mouth, objection. He doesn't have a license to practice law. Further, these are corporations. Therefore, under People v. California Corporation, they're conducting the unauthorized practice of law. There are so many ways you can bind them up on day one that they can move forward. They can't move forward. They're stuck. And you bind them up that way. Okay. First thing, they don't have a license to practice law. Show me where they have a license to practice law. They can't. They don't. None of them do. So now, guess what? The developer now has to do what? Get new counsel. Okay. I didn't say attorney. I said counsel. So he thinks he has to get another attorney. He's never going to be able to get another attorney because none of them have a license to practice law. So now he's stuck trying to defend this on his own and he doesn't know squat. I guarantee he doesn't know squat. He doesn't know how to defend himself. So right there, by doing that injunction, you're going to bind them up indefinitely. You can string that out for ten years. He's not going to be able to afford to string that out for ten years. He's not smart enough to how to how to defend himself. And all you're asking for is what remedy you want them to resolve the water issue because it's causing a harm and they have to make good on that. They have to fix the problem. So. Yeah, if I was looking to bind them up, that's exactly what I would do. So this is what is currently going on. I want to show you this. So we have to restrict the water. I want you guys to understand how ignorant these people are. Who's restricting? The township, the criminals in Byron Township. By what authority? By talking out of their behind authority. What authority are they claiming they have to regulate water? Well, they developed another thing called the Byron Gaines Water Authority. And so they're just a bunch of fools. Here's what I would put to them. I want to show you this. They just told us they were going to restrict our water for the year on odd even days. But these idiots, this is what they're doing. This is currently going on. Why are they restricting water? They're killing the wells and trying to force everybody to be on water so that they can develop it. But look at this. They're literally just pumping. This is the smallest water discharge that I've seen. Usually it's a lot more than this, but they're still doing it. Yeah, that is. Yeah. Why is that on private property? Does that owner, did that homeowner consent to that? I don't know. It's hard to tell. A lot of times when they do stuff like that, they buy like easements and such. But that's what they did. That's what they have done. I would hit them with, I don't know, a thousand dollars a gallon that they're pumping across private property. If I was that homeowner, that's exactly what I would do. Guess what? You're on private property. One, the pipe. Here's the fee for the pipe coming on my private property. Two, every gallon that you pump through there, it's a thousand dollars a gallon. Yeah. It's so ridiculous. It's just ridiculous. I hate these people. I really do. I should be assuming myself. I'm giving you remedies as far as how to go after them. You know, you have to make them, I have to make them hurt. And financially is how you make them hurt. So. But I got a big announcement for you today. What's your announcement? Okay. Yesterday, we had interviews with USA Today and the Detroit News. We have more interviews coming up here. We have the launch this Thursday, Friday, going into the military month. Sam from Australia, who helped my dad, is back. They were here at my dad's house yesterday. We did interviews. And... They're doing the launch, the fifty, fifty, fifty launch this Thursday, Friday. Now, what that is, is fifty veterans in fifty states in fifty days. So there would be one veteran in every state for all fifty states. It's going to be hooked up a GoFundMe account to help them raise money for whatever their situation may be. And so it's going to be going over the next fifty days. So they're starting here in Michigan. And my father, being the vet, he was a vet, and so he is contributing one thousand dollars for each GoFundMe account to get them started. Oh, that's cool. So just get this out to them. We're getting this out to the masses that this campaign is starting this week. The news media should start watching the interviews probably Thursday or Friday so that we start being televised. And I know we're supposed to be meeting with Fox News, Good Morning America and a whole bunch of others. So there's going to be a lot of publicity on this now. This is to bring awareness of how bad the veterans are being treated and so that everybody gets, you know, can help chip in and help these veterans with their situation. So everything is going to be going through GoFundMe and there's a Facebook page that's going to be showing everything as well. So there's going to be more details coming out on that here shortly is how everybody can contact that. They want to contribute. They can. All fifty veterans will be listed on the on the page so you can go through, look at all their different stories and contribute to whomever you want or as many as you want. So that's that's what's happening starting this week. Well, that's cool. Congratulations. That sounds like a cool thing, a cool project to be involved in. Yeah. And I feel really I'm so thankful for your dad and what happened for your dad. That is just an amazing story of compassion from. from Americans to reach out and see somebody who has really been run through the ringers there. And it's just very nice to see that. I bet he's having a riot with it. He's overwhelmed by it. He's still trying to settle in with the realization of what happened. I'm sure, I'm sure. know he was talking about going golfing and i said dad you need some new clubs he's like oh i got my old ones i'm like dad you haven't golfed in twenty years you can afford to go out and buy a new set of golf clubs and he just that mentality just hasn't sunk in yet that he can just go out and buy a new set of golf clubs so um but i'm working on it for him i'll get him there um but in addition to that um We're also putting together and we've been working on this for about three years now. And what we're looking to do is expand on what Sam has been is going to do for the next fifty days. And what I mean by expand is what we want to do is, for example, go to tunnel the towers. I want their whole list of all their veterans. And instead of doing what they're doing, like a onesie-twosie type thing, helping these vets. I want the whole list, because we're going to take care of the entire list right now. And we're looking to eliminate their deaths. We're going to help them get into a house, get a car, get their, if they need, prosthetics, take care of their medical bills, everything. And so this is what we're shooting for. uh to be able to take care of all that and then from there uh probably expand out from there but uh right now we're shooting to help the veterans uh all of them as quickly and as you know as we possibly can and i got uh a group of people uh who who are just amazing and we're willing to do all this at no charge We're not charging anybody anything for this. And we need to get everybody on board with this to show the children of Congress how badly they have failed. We need to show the courts how badly they have failed because ultimately the root source of the problem here is the children of Congress. They're the ones who caused this problem. And the courts are not giving a remedy for this problem. Courts are a joke. Who controls the courts? The bar. Which is also a joke, a criminal joke, bad joke. Yes. So we need to get people to understand this. We need to show people how this all works. And this is what we're going to do. Again, we've been working on this. I have been personally working on this for the last three years, getting this system into place. And we're very, very close to getting able to launch this. And so we're hoping to, once Sam gets done with his campaign, we're hoping to be able to possibly launch right after his. So that's that's the goal right now, the tentative goal. And I'm hoping that we can meet that meet that goal as quickly as possible. So. Wow. Well, that's that's really cool. That is good news. So, yeah, it's It should have happened a long time ago. Why we have the situation we have now where you have vets coming back here who have been maimed and disabled, why they're not being taken care of does not make sense to me. Does not make any sense to me. They gave to this country, they gave to everybody's security and they're getting nothing in return. They're being ignored. They're being abused. This can't stand. How does this stand in this country? Okay, we can give money to all these other countries, but we can't take care of our own. That's a problem. That's a failure of the social contract. That is a failure of our administrations. I would say it's a planned. I would say that it's a planned overthrow of the American people. In a sense, it is. In a sense, it is. And we've got to put a stop to this. It's our job to put a stop to it. We are the employers. They work for us. And this is conduct unbecoming. This is conduct that is disgraceful. Okay. And we got to put a stop to this. So I hope everybody jumps on board on this. I hope everybody can help out in any way that they can. How would people get involved, Mike? You can reach out to me. You can reach out to the American Equity Group. How would they do that? Give a contact of how to do that. Yeah. We have an email address. It's called American EG. See if I got one in here for you in a minute. I think I might. I think you do have it. Here we go. There you go. Yeah. So, yeah, reach out to us. And, you know, this is this this this has been a long time coming. I mean, and this isn't a party line situation. That's why I say the children of Congress, they're all the same. Which who has ever stepped up, OK, to do something about this? Nobody. I don't care what party you're talking about. I don't care what administration's in power. It doesn't matter. They've all failed. They have all failed. And it's time to put a stop to it, put an end to it, and do something about it. So that's our job. It's such a big problem because of how big, say, like the VA has gotten. One of my sister-in-laws ran a VA out in Iowa. And it's so big that nobody can even get their arms around how big this is. But it doesn't, the guys and gals, the brave men and women that serve this country, that money never gets to them. It's like how our governments run. It's so bloated. It's so bloated and there's no accountability to any of it that the services that should be getting to people aren't even getting there. Because the beast consumes it before it actually gets to the people who need it. One of the meetings I had with GoFundMe, We discussed and they were not even aware of this. I said, we got to make sure that whomever these veterans are that we're going to be helping through this campaign here, that they're protected. They're like, what are you talking about? I said, you have predatory attorneys out there who will see these veterans get a lump sum of money and they're going to go to their bar buddy judge at the probate court, make me a guardian of that veteran. You know, that's what they're going to ask the judge to do. Make me a guardian. And now that attorney as guardian of that veteran can go in there and pillage and pirate that account that was set up for that veteran. OK, so we had to go through and we were, you know, we were adamant. There has to be protocols set in place to help this. And we're even willing to set up trust accounts. to help these veterans to to help protect those as and keep it from these pre and they had no idea that existed. And I explained of the situations we h where these predatory att get a guardianship on som and pirate the the trust that are being supposedly supposed to go to the bene The beneficiaries are seeing nothing. We've got people who have been forced out of their homes because the guardian took the house, sold it out from under them, and took the money and ran. And there's a lot of that that's going on right now. This whole thing is nonsense. Yes. Yes. And, you know, Lansing says, oh, we're investigating them. No, they're not. Right. Sure you are. They don't enforce anything. Even if a judgment is made, the state has no reason to enforce it. They don't have any reason to enforce it. They have no reason to make sure that anything is held accountable. No, there's no accountability. It's time that we hold them accountable. And you know what? If we can't get remedy, well, we know we can't get remedy in state court. If we cannot get remedy in the federal courts on these matters, then you know what? Maybe it's time under the ninth and tenth amendment, we set up our own local courts and we drag them in same way they drag us in to our court and we will have a trial by jury. We'll have a grand jury look at the case, see if there's validity to it, and we'll try them in our own courts. And we'll set up our own courts and hold them accountable. And because if we can't get remedy in the other courts because they refuse to follow the Constitution, what other remedy is there? What other choice do we have? So, you know, enough is enough. They're blatantly thumbing their nose at the Constitution. So, you know what? If that's the way they want to do it, then we have the right to replace them. We have the right to create our own courts. So be careful for what you ask out there, public functionaries, because you may get what you don't realize you're going to get. Does it feel to you like they're trying to push us into a civil war? Yes, that's exactly what they're trying to do. They're trying to push it to where somebody goes out there and takes action and say, oh, let's see, these are a bunch of extremists. And they'll put a party name to it or they'll call you a sovereign citizen or some other label. That's all they do. They like to put labels on everybody. OK, and they they hide the true fact of what that was all about. why was why did someone react that way why did they do this why did they protest this way and even on a peaceful protest they'll twist it and say oh these are a bunch of extremists these are those sovereign citizens out there okay let blm and come and ransack a city or something but the problem with that you know what i thought was really odd about that the the whole blm thing They hurt the areas that were more or less, they went after the black neighborhoods and the minority neighborhoods. They didn't necessarily come out to the burbs. They stayed in those things that were closer to downtowns. Right. So tell me that you stand for anything. Black Lives Matters when you victimize the people in the black neighborhoods. That's what I was seeing a lot of. When are they going to have a BLM rally in front of Pelosi's house or Gavin Newsom or Chuck Schumer or even around some of the Republicans out there? When are you going to put a rally in front of the public functionaries that are causing the problem you're protesting about? Right. And, and just so everybody knows, you know, a lot of the, a lot of the people that live outside of the downtown areas, guess what? Most of us are hunters and, or we, we value our second amendment. So it probably wouldn't end well, you know, just saying. I know, I know that when, when they were rioting our neighborhood, we've got three cops in our neighborhood and a detective, and they had this thing locked down. If somebody had even driven into the neighborhood, it would have been all over for them. Well, Here you got Oakland County putting out the, you know, they want to put out those drones to surveil. And they're saying it's for everybody's safety and benefit. Excuse me. We own, you know, when you have a piece of private property, you own all that below and all that above. To the heavens. So when you throw a drone into my private airspace, unannounced, uninvited, one, I might just shoot the damn thing down for target practice. Okay. Two, that is now considered abandoned property. It's mine. Three, if you try and claim it, whoever it may be, the sheriff's department or whatever other department out there that's doing this, guess what? I'm now charging you for violating my airspace. I'm going to hit you with a bill for violating my airspace because you don't have the right to do so. And because I have a biometric trust in place, you're taking photographs. Well, when the government takes something, they must give just compensation for the taking under the taking clause. So if you're taking something from me, then I have a right to charge you for that. You don't get a free ride here. Constitution doesn't allow that free ride. When you take something, that's why when they wouldn't photograph me or print me in jail because of the biometric trust, because it's one million dollars for each occurrence. So you take ten fingerprints, that's ten million dollars and that's payable in gold or silver. If they pay in a fiat currency, it's a twenty five to one ratio. So I they don't want to do that. And I don't consent to it. You don't have to consent. And that's what bound them up. That case ended up getting dismissed because they couldn't process me. They couldn't do squat. So this is what people got to understand. You've got to stop consenting to their tyrannical positions and what they're putting on you. Just say no. I'm sorry. No, not today. And you know what, judge? You're not really a judge. You think you're a judge. You claim you're a judge. You look like a judge, but you're really not a judge. You're an administrator. Would you like me to prove it? Where's your oath of office? I want to see a certified copy of your oath of office. You're in non-compliance with Article I, Section X of the Michigan Constitution. You're in non-compliance with Five U.S.C. and Twenty-Eight U.S.C. as regards to oath of office. So you don't have an oath of office to start with. Number two, where's your anti-bribery statement? Oh, you don't have that on file. Where's your foreign agent registration statement, which you're required to have? They try and say, oh, no, we don't know. You're a foreign agent. Your oath to the bar makes you a foreign agent because that's to the British crown. And how about Article VI, Section XIX? I want a certified copy of your license to practice law, which is a requirement of the Michigan Constitution for you to sit the bench. And because you don't have one, you're not a judge. Those are improprieties. So even if you were a judge... Let's just go on a linear. Let's say you are a judge. Well, those are improprieties. Under Title XXVIII, Section four, five, five, in conjunction with the rulings of the Seventh Circuit in the case of Taylor v. O'Grady in nineteen eighty nine, the judge is opined that if the possibility of an impropriety exists and the possibility need not be proven just that it may exist, a judge is automatically disqualified. Here, we've well met the possibility of impropriety. We can actually prove the improprieties. Therefore, they're not judges. And even if they were, they're disqualified. They have no authority. Further, if the state is a party to the case. So when you get a speeding ticket, what does it say? State of Michigan versus John Doe. Or even if it says City of Farmington, City of Grand Rapids, or the Township of. Whenever that is on there, those are appendages of the state. Okay, the Township of. is part of the county, the county is part of the state. Those are appendages. So if the hand does something wrong, does the whole body is a part of that whole claim. Article three, section two, clause two. When a state is a party to the case, original jurisdictions with the US Supreme Court, not these state courts. Well, and this is a problem because all of the election cases, we try to run them through the state of Michigan because you're supposed to do that, but you can't get remedy in it. It's got to be outside of the state because they are protecting their own in the states. If the state is a party to the case, original jurisdiction is with the US Supreme Court, Article III, Section II, Clause II of the US Constitution. So your claims should be taken to the US Supreme Court directly. So let's just say I've got this little gem here that they did in the court of claims. And they dismissed it with prejudice for lack of standing. And I don't understand that because I'm an elector in the state of Michigan. And also for immunity, sovereign immunity. Which is what they always use. It's like, you don't have standing. You can't sue us. Who the hell are you? Is what they're saying. And then with sovereign immunity, it's like, nope, we can do whatever we want. We just we just approved it. That's fine. We've got that ability to just make make, you know, decisions. If they declare themselves a corporation, they lost their sovereignty. A corporation cannot be sovereign. Okay, so if this is Jocelyn Benson who has the Honorable James Robert Redford, how do you take this? What do you do with it next? I would refile with the U.S. Supreme Court de novo because you technically did not have it in the right court. You weren't in the proper venue. Because the state is a party to the case. So I would refile it de novo with the U.S. Supreme Court. Okay. Because I just got that just recently. Because these are constitutional issues. They are. These are all constitutional issues. All of them. In the state. Here's the other side of this coin. Your taxes pay for all these positions. You pay for the state. You pay for the property. You're paying for their attorneys. You're paying for the judge's. that are ruling on this. Well, yeah. They all of a sudden mob you with like five attorneys from the Attorney General's office to defend themselves. So your tax dollars are funding their defense. And they should absolutely have to get their own attorneys. They shouldn't just grab the attorneys from the state. It's absurd. Correct. They've got an unlimited bill or an unlimited account to be able to pay these people as much as they want to fight us. yes that's why you take it out of the state courts go to the federal side and because the state's a party take it to the u.s supreme court this is a constitutional issue there's no there's no statute of limitations with constitutional issues either is there i don't believe there is because most of it's based on fraud there's no statute of limitations on fraud Well, this is definitely fraud. And, you know, it's like, there's so much of it. It's like, I wish we had like thousands of us that engaged in this sort of behavior because everybody needs to get educated in this and step up and do something. Do something. And I would also, whatever, I don't know who exactly you're suing on that. Jasper Benson, our Secretary of State. Do you have her husband listed? No, I just have her listed. Why not? The husband too. Why? Because he is benefiting from her fraud. That's an unjust enrichment on his part. So you have to sue him as well and include him on the lawsuit because he's receiving unjust enrichment for the fraud that she's committed. Well, the fraud is that it's basically that the state was registering voters because what they did is they created an illegal API, which is outside of the Michigan, what's allowable by the law, to register voters and gave it to Rock the Vote. And we have all of the information from Rock the Vote because one of the wonderful clerks in the state went ahead and gave it to us. And then the state shut it down when they saw that we were looking into it. But we already had the evidence. She got paid for doing all that, didn't she? What's that? She got paid during that whole time, didn't she? I'm sure she did. Yes, absolutely. Did her pay benefit her husband? I would think so. That's an unjust enrichment. Do I go for damages? Do I do like a mandamus or do I do it for damages? um that's up to you what you want to do there you sue them in their their uh personal capacity yes because they usurp their authority they lose immunity you got norton ex parte young and sure v roads and they'll kill all their immunities gotcha So, yeah, that's so that was my that was my newest one that I tell you right now. Where did where anywhere in the U.S. Constitution or the Michigan Constitution is it permissible where they can take an office and create and convert it into a corporation? That's not permissible. Nowhere within the original eighteen enumerated powers under the U.S. Constitution can you take parts of the government and convert it into a corporation. Cannot do it. The language is not there. The word corporation does not exist in any of our founding documents. Neither does a public corporate body, charter. None of those terms exist anywhere in our founding documents. Just like democracy doesn't appear anywhere in our founding documents. And how, by operating as a corporation, is that guaranteeing us, the people, a Republican form of government? It isn't. They're doing everything to the contrary. That's a violation of the social contract. They're in breach of contract. I would hit them with all of that. And then when they get their attorneys up there, I'd hit them with no license to practice law and unauthorized practice of law. Shut them down. You've got to bring it to the Supreme Court to do it. Yes. So what happens if the Supreme Court decides not to hear it? How do you get it heard? Well, then we stop funding them. That's number one. Stop funding them. Stop paying taxes. I would take what you think you might owe in taxes, put it into an escrow account just as a backup position just in case. But I would stop paying taxes until they restore the social contract and act de jure in their office. If they refuse, they don't get paid. If you hire a contractor to put a new roof on your house and he puts the shingles on upside down, are you going to pay him? No, he didn't do his job right. So why are we paying them to do a bad job? Why are we paying them to deprive us of our rights? Why are we paying them to cause everyone a harm? If you're not willing to pay the contractor for doing a bad job, then why would we pay them? It doesn't make sense. And, you know, to all those people that are sitting in these offices saying, well, you know, you heard it during COVID. Well, you know, I have to have a job. And I look at them going, well, there's a lot of things you can do. If you're breaking the law in a job, you've got to resign. You've got to leave. And I really do believe that we may be used to the lifestyles we have, but that doesn't mean that we keep going if it means we're really breaking the law or harming other people. I can't even imagine when I listen to that with the doctors and nurses saying, you know, I have to have a job. So they lined right up to do the clot shots. or the businesses that helped enforce, that the state recruited as their little KGB, I'm going to call it KGB out there, secret police type shit, where all of these companies were enforcing the state's unconstitutional mandates. It was wrong on every level. Or the churches that shut down, the five one C threes, they shut down those churches because, oh, well, and they let people die alone. This is a huge ethical dilemma. But when things are wrong, you've got to take action and not participate. If you're working for the government right now, you probably should resign and or start turning in names with the whistleblower act that's out there. You should start turning in names. They're giving you a way out right now. But that escape hatch is going to close at some point in time. And you're going to be thrown into the basket with all of the other lawbreakers. They're giving you a chance right now to get out and to help. If you don't, you're going to be thrown in with those that have broken the law. Guaranteed. My message to all public functionaries right now, and I just had a meeting with a township last week who's attempting to, they haven't created the ordinances yet, but they're looking to create ordinances pertaining to private roads and private driveways to regulate them. Let that sink in for a second. That's taking your property, guys, just in case you don't understand what's happening. They're literally taking your property inch by inch. Yes. Car by car. If they can shut your car off while you're driving because they're doing they're running biometrics in all the cars that are after two thousand thirteen. So this township put a moratorium in place, you're not allowed to build You're not allowed to split property until they get done creating their ordinances. Oh, really? Seriously. Now, so I went to their meeting. They were supposed to have an open meeting, questions and answers. They changed the venue, okay, because I had met them the week before and said, you guys are, what are you smoking? And so they only allowed, you know, the call to the public for people to speak on this. Well, I went, uh-uh. I'm here to air a grievance, and I come also with a remedy. So I informed them that their moratorium was no good. Why? Moratorium cannot last forever indefinitely. It has to have an end date. Theirs didn't. And I had talked to some of the people in the area and they said, yeah, this crap's been going on for twenty years. I said, secondly, your moratorium failed because it has to be based on an actual state statute, which it's not. You are putting a harm Because people who want to buy property, split property, or build on property can't. So you're interfering with contracts. Violation of Article I, Section X of the Michigan Constitution. So you're violating that right there. And so I went on and on. And I explained to them their acts of usurpation, why they're causing harm. And I came up with a remedy that we can. And the biggest problem was money. I said, we can resolve those issues, the money issues as well. And I said, what you think you had, what you're trying to do is regulate these private roads and driveways instead of just using common sense. Common sense says, if I have a house on a P on a, on a drive, you should be able to get a fire truck in there. You should be able to get an EMS unit in there. That's just common sense. You don't need regulations to regulate common sense. And that's all they have to do. So, They're rescheduling another meeting in May here, and I'm going to come and hit them with a lot harder presentation. Because I said, first off, I said, what you're opening up is what's called territorial jurisdiction. We the people own all the public roads, not the state, not the county, not the townships. We the people own all public roads. If we own the public roads, we most definitely own the private roads. You must, if you're gonna declare that you have the authority to regulate something that's private, and which by the way, you just admitted because it's private, it can't be taxed by the way, then you have to show where you have a financial vested interest in that private property, which you can't do. Second, you have to show and prove that you have an equal or greater equitable title to that property. which you cannot do therefore you have no delegated authority over something that's private none whatsoever so the next meeting should be interesting as to how they're going to react to all this um but one other thing is that you know they failed and then i'm watching the rest of the meeting i was going to leave but i decided to stay for the rest of the meeting And two things ended up popping up that caught my attention. One was the fact that they voted on the entire board voted on executive issues and legislative issues. We repeat that they all voted on it. Wait a minute. Where do they have the delegated authority for someone who's part of the executive branch to also be part of the legislative branch? That's a violation of the separation of powers. And I finally got them to admit that this information of how they run the township comes from the Michigan Township Association. Oh, that whole bunch of crap is amazing. The Michigan Township Association is disturbing, and they're taking orders. They all do it through these associations, these NGOs and associations that they make. As soon as they make an association, they give it powers to regulate and bring their crap into our areas. They're running everything. We don't matter to these people. Well, it's going to matter. So one of the other things that they were trying to fight and they were looking to put another moratorium on was the battery storage facilities and the, what was the other one? Oh, for the computer chips. Data centers. Data centers. Thank you. And they were trying to figure out what to do about it because they stated on the record that the state was cramming this down the throats of all the townships. So I explained to them, I said, if you're looking to really fight this, I suggest you look at public law, ninety two five hundred, the Clean Water Act. There's language in there that will shut the state down from being able to cram it down your throats and you can shut the whole process down. Now, whether that they took my advice, we're going to find out. But yeah, public law, ninety two five hundred would stop those data centers and battery storage facilities from being built. That's what people have to understand. They have to take a look at that. So, you know, you got to get engaged. Now, do I live in that township? No. But I have a client that wants to do work in that town. He wants me to do some work for them in that township. So that's why I went to the meeting. Because they're putting restrictions and prohibiting I from being able to fulfill a contract. They're interfering in our contract. And I'm not going to allow them to do that. And if they want to take me to court, please, by all means, let's go to court because I'll bump it right to federal court right off the get-go, right out of the gate, hit them with no license to practice law, unauthorized practice of law. I mean, they're done. They won't be able to show any delegated authority whatsoever over private property. And we'll make this a federal issue and we'll get it resolved that way if they're stupid enough to try that, which I don't think they are. So I hope that they realize that. And I told him, I said, I'm going to, here's the other part of the remedy. I'm willing to help you function as a Republic. I'm willing to help you understand what your duties are as a Republican form of government. And I don't want you to see, and this is actually what I told him. I said, I don't want to see you fall into the same trap as your neighbor. They're like, what are you talking about? I said, Genoa township in Livingston County. I said Genoa Township right now is facing multiple. They're already in federal court, but they're going to be hit with a lot more federal lawsuits here pretty soon. And now there looks to be a conspiracy between Genoa Township, the county commissioners, and the courts of Livingston County that they're all conspiring. And so this is something that's going to tear Livingston County right apart. It's probably going to bankrupt the county by the time this is done. And so I told him, I said, don't fall into the same trap. Don't fall in the same trap because you will not survive this because you'll end up bankrupt with all the federal lawsuits. Well, and I think that right now what needs to be done is they need to be sued and the people that are sitting in there need to be sued in their individual capacity. That would... improve behavior very quickly. If they actually had to find a bite to their behavior that they are going to have to deal with. I mean, if we started biting them, not physically, don't go to torches and pitchforks, but you know what I mean? It's like if we actually went after their stuff, it's kind of like a Robin Hood move. But honestly, it's like to go in there and enforce it and that they have personal consequences for their bad actions. That's what really needs to happen. Yep. That's where you're going to hurt them. That's where you're going to get their attention. When their personal assets are on the line, that gets their attention. Absolutely. What can we do about this? It's simple. Stop your shenanigans. Stop the crap that you're pulling. Start doing your job like you're supposed to. And this won't happen. Yep. There you go. Well, it's eleven o'clock here. I love having you on. And so let's let's go about our day and then I'll see you next week. I've got my barn working pretty good right now. So, you know, finally got that moving in the right direction. But I really appreciate everything you have to say in the time that you've taken to to educate everyone here. It's it's really is extraordinary. And I'll probably be talking to you this week a little bit more on on more advanced ways for me to go after these people, because, you We can't just sit and take them kicking us in the face over and over and over again. You have to stand up and do something. And when they screw up, like they did with this one, the nice thing is I'm glad I've gone through all these processes, even if there was some losses incurred along the way, because I'm a first-person witness and also damaged by the entire system. So I can talk with it. It does give me a little bit more jurisdiction, even though the jurisdiction was already always there. But I can actually talk about it in the first person that I've seen it. I've experienced it with my own eyes. It's not somebody just telling me this is exactly how it works. And this is how they this is how they have taken our entire nation hostage. No, no justice. There is no justice for all at all. And it's the it's the the fault of a lot of different. entities, the judicial system, entirety, the entirety of it, the judges, the attorneys, Congress, all of them, all of the regulatory industries that try to cap, this has all got to come down because it's honestly, it's RICO because they're all conspiring together to take away our rights, even though they made it almost impossible to enforce the the laws that hold them accountable. If they commit RICO, they've really done a great job to hide and be able to put up a wall to wall themselves off from us. But you know what? We still have options. And so we need to go forward. So anyhow, let's say a prayer and go on our day. Dear Heavenly Father, thank you so much for this wonderful day. I ask your blessings on, on Mike and his dad and their efforts that they're doing to help the veterans. I ask that you would give them all your favor, your help, that you would open doors, that you would, create paths that are clear so that they know exactly what to do and that you would bring many, many people to them that are willing to walk with them and help them in their efforts to do good works here and to help people who really do need their help. We thank you for that effort. We ask for your protection for every single veteran out there that there would be no one that would come to steal their stuff further and victimize them like predatory attorneys. I ask that you would confuse every action that would come across their evil minds of people that victimize other people, that you would confuse it, that you would send it into chaos, into their own little chaos of their own making, and that you would help every good action to succeed. And for those that do plan bad things, we ask for them to repent, turn to you, see the errors of what they're doing, and turn their hearts to doing the right thing, to serving you, to serving the communities around them, to helping people rather than hurting them. It's not a game. And those of us who see it clearly as that they're playing games with people's lives, they're causing horrible, horrible pain. We ask that this would be redeemed by you and turned around, that all would be saved, that turn towards you. Thank you so much for this day. Help us to see the things around us that need to be done, that we would listen to you, that we would see those opportunities to be of service, and that we would give our hearts, our time, our actions, our treasure to other people around us when we do see the need. Thank you so very much for everything you've done for us. We thank you for the gift of salvation. We thank you that you walk with us, that you provide for us. and that you do give us direction in how we conduct ourselves and in our daily lives. Thank you. Thank you so much for everything. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen. So anyhow, here we go, boys and girls, to that part of the show. Ding, ding, ding, ding. Go to brandenburgforgovernor.com because I'm the best non-conceited or whatever non-conceited in the history of the United States. And I'd like to have a discussion with the rightful president of the United States, President Donald J. Trump, wearing cowboy boots. We'll get into who wears them better. I wear them every day, so I'm going to win that one easily. And then we'll talk about how to fix this mess that we're into. And that's my twenty twenty two protest. So on the rigged, stolen and fraudulent election, we cannot go forward without fixing the things that are there. We have to tear down the stuff that is not supposed to be there, that is victimizing and charge the perpetrators who have put it in place. And I am absolutely committed, as Mike is and many other people, to doing this. We ask you to join us. As chairman of the U.S. Taxpayers Party, which is the Constitution Party in Michigan, USTPM.org, I would like you to join us. We are doing some really great things right now. And a lot of it's going to be accountability for these people that are in office doing the wrong thing. We have to hold people accountable. There has to be accountability and prosecutions. for bad actions. And you know what? We would love for you to just, we actually have a good time in our meetings. You should see how much laughing we do in it. It's not all serious. It's being in a bad situation, being able to keep your head above it, realize that bad things are going to happen. You can't let it take you down. You got to just keep going and be tougher than them. And sometimes being tougher is having a good attitude and being able to smile and laugh and even though things are going wrong to keep the people around you going in the right direction, because we're not going to stop. It's not going to come to an end until we get this stuff right. So with that said, God bless you all. God bless all of those whom you love and God bless America. Make it a great day. Do some great things today. There's flowers that are blooming out there. Pick a few flowers. Give them to somebody you don't know or those that you do know and step up to help. Anyhow, I plan on seeing you tomorrow on here and have a great day and make it so.