Published July 7, 2025, 9:01 a.m.
9am Vicky Davis Technocratic Communism The United Nations as an organization is world communism. The strategy to impose world communism on the people of the United States (and the other countries in this hemisphere) has been economic rather than military as the people were led to believe it would be. It's our own leaders who were the Pied Pipers leading us to this demise of the U.S. I'm working on a timeline that shows the who, when and what. 10am Daniel Richard - Daniel Richard, a constitutional scholar from New Hampshire has brought a case against the state, which claims that N.H. election laws have been illegally altered by the executive and legislative branches of the state government over the years, without the consent of the voters, thereby making the legislature’s actions unconstitutional. On Monday, October 30, 2023, the New Hampshire Supreme Court, on their own initiative, scheduled oral arguments for November 29th, 2023 at 9am, in a highly-anticipated election law case of Daniel Richard vs. Governor Chris Sununu, et al. involving the executive and legislature branches of government repeatedly violating the voting rights of Mr. Richard, and the people of this State, by altering the mandatory election provisions of the Constitution of New Hampshire established by the people by legislative fiat. This case poses the following questions. Who is qualified to voter in New Hampshire? Who is qualified to vote absentee in this State? Who is required to “sort,” “count” and certify the votes in the towns and cities? Are voting machines constitutional in N.H? Can the legislature delegate its law-making power under the State and U.S. Constitutions to an unelected body of bureaucrats (the NH Ballot Law Commission) to make election laws (including voting machine laws), and the ability to suspend State and Federal election laws? The use of vote tabulation equipment to conceal the counting of un-verified and uncertified absentee ballots and the illegal certification of the elections results. X/Twitter: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mrGmPwevpwKy Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/636616148890812/videos/1072997468258025 Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6vu3u7-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-772025-technocratic-tyranny-and-daniel-richard.html https://rumble.com/v6vu3qt-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-772025technocratic-tyranny-and-daniel-richard-.html Odysee: https://odysee.com/@BrandenburgNewsNetwork:d/bnn-2025-07-07-technocratic-tyranny-and-daniel-richard-pro-se:3 BNN Live: https://Live.BrandenburgNewsNetwork.com Guests: Donna Brandenburg, Vicky Davis, Daniel Richard
Good morning. Welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg, and it is the seventh day of July, twenty twenty five. Welcome to our show today. Today, I start out at nine o'clock with Vicki Davis, the technocratic tyranny. And at ten o'clock, it is Daniel Richard, the the guy that's out in New New New Hampshire, who is, in fact, fighting pro se. And he's going to the Supreme Court of of New Hampshire for the third time, which is really interesting. Learning a lot about that. I'm going to get right into it with Vicki here this morning. Morning, Vicki. How are you doing? Good morning. Fine, thank you. I really enjoyed this morning. We actually had time to just chat as friends before we got on, which I really enjoyed that today. So lots going on and lots to talk about. Do you want me to start out with a video or just kind of give some background information on what we're talking about today? Let's give some background. On June the takedown of an alleged insurance fraud scheme that included, of course, Medicare, Medicaid, supposed to be fourteen billion dollars of fraud that they that fraudulent claims that were processed and paid. Now, the obvious question is, how could that possibly happen that there are fourteen billion dollars worth of claims that were processed and paid? It just happened. Nothing to see here. Move along. Right. Right. They just get claims in and pay them. Don't look at them at all, which is just so much BS you could choke on it. But anyway, the interesting part of the press conference was when they got to the solution. The solution really is a non sequitur. And that's the clip that I'd like you to play. And then I'll talk about that after. All right, let's check this thing out. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Drug Enforcement Administration. and of course, countless partners across the federal, state, and local law enforcement community, and dozens of United States attorney's offices. Thank you to all who made today possible. Now, despite these historic achievements, we aren't resting on our laurels. We're making advancements to stay ahead of the criminals and their illicit schemes. That is why today I'm also announcing that we are working with our partners at FBI, HHS, OIG, and other federal agencies to create a healthcare data fusion center. Right there. Healthcare data fusion center is the solution. That is just so much BS. I can't even tell you. It goes, what it is, it's the completion of a project to create a nationalized database of medical records that was initiated in the nineties by President George Herbert Walker Bush. And the first inquiry on that was by Senator John Glenn, who was the, he was chairman of the oversight committee. And he made the first inquiry of GAO concerning the benefits of a nationalized medical records system for medical research. Now, following that, they came up with a different excuse than medical research, but the first inquiry was for medical research. So that's very, very important. What else can you add to this whole situation? Because I know that there's going to be like, fifty jumps of more connections here if you start going down that path. All right. Well, first, let me say that human experimentation, that was at the Nuremberg trials in Germany. That was the subject of the Nuremberg trials was human experimentation. And it just happens to be that I've paid attention all my life because when I was in the sixth grade, our teacher brought in a Jewish woman who told our class about the human experimentation in Nazi Germany. And that had to be traumatic. It's in sixth grade. Well, I was an advanced reader, so it piqued my curiosity. So I read at least one book, probably two books about the trials at Nuremberg. They hung twenty doctors at Nuremberg. And out of the Nuremberg trials, they came up with the Nuremberg Code, which was probably the first, well, not probably, it was the first code of ethics for medicine and the use and opposing the abuse of the field of medicine. I wonder how many doctors in the United States would hang now for taking money for for the shots, the COVID shots? A lot of them should, because there are laws against that, except that that whole scam was run by the CDC. And it was a public health initiative. There's a difference between public health and medicine. Public health is environmental health. Okay. They inspect restaurants, make sure they're not loaded with mice droppings and all that kind of stuff. And they inspect beauty shops and just all kinds of stuff that have to do with environmental health. But what they used the COVID dialectic for was they were trying to take over management of our population. It was so clear to me. I mean, you know, and I was one of the opposition, let's say, you know, when they tried to make us all wear masks and, you know, do all that stuff. Yeah, me too. And I testified in front of the public health board in my county, and I reminded them of the Nuremberg trials. And so they didn't vote to make us wear masks or anything like that. Well, that's pretty interesting. I'd like to look into that video a little bit further and find out if there's anything more to that. I mean, you're really good at spotting that dialectic going on there. and where the crap, the BS is, it really lies and such. What else did you find about this? Well, it's the continuous continuation of an agenda that was started in nineteen ninety. Let me get you. I have a whole page of articles on our health care system. And basically what they're trying to do is to have global management of our health care system. Global health was an initiative that was agreed to by the Clinton administration. Let me ask you a question. You know, you were talking about inspections. What's really interesting to me is that in our businesses, all of our businesses get inspected by someone at this point in time. And I find it to be a sham because the inspector is no less than somebody with a very basic education on anything. They really don't do a good job. It's just basically a way to CYA and leave a paper trail. But I do think it gives people a false sense of security. Well, it's a jobs program for a lot of people. Yeah. When I see like, like building inspectors, there's very few of them that are actually really, that really do a good job. So they'll come out and they'll point out stupid stuff like paint on a door knob or something like that. But they'll miss the things that are obvious. Like I told one, one time I said, I said, you do realize that if I wanted to, I could hide things. I could hide anything I want on you, but I don't do that. And I won't do that because I'm not a liar. Right. And so, so, you know, just to be, just to be clear. So, but I was, I was kind of like upfront and interface on it. And I, I typically will do that when somebody comes to, to do a training too, and say, you know, this is just a rubber stamp and there's really, there's really not much reality in it. I've seen it when we've been in training where the trainers that you'll have to take the training to do a job, the trainers will sit there and everybody's kind of half asleep in the room. And you know, you've got that one kid that goes, Hey, you know, they'll always raise their hands cause they know the answers, but the majority of people aren't really paying attention. And then at the end, they'll go through the training and the trainer will literally give them the answers on the test. and say, well, this is the question. Now, what is the answer to it? And somebody will say something, that's right, that's the answer. Everybody will mark the answers down. And I'm like, this isn't mastery of the content. In fact, I redid our training program in one of the companies just because I was like, no, no, no, no, we're not going down this path. I actually want real training, not just something that absolves everybody from guilt. And so it helped with the help of one of our project managers actually write real training and require mastery. That was years ago. Well, yeah, that's important. If you do it right, it's important. But anyway, so back to this article, I just gave you three more links. But the idea of a national system of medical records is just, you know, if you're just looking at it from a purely functional point of view, there's no reason for it. It's an expense that is unnecessary unless you have something else in mind. And what they have in mind is medical research with a nationalized system of medical records at where the records are centralized in a fusion center, they can conduct human experimentation without anybody realizing that it's happening. What do you think the goal is for this? I mean, why do you think they want to go to human experimentation? Genetic research. But what's the plan? What do they want to do with it? You know, there's the question. Hacking us. Understanding the DNA so they can modify it. These people that are doing this, I consider them to be on the team of the Antichrist. Because if you set up your medical system such that these people have a free hand to use your body for experimentation. That's evil. That's evil to the max. Their own sick pursuits, whatever it is. Like you said, I think we're dealing with a satanic system. They want to destroy humanity is what I think is going on. Yeah, well, they certainly do want to cull the population and there is no better way to do that. You know, they consider the majority of our population to be useless eaters. And the proof of that is that in nineteen ninety five, when our Senate voted to establish the World Trade Organization, they turned people into commodities. You're nothing but a commodity. I'm nothing but a commodity. Everybody in the audience is nothing but a commodity because when the World Trade Organization was created, it included both goods and services. Well, what's a service? A service is a person or a job, whether it be a lawyer, an accountant, a teacher, an IT person like I was, they turned people into commodities for world trade. And that was when they started flooding our country with H-B visa holders from India. They were just importing a new workforce, a replacement workforce because they could get them cheaper. And more controllable because because of a number of things, unfortunately. Yes. Yes. At that time, programmers here were being paid maybe fifty dollars an hour. That's what they're paid, not what they were billed at, but what the programmer was paid. Well, when you consider the cost of living in our country and You know, the programmer might have to travel somewhere to do a job. Fifty dollars an hour is not much. But over in India, they were paying them three dollars an hour. So and that's the whole that's the whole difference, really, because if you're talking about a world economic system, machines, a machine running in China is the same as a machine running here. The difference is in the price of labor. So if over in China they could pay their people fifty cents an hour compared to fifteen or twenty dollars an hour here, they of course went with the Chinese option and that's what gutted our economy. They sold out our people when they voted to establish the World Trade Organization and they turned people into commodities. Al Richards is on and he sent me a TikTok video that's about Luciferian Islam and he sent me a link and love says good morning. So there's a there's you know, how is that any different than slavery? It isn't, it just isn't. And, um, also the money laundering, if they're used, if you're using people instead of serving people, I mean, can you even imagine if our country went back to the way that it's supposed to work with, uh, you know, by, via the constitution laid out by the constitution, what a difference it would make if we actually had servant leaders that were, that were, uh, in the government that actually were there to serve the population and make it a better place instead of all going to themselves. I'm so disgusted with this. I can't even put it into words. I don't even understand how people think this way. I really don't. It's a hard thing for me to even get my arms around because it's so disgusting to me. Morning, Beth. I see Beth there too. Well, the globalist agenda, or you could call them the liberal progressives, their plan, when they created the WTO, they were basically ripping away the borders of our nation state. And the idea of the liberal world order, and I have a link to a, what's his name? Mearsheimer. He gave a presentation in Australia about the liberal world order. The idea was conversion. Now, he didn't say this directly. This is my interpretation of what the liberal world order is. The elimination of nation states replaced by regions. Which is what they've already done. We just haven't caught up to where they are because we've got like a dual system going on right now. I think that's what President Trump is trying to restore in the good guys. And I do believe that we are going in the right direction. My opinion on seeing this stuff, honestly, is that they are allowing people to commit the crimes themselves. to draw them out of the dark, to nab them. That's what I really think is going on right now, like one of the biggest sting operations in the history of the world. And these people are so arrogant and so stupid that they think that they've got the upper hand, but I don't think they do. But, you know, that's just my personal opinion on it. But I'm a positive person on this, not because I believe that what they're doing is right. I like to analyze it to see – This is what they're doing. And this is absolutely wrong. And this is what we've got to get away from. But to look at it so that we don't make the mistakes again when God Almighty restores it, because I do believe that God is in control and that for the faith of one person, he will save a nation. Well, that what? the globalists are trying to do is to end the nation state system. I did an article about world regions. And if you look at the United, if you just look at a map of the world, you can see where the continental borders are. And the Americas from Greenland, clear to the tip of Argentina, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina is one region of the Americas. And so over the years, they have been trying, since at least, when Ronald Reagan signed the La Paz Treaty with Mexico, creating an international zone on the border. That's what they've been working towards was the elimination of our nation state to be replaced by continental governing structure under the United Nations. Everything is just too big right now. When you look at collectivism, it's just too big. When things are aggregated like that, you lose your humanity no matter what happens because you don't even know the people who are running things. So anyway, here's the article you wrote on IBM and Dr. Mengele together. Yes, together again. That was like the first article that I wrote about the health care system. What happened was I listened. I was just listening to a conference of the National Governors Association, and they started talking about personalized medicine. And personalized medicine, which means medicine by your body chemistry, that's by definition, experimental by definition, you know? And so that's, that's really why they want the database of medical records is so that they can tell us if we don't, if we don't capitulate, well, Essentially, they'll have the information there to do that. But IBM was involved with the Nazis. They wrote systems for them to keep track of their prisoners. Now, I'm not I'm not one hundred percent sure that the numbers on their arms were prisoner numbers or were they bank account numbers? I don't know. That's interesting. I don't think I ever thought of that. Yeah. Well, it's, I don't know. Yeah. There's a lot we don't know, but here you go. You've got a, you've got a key punch card here on that, on that book. That's pretty interesting. I remember, I remember doing that when I was in college for the big mainframes and this one that we were all going to be programmers. So here we go. Let's go to infrastructure. information infrastructure. Yeah, the national infrastructure to the global information infrastructure. And that's why really we had that COVID dialectic, because the global, they were trying to move to the global system of global health. And, you know, with the the global information infrastructure would mean fusion centers at the global level. I mean, people don't understand how critically important information is. And during the Clinton administration, they just opened up our records to everybody when they decided to create the global information infrastructure. Well, that was the best possible thing they could do for our enemies. Sure. Well, and then look at the concern I've had with JD Vance from the beginning is his ties with Peter Thiel and Palantir and EcoHealth Alliance, all of that stuff is kind of rolled in together. And it's really concerning to me. It's very concerning. You know, everything that we have that, that we know has been infiltrated. And you really have to go in a person-to-person evaluation on things. Al Richards says, Islam says their Mahadi Antichrist will rise from the place of the sun setting. That is the West. We are the West. Obama is Muslim. He's married to a man. His children are not his own. He imprisoned Joe Arapio for improving his birth certificate. was a fraud. Everything about him is a lie. I typically think that there's more truth in that than what a lot of people want to acknowledge that we have the enemy is within, which actually brings me to a really good spot here to look at. Let me see if I can find the timeline here. The timeline for nine, eleven. Talk about the enemy within. I mean, You have to have your head buried in the sand somewhere to not have come across all of the anomalies at nine eleven. You know, I was obsessed about that when it happened. I remember the exact place I was. I was out for breakfast with my dad. I had my kids with me and we took the kids out for breakfast and I was going to show them show them a new house that I bought because, you know, I own I own some income property and such. I want to show it to my dad. Right. My dad was probably my best supporter at the time. And we were sitting there and watched the towers come down in that restaurant. My dad never missed a beat. He was pretty sharp guy, I got to tell you. And he looked at me and he said, that is controlled demolition. That's the first thing out of his mouth. And so, you know, we used to have some wonderful discussions. My dad was literally my best friend. And we had so many great discussions on topics that mattered. He didn't get too excited about anything. He didn't get caught up in drama. He just was here to help. You know, dad here to help everyone. And there was nothing that ever made sense about nine eleven to me. Nothing. There was nothing. But I was pretty traumatized on nine eleven. A friend of mine from New York called me and said, turn on the TV. And I did. And I saw the towers coming down. I mean, I about had a heart attack because my son was a couple of blocks away from there. I had a cousin that was right downtown. She was working as an attorney in Manhattan. And her recount of it, I mean, the trauma from say my cousins, because I had two of them, one that watched come down from outside of New York City, and then my other cousin who was working in New York City, and listening to their accounts of what, what it was like and how they were trying to get out of Manhattan was fairly traumatizing. And so, you know, you sit there and you look at this and go, this was controlled demolition. And they're like, no, this was the Muslims that did this and such. And I'm like, I'm pretty extra sure that those planes were not what you think they were. But, you know, at the time you couldn't talk about what you were already awake to. But I think people are absolutely right. So a lot of us were sitting out there like an island, you know, an island going, an island of our own perceptions and a few people that were bringing it forward. But nobody wanted to talk about it because of the trauma in the people that were on the ground. They couldn't see it. from a vantage point outside of where their pain was. And I think we still have that going on right now as people are waking up. There are so many people that are experiencing the pain of the cabal, if you want to call it, or the organized crime syndicate of the globalists, that they can't see it for what it really is. Yeah. Yeah. well on that morning of nine eleven I tried calling my son obviously I couldn't get through on the phone but I was able to get him on the internet so I spent all day in front of my computer every few minutes I type are you there oh my god he'd say Yeah, I'm here, Mom. It's okay. I can't imagine the trauma as a mom you went through looking in on this, too. I mean, that's exactly what we're talking about. Trauma typically wrecks a normal person. Yeah. Well, what he told me was that outside of his building, out the windows, they couldn't see a thing. It was all black. Oh, my gosh. And his company wouldn't let anybody out of the building. Where was he? He was in downtown Manhattan a few blocks away. Oh, my gosh. On Maiden Lane, I think it was. But he had to wait until it was after three o'clock in the afternoon till his employer released them. And they had to walk all the way from downtown Manhattan all the way up to Midtown. to be able to get transportation out of Manhattan. So, I mean, that was one of the most traumatic days of my life, you know? I can't imagine. So after nine, eleven, I didn't even think about it, you know, for a couple of years because I just, you know, erased that from my memory banks. But then, There were some, I was in a group and they were, they began researching not only nine, eleven, but what was happening to our economy. And there was a guy, a military analyst named Thomas P. M. Barnett. And he's familiar. Yeah, he was a military analyst. He gave a presentation on C-SPAN about military in the twenty first century. And he mentioned nine eleven in his presentation. And I was so focused on what he was saying, I actually transcribed his presentation it was like two and a half hours and this was back in the day when C-SPAN did not have an archive so you know once a program was over it was gone and so I spent a couple months transcribing every word he said because I thought it was so important Do you have it on your site? Yeah, yeah I do Did you give me the link for that? No. Okay, we should probably put that up. You've got the socialists. Your experiences are just amazing. I'm so sorry for what you went through with your son. How traumatizing. Yeah, it was pretty bad. Denise is in here in the chat. She says, don't forget Elon is highly involved in global health. Recently, according to General Flynn on Benny Johnson's podcast, Trump is surrounded by our enemies. So I typically think that President Trump is always the bait. He throws things out there to see how people are going to react. And I think sometimes, you know, you put people in positions to watch them fail. So you've got something on them, right? Yes. Then you've, you've got clear evidence. You can have all the opinions of the world, but unless you catch someone in the act of something, they can usually wiggle out of this. If I were a good guy planning this, honestly, I would want such tight iron clad proof about it that there's no wiggle room and no questions. I think that's what he's doing to really do. Yeah. Well, the objective of building a global health system, it's very important that, and it's good that your listener there caught on to that, that Elon Musk, because he's got Starlink. And what do you need for a global health system? You need to be able to connect anywhere in the world, right? Yeah, I don't know if you probably didn't see it, but I posted on the fact that India is in big trouble right now because the programmers for the entire Middle East, the programming was accomplished in India. And there's a backdoor in every single person that goes to the Middle East right now. All of their information is going directly to Israel. So I know it's not a popular thing to talk about, and I have no problems with the Jewish people. I have no problem with the Chinese people or any people. It's the governments that have my dander up here a little bit because I'm so... disgusted with the world governance systems and they are completely separate from the people so ADL you can just shove it because I'm not against the people but what I am against is the Israeli government Mossad just like I'm against a lot of the things that are in our government and the CIA and all of these unconstitutional agencies which basically have captured the whole world and have just thumbed their nose at every country and every people across the globe. It's them against us. And I think they're the ones that brought the towers down, I really do. And I think Israel was involved in it. You can't look at AIPAC running around controlling all of our congresspeople. You can't look at the situation with the Indian programmers or the Indian programming giving a backdoor to Israel without going, who in the heck is pulling the levers? I think we all know, and it doesn't take a long time to look at this, but it's not the people we have a beef with. And I don't even believe that most of Israel is Semitic. It's like the entire Middle East is a Semitic people. So anti-Semites, what are you actually talking about here? Well, I didn't realize this, but I heard the other day that the Israeli Jews are actually from the Ukraine, Ukrainian Jews. Originally, they were the ones that settled it. Black Sea area, aren't they? I'm not sure about that, but they're not UK Israelis. You know, they're not... even though it was Rothschild that set aside that area for the, quote, Jews. Yeah, and yeah, it's really odd, but my studies too have kind of shown that it looks like most of the people that are in charge of the government, and I'm not saying this is true of all Jews, right, but that they came up through the Black Sea area, And Russia gave them a choice because they knew they were sacrificing babies. This is not necessarily God's people. This is like an infiltration of Jewish people. And they said, you have to choose a different religion because y'all are, you know, sacrificing babies and, and practicing Satanist. They said, choose Islam, Christianity, or the Jewish religion. They chose the Jews and then, then went in and moved across to the UK and, and the whole ten yards, and then set up Israel as a country. I don't believe they're Jewish. I really don't, that the people pulling the levers. I think this is something that's entirely different. Just like the people in our government that are pulling the levers, I don't necessarily believe that they're who they present themselves as, but that they're infiltrators. I feel the same way about the Christian church, and I'm a Christian. I believe the majority of it is captured. I really do believe that it's apostate. And the Bible talks about it. The Bible also talks about the synagogue of Satan. So it was kind of all written there. You know, it's in the book, you know, read the book. And it's pretty well spelled out on what's actually going on here. It's information about everything that we thought was good. And they use our good nature in order to deceive us. Yes. Well, if you understand that what they're doing actually is converting from the system of nation states. It was in sixteen forty eight. There was a thirty years war between the Protestants and the Catholics, and they ended that war with the Westphalian Treaty. And that was the beginning of the nation state system where they agreed that a nation state would be formed and they could set the rules for their nation state. We could set the rules for our nation state, et cetera. Well, what the globalists want to do is to eliminate the Westphalian system of nation states and move to a system of regions under a world governing system. So if you understand that that's the high level objective. Now, they can't do this kind of stuff. They've been working on this for at least a hundred years. Yeah, I'd say centuries. uh-huh so um so the fact that people don't see it or they might see a little bit of it and think oh they'll never get this done well they're pretty damn close to getting it done they have been dismantling our nation state um for at least uh Sixty years, you know, when it happened to the fall of Rome, I mean, when you look at the Roman empire and how the decline came in the end and for all you guys out there that think of the Roman empire, like twice a day, just about, you know, I think it was quoted that men think about the Roman empire like twice a day or women are like, okay, you know, but when you look at the, the, the downfall of every civilization, it's pretty much followed this playbook and they keep the Satanists keep trying as a satanic death cult. Unbelievable. Yeah. Well, and what does that do is they dismantle your nation state, at least our nation state, our country gets more and more and more dysfunctional. Right. When they, when they turned people into commodities to, and started importing foreigners as fast as they could, whether it was on H-B or the refugee system or just allowing Mexicans to just cross the border. They're basically importing a replacement population for us. It's a replacement culture. So like the culture unifies people. in every country, it's the culture, right? So when you think about this, I think this is very interesting. When you look at when the United States was born, everybody that came here from a different country was really proud to be an American. It was American first, and then the country of origin Afterwards, I'm an American and our family is from X country or whatever it is. But now it's like I'm a Spanish American. I'm a Mexican American. You see what I'm saying? I'm an African American. That's so much bullshit. It's like either you're an American, American first because we're here standing together or. Or you are literally importing your identity as another country. Well, if that's what you want to identify with, maybe you should go back. You know, it's like you want to you want to live that culture. That's fine. I don't hold it against anyone. But if we're going to function as a nation, we cannot be divided. We have to stand together. And there is an American culture. They've been trying to wipe it out for for for a century, for a couple of centuries now. They've been trying to wipe out the culture here. America has its own culture. And we can celebrate our holidays differently. I don't have any problems with that. But what is the American culture? What is the American experience? And I think we've lost that. The National Archives, and they had a wonderful display on the American culture. And when I walked in there, I'm like, They got it right. We have an American culture. What is it? And you see America, if you have to say another country before America, that's kind of like a slap in the face to all of us. Well, that's part of the idea of the liberal world order is that they're going to create a global world order. And that's not going to work. It has never worked. That's why nation states were created to begin with, because I'm not going to live next door to people who are cannibals. You know, there are cannibals in the world. They have their culture, and they could just, by God, keep it where it was created. Well, that's not in the United States. That's where the kids are going, at least some of them. Yeah. That's the hard truth. There's no thought that you can have that's too insane. I mean, I remember back in the, I think it was the eighties, a Korean couple moved here from Korea and the husband killed the wife. And his defense was that was his culture to do that. And it was fought out in court. I think he did end up going to jail, but the idea that he would argue that that was their culture to do that. Right. That should have said, you know, we're in trouble here. We're in big trouble. I mean, when you look at the current amputation. program amputating children's sex organs. It's an amputation. I think we need to frame this as the way that it is. And in the traditional Muslim communities, they believe in female genital mutilation, which is an amputation. So why is that any different? And, you know, I think that we need to, everyone needs to think about this seriously. Would you want somebody amputating your sex organs where you have absolutely no ability to perform whether it was by castration of males or like they used to do, they used to castrate males and turn them into eunuchs. It's like, this is not okay. This is not a choice that another person should make. The same thing with, and I feel this way about abortion. Abortion is, and I get asked this all the time. Oh, the people say, oh, Donna's for abortion. It's like, have you people actually listened to me? No, they haven't. You know, when we take someone else's life, in our own hands or their bodies in our own hands. It's wrong. It's wrong on all levels. God created us the way that he designed us. And he doesn't make mistakes. Even if we think that there's a mistake being made, there are no mistakes made. Are you familiar with the eugenics movements of the early nineteen hundreds? I am not. the experimentation that they were doing at cold springs harbor no I'm not yeah the elite in our country that was a very prosperous time in our country money always whenever there's money people get stupid every time well they did and they uh thought that they should be able to um sterilize people of lesser intellect, who they assumed were lesser intellect. I've heard of that, but I didn't know that that's where it was. What's Cold Springs, are you saying? Yeah, Cold Springs Harbor on Long Island. And it's called the eugenics movement. These elites, wealthy elites, decided that they could just call the population And it's exactly the same thing that happened in Nazi Germany, but it was in our country first. So it's just a repeat. I'm pretty sure that they've been doing this from the beginning of time. Well, okay. And now with going back to the Medical Records Fusion Center, They'll be able to select populations for either culling or for human experimentation, and you won't know. They might select you. You might have some interesting genetic propensity, and they want to modify that in some way and see how it works out. So don't think that it's only going to be poor people on Medicaid, because that's not it. If it was only poor people on Medicaid, they would have a fusion center for people on Medicaid. But when they brought the medical records together, they did it for the military, the VA, Medicare, Medicaid, and they will bring private insurers into it. That's the ability. If you have a database that is a fusion center, it's the ability to use that data without anybody knowing about it, without anybody talking about it, to be able to go and selectively choose their test subjects. Okay. Now, one of the things that really caught my interest, and it was in the early two thousands. Are you familiar with CJD, Crookson's Jacobson disease or something like that? It's really very rare. Well, here in Twin Falls, Idaho, there were five people diagnosed with CJD. How the hell does that happen? Yeah, that's kind of wild, isn't it? Yeah. That was not an anomaly. But supposedly, they couldn't figure out the source of the CJD, even though five people had it. I believe they were senior citizens. They just couldn't figure this out. But that's the kind of thing that they'll be able to do when they have this fusion center, this national database of medical records that actually folds into global health, the global health fusion center of medical records. I mean, it's so monstrous. It's so monstrous. I can't even tell you. They had no, no business, no justification for doing this whatsoever. Well, and look at the twenty three and me nonsense out there. People were submitting their DNA to a database. I don't know about you, but I was like, are you out of your mind? I don't trust people enough. Well, and there was that woman with her company Theranos. Her name is Elizabeth. I can't think of what her name was. But what she was doing was getting blood samples. The doctors would, I guess, send patients to her to give a blood sample for their examination. Well, she was collecting those samples. And that story, if you're not familiar with it, that is a fascinating story. What does she do with it? Well, that's what they use the blood sample for was to, to analyze your blood, your DNA. Right. What was she doing specifically with it? I mean, was there a, a greater, a greater effort that we should know about? I'm sure there was, she was working. Now let me find her name. I'm just wondering if she's like sending it straight to a source, either like Switzerland or China or who knows, you know? Pakistan, probably because her partner was from Pakistan. His name was Sunny Balwani. Huh. That's interesting. Yeah, I watched that whole story. And you know why? Because of the high profile people that were involved with what she was doing. She was one of these young, beautiful internet people that was basically a circus unto herself. But let me see. It's just so interesting. Yeah, it's quite amazing. Bill Frist, he was a senator at the time. George Shultz, some really high profile people were involved with her, which tells you how serious it is about what they're calling preventative medicine. supposedly they're saying they can analyze your blood, determine what your proclivities would be for the development of some kind of medical problem and prevent it before it happens. Which is really insane, you know, when you think about it, because just because you have a proclivity for something doesn't mean you're going to get it. Denise just said they sterilized my cousin at two years old with schizophrenia. She was sent to Ann Arbor mental hospital. They didn't want these people reproducing. That's right. That's eugenics. That is eugenics. Well, yeah. Yeah. Not much to say about this. You know, it's, it's we, we have a large spiritual crisis going on in the world right now. Large. Yeah. Yeah. It's evil. I mean, that's how I feel about it, is that it's evil, what's happening in the world. When things don't go exactly right, quite honestly, I think you learn more than when they go perfectly. That's the goal seems to be right now, to pursue all those things that are instant gratification, that look good, that give you, say, like a Pinterest reality, when in fact, I think the things that are a little more difficult or challenging actually are more fulfilling because they help you think. They help you problem solve. They're a challenge instead of seeing it as complete disaster. So my youngest is very mentally ill, very, very disabled and very mentally ill. She was in a train exit where her mother was killed at her side. She comes with a lot of challenges. I'm going to say that right now. And everyone who's around her has their lives completely changed because she's so challenging to be around. So we we grow that way. And I don't think we should be adverse to jumping in, you know, running right into the fire when there's a problem out there, because you'll you'll think it through when you get in with the more hard situations you get into, the better you are at handling them. And I think that that's something that God intends for us. He's training us. Every time we go into something that's difficult or challenging or painful, we change. The way the United States is right now is that people are so adverse to it that they run away from it. And they never learn how to cope or handle difficult things in life because it's so easy to run to a crutch. Well, I'll tell you what, I am not the personality type to be able to work with people with problems because I have my own problems, you know? And so I have a flash temper and I'm just not the right personality. I've seen, of course, over my lifetime, I've seen people that are just so incredibly good with challenging people. And I admire those people. I just can't be one of them. Your personality is one of my favorite because you're right out there with how you feel. And I personally think that people that have flash tempers are very interesting to me because there's no hiding anything. And really, it's a real relationship instead of the fake phony ones where people are like, how you doing? I just love you and that sort of thing. And I'm just like, I hate those people. There was a Clint Eastwood movie where he said, a man has to know his limitations. And that's the way I've always thought. A woman's got to know her limitations, and I know mine. Yeah. Well, I love you as you are. I'm glad you are exactly the way you are because I think you're perfect. Well, thank you. You know, it's just like, for me, it's like, I don't like a perfect horse. You know, people, we just brought a new horse into the barn and, and yesterday and, uh, it's got a little, it got a few challenges, you know, good horse, but a little challenging. And, uh, And I was talking to someone that was there and I said, you know, personally, I like a horse. It's a little challenging because otherwise it's too easy on board. You know, there was a psychiatrist. You know, there's an issue with giving medications to children. And I absolutely do not believe in giving medications. psychotropic drugs to children. What they did with our healthcare system is they gave an incentive for people to have their kids declared ADHD. I mean, it was, it's all about the money. Money makes people stupid. Yes. Yeah, I actually worked with a guy who was a programmer. He had his own son declared ADHD and he was getting like five hundred a month on it, making money on his own kid. Oh, disgusting to the max. I can't even tell you. Yeah. But yeah. so so they incentivized all of these kids I think that's why a lot of kids since about nineteen seventy four when they started this medication of kids but they used to call them hyperactive now they call them adhd But what it was is that boys would not sit down and play nice like girls. So they had a lot of boys declared ADHD. That's the beginning of gender confusion right there. I'm going to tell you what. How many boys could ever sit in school? My son could never do that. Yeah, he was up running around, you know. But I went in to pick him up one day from preschool and the director said she wanted to talk to me. And so I talked to her and she said, your son is hyperactive and he needs to be on medication. I said, OK, thank you very much. I took my son out of there and I never went back. I got him in a different preschool. So proud of you. I'm so proud of you. That's a good parent right there. There was no way I would have let him, because there was nothing wrong with him. He was a boy. I grew up with boys and I know they're different. They never wanted to play with me because I was a girl. Stinky girls and stinky boys. You know, remember when you were a kid, it's like, yeah, the boys were harassing the girls full time and they still harass girls full time, you know? Yes, they do. That is what boys do. They do. It's right. But anyway, this psychiatrist, he wrote a book called something about the wildest, wildest, Ponies make the best horses or something like that. So if you've got a young, a colt that's wild, he'll probably grow up to be a good horse because he has spirit and character and everything else. Well, they're brave. It's like, you know, I've talked about the difference between, because, you know, we have horses, the difference between a stallion and a gelding, who is a cut stallion, non-reproducing, and a mare. You know, geldings are just kind of like they're just there. They they're happy to be there. They're kind of like a dog, you know, whatever you want to do. That's fantastic. A mare's attitude. I am not going to do that. And you're going to discuss it with her until she's like, OK, I think that's a good idea. Let's go do this together. Right. And a stallion is like, he's like the sentry of the whole herd. They're like so brave. You get on a stallion and they're just kind of watching things and looking for threats and whistling at the girls and, you know, and creating a commotion and that sort of thing. But I'm going to tell you what, they're always on alert for a threat. And if you're on a stallion and they see a threat, they puff up, they get big, and their neck gets puffy like this. And they look at the threat like, I either kick your tail here in twenty feet, your choice, or back down. And that's just the way that they're made. Nobody's going to change it either. I mean, and it's a beautiful thing. I love the fact that we are not confused about gender. There's no confusion here. Mm-hmm. Yeah, I think that there are so few people that are really gender confused. I mean, it's like a percentage in the single digit. But what they are doing, they are creating lifetime patients for drugs and experimentation. Ooh, there you go. And I feel so bad. Yeah, I feel so bad for people that have had altering surgery and they try to undo it. But you can't. I mean, you know, those once you alter your body like that, it's that way to stay. And I listened to a gal talk about that after she had had, you know, she she she had a You know, amputation surgery and they they she went from a woman to a man and then she was transitioning back to listen to her testimony was heartbreaking. She said, I just should have waited. I should have waited. She said she had both top and bottom surgery and where they they took the skin to to create the penis was out of her her arm. And it was horrific scarring, just horrific. She goes, I have nothing. She said, I am literally, she was in her twenties. She said, I'm just waiting to die. She said, I have lost everything that made me human. And it was absolutely heartbreaking. And her messages to people that are amputating their children's, anything on their children, it should be the same thing as saying, oh, you know what? My kid wants to be a pirate. I'm going to amputate a leg because he wants to be a pirate. That's about the sanity that's going in here with the gender surgeries. No, it's an amputation. If I had my way. I would hang every damn one of those people that are involved in that. And they shouldn't even be in the schools. They shouldn't have this kind of curriculum in the schools or counselors that counsel this stuff. Because it's so easy for an adult to manipulate a child. It's my children's by proxy is what it is. Yeah. It's... Yeah, and we've got a whole nest of these monsters up in northern Idaho. They're crazy. They're just batshit crazy. You know, you're going to start amputating pieces of other people's bodies. I don't care if they're your kids. This is not okay. I'm going to bring Daniel on a minute, but hang on for a minute. That doesn't mean you have to leave, okay? Because he said he texted in the chat and said, I was one of those boys. Oh, that was wild? Were you a wild guy, Daniel? No. I don't know if Daniel could see me. Are you on there, Daniel? I can see you. Can you see us and hear us? I don't think you can. Let me, let me see. Invite him on. Cause the sound is, he can't hear us. Let's see. You're not muted. So let's see what's, what's happening there. So yeah, he says, uh, I can see you. Hi. Can't hear you. Can you hear us? Oh, I don't know. You can go out and come back in and see if that works. Here, I'll have to, like you can hear me. There you go. He left. I think he's going to come back in. We'll see what happens. But yeah, this whole thing is just crazy. And you know, what's really horrible about it is when you really look at it, Pritzker was the one that was really behind all of these gender amputation clinics. And to see how many of those increased after twenty twelve was is shocking. The map of it is just absolutely shocking. I don't understand. I am. You know what kind of proves how how much we've lost our country, the borders, the the moral fiber of our country. It's gone. Yeah, I don't think Daniel can hear us yet. So, hi, I can hear you. Let's see, he's got a technical thing. We'll just keep talking and then... Do you have microphones? I got it. Oh, there you go. Awesome. That's what I love about our show. It's real, real news for real people by real people at the kitchen table, sort of, you know, to get things for. So you were one of those boys, huh? I was. I was. I was. It caused me a lot of grief through. That's why I hated school. I didn't fit the model. know I now look back and realize that god did bless me with this extraordinary memory in in high iq and I wouldn't sit down I was all over the place because they weren't meeting me at my needs at all because I didn't fit their model of industrial schools and this these indoctrination centers because that's what they are now that's what they've been since more than a hundred years and so yeah I I it was founded very frustrating You know what? As a, as a girl, I hated school too. I remember walking up to the school every morning. And as soon as I saw the school, it just an ache in the pit of my stomach. I was so bored that I was just, I was so bored at school and I just hated it. Absolutely despised it. So I don't know. I think we can do better. But when, when I went to school, they had, the kids divided they and and I didn't know this you know when I was a kid but I did figure it out you know when I was in junior high but they had the fast kids in one class and the slower kids in another class and so that they could teach to where the kid was and um They got rid of that system and put all kids in the same class, and then they started using the smarter kids to tutor the slower ones, which is completely unfair to the faster kids. You know, they have so screwed up our schools that basically they are just a place for kids to spend time during the day. Babysitter. You know, when I started homeschooling my kids, because I was done with this whole system before I even put my kids. And I sent my one son to preschool because, you know, that's what I already did for two days. And I was like, this is the dumbest thing I've ever seen in my life. We're done with this and brought the kids home. And when I realized that an average time that kids receive education in a school is less than two hours a day. The rest of it's classroom management. And we wonder why forty percent of the kids in the schools can't even read, let alone have any life schools. It's just indoctrination to make them better, better sheeple to follow the directives. It's really a shame. So, Vicki, thank you for being on today. I love you to pieces, my friend, and everything you bring to the table. Is there anything else you want to talk about? No, because I could go on for days, but I'd rather hear Daniel. So thank you for having me on and. I'll talk to you later. We'll plan on next week, Monday. Again, I really do like the combination of the two of you here because I think you're just extraordinary people. And I've kind of shifted being on a little bit away from the audience builders to people who are actually doing things on the ground. And I think that that's exactly the way that I'm going to continue to go. So how are you this morning? Doing well after a beautiful, long weekend. I'm doing fabulous. Did you have a nice celebration? Not so much as far as celebration, but worked on my dog. I have been competing in dog sport for many years, and it's a German dog sport where the German Shepherd breed has been tested this way for more than a hundred years in tracking obedience and protection to... put them through these field trials, and only those dogs that excel at those field trials are permitted for use in breeding. You know, the very purpose of selective breeding, right? In the horse world, you know that they have their protocols to develop their various strains of horses for their specific functions and it's the same for us so yeah I was I'd been away from it for almost seven years I retired my old dog back in and so it was great to get back on the horse again no pun intended I love seeing the video you sent me. That was very nice. The videos. And so just so you know, I actually have a German shepherd, but she's not that kind of a German shepherd, you know, she's, she's a, she's a amazing dog, but, but she'd rather just kind of like play ball and, and sit on the sofa with you and just, just have her, her moment of being with her people. Yeah, and that's the way the majority are for sure. And those of us who breed them for work, they don't make good pets in the beginning. My protocol is I train the dog to perform all the tasks that I need it to perform. Then they can become domesticated. In other words, to live in the home in any capacity, because otherwise, when you train them to be a high intensity, we were talking about hyperactive kids. You see the same in the working dogs, right? You have all this instinct to perform certain tasks, and they have to have an outlet for these instincts. And if you don't, you get into behavioral issues. So when you try to train these dogs to, if you try to domesticate them first, you have to take quite a bit out of their tendencies to perform the barking, digging, biting, chewing, all of these things are not appropriate for domestic application. And so if you have to correct them for any of those behaviors to live in your home, you start tuning out or tuning down You know, that's what they did to me. They wanted to force me into this model. And so dogs that have lesser drive, lesser, uh, high levels of instinct, um, make much better pets. So, and, and not all of them, you know, again, we only, only a small percentage of these high performance animals are selected to perpetuate that. Um, and, and so that's why I train them. My dog isn't a house dog until it's nearly four years old. Oh, wow. because that way I've had the opportunity to train it in all the phases. So I get maximum performance for those phases of the work. And then I can domesticate them because I've also already established yin and yang, positive and negative communication. So we're on the same page having trained them to do all these wonderful things. now we're in tune with one another. So I can correct her for jumping. I can correct her for being on the furniture if I don't want her on the furniture and so on and so forth. Oh, that's really cool. Well, I tell you what, what are we going to talk about today, pro se wise? We had a group that met at my barn this past week, and it was really fun. We had a great time. Very, very well educated on the law, on the Constitution, on the sheriff's office and such. Several of them have worked and filed pro se cases, which was really fun. I'm so interested in this topic. So what are we going to talk about? I'm going to jump out and let you talk for a minute. I'm going to grab another coffee here, if you don't mind. Yeah, no, that's fine. I came prepared. It's already brewed. Awesome. Because I didn't go to a break here like I normally do. So go ahead and talk. I'm going to stop the camera. And you just talk, and I'll be back in just a minute, OK? Sure. I think the biggest thing for me has been Once I understood that our state constitution was no longer taught in our university system, in our state law school at the big University of New Hampshire, I started connecting some dots. And that was that most of the judges and the lawyers in this state, they all rely, they're taught in law school, the importance of precedent set by the courts. and they unfortunately have become too dependent on that and therefore they don't study the fundamentals at the same level that I have and therefore these these fundamentals are the basis by which we can bring litigation because What is it that we are entitled to as part of the social compact? That is the ability to defend ourselves, both in the physical realm of personal security, but also Article II of our state constitution. Let me pull it up here. Well, when it goes too much to statutes and case law, the way that they're doing it, one bad decision can drive a ton of them. Well, that's exactly right. You're absolutely right. I mean, it can literally wreck justice by one bad decision by one bad judge. Our article two in our state constitution says, all men have certain natural, essential, and inherent rights, among which are the enjoying and defending. Who does the enjoying and defending? You do. These are your private property. This is what James Madison so eloquently established in his famous essay on property rights. And I challenge all of you who are contemplating any pro se litigation to read that beautiful work of James Madison, because it explains what they meant. What exactly do you get in exchange for surrendering some of your natural rights to a society? What is the private property rights that you retain under the people? And this should be the basis of all your litigation because virtually everything that is being done against us violates those basic principles where they are trespassing on your property, your rights. James Madison famously said in that essay that you have a property and your rights and a right to your property. That's powerful stuff and understanding the full scope. Matter of fact, I have it up here. I was working on... I was working on something else, but let me give you a basic rundown. This term in a particular application means, quote, that dominion which one man claims and exercises over external things of the world in exclusion of every other individual. In a larger and just meaning, it embraces everything to which a man may attach a value and have a right, which leaves to everyone else a like advantage. In the former sense, a man's land and merchandise or money is called property. In the latter sense, a man has a property in his opinions and the free communications of them. He has a property of particular value in his religious opinions and the profession and practice dictated by them. He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person. He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objections on which to employ them. In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights. That's the introduction. I'll leave your audience to go look that up on their own. But that is the basis of the social compact. What do you get in exchange for paying your taxes? You get a variety of things. And one of them is the ability to... All of our our thirty eight enumerated rights, thirty nine today, plus a few A's and B's. All of those are no go zones for the government. And you find that virtually all the things that we have to push back upon are where the legislature. I don't know if you are you familiar with the decisions, the Heller Bruin decisions? We talked about that before here. What's happened under those decisions is that the Supreme Court has now reaffirmed a fundamental truth. that when dealing with our property, our rights, that the government no longer, judges can no longer act as a balancing, apply a balancing test called means and scrutiny, where the judges will decide how much of the public policy should infringe upon this no-go zone In the public good. And this has been the backbone of so much gun legislation for years, like New York City and in the progressive states where they have violated the Second Amendment under the pretense that for the public good, that a judge is going to decide that some things established by the founding fathers should now be infringed upon. And you can see this throughout all of the things they do to us. And this is the basis, I believe, where we have standing. We have standing because this is the basis of our social compact. If you go back and see my oral arguments before my state Supreme Court, the judge stopped me early on and asked me, if we grant you a trial by jury, what exactly would you raise before the jury? And I said, the substance of my enumerated rights, because this is all part of what the government has a duty to protect, and it's not doing that very thing. And so, yeah, that would be my intro to that for keeping it simple and not overwhelming the audience on, because you know me, I can go on for the next hour and give you citation after citation, but I want to keep it simple. Yeah, and I think that it's all good. I mean, do you ever learn better from like a timeline type thing where you read the chapter heads and that sort of thing, the titles, and then dive down into the deeper information? So I think sometimes looking at it as the whole and simplifying it to one statement like that, like, you know, just defending our enumerated rights, that's it. No, you're correct. And because I'm not classically trained, we already established the fact that I hated school. I'm not a byproduct of the school system. I challenged what it did teach me is to challenge everything. Hey, you know what? This is a great this is honestly a very great little tangent to be on because I was the same way. I didn't I and I think we're born that way. I really do. And genetically endowed. And just truly just annoyed with all forms of deception and time wasters and things that we're bored with. Well, and the other thing for me personally was no one was able to convey to me, neither my parents or the school system, the importance of the things they wished for me to understand. I didn't get it. They failed in that capacity to convey to me why, again, one of the things I hated in school, I hated English. I've just found it boring. It wasn't exciting to me. Same with math. You know, now as a precision long range shooter, I can assure you that if I understood that how important it was for sending rounds down range at extreme distances was all math. It's all math, understanding the mathematical formulas that affect the travel of a bullet and how the weather and the air and the environment all affect the trajectories of a projectile. Yeah. That's a huge failing in the non-education system that we have. is tying these principles or teaching into real life applications. So you can sit there and do pages and pages of sums as a child and never be able to apply it to anything. They leave it out. So like when I taught my kids, I would bring them to a grocery store and have them convert the numbers or the price into prices per ounce and do comparisons. and read labels and that sort of thing. Tangible. Tangible real life application. I hated history. Now I love it because I was like, why do I need to know all these dates? This is ridiculous because all they ever taught were dates and I didn't care. I was like, okay, so there's a date on that. What does that mean about anything? I mean, you know, it didn't mean anything to me. I just skipped right over it and had to relearn everything later. Then some of the things I heard sort of clicked in, but I could have cared less about what I was learning in school. No, you're absolutely right. And, you know, like I said, my frustration with the institution led me to challenge everything, and I would carry that into life the rest of my life. You know, as you know now, I'm now involved with another group of patriots here in the state where the state Supreme Court has just – upheld a bad decision called Claremont, and it did so for two reasons. One, it is the established precedent of the court that was a bad decision, but the Attorney General's Office didn't challenge the bad precedent. Rather, they let it stand so they could justify the indoctrination centers they've established. And this led me into a deep dive of understanding the evolution of education in the United States. The court in that decision used a history book called The History of Education in New Hampshire. And so it explained from Plymouth Rock, which was the second settlement in the North American continent after Jamestown, They used that history that leads to Boston and so on and so forth. And so my dive into the evolution of our history has, it's been a while since I visited this topic, but I do know that during the transition from the nineteenth century to the twentieth century during the Industrial Revolution, scholars much more learned on this history have explained in great detail I'm not current on it so forgive me but I do know that they intentionally made public school as a dumbed down protocol just smart enough they only wanted to produce students smart enough to read blueprints basic reading and writing skills to adjust to this growing industrial revolution because there was a lack of these skills. And so our public schools as we know them today, as they evolved out of a out of a quasi-religious first and secular components of education. Second, what's happened is that that morphed into completely removal of the gospel and a transition into a purely secular entity and continuing to call that a public school, leaving what out of the equation? Morality. Now your government- There's no standard without God involved. Exactly, because when you remove the fundamental principles, whether you believe or don't believe, the point is, what I believe for sure is that the gospel has established a history of the human species. And when you understand, as I said before, basic instruction before leaving earth, right? It's a history lesson about human behavior. And this education protocol puts in the basis of what is moral and what is not moral. When you look at the globe as an entity, the moral compass of every society on the planet is derived from what? The religious protocol of that culture. So if you're in Israel, it'd be Judaism. If you're in an Islamic country, it'd be the Koran. If you're in India, it'd be the Hindu faith, and so on and so forth, right? So morality is predicated on what? Some type of religious belief system. Because otherwise, what is the human... What do you find when you deal with people who are secular by choice, who have either not been taught... a religious belief of any kind. They are left, as you hear people say, well, you should just be a good person. Well, what is a good person? They become a God and of themselves in their own mind because then they set the rules and there's no standard that doesn't make any difference. As long as they feel good about it, they justify whatever their actions are to themselves. So they can do whatever they want. Well, yeah, absolutely. And secondarily, what it does is that their happiness and their perspective is based on what makes them feel good. Yes. So now we get into a debate over fruits of the spirit versus fruits of the flesh, right? Right. And so this is an underlying issue where people simply choose based on what's good for them. Well, that's good because it's all relative to their perspective and not based on thousands of years in human behavior. What I believe is for sure is that the human, as King Solomon said, there's nothing new under the sun. We as human beings are no different than Adam and Eve today. It's a perpetuation of the human species from beginning to end. So those fundamental principles of the Old Testament and all of the morality that derive from that concept, even though we did ultimately get to the New Testament, the point is why all of those things came to be are detailed in the scriptures. They're detailed because they found evidence generation after generation after generation, that these time-tested protocols or beliefs were rooted in the human condition and the human experience. And so, but, you know, that's my thought on the education system. And of course, this leads to my next pro se fight. And that will be challenging the tax structure of the state, which the state court has tried to make law by ruling that the word cherish in the year, in the twentieth century, now all of a sudden means that the word cherish was interpreted by the state Supreme Court as a state mandate to tax. Think about that. Okay. Yeah, it's absurd. It's absurd. Think of it this way. I don't want to get the connection. Right, exactly. If you look at what did we fight the revolution over? Taxation without representation. The Stamp Act, right? The Parliament. Tax, too. It's like we're at an above tax rate. So our state constitution established very clearly that in order to prohibit the abusive practices of the previous government, the English monarchy and its parliament, of willy-nilly just passing new laws, regulations, and statutes, that would be the basis of increasing your taxes, right? Well, this was prohibited. And so our state constitution prohibits that process without the people consenting to a new form of tax. So in New Hampshire, it's only happened five times because the original tax was based on we're going to make the property owners pay for their protection. And in order to expand that tax base, it's been done five times. proving my point but guess what didn't happen there was no an amendment to the state constitution to allow the state to tax your property to finance schools this court decided the word cherish means something it doesn't mean altogether and what they the other thing they did is they looked at the the the history in the they applied the wrong history test let me explain In the Heller-Bruin decision, Clarence Thomas and Bruin articulated that not all history is the same. He established that, look, you must look at the history at the time these documents were written and not a hundred years later or too far back into antiquity. In other words, English common law, things that were changed because of the American system. Remember, we started the North American experiment that would grow into the United States of America in Jamestown and Plymouth Rock in sixteen twenty or approximately right. Jamestown was the slightly earlier. But the point is that. What did they bring with them? Here we have a saying in New Hampshire, and most Republican states are the same, don't move here and mass up New Hampshire. In other words, don't bring your Democrat politics here because you're fleeing Democrat policies in a blue state, and that's what they do, right? And so this is what they did in the colonial period. And this is another thing they don't teach in school. So Plymouth Rock, the compact began in sixteen twenty. The Mayflower was headed to Jamestown. The East India Company had chartered a boat, the Mayflower, to go all the way to Jamestown. It never made it. The weather, the boat took on damage from the bad weather crossing the Atlantic. They would be they would find safe harbor in the Massachusetts Bay and they would redraft their charter and that would become the Mayflower Compact. And so from there, that was sixteen twenty. The Declaration of Independence is one hundred and fifty years later. This is exactly why the Declaration of Independence, if you read it today, sounds like a direct charge at our government that exists now. Why? Because the hundred and fifty years of colonial rule, that's what it was. That's what they rebelled against. It was actually should have been called an English Civil War. Because as I said before, if you understand that the English government, the history of it is taught very well by Chris Ann Hall, the attorney from Florida, that the eleven hundred Charter of Liberties, the twelve fifteen Magna Carta, the petition of right. Right. So the eleven hundred Charter of Liberty was, hey, you need to stop acting like a king. You were supposed to handle our external affairs and you keep misbehaving. So you need to promise that you won't do it anymore. Well, that didn't last very long. A hundred years goes by and we get to Magna Carta. Finally, they grab the king, put a sword to his throat and say, hey, unless you agree to adhere to an expanded document called Magna Carta, That our social compact is done. This is where we got redress of grievances in some of our other rights. And so that would last until sixteen twenty eight, where the English petitioned the parliament. The English people petitioned the parliament and said, hey, you're ignoring the eleven hundred charter liberties. You're ignoring Magna Carta. We want you to stop. And so they wouldn't. So it leads to the grand remonstrance, which is the stern rebuke and protest, written protest, detailing just like the Declaration of Independence, detailing all of these things that we don't like that you're doing to us. Doesn't that sound like today? Yes. Right? And then they would lead to, ultimately, they would kill the king, establish an english bill of rights bring in a foreign entity the duke of orange and and um and so on and say hey we'll make you the king if you agree to establish this english bill of rights well that was what do you think they brought here to the to the new world That very concept. If you read New Hampshire's, New Hampshire was the first of the thirteen colonies to write a constitution. In the body of the document, one of their grievances is that you've deprived us of our rights enumerated in the English Bill of Rights. putting in motion this repetitive pattern. So that's why history is so important, that it's simply, as King Solomon said, there's nothing new under the sun. The human condition perpetually repeats itself. And so this is where we find ourselves and why it's so important to know these fundamentals, because it didn't begin in the modern era. It began hundreds of years ago. And so that's why for me it was, and again, things not taught in law school. Now, most lawyers and most judges will learn about these things if they have to study a particular challenge to a state or federal constitution. And so we do get good occasional good precedent like we've gotten in the Heller Bruin decisions and the abolition of this balancing test and now the dismantling of Chevron deference and that they will no longer allow these administrative bodies to make law, to prosecute the violation of their rules and regulations and sit in judgment, right? The very definition of tyranny, the breakdown of separation of powers, right? And of course, that's been achieved by how? Dumbing down, back to education, dumbing down our education system. And if you study that process, that's what's happened is now we're no longer teaching it. So we have both political parties, excuse me, both political parties who elect well-intended volunteers who run our state legislature gets paid a hundred dollars a year. That's it. Wow. Yeah. And by the way, it's supposed to be paid in silver. Okay. So if you paid them in silver, it would correct the inflationary consequences of the debasement of our value of our currency. But I digress. That's another conversation for another day. But yeah, so this whole process is that's how they got away with dumbing us down. So they go there and they don't understand the limit, the source of their authority and the limits of their power. So both parties have a party platform. One is red, one is blue. Go sports team, go. And what they do is there's a bait and switch. The bait and switch is the party platform for me personally, the Republican Party platform is wonderful. I agree with the majority of it. Where I start, where they go off the rails is, for example, in the education realm, they continue to stand by and sanction big government control of our school system. that has left them poorly educated about how they ought to establish public policy while protecting private rights. Milton Friedman, one of my favorite economists recently, I think I said this last time, it's worth repeating. He said that in a short video that government really should only do four things. One, to protect the homeland, to protect the state, and then ultimately the states would give that power to the federal government. So to protect ourselves from foreign invaders and to protect our commercial activity around the globe. Government is the only entity that's capable of doing that, even though they'll do it at twice the cost of the private. But there's no way really to get the private entity to perform that task. The second is to establish the rules of the game, right? And what does that look like? And so that is to establish property rights so that we know what the rules are and that those are part of the social combat. The next item is also protecting one citizen from another. When a group of citizens using a democracy mob rule want to take your bicycle from you, right? In a democracy, if fifty one percent of them say they will, they'll take your property from you. Right. They get away with it. But in a republic, they can't. Why? Because the social right. Your private property is your rights, and this is someplace they can't go. And the reason the government doesn't do a good job at this is because it spends too much time doing that which it ought not do in the first place, because we the people never gave it authority to do these things. And then lastly, not co-equal branches of government, but rather a judiciary that is third and last for a reason. Remember, when you read my state constitution anyway, the state Supreme Court in a famous case, Wooster v. Plymouth, reaffirmed that fundamental truth that it's established in a numerical hierarchy with the first article being the most important and moving on up. So the first thing they established in this new form of government after establishing a Bill of Rights, by the way, all the thirteen colonies begin with the Bill of Rights. Because again, a Republican form of government, the very purpose of creating the part two, a form of government is to protect part one. And so by doing this, the reason, so the first thing we get is the legislature. started with the Senate, then a House of Representatives, then they created the executive branch. We have a governor and executive council. And then lastly, a judicial body, which Milton said that judicial body is there to adjudicate controversies that cover the first two items. And that really is the summation of what your government ought to do. So regardless of what state in the union you're in, this is a really important piece. And so I'll take your questions. I don't know if you have any, but it's going to be a good segue to my op-ed I sent you. Well, I tell you, I just really like listening to you talk and process everything as a whole because you typically lead into the next topic. And I'd like to hear what you have to say. I don't really have any questions. It makes sense to me. Well, good, good. I sent you an op-ed about voting. So we talked about the first issue, education and the modification of the education system to dumb down society and not to increase the quality. We spend more per capita in the United States of America than any nation on the planet in our education system. It's a complete failure. If you don't like the Democratic Party and its policies and the division of the United States because of it, I would submit to you that they were listening to Sigmund Freud, who understood, let me take a child for the first years of his life, and I will create a Democrat for you. I'm paraphrasing, of course. He didn't say that. But the point is he understood that if you could imprint young minds and mold young minds, and that's what's going on in our schools, right? But the second part is, I know it's a big jump, but how do we achieve this? You first dumb the people down, then through control of the media, you can get them to vote for their own demise and their own dumbing down of their culture. And they did this at the ballot box. And so, as you already know, this is a big part of my lawsuit. But I want to expand this into a nationwide problem. And if we don't fix this, then we are doomed as a culture. So let me get into it. In seventeen seventy six, New Hampshire state constitution was first written in as all the other colonies. Citizenship was something retained as a power because each state became a sovereign country. When you read the Declaration of Independence, it says clearly that we're divorcing ourselves from the state of England. Right? The word state means a country. So the sovereign powers granted by a sovereign people to their legislatures also included the right to define who their citizens are. Here in New Hampshire, our first recorded event of that is in the year, after our second constitution was adopted in the summer of, went into effect June second, . And that constitution, they put in place the ability for the legislature to be responsible for defining who its citizens are. So our first recorded cases, Peter D'Souza and his wife and his two children petitioned the legislature because there were no statutes in place giving the secretary of state the authority to issue naturalization papers right so this was an act handled by the parliament or the state legislature excuse me and so when it did this the state legislature had the authority to regulate commerce as one of its authorities and the other one was also to authorize those who want to be naturalized so that's our first recorded event now this is really important because it sets the precedent that state citizenship begins before the united states of america It becomes the backdrop and the control of all the thirteen states established by their legislative bodies, the mechanism by which you become. Read the articles of Confederation that follow, right? Because that's the next document here in our genealogy. All thirteen states, right after the Declaration of Independence, I like to call the divorce letter. After that document, they all write constitutions declaring themselves free, sovereign, and independent countries, right? Hang on. Pull it up here so I can quote it verbatim. Articles of Confederation. Here we go. Article two, each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States in Congress assembled. See, the states, even when they wrote the U.S. Constitution, didn't surrender their sovereignty. If you don't believe me, what does the Ninth and Tenth Amendments say? It reaffirms that very thing. The Ninth, to paraphrase, says just because we didn't think about it and write it down doesn't mean that you can just assume powers we didn't give you. And then the Tenth makes it even stronger, right? That those powers not specifically delegated to us or retained by the states are retained by the people. So this goes to the issue of state citizenship. This is a really big deal. So in the US Constitution, which becomes the next document in our genealogy, becomes Article I, Section VIII, Clause IV is to establish a uniform rule of naturalization key for foreign-born nationals. In other words, at creating this new union called the United States of America, we delegated to the federal government to establish the rules for moving to America when you were born in some other country in the world so that it would be the same throughout. But In the very first act, the very first meeting of the U.S. Congress in seventeen ninety in New York City, that's where they assembled Washington, D.C. is yet to be surveyed and created as a land as a ten mile square. They passed the very first Immigration and Naturalization Act of seventeen ninety. It explains how you become naturalized, which is you apply. First, you had to meet the durational residency requirement established by federal law and live within one of the states of the union, meet their residency requirement, and then do two things. Prove to the court that you are a person of good character because you came here and took care of yourself and stayed out of trouble. And secondarily, that having done that, you then upon meeting that qualification, I'm skipping the other one, you would then swear an oath and you would become an American citizen, a citizen of a state. not a citizen of Washington, DC. See, there's a distinct difference between a citizen of the United States of America, which is what my immigration certificate says. See, I have a natural, remember I was born in Canada. My parents moved to New Hampshire in the sixties. So I was naturalized. So I went through the process. So we'll get to the Fourteenth Amendment in a moment. But this process puts in place that a citizen of the United States of America is a state citizen. It's not a federal US citizen. Who is a federal US citizen? That's a person born or naturalized in federal territory. Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and so on and so forth. Why? Because what are they, Donna? All of them are not states, are they? No. And who has jurisdiction over them? The federal government. So the federal government grants them federal citizenship because it can't grant them state citizenship. And there's a blurring of the lines in the twentieth century. We've all been converted to the wrong application so that if Article I, Section VIII of the U.S. Constitution says that the federal government, I think it's Clause XVII of the Enumerated Powers, says the Congress only has jurisdiction over the Ten Mile Square and federal territory, How did it then obtain jurisdiction over all of us? Right? What was the mechanism for that? They had to get us to consent to being in federal jurisdiction by changing and reversing the language from citizen of the United States to United States citizen. Huh. It's a sleight of hand. It's a sleight of hand. Yeah. Right. Most people have never unraveled that because that's exactly what they've done. So if they have to move your corporate entity, your legal name, have you ever heard why your name is spelled in all capital letters in virtually all of your legal correspondence? I have, I have. So the reason this is done is it is done in order to establish a, to create a corporate persona, a legal fiction, because the federal government doesn't have jurisdiction over the citizens of the state in under common law. They have to traffic your person and create a corporate person in order to get you to consent to federal jurisdiction. This would lead to the whole new deal. See, the changing of all of this starts with a multiple step process. First was the creation of birth certificates. Now in the beginning, When prior to the nineteen twenties, the federal government, excuse me, the states and your birth record was, in fact, your family Bible. If you look at most Bibles at the front, there's a genealogy that would be written into the beginning of the Bible. And your Bible was your passport because it established how you move from place to place. So in the twentieth century, under the false pretense of the federal government in the census, wanted to track the birth record of all Americans. And this put in this apparent, see, they weren't documenting who and the names and the details, but this would ultimately lead to establishing a birth certificate. And this birth certificate would then create the legal fiction. The original birth certificates, your name would be styled in your Christian name, styled in the form of your signature. This signature application was in effect for a very long time until it got incorporated into changing it. Today, when you look at it, and by the way, I went to a state court and corrected this with my state court. And the judge figured out what I was doing. See, my naturalization certificate is where those who are born outside of the United States in order to create this legal fiction. And by the way, this is part of our state law. The reason you capitalize a name in all caps is because you're creating a legal fiction, a corporate entity. So I said to the judge, your honor, when I applied to become a citizen of the United States of America, The federal government changed my name. They spelled my name in all capital letters, capitalizing my name. And I signed the document stating that I agreed to this. I would receive it in the mail. I says, but that's not who I am. They changed. What did the judge say? She lowered her glasses and said, I get it. And I produced my document. I said, if you notice your honor, My name given by the government isn't the name given by my parents. So I want my legal name to reflect who I am and so that there's no misapplication of a legal fiction to coerce me into contracts. And this is how the federal government, ultimately, I'm giving a summary here without getting into all the details, but this is how the federal, because what did I tell you about the New Deal in they sent FDR in order to try to fix the Great Depression caused by the Federal Reserve. They would summon people from all of the forty-eight states to a meeting, and FDR told all of them to returned to their state governments and passed legislation to accept federal aid. So in ours, it happened. This happened in nineteen thirty three. Now, in order to do this, they why did they have to pass legislation to do this? Because what did I say? Article one, section eight, clause seventeen of the U.S. Constitution says the federal government only has jurisdiction over the ten mile square in its federal territories. I challenge your readers, not your readers, those viewing this today, to go look at the enumerated powers. Again, you can summarize the enumerated powers to do the, as Madison said, the external affairs of the states, to wage war on their behalf, to negotiate peace. to establish treaties for common defense and for commerce and to regulate commerce between the Indian tribes and between the sovereign countries called states and between foreign nations, right? Right. If that's all it can do, right? It really, and you look at the parts where you have certain rights, like the privileges and immunities clause, right? But when you look at it as a sum total, you're going to find that the federal government wasn't created to really deal with you. Why? Because the state government already did that for you. And as Patrick Henry warned, Most people have not studied the Virginia ratification debate between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. Madison and Hamilton were Federalist. James Madison, excuse me, Patrick Henry and George Mason were Anti-Federalist. The names were an oxymoron because they were the opposite, right? Patrick Henry... argued that the U.S. Constitution as written, because the judiciary was given too much powers and there was too much of a consolidating tendency, this was the result of James Madison. James Madison tried to create a national central sovereign power in a limited monarchy called the president. And so he submitted his work to the famous Constitutional Convention to try to bring about these change to creating this national central government, which would ultimately create this democracy. And excuse me, Patrick Henry objected. He said, if we ratify the U.S. Constitution as written, which ultimately would be ratified as written, if we do this, it would ultimately destroy the sovereignty of the states. Hasn't that happened? It sure has. And these are some of the tools that have been put in place. And if we do not fix these things, why do you think the federal government does all these things? Why do you think the Democrats go on the offenses and tell us that, oh, we're going to lose Medicaid. We're going to lose Medicaid. We're going to do all these social programs. It has no constitutional authority to pass in the first place. to make the people dependent on a central national government destroying the constitutional republic by bribing all of the states into taking federal aid and this would snowball progressively step by step so this is where we would get the state legislatures would pass federal aid authorizing them to create a second set of books and why do you think Social Security was fundamentally created? We all know what they told us as to why, but I would argue the real reason that Social Security was created was to create a business relationship between the federal government not authorized to conduct any activity on behalf of the citizens of the several states, but rather to establish a commercial contractual relationship where the people become involved in commerce because they are. They're taking money from you for this retirement account. This was all part of this conversion where you had to become a legal fiction because look at Article II, excuse me, Article III of the federal courts, right? What is their jurisdiction? Admiralty maritime jurisdiction. Why? The law of the sea, the law of commerce. So it's there from the beginning. Some people say the organic act of seventeen eighty one, which consolidated the six different jurisdictions that were part of the ten mile square. Remember, the ten mile square incorporated Maryland and Maryland, I believe, in Virginia. If I'm Correct me if I'm wrong. You had Georgetown in the city of Washington and then the counties in both states by which those two cities were in. So the Organic Act consolidated them. Now, there are some people who have argued that this is where the United States became a corporation. No. No. The United States government in the very beginning, James Madison said three times in the Constitutional Convention of seventeen eighty seven. The United States government is a body corporate and a body politic. It has political jurisdiction over the ten-mile square in federal jurisdiction to make law and rules and regulations to control federal territory. But its corporate powers were specifically given to it so that it could establish the land it sits on and the federal territories where forts, ports, and arsenals were established for the common defense, right? And then also, so all of these things get put in place and then And back to wage war, negotiate peace, and to regulate what? Commerce. So that's why the federal courts are specifically... See, there's not technically a common law federal jurisdiction. It's admiralty, maritime law, to regulate international commerce. This makes so much sense to me, what you're saying right now, because that's what we've been talking about, is that we are living in a corporatocracy... And the corporations are pulling the strings right now. Now, let me bring this full circle. Talked about destroying the sovereignty of the states. Let me prove it to you. In the nineteen seventies, we saw the reshaping of our election laws where they would get you to consent to being a U.S. citizen as a question. And that. Oh. that you would apply at your age of sixteen to consenting to being a U.S. citizen because your method of transportation throughout all the states in the Union was a commercial activity. So they used the Commerce Clause and then got you to order to have reciprocity. So are you a U.S. citizen because the federal government had jurisdiction over commerce? So you would say yes without knowing the difference between a state citizen and a U.S. citizen. That's the first time I've connected the dots and I've heard people say that, but I've never connected the dots. It makes so much sense. The second part is when you vote, are you a U.S. citizen? And without knowing the difference, you would say yes because you're also voting for federal elections and federal offices. So you were tricked into federal jurisdiction. And who is it? Your all caps name. Now, The elections get changed. They destroy the sovereignty of all the states by making these changes. They destroy the sovereignty of all fifty states by removing the process of moving from one state to the next. And let me tell you where this comes from. The famous case of Susan B. Anthony. We know her from women's suffrage, right? the Nineteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? Well, there's something far more famous about her. And let me read it to you. Hang on. She voted in the election in New York. And let me see. I moved this document. Forgive me. Forgive me. I've got it here somewhere. Where did I move it to? I hate it when I move to it. I have too many documents open. Technology is great until it doesn't work, you know. And whether an organization, the same thing. Must have closed it. Anyway, the point of all of this was that she sued and she got arrested and charged and it went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. She argued that the Fourteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote. And she lost. There's another famous case in California. Same thing. That was part of my... my op-ed. I was pointing out that in those two cases, that your right to vote doesn't emanate from your federal constitution. It emanates from your state constitution. I mean, yeah, from the state constitution. If you don't believe me, read Article I, Section IV of the U.S. Constitution, where the states reserved unto themselves how they're going to establish the time, the place, and the manner in which you elect federal offices is reserved to the state legislatures. So it's your state citizenship status that grants you the authority. And in the year, in New Hampshire, after the U S constitution was ratified in our state legislature, a short, years later would put the mechanism. So if you were born in any one of the other states in the union and you move to New Hampshire, You don't change your domicile. You change your legal status as a citizen of the state. Because what does the Fourteenth Amendment say? All persons born or naturalized in the United States, which means the states in the Union, and subject to their jurisdiction, the states, are citizens of the United States and the state wherein they reside. Get it? So what are they saying? The Fourteenth Amendment was written for the freed slaves. It was written to create not a new class of citizen, but rather to create the same rights enjoyed by white people, because Dred Scott was a racist decision by the U.S. Supreme Court where Mr. Scott was denied his right to And he lost, and the Supreme Court said the U.S. Constitution was written by white Christian men, and it didn't apply to anybody else. So to fix this, the Fourteenth Amendment, to give citizenship, state citizenship, to all the freed slaves. And so it would go on to write the next portions of the Fourteenth Amendment, which is no state shall, no state shall. equal protection of the law, due process of the law, and property rights, right? That the state government, so the federal government, would now tell the states what it can and cannot do because prior to that, the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution was written exclusively to prohibit the federal government from enacting laws that violated your state rights. So I don't know if I lost you there, but what's happening? No, you didn't. I can see exactly where you're going with this. So what they did is they changed the legal definition. So here's our problem today. If your state legislature says, hey, you have to consent and swear by affidavit, qualified voter affidavit, that you're a U.S. citizen in order to vote, well, why are they making you consent to federal jurisdiction when the federal constitution doesn't provide you the right to vote your state constitution does? Because they lied to everyone and changed the mechanism that was in place. It was total manipulation and it was very subversive. It was. And so the law from one hundred and eighteen to one hundred and seventy three in New Hampshire was if you moved here to New Hampshire, you would surrender. See, the word state citizen and domicile are actually synonymous. They mean the same thing. It's a new word added in nineteen seventy six, not seventeen seventy six. Why is that change? It wasn't a change at all. It was an attempt for the state legislature to create this criminal subversion where they would then refer to all American citizens so that you could leave California, go to one of our universities, get indoctrinated by the leftist professors, and vote in our state elections, turning our red state into a blue state. That's the whole story. I'm sticking to it. Yeah. Wow. I'm going to have to unpack that a little bit. And again, it's just, it's shocking. This has been going on for a very long time. It has. It's progressively step by step by step. Each step along the way is intention to dumb the society down, to remove the lessons I've been giving you and your audience in these podcasts, that these things are not taught. And they're simple. They're really not complicated once you put them all together. And this goes back to my childhood. This is how we began. My mother kept me busy by giving me complex, multi, you know, very complex puzzles. She progressively moved up and it gave me this capacity of problem solving. I would take a box of a puzzle, shake it up. tip it upside down on the table, stick the inside cover, the picture of the puzzle and start piecing it together. Little did I know at the time that she was programming my mind. She didn't know either, but this would be the ultimate result. This developed my problem solving skills far better than the school did. And so this caused me to do what a hyperactive kid to focus. And I found it challenging. And so God bless my mother. Yeah, it's amazing how God actually arranges our lives. And even as I'm going to go back to things that may seem challenging or bad at the time, develop things in us that we would never, ever get any other way. So to be risk averse or adverse or to be, you know, feeling bad about things that have happened, I can promise you we've all learned more through those experiences than the Pinterest type of life. No, you're absolutely right. And so, yeah, this has been a big part of all the fraud that's perpetuated on us. So now college kids or out of staters can show up on the same day. Now remember, the federal government in the early nineteen seventies is a famous case that makes it all the way to the US Supreme Court and not famous to most people because they don't understand the nuance of how important this case was. a law professor moved to the University of Tennessee. When he registered to vote, the Tennessee legislature had already changed its prerequisite to establishing a domicile or residency as the qualifying event to vote. And when he did so, he was denied the right to vote because he did not meet the durational residency requirement established by the state legislature to qualify to vote. And he argued successfully in one of the U.S. Supreme Court that the state government cannot use durational residency. In other words, that you must live in the state for X amount of time before you are authorized to vote, arguing why should a new resident be treated unequally to an old resident? That's an easy question to answer. Exactly. So they pass the law. It's an invasion. You can invade a country very easily if you don't have directional residency. And I know there's some countries across the world that they require you to be a third generation living in that country before they will allow you to vote. Absolutely. And so, hang on, I think I found where I wanted this. I think it was here. I know what happened to me. I left my Too many tabs open, right? Too many tabs. It was because I opened a PDF. This is this quote from the U.S. Supreme Court. The right or privilege of voting is one arising under the Constitution of the state and not under the Constitution of the United States. The qualifications are different in the different states. Citizenship, age, sex, residence are variously required in the different states and may be so. If the right belongs to any particular person, it's because such a person is entitled to it by the laws of the state where he offers to exercise it and not because of citizenship of the United States. So they denied her the right to vote. It would take an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the Nineteenth Amendment, where women would finally get that right. But it was because of these decisions pointing out this very fundamental truth. So, yeah, they got away. So now, but here's the hook. You can't make durational residency as a prerequisite to vote. But guess where you can apply durational residency? Where's that? State citizenship. Why? Because the federal government does so. So the federal government establishes, remember I started with explaining that in the beginning, the sovereign states gave the federal government the ability to make the rules uniform for immigration of all foreign-born nationals. That first immigration law at the very last sentence established that the states retain the sovereignty to define who its own citizens are. Some of it was based on racism because the Southern states didn't want to be compelled to take black people as their citizens. So that was part of it. But the second part of it is the states were in fact sovereign. So a citizen born in California, New Mexico, Louisiana, Alaska, so on, who moves to a new state, The state retains its authority to define who they are. Another way they get us to adapting federal law. Remember I said commercial contracts? What do you think welfare is? Federally funded welfare. Is only available to who? Federal government doles out the money. You have to consent to being what? A federal citizen. See how they did it? Yeah, I see. All these things have gotten us to change. And this is why we now have a national central democracy. When the liberals scream, Donald Trump is destroying their democracy. They're telling the truth because we now live in a democracy because of today's explanation. And we are no longer a constitutional republic limited by our state and federal constitutions. And that's my story for today. So, Kate, this is outstanding. I love your teachings. I really do. How do we get out of the situation that we're in? My answer is always going to be nullification and going back and nullifying until what was the original intention. So what are your answers to this? My answer is simple. Since I appear to be the first one to have unraveled this in this complex manner, my goal is to set up a Committee of Safety, which was a founding era committee. group of patriots who acted in an executive capacity to organize the revolution. Establish a committee of safety in all fifty states and God willing that I have the capacity to then go in each of the states as quickly as possible to restore the sovereignty of each state and let the patriots of each state restore their individual sovereignty. Once they learn what's been taken from them, that this can all be taken back because- Do you have this all written out on how you would step by step go through this? it's all part of my legal fight and all of this is based in my briefs. Now it hasn't been, I haven't tied together because I've had a struggle with, with financial support here, uh, just to get done what I, what I have actively going on with my litigation. So obviously I'm looking for support from others around the country, God willing that we have this happen in each state and this would solve this election solution, right? Um, What's coming on, which would, would have a major turnaround. Those who are, are, I disagree with an article five convention. It's a bad idea. Now I disagree for a different reason. I disagree with an article five convention because we don't have enough people in the United States who have a comp, a deep enough understanding of the fundamental principles. Integrity. That too, that too, but secondarily, that they are not knowledgeable enough, and that may offend people, I'm sorry, but I'm speaking the truth, is that because of that, they would not be able to fix the problems. I believe the real solution is the one I just articulated. That in order to fix the problem, we have to first take back our states from the grassroots, from the bottom up. Restore the sovereignty of all fifty states by them understanding what's been stolen from them to bring the federal government back in check. The federal government, when the U.S. Constitution was written, do you realize it was a bankruptcy document, the U.S. Constitution? Did I ever share that with you? No. No. Yeah, give me a second here. I'll prove it to you. Article six. If any of you have your constitutions open, go to article six and the very first sentence. Article six. All debts contracted and engagements entered into before the adaptation of this constitution shall be valid against the United States under this constitution as under the Confederation. In other words, all the debt that was incurred to fight the Revolutionary War that as this contract came to be, this compact came to be, we agreed to pick up the tab. The federal government, when it was created, was bankrupt. We are bankrupt today. The Federal Reserve System has bankrupted the United States. We are financially and morally bankrupt. The solution to the problem is for the states, after restoring their sovereignty, to put the federal government through an organized bankruptcy. That's the solution. And it takes an educated people to do this. I love this. This is fantastic. Thank you so much for all the time that you put. I can't even imagine the amount of time you've put into this over the past decades. It has been a tremendous labor of love. I would guess. And I clearly understand that the good Lord allowed my life to play itself out the way it did so that I would be in a position to, one, the capacity, the mental capacity and the genetic skill set that he gave me. Remember we talked about hyperactive kids with your first guest, right? Yeah. That temperament, when you have a child like that, because I've been dealing... One of the blessings of my life is as a professional dog trainer, right? I used to manage a federal agency. I was in charge of the U.S. Department of Energy. I had ten bomb dogs under my command. I've trained thousands of dogs. And so my application of behavioral science, I've had the ability because a canine has a short lifespan compared to a human being. So I've been able to understand... and found these things to be challenging on how to teach, right? And so this process has gave me the unique understanding of trying these practices on thousands of animals that don't have our complex thinking process, keeping it simple, because that's what they are. They are simple. They're made up of primary instincts. Their thought process is predicated by stored memory patterns and not critical thinking skills that you and I possess. So by doing this, uh, so that was number one, uh, that I had this capacity and I found my teachers to be dumb. I just didn't, I wasn't, it wasn't attractive to me whatsoever to the memory capacity. And then ultimately, uh, my life as it played itself out. So today I don't have a lot of net worth. don't have a mortgage, don't have a home that I own. I have limited resources, but guess what I have? Peace of mind because I can risk it all because I have nothing for them to take. If they take me out, I'm a Christian, I go home early. I'm not worried about that consequence, but I have nothing to take. My automobile is paid for. I have no mortgage, no debt, none of that. So to some people, I remember when the COVID crisis was going on and a lot of the women that were attending my speaking events, it came to be, where are all the men? And my answer was, all the good men are at work. They're at work supporting their families because they're all in debt. Because of the mechanism by which our society is financed. That gets into a whole story on the Federal Reserve System. For your audience, read The Creature from Jekyll Island. You'll understand. But that's where they're all at. And so what are they not capable of doing? Risking the comfortable life they have. They're unwilling or incapable. And so we have a friend of mine did a brilliant speech on this. He talked about why people are unwilling to become patriots and he came up with three excellent reasons. One, people are not uncomfortable enough. Agreed. Second, they don't want to be made uncomfortable. period. They just don't want it. They want to be part of the herd and not be the target. Right? And lastly, they have tried twice bitten, twice shy. They've made an effort to get involved, either following some false teaching or ideology that led them down a sovereign citizen route and gotten them in legal trouble. I find a lot of those patriots in my speaking events where they're looking for legal solutions trying to realizing that the system is broken and trying to rechange their legal status and thinking falsely that if I change and correct my legal status, that I don't have to have a driver's license. I don't have to register my car. I don't, you know, I can put on these plates and, you know, uh, UCC, uh, three Oh one, right. Uh, under duress and all of these other tactics that are being taught. And, uh, Then they get burned. They ultimately meet a cop and a judge who ruins their life because they followed false teaching. My point along the way has always been, look, We already have what we need with our foundational documents. We don't need to reinvent the wheel. We have something that the founding fathers didn't have, these brilliant foundational documents that they created to solve the problems that they encountered under the Declaration of Independence. Again, we don't have to reinvent the wheel. I'm not sure we could do today what they did back then at all, because people are so quick to defend their biases rather than to have a civil discord. in order to create something that's for the mutual good of everyone. I would love to believe that we could do that, but people are going to have to leave their biases and say, it doesn't matter where the idea comes from. We have to go with the best idea. So what we're at right now is we need to go back to what worked and that's those founding documents and nullify and just nullify in a everything else that's past that because they all it did was centralize the power and unlimited power is unlimited corruption we we cannot do that and I really I really think that you know everything you had to say today was so pivotal on how to restore the united states to get away from the federal government which is totally out of control But our state governments are too. When we look at how much money our government, the state of Michigan, has spent overseas to be laundered back into the politicians' bank accounts and how much money they enter into service, allegedly service with, and what they leave with is obscene. If you look at my state constitution, the sixteenth amendment was, they were incapable and my state did not vote for the sixteenth amendment because it was restrained by a state constitution. And prior to the sixteenth amendment, which was unlawfully ratified, the US Supreme Court had declared any type of income tax unconstitutional. Back to my earlier point that the reason tariffs duties and impost were part of the original taxing scheme because those involved with international commerce would pay their own expenses. And remember I said that if you look at the Constitution properly, you will discover the foundational documents. There is no relationship between the citizens of the states and the federal government. It wasn't written to carry out your needs at the state level. That's already done by your state government. That's why the Federalist, Alexander Hamilton in Madison in the Federalist Papers talked about that the powers of the federal government are few and well-defined because they were opposing a federal bill of rights because they said they were unnecessary and that by writing them down that we would be vulnerable by writing them down because the federal government can't assume powers we didn't give them. Thank God they did write them down because history would prove itself that they were in fact necessary because the generations that would follow. And, you know, back to the, you know, the final point about why patriots, you know, once bitten twice shy is they've gotten involved and others didn't join them. They got burned out and they walked away and they're waiting for someone else to pick up the mantle. Right. And it goes right back to we all have to be responsible for taking that responsibility on and doing the right thing, even if nobody else does. Right. We have to, at our state, so that's something else that just further complicates it in our state, in Michigan, is that they never really properly ratified or installed the, it was never voted in the nineteen sixty three constitution. We have an illegal, unlawful constitution. They only did it by one, I think it's one-tenth of one percent of the voters. So our Constitution for the year to be struck off the record. Just by that, you know, just peeling the layers back until we get to what worked and what's a lawful way to run the states and the country. It's amazing. And the reason I believe the proper way to achieve the goal of those who want an Article V Convention is that can only happen once the people have educated themselves to such an extent to understand the fundamental principles. Then you would have a citizenry capable of modifying the federal government, putting it through an organized bankruptcy, but not until then. So for me, that's why the Article V Convention is a non-starter. I understand both sides of the argument. But again, what I find with really smart people, and I've met a lot of really smart people in my activism, those who possess critical thinking skills, those who are accomplished both in business and in life, their biggest shortcoming isn't their brilliance, but rather that they are still not up to speed with the depth of knowledge that is necessary to correct these issues. I have a constant back and forth. For example, the state citizenship piece, right? The oath of office or the oath of allegiance and these kinds of things. I've got good patriot friends who challenge me on these things, rightfully so. And I love the questions. But the point is, is that I have to redirect them back to fundamental principles. because they are still missing pieces of the puzzle. Do we want to send those people to an Article V convention? No, because they would, being really smart, offer modern solutions to fundamental principles. And we don't want modern solutions for fundamental principles. We want restoration of fundamental principles. Well, and your point that you made last week is that we don't really have consent when we're voting for things because we're not being told the truth in proposals and such. So the whole thing is built on deception, which is unfortunate. And the only way you get past that is to critically think and truly question everything. Well, Daniel, once again, I just so much enjoyed this segment and I look forward to next week. I'm going to be off. Just so everybody knows, I'm going to be off for the majority of this week because I'm going to be on location, actually. So I'll do a little bit of broadcast when I'm there. I'll post some things. to my social media channels, which primarily right now what I'm using is Telegram and X. And so my favorite is Telegram just because I have less censorship there. So for everybody to know that. But I really appreciate everything. And you can send me anything you have. Just a trivia question here. What is, besides the founding documents and the Bible, what is your favorite book or your favorite ten? um I think the five that set up the five that chris ann hall teaches of about how government how the north american experience came to be so that would be the eleven hundred charter of liberties the twelve fifteen magna carta petition of right the grand remonstrance those five are pivotal Because then it sets up the states that would ultimately set up the federal government. New Hampshire is my favorite of all of them. And the reason it is, is that remember I said from sixteen twenty to seventeen seventy six, one hundred and fifty years had passed. The original defect of our state constitution of seventeen seventy six written six months before the Declaration of Independence was highly defective. Our education system was broken. They were practicing English common law. And and so it and its defects came with it. And so New Hampshire had the good fortune to let the other twelve states write their constitutions during the Revolution and had the wisdom to look at all of the others and then be the thirteenth of the original thirteen to write the one we have today. I'd love to look at the defects of common law because I know some of them, some of the deficits there, though I think that a common law system that were based on some of the actions and they're like the grand jury and that sort of thing needs to be needs to be taken into account and such. But I'd love to talk about that. Thank you for coming on today. So would you like to say a prayer today? I'm always going to ask you that. No, I'd like you to. And let me close out with one point. And that is, it's not that I have any ill will of common law. The issue is that common law from a monarch, common law from an English parliament, America practiced American common law that became its own. And its principles need to be part of how we move forward, not abolished in any capacity. So I didn't want to leave on that misnomer or leave that impression. But it was the fact that we inverted the paradigm where the people became sovereign. The people possess all of the authority collectively. See, I think this is why we question everything is because we question everything for clarity's sake on what is good and true and also what people intend to communicate with or the ideas that they want to communicate. So let's just go to prayer right now and go on to our day. Dear Heavenly Father, thank you so much for Daniel and Vicki and all the wonderful people out there that are listening today. And also for this wonderful land that you've given us, our country, our world, and our all the blessings and the beauty that you've given us. We thank you so much for being able to walk with you on this earth, because I believe that we can when we turn to you and accept your gift, the gift of eternal life, the gift of salvation, not just at the end of our lives, but right now in every moment of our day. As we turn to you, you help us on things that are difficult, things that are not necessarily the way that we envision them so that we can challenge things that are wrong and we can look at things and figure out better ways of accomplishing the work that you set us here to do. Thank you so much for giving us your presence in every situation. And we want to be a blessing to you as you've been to us. And so just know that we love you. We invite you into our lives, into our country, into our states, into our families. And we all have difficulties in different directions. We ask you to help us through those things as we turn to you. Thank you for being a great friend to us. We wanna be a friend to you also. In the name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and savior, we pray, amen. Amen. By the way, I just wanna clarify something. Yeah, go ahead. My prayer, I find myself after these intense sessions, to have all of this in my head, and I can't leave that realm to pray with my heart. It takes me a while to come out of what I've just covered hundreds of years of history. That's all swimming in my head. And I feel in Kate or not qualified, not qualified, but just inability to reach my heart into price. So thank you for leading us in prayer. Oh, no worries. You know, and sometimes I have difficulties too, because, because I got to tell you, it's like, if I'm quiet for a while, my prayers are different. And there's no two ways about it. Cause I'm literally communing with God and I'm talking. I'm talking to God and I'm listening to what he says and literally having a conversation with God. When I'm on here interviewing everyone, I'm having to to keep up with what people are saying, too. And I have to make that quick. So I understand. And some days, I mean, I'm sure everybody notices that with me, too, is that some days I'm right there and other days where I'm I'm. making all these other connections on the outside of what's being talked about. Because I'm also connecting things in my mind with the things that you're saying. So to make that jump to quieting down and talking to God Almighty, that's a difficult thing to do. There's no two ways about it. But that's what I like about... Brandenburg News Network is that this is real news for real people by real people. It's we are not curating any type of scripted out content here. It's not it doesn't happen here. This is just two people talking. Right. And I think I think that that's the beauty of just having real discussions, not not, you know, not uh, mainstream fake stream media. This is just the way it is. Let me create it. Let me create a banner here for your, uh, let me, let me go here. We'll go ahead and create. Yeah. Anyone who wants to contribute to my cause, I put up my, uh, how I can be reached in a lot of my legal work is available there. And, uh, any donation would be greatly appreciated taking me a lot. I've spent my savings and, uh, I'm still in the fight. Here, let me go ahead and put it. I've got skills. I have some skills. I don't always have great skills, but we're going to go ahead and do this. There you go. So there's Daniel's website. It's wonderful. I have you up here too. If I move around, let me see if I can find it because I try to always have people's websites up as we're talking through things. It may take me a minute because I've got so many tabs open also. It's probably in another window here. Yep, too many tabs open. But anyhow, that's how you find Daniel's website, and your complaints are there, your cases are there, et cetera. And I'm so grateful for the time that you've brought. you know, that you've put into this. It's amazing. So we'll, we'll talk again next week, Monday. And with this, let's see, run, run arm. Ding, ding, ding, ding. Please go to brandnewsgovernment.com because I'm the best non-consider who's ever not conceived in the history of the United States of America. And I'd like to have a discussion with the rightful president of the United States, President Donald J. Trump. Cowboy boots. I wear, I win that one. We talk about things and we talk about real, real things. Anyhow, everyone have a wonderful week. That's my twenty twenty two protest for running. Great. So everyone have a great week. I'm not going to be here for the next few days. I will be. In fact, I'm going to actually be in Washington, D.C., working on some very important projects and meeting some people that I believe are writing the United States of America. I have great faith. The things are going in a wonderful direction. We just have to remember to stay in the game. As you said, people get bitten once and they're shy on this, you know, approaching it again, going back and potentially being bitten again. You know, that's really what separates people. People who follow God and have that unwavering commitment. We follow God. We don't follow our circumstances. Amen. When we take an oath to something, there is no time frame to it. There's no turning back. There's no wavering. We will literally keep our eyes on it, regardless of the difficulties that come our way. We're going to continue to fight because we haven't won the challenge. And the challenge is only taken away by God Almighty. And he hasn't taken that away, nor do I think he's going to. Because our quest is... You know, God's will on earth as it is in heaven, not our own circumstances. And that's a very different mindset than what the majority of people have. They have timeframes on it. Well, when are we done with this? I don't know. And I don't care. We're here for God's will on earth as it is in heaven. Pretty extra sure that's going to be a lifelong quest. And there's no turning away from that. So with that said, have a great week this week. You too now. God bless. I will be posting to my social media accounts and such. If you want to keep up on what I'm doing, who I'm talking to, look at my Telegram channel. It's at Brandenburg number four MI. And you'll see the post there. Awesome. God bless you all. God bless all those whom you love and God bless America. Make it a great day. It's a choice. Every minute, every step, every action we take, every word we say, it is a choice to go forward as a warrior, unwavering, unafraid, and no backing down, no negotiating on some of these principles. So with that said, I wish you all well and have a great week and I will see you next week or the end of this week. All right. Thanks, Daniel. You're welcome. Bye-bye.