Published Nov. 14, 2024, 9:03 a.m.
9am News and views 10am Richard Gage San Francisco Bay area architect Richard Gage, AIA, member of the American Institute of Architects and founder & former CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. He now leads the charge for a new World Trade Center investigation along with his courageous wife Gail at RichardGage911.org. Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the WTC high-rises after hearing the startling conclusions of a reluctant 9/11 researcher, David Ray Griffin, on the radio in 2006, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 9/11. The organization he founded, AE911Truth, now numbers more than 3,600 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 9/11. X/Twitter: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mnGeAXPLXZGX Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5p80rz-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-11142024-news-and-architect-richard-gage-911-i.html https://rumble.com/v5p81ct-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-11142024-news-and-architect-richard-gage-911-i.html Guests: Donna Brandenburg, Chris Deal, Richard Gage, Karen the Riveter, Melissa Fryzel
Good morning and welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg and it is the fourteenth day of November twenty twenty four. Welcome to our show today. You know, I'm hoping you're having a great day and that you're watching things out there with a little bit of suspicion that what we're seeing isn't exactly what's going on here, because the only thing that we can count on, keep your eyes on God. He is working through all kinds of things. bringing people around, and this whole life is about having a relationship with him. So don't be afraid about what you see. I'm seeing a lot of things that I'm really pretty suspect of, and it might take a little time to shake out, but I think it will. This morning, we have news and views, and big deal, Chris Deal, American Security, is going to be on this morning, as well as Christina Holbrook, waiting for her to jump on right now, but Chris is on. The second hour is Richard Gage. He's an architect, and he's done extensive studying of for for the uh uh the the nine eleven and what really happened with building seven the towers and such now I apparently kicked a whole bee's nest of people who think that everyone is on opposite sides well if they are that's okay I'm listening for information I'm not listening to follow the the next cult of personality I'm actually just listening for information And what I found is that if I listen to, let's say, both Republicans and Democrats, the truth kind of comes together. You'll pick some over here and pick some over here. But I never take what anybody says wholesale, just so everybody knows that. So I do believe that in real journalism, you should actually listen to both sides, give them a place to talk and not make so much comment that you're actually becoming a content curator based on your own opinions. So right now, I think what we're going to continue doing is talking to everybody, and I hope it stirs the pot a little bit more, because what ends up happening is other people bring more information to the table. And I have, in fact, on X, invited someone on who has another viewpoint, which I find would be really interesting. I would love to interview anybody who's got information on that. So with that said, I'm going to bring on the big deal, Chris Deal right here. What's happening, Chris? Hey, not a lot. How you doing? Good morning. Chris Frank. What's in a name? What's in a name? What's in a name? Yeah. So we were talking this morning about what's been going on over in Oscoda, Michigan with the, with the semi trailers and such that they are saying that FEMA is bringing in. And I've got some, I've got some possibilities of which way this is going to go, but let me bring up the, the let's, let's take a look at the, the meeting here that everybody's jumped on, because I think this is about the potash company and our, our, our, uh, natural resources, that's what I believe. But watch these guys in this meeting, the Escoda Township meeting. Has chosen the airport facility as a stationing hub for emergency services through FEMA. They will be serving six counties in this area and they will be bringing in some three hundred and fifty semi trailers with equipment. the park on the base. Also, if you see a lot of trucks coming into the base, that's what it is. It's nothing to get scared about. They're staging for emergency situations in any of these six counties that FEMA takes care of. And Mr. Freeman is in the house. He goes into that next part with him talking, doesn't he, Chris? Yeah, and part of his concern is we just wanted to write him from the airport. They are working on the paperwork to submit for the grant to build a terminal at the airport. So we saw prospective pictures of what it would look like, and it will be fantastic. It will be slightly smaller than what we have now, but it will be a beautiful building. So we're going to have a big, new, beautiful building with a bunch of semi-trailers parked behind it, huh? Good evening, everyone. I apologize for being a little late. Phase six, the Coleman. I'm going to take that, just a second, take a pause so I don't get a YouTube strike on this, though. Although we're not on YouTube today because I'm pretty sure we're going to be talking about some other issues that are going to get us banned here. So I just, I discluded the YouTube channel today so that we can just bring the truth out. Let's keep going. The area of the C-IIR-II project is complete. In tonight's packet is the final balancing change order that cleans up that project and then the final pay request and that'll be submitted to ego for reimbursement here shortly. There you go, EGLE, which is the DNR, which is what I saw up at Grayling. There was no military up at Grayling that I saw, or pretty much almost none. And I was told that most of the people there work for the State Department and or it is staffed by DK Security, which is an Amway-related security company out of Kentwood, Michigan. And when I looked up DK, They have satellite offices all over the United States, which should be really concerning to everyone. If you really want to know the truth, it should be very concerning to everyone. So let's continue here because these people have been up around grayling. They have been stripping our natural resources, which led me to look up Michigan Potash and Salt Company. I don't think this is what we think where they're using these agencies to pilfer the natural resources of the state. Just to summary, contractor completed a hundred and forty seven water main connections with curb stops at meter pits of that hundred and forty seven ninety eight of them were water services, actual water services connecting to residents and along with the well abandonments. All the difference between the one forty seven and ninety eight is curb stops were made and meter pits were installed at every parcel. So that future connections, the meter pits will all be in place. So. Phase seven of the water project with Canada and trucking contractor is working on individual services and well, abandoned abandonments. So what's your thoughts here, Chris? Well, I remember. Morning. I remember WEF wanting to move into Michigan and set up a whole bunch of factories. In fact, China wants to set up a whole bunch of factories in Michigan. And I think, yeah, I think you're right about the resources. uh and with the water mains and everything like that I mean why are they going there I mean I don't understand what what it is usually you put those in when you're building something they're putting in infrastructure for a reason uh not not because well nothing's there right I mean water means and curbs for a reason I want to make sure I understand this correctly. So this potash and salt company is a fertilizer company, correct? Well, it's minerals. And so when you're looking at that, I believe that it's just purely minerals. OK. So when I look at it, I'm looking at what natural resources are they going after. And I don't think that that's where it stops. I just think that that's where it, you know, I think I'm going to go back and put it up on YouTube here a minute because we're just going to poke the bear a little bit. Yeah, let's, I think if you look at what they're doing to the natural resources, And then you can go one step further with the public-private partnerships and such. Then you're really seeing what's happening, a better picture of it, quite honestly. So what I'm looking at is that there was a Senate bill in March. that put this potash on their critical mineral list, which is very convenient when you deal with anybody. When you assume any type of corruption, you know, you've always got to assume the government. And then it looks like my past senator, Sherrod Brown, was one of the people that authored this bill. And he's corrupt as they come. He smiles real pretty, but he's corrupt. Well, the end of the potash is going to be fertilizer. But the point being is that that what I'm looking at right now is just pure and simple, the fact that they're pilfering their natural resources. And so the next step would be, like, who's the other companies that they're going to be selling to, and what are the connections to our politicians? I'm sure there are, because it says that we import ninety-five percent. We import ninety-five percent of the potash. So that's how they probably got the bill through. So There's going to be, you know, every time, any time we find a little bit of corruption somewhere, it seems like our government is always attached to that. It says by adding phosphate and potash to the critical mineral resource, we can take a significant stride to securing our own future and sending a clear message. So we use this for, obviously, our food supply, correct? Yes. Well, it's fertilizer, you know, you use potting fertilizer and such. I believe that it goes into other products too. It could go into, well, let me look up just so I'm accurate here because I can make an educated guess on the other industries that use it. But let's just go ahead and look it up. I'd like to know what the other six counties, what other counties it is. And also I would like, uh to have record of their meetings because I'll bet you anything their meetings are almost identical to the meeting that you just displayed uh doing the same thing so I think we're going to see a very uh a uh movement uh of uh whatever it is that they're they are doing They're probably doing it in all six counties at the same time. It's all going to go up at the same time. Bam. So potash is the main ingredient in most fertilizers, which contains a mixture of phosphates, nitrogen, and potassium. The term potash refers to potassium-rich minerals that are used in agriculture. Potassium in these salts is known as a regulator since it can influence more than sixty enzymes that control the quality of crops. Over ninety million tons of potash is mixed worldwide. Well, that's not exactly what I'm looking for because, although this is helpful, so we're talking, you know, fertilizer is a chip shop, but I think it's also in other things. Let's see. It's also used in snow melt, aluminum recycling, metal electroplating, can be used as a water softener. Potassium carbonate is used in producing textiles, photographic chemicals, fire extinguishers, and animal feed supplements. Combined with Silica sand to form water glass is known as potassium silicate. Water glass is used for arc welding electrodes and potassium hydroxide is used in soap making and in industrial water treatment. So you're telling me, and this is just my cause for concern is being, you know, just learning about this company. So the fertilizer we use to grow our food is also used in snow removal and all the, because that sounds pretty disgusting actually. Well, well, and just because something is used for different, different things doesn't mean it's disgusting. Potash has been around for a long time. And so, I mean, this isn't, this isn't like a, a compound that we should really actually be afraid of. It's, it's just, it just is, you know, so I'm, I'm not particularly concerned with it. Just like nitrogen, you know, you can, you can use a, nitrogen in snow melt too. You can use it in a lot of different things. I mean, we throw it on the ground because it's a great fertilizer, but it just is. I mean, if you plant beans first, beans will fix nitrogen in the soil. And then, so let's just say you rotate your crops out and you plant beans and then you go to corn. The nitrogen that the beans fix in the ground helps the corn. So just because potash is used for different materials doesn't mean it's toxic or bad. It's naturally occurring. So it just has multiple uses. How's that for a description? That's okay. That clears it up for me. And this is mined, correct? Yes. Okay. Yeah. I think it can, I think it actually can be, can be, uh, uh, created too. So, um, but there's, when I looked at this, when I looked at this, this is kind of interesting. Let's look down on this into a private potash operation. There we go. So, and this could actually be something too, that there's something else there after that. Yeah. Well, I'm pretty sure they're probably knocking this out, trying to knock this out a little bit. So they're talking about fertilizer prices. Seven thousand feet underground, a massive mineral deposit left behind by ancient evaporated seas could be the key to a new billion dollar industry. So I think I think potash comes from from burning to potassium ore. deposit that stretches underneath. So they're not, they're, I don't think that they're, that they're, uh, let's see, deposit contains salt, potassium chloride, commonly called potash, critical and increasing cost components of fertilizer, um, commonly called potash. So there you go. They just got awarded a new contract. Who did? Um, let's see, I'm reading it now. Um, so it says EPC contractor for, uh, vilta project this significant milestone they just awarded a it's on that um on their website the potash company that you're just speaking of yeah so I so I think that this is um but what it certainly is is public private partnership it's going through when they mention eagle which is the dnr which has been clear-cutting the state of michigan they've been responsible for for managing that and keeping people out of those areas so they can clear cut and pilfer our resources. That's really what's going on here. So. Trees are knocked down. Yeah, they just clear cut it because when I was up there, the stumps, the uneven ground, they're not finishing it off. If a contractor that was not in bed with them was doing this sort of nonsense, the DNR, they would come down on a company that was not being protected by them like there's no tomorrow. They wouldn't allow this type of behavior. So whoever's in bed with them on these clear cutting operations, is probably also being protected by them and and they're doing it they're doing it absolutely wrong I want to know what the receipts are I want to know what they're doing with both the minerals as well as the logging rights that they've taken because something's going on here and it's not it's not okay well you know where I would look first miss donna I would look at the the senators that uh put this um this new bill through to make um Make it a critical mineral on the critical mineral list, because if something goes on any type of shortage, which obviously if it's on this list and it is, then you've always got hands into it. And it's Sherrod Brown, Tillis, Baldwin, Marshall, Pete Ricketts and Rick Scott. So this is all on their website. Yeah, this was introduced by Senator John Bumstead. There's a little concern with this. And presented to the governor. So I've got the bill pulled up here. Hang on, let's look at this. So here we go. This is a... Okay, let me get out of here. Public Act Become Law. Sponsors were Roger Victory, Ed McBroom, Jim Runstead, Kevin Daly, Michael McDonald, and John Bomstead. So I know Jim, and I think he's a decent guy. Supplemental Water Supply Quality and Standards. So it was Drinking Water and Water Infrastructure Improvement Supplemental. It's an Appropriations Act. So there you go. I'd start with those guys. Well, I could ask Jim what's going on with this and be really concerned about it because I am a little concerned about what I'm seeing and the fact that they were, that it's connected with the, so let me go back here a minute. Let me go back one and we'll go back into the fact that it is connected to this. Yeah. So there you go. Interesting. Well, it's something to look into a little further, I guess. So, yeah. So, and, and a little concerned, this is interesting. Usually I have another screen up here. That has lots of people following it. And it's at zero right now. So I don't know what's going on. So could be that the nine eleven thing that's coming on is going to. Morning, Melissa. How you doing? Morning. You said you don't know what's happening. I'm just going to jump in. Last night I was on TikTok. Yeah. Other platforms looking for specific search terms and that I know we're out there. Nothing is coming up. Nothing. What are you looking for? That they were going to, they started that thing, you know, they progressed from, they're going to attack in Aqua Tofana conservative men to now they're going to start attacking in dog walking southern women. What are you talking about? That's that liberal shit, Donna, that we've been investigating for like a week now. Okay, so let's go back and like put that out there. Okay, so I'll start, you finish, Melissa. So once Donald Trump became president-elect, the liberal women, well, first they started by shaving their head. Now y'all look like fucking skinheads. Let's just start there. And then they started openly saying they were going to commit homicide using a drug that was made in the sixteen thirties. It's a poison. It's called aqua tifana. That they were going to slip this in conservative men's drinks unknowingly. And keep in mind, these people hold positions in our community. And they were going to kill them that way. And it's a whole four B movement. It's attached to that. It started when Nick, what is it, Flutez, said that your body, my choice. One man said this. and they all took off running I reported on it on my tiktok channel um a couple uh like a couple days ago and now I don't I don't know what melissa's found out since then um I don't I've been searching for like un you know deaths that are you know conservative deaths that haven't you know are not explained yet because I don't know if they realize this our um advancements in you know just our testing our scientific testing as far as the blood and the coronor and that type of shit, I'm sure if they can't test for the actual poison, I'm sure it will have some kind of elevated levels within your body of something. They're going to be able to find it. So why don't you pick up from there, Melissa, because I don't know what you were talking about. I haven't seen that yet. Yeah, so I'll have to find some of that in a bit. So after they threaten the men with Aqua's fauna, I think we can see that all of the men's women got on there and they're like, Oh no, you're not honey. Like, and it caused a great divide. Right. So what I'm seeing is once they made these, you know, those actions that Christina is talking about there, I watched a shift. And so now you have the lesbian women, you have the straight liberal, you know, Kamala men who, are saying, yeah, screw y'all. You're crazy. So I guess we're switching sides now. So now, I guess that's lit them up. And now, in response, the crazies on the left are saying, instead of Awkwafina, I guess now they're going to start attacking Southern women. I wish your bitch would. And they said they are going to dog walk Southern women. Listen, listen. Ain't nobody dog walking me. But back to the point, exactly. I mean, they don't know what they're doing. Most of us in the South, you know, we're Gen X and we're going through menopause right now. So they're just going to scratch that itch for us. So did they discuss this murder plot on social media? Yes. Yes. Yes. So why isn't this... I already turned it into the FBI. Nothing. Same thing at the same time. TikTok is allowing it to go on. I turned it into TikTok legal. The FBI should have their phone records, their text records, everything. And they should be investigated. Unless, of course, I don't know, something crazy like they don't care what they're in on. I don't know. I don't know. They probably don't take it seriously, which is what you find a lot that comes on TikTok. They take it very seriously, depending on what... Well, they're doing nothing as far as I know of. You say one thing that's sensitive, they're going to go after you if you're on the wrong political side. Right. So, yeah, that's... Well, I'm kind of wondering, though, you know, there's all this conjecture going around. And I have to believe that the good guys are in control, that there's a lot of bad guys out there, but the good guys are in control. And with that said, if I were to plan something out to actually take down a global crime syndicate. I think that what you would do is let them commit the crimes and then document it all and then when you're going to take them down and get them all at one time or pick off the higher ones first and then the lowest ones and start squeezing the ones in the middle because that's probably where the majority of the bad guys really are. or people that are complicit. I got all their names. I've been recording it for a better part of it since Trump got in. It started as soon as that Nick Flutez guy, who is an openly Nazi, as he is. says himself. Can you put that in the private chat so we can see who this guy is? I can't do that. Melissa may be able to. Nick Flutez, remember I told you that story, Donna, about when we was at the People's Convention? I think it was in Detroit. Me and Josh and them came out. That was the guy that was across the street that Charlie Kirk wouldn't let in. Oh, yeah, because I wanted to go out and talk to him. I was like, hey, I want to go talk to this dude and and uh see well I went to the crowd out of them I should have just gone over there and walked up and shook his hand you know I did go over there and his his little flunkies which are all young children men not women uh they followed me around and tried to push me out really crazy I got I got tons of footage on it did they put your did they put their hands on you or not no they all surrounded me and then started walking me towards the edge of the sidewalk Really? And I told him, you better back up, motherfucker, because you're fucking with the wrong one. We'll rumble right here in the middle of friggin' Detroit. Grow men or not. So, he got a lot of attention because when he started speaking out, because he was saying things that made sense to young conservative men. But then he went all fucking alt-right with it. Now there's footage of him on the internet. He maced some woman that came to his door, which I'm sure a lot of people are coming to his door right now. But he maced this female. I'm not going to say that she didn't deserve to be maced. That's not my opinion to make. But I think he's in a little bit of hiding right now, to be honest. Yeah, he needs to be. So why don't I jump in? What were y'all talking about before I got on? I didn't catch that. Oh, we were talking about Michigan Potash and Salt Company and Eagle, which they were playing a video. The big thing right now in Michigan is the fact that FEMA is contracting or alleged to contract to dump three hundred and some odd semis on the ground at an air base in Oscoda. Now, something that I found out that's underneath this is really interesting because, you know, can't take things at face value. The guy that apparently owns that abandoned airfield up there, which I don't really get it, and I think we need to look into this some more, was actually given the air base by an agency. That's what one of my whistleblowers told me. And we have to look into this a little bit more to see if it's true. But this has been a long time in coming, and it wasn't just a right-away thing. And the other thing is that All the counties that they are saying they're there to protect are at least an hour and a half away from this airbase. So I'm like, what? You know, let me let me put it in here and I'll show you. I'll get a map up so you can see. That's why I was calling you this morning, Melissa. I wanted you to look at the Google Maps on that on the airbase he's talking about. So I don't know if this is the person that if it's actually an air base or if it's decommissioned. So let me see if we can get. So hang on. You're going to see what I'm going to look at here on the fly. Wurtsmith Air Force Base is a decommissioned United States Air Force Base in Osco County. Hang on a second. So there's a lot of misinformation going on here. Let's see. We've got Paul Warsmith, commander of the SAC's Eighth Air Force, was killed when his B- twenty five Mitchell bomber bomber crashed on Cold Mountain near Asheville, North Carolina in forty six. Well, that's kind of interesting. Oh, yeah, I seen that this morning. You know, Miss Donna, just real quick, when we're talking about other things, your service is great. But as soon as you go back talking about that potash company, it starts to break up. Yeah, Potash, Potash, Potash, Michigan Potash and Salt Company. I think we're over the target here on this, guys. I really do. So now I'm going to show you where Escoda is. And for a person who's in Michigan, I'm calling bullshit to this because I don't know what's going on here, but it's probably not what they're portraying it by, okay? So here I am over here in the Grand Rapids area. Here is the air base up here. And the county's, that they were talking about are in direct line in this direct line across here. Almost completely like in a straight line from Racine, right? Now, what I can tell you in Michigan is that the largest human trafficking pipeline in the state right now is right here down ninety four into Detroit, across the bridge and out into Canada. They're also dumping them off. It's easy to dump them off and just so that everybody knows. Most people come to Michigan for the first time, go out to the Great Lakes and go, whoa, I can't see across the other side. They think this is going to be something they're going to look out and see Wisconsin, right? You do not see Wisconsin. You do not see Canada. You do not see across the Great Lakes, Lake Michigan at any rate. There are portions where you can see across it, like Port Huron over here. and Detroit into Windsor. But generally, if you're along the coastline from here, you ain't seeing nothing out there but water, okay? This is all water. You're going to see water. You're not even going to really see the islands much there, but you're certainly not going to see this shore over here. It is incredibly easy. to dump off into Lake Michigan and completely be lost off the radar. When I was traveling around for governor, what I saw up here in the Alpena area, as well as Sheboygan. So here's Sheboygan, Alpena's over here. So let's zoom in on this. And I said something to the people that I know that actually have the ability to, in fact, say things, is this whole area here, has got some really, really weird watercraft in it. And I started looking up the watercraft because that's what I do. I don't believe anything that somebody tells me ever. And I mean ever. When I started looking this stuff up here, the watercraft that was out there, they were doing weekly cruises on the Great Lakes at like eight thousand dollars on up a person. I'm going to tell you right now, that is a lot of money for a week's cruise on the lake. Did you say eight thousand? Per person. Eight thousand dollars? Yes. And I want you to think about this. The only time you're traveling on the Great Lakes really for recreation is about three months out of the summer because it's damn cold here. It's cold and the waters are treacherous. That's why the Edmund Fitzgerald went down. And when Gordon Lightfoot put out the songs that, you know, The islands and bays are for sportsmen. He wasn't kidding, okay? There's people that die on Lake Michigan every single year because they don't have respect for the water. We have riptides here. They'll go out on the ice in the winter and the ice will shift and they'll go down. They'll dive off the piers. I mean, these are stupid people that do this, that aren't from the area, that don't have respect for it. But I want you to look at this. Also, when we talk about The islands down in the Caribbean, check this out. Within probably less than on high speed, you're going to be able to cross this border. There is no border control there whatsoever. I'm just telling you that. And you're from Michigan into Canada. Bing, bing, bing, bing, real quick. All kinds of islands here. So if you think that Epstein Island was the only one, they're just like waking all y'all up. This thing is loaded with islands. And when you get down into this area here by Mitchell Bay and such, you're looking at this. Let's go in here. And the kids that have disappeared and have the kids in the Detroit area in the seventies that disappeared and was connected to Fox Island by Leelanau. I hope you understand the complexity of the geography here. If you don't, I will spend a little more time educating all y'all on it. But look at the complexity. Oh, listen. So you got a bunch of kids. So you got in May of twenty, twenty three, twenty five kids just ended up missing in Detroit. I mean, there's tons of news stories on it. Not only that, but if you go back to my research at the border, And the conversations that I had when finding out their next stop was the American Islam College in Chicago. And remember Greg Switzer, he was running for HD-Forty-Four out here in Texas, retired Lieutenant Marine Colonel. He looked into it and he said, this goes into what he's hearing, that when they leave Chicago, when those that they want to traffic leave the Chicago area, they're being moved up to the Great Lakes region, he said, and they were reporting that the people were never being seen again. I would say that that's very possible because you remember when, you remember when Killary and Huma Abedin had their, there was a, there was a, a funeral home that they found a whole bunch of fetuses buried and such in the attic there in the Detroit area. Specifically, I believe it was in the Dearborn area, which is a Muslim community. I'm going to tell you what, I am fundamentally concerned about what I am seeing here and the connections. And I'm just going to say right now that when we start looking at things that seem to be the direction that the mainstream media narrative wants us to go, step just a little bit off to the left or just a bit off to the right. And I don't mean politically, I'm saying take a step off center. And that's probably where we should be looking. Because I think we're going to find some incredible things. Why did they all of a sudden come up with this FEMA, you know, confused FEMA information on an air base that doesn't even remotely, logistically would be stupid for protecting those counties? It's not a drone area. My fucking laptop just crashed. Okay. Okay. Yeah, it's like, why would they do that up in Oscoda? Because it's at least an hour and a half away from those areas that they're saying they're setting up for disaster to be able to protect. It does not make sense. That's a red flag. It's a big red flag. And so I'm not really buying this at all. So my question is, is that we need to look into it because there may be some connections there that are closer to what they're trying to hide. Okay. And I can tell you right now that the target for what's coming across that border, not only is it going across the United States, it's going into Michigan because we can make all kinds of kids disappear in Michigan without a trace. And I'm not going to say we as I'm involved in it because I'm not. But the state of Michigan and the powers that be here can make people disappear so quickly. It would scare you. And when you've got an international port right here, let's check out with this. Because honestly, we've got a geopolitical cluster going on here in Michigan. Let's run down here to where we connect to Windsor. Let's look down here a minute. So we've got, here's a border right here. We've got the way we go right across here into Windsor here, Detroit. And we've got the international port here in Detroit. You have got a real problem in making people accessible to cross the border and absolutely disappear them. And what's happening with the container traffic here? Remember when they found that container in L.A. ? And they found just tons of human remains in it, a lot of them fetuses, a lot of them kids. And the guys that found that out in the L.A. port, well, remember what President Trump, the greatest president in the history of the United States of America, did. He stopped that port from having two international powers in control of that port, which was brilliant on his part. But what's happening in Michigan here, I know that there was someone, because I know that there was someone at a party, because I know the people around it, a couple of years ago. And this gal disappeared from this party and they tracked her cell phone to one of those containers. Let me ask you a question, Miss Donna. Hang on a minute. They called the police. The police refused to break that container open, even though the cell phone was there and they found her body dead on a beach in Africa two weeks later. That was that case? That was the case. And I know the people that are around it. So when you look, go look back at Fox Island in the seventies and what they did with kids in Fox Island. And there's a connection there between Detroit and Fox Island here. Let's go out on this. I'll show you where that is too, because this is how they're doing it. Most of the islands around Michigan have got an airstrip on it. Now let's go back to this. Let's look at the airstrip that they've got there and that they're wanting to put here, that they've got an airfield there. Look at where Grayling was, which I went to Grayling. There was no military on Grayling. It was all Eagle, the DNR and DK security, which I found satellite offices for DK in weird spots across the United States. They've got about thirty five of them. So I know that we know that there have there has to I mean, there's something going on up at the Grayling because we've been watching for days with the helicopters leaving from there. Those are military helicopters. Yeah. Yeah. So let's jump in here to Fox Island. See if I can find it. Where is Vancouver and the port of Vancouver in reference to this lake right here? Because I just seen a story and actually TikTok violated me for it, which is real weird because there's tons of other stories on there. A lady was jogging and she stopped and she turned around and started. And this was just a few days ago, like two days ago. She turned around and she... Yeah, I see it. Okay. So she turned around and she started screaming that there is human trafficking in those containers on the port of Vancouver. And then their authorities came out and I guess they did find some. Yeah, this is the crux of it right here. So where are they going with these kids? They're farming us. Yeah, they're farming us. So let's go up here. So now we've got Grayling right there. There's Grayling. We're straight across from Traverse City. And I can tell you what I found in Traverse City. So we've got to go over here because this is the area they're clear-cutting right there. They're clear-cutting it. You can see it from a satellite map. And look at this. My, my, my. And guess what? Next to Petoskey, let's go up here because what I saw in Petoskey up here, Bay Harbor, this is another thing that I got to tell you. It was crazy because I ended up running face to face with the global nest of globalists up there next to Petoskey or in Petoskey because there's another place up there. See, this is the great thing about spooking around on the ground. All right. You get to actually see what the heck's going on up there. And there's some China connections up here. And, oh, I don't know, let's say Boyne and Charlevoix. So if you go up here to Petoskey, and you have a really nice time up here because it's real pretty, and you get over here to Bayshore. And I was told, oh, yeah, we've got to have a casino up there because we've got a place to launder our money. And you got Bear Creek Plaza, which anytime you see Bear Creek, I want to tell everybody, raise your awareness. Your spidey senses should be kicking in, okay? So I'm up here in Bay Harbor. We just kind of we were driving around like, what the heck is that? I didn't know it was there. And we went down there and there was a guy there that basically said to me, oh, we really we really hate Tudor Dixon. I'm in with the DeVoss's and all the all his exact words. where every billionaire on the planet has got a place up in this area. We want to do a fundraiser for you because we really don't like Tudor Dixon and we want to do a fundraiser and took pictures and such. And I went next door and, and Ron Weiser, the ex chairman of the Republican party has got a shop up there. And I went there and, just in his face, bought the most expensive glass of wine that he did and flipped off the sign and took a picture. Well, I'll tell you what, they were watching me, which is exactly what I wanted them to do. And I provoked them. And within five minutes, the people I met up there said, you will not be using our pictures. You will not be saying that you know us, an endorsement or anything like that. So automatically they realized, guess what? Brandenburg was not playing fucking ball with them. And it was like, but this is something that you need to know as going around because I'm not buying this. And nobody out there should be buying this narrative at all. Not at all. They're getting us to look somewhere else while they are screwing us royally. Let me see if I can zoom in. See, I'm going to zoom in here a little bit and show you all these little tiny islands that are up here. Those are beautiful. I got a question. Doesn't Ron Weiser participate in the Atlantic World Forum? He's part of the Atlantic Council. And not only is he part of the Atlantic Council, he also was involved with Burisma Oil. And he also made a donation, which nobody wants to talk about, to Biden. And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why the Republican Party in the state of Michigan is so screwed up. They tried to clean the nest up, and guess what happened? The person that came up with the report for removing Christina Karama, which I absolutely, there's good information, and she should have been gone because she was tied in with somebody else. Why is it that they're putting up people that look like they're opposed, but they have connections to China? on the Karamo side, and I can prove that. And on the other side with Pete Hoekstra, who signed the Patriot Act, and oh goodness, how does that connect? Perhaps with the DeVosses and Amway, and perhaps the Dutch banking families. I think we would be looking behind us. I'm going to put up Fox Island here, and then I have posted the nonsense. Let's see, Fox Island. Wait a minute. I just looked up this Ron Weiser guy. He was at the RNC, I think. Of course he was. I have pictures of him. Yeah, he's the chairman of the Republican Party in Michigan, or he was. So here we go. We have, let me see. Oh, we've got Fox Island here. We've got a little Fox Island. Ta-da. There's a little tiny Fox Island. And this is outside of Detroit. There's a Fox Island, but that's not what I'm looking for. I'm looking for, I'm looking for something else here. Here we go. There is Fox Island and oh my look, wow. Significant. This is look at all these islands. So, and there's a lot of native American children. remains that have been found on these islands there's a reason why they're why they're going after ethnic populations yeah it has probably more to do with an ideology so this dude was so he's the one that donated um the money to for the mike pence's legal bills I remember this that were during the Mueller investigation. Yeah. Well, and, and look at, look at who all was, was look at, look at what happened on the seventh of January. Guess who, who resigned as the, the, the education secretary of education. Who? This guy. Oh, okay. Okay. Wait a minute. This guy's been in all kinds of stuff. Yes. And Ukraine and Atlantic Council. And guess what? The Republican Party put them right in and they did remove them, which is good. However, with that said, yeah, we have some we have some issues. He was the one the witches burn at the stake. I remember this. OK, I know who you're talking about now. Yeah, this is all coming back to me now. So I'm to the vice chair. Let's see. I'm here, Donna. We lost wireless connections last night. AT&T claiming a power surge. They're going to take the power grid down. Just wait and see. I think it's going to happen before Trump gets put in. I do, too. Exposure to PFAS can have serious health effects in the air, water, and soil. And Marco said he understood Wurtsmith to be contaminated with PFAS. Well, I think that's pretty much a chip shot here. So anyhow, yeah, kind of an interesting... Let's talk about Fox Island. It's a naturally formed island in Detroit River, southeast Michigan in the late eighteen hundreds. It was used by Dunbar and Sullivan Company to store explosives for engineering projects in the Detroit River shipping channels. It serves as a picnic location and such. The island is now privately owned. My, my, my. Who owns it? Let's go and look. Sorry, I'm listening in. I'm getting ready to head to Austin. Oh, you got that prayer thing with General Flynn? No, we're going this morning with the legislators there and we're going to be pushing some policy legislative ideas. So Fox Island is owned by... I don't see... Let me look because I'm going to look for another one. Hang on a minute. It should be a public record. That's what I'm looking at now. So here's another one that we need to look at here because this is more, this is actually, that's important, but there's another one that I believe is more important. And this is the one that we need to be looking at. And it's up here off of, all of this area where the globalists told me the billionaires have all of their point. It's off of Leelanau Peninsula and about ten miles southwest of Beaver Island. Two islands form an archipelago and it is there is a airstrip there. And when you start looking into this North Fox Island operational grass airstrip accessible and there was a connection there with some kids that disappeared. Yeah, criminal history. Child pornography ring. So look at the one, the one on the east side is fine, but this is the one I want you to look at is the one up by Leelanau. Because this is where the child porn ring was discovered operating out of North Fox Island. And the connection was to a bunch of kids and a bunch of kids that disappeared. And he fled the United States to, let's see, to the Netherlands in nineteen seventy six, which is something we need to be watching with the Dutch banking families, which is right next to Belgium and such and the seat of money and power. And we could also be looking at the castle of the dark mother. And there are lots of questions. I just made my stomach turn. I can't. okay looks like uh who owns fox island it said some guy johnson david johnson is that the one in the south or is that the one in the north uh it just said box hold on let me what he owned it but he sold it back to the state of michigan in look to the one up by leland off that's the one we need to be looking at so it was here there's multiple county child killer case And the victims were held captive before killing, and four of the deaths triggered an investigation. And how it happened, it was really crazy. But when you look at that, where there's one, there's going to be more. And so kind of an interesting thing. And the proximity here, the proximity between these areas and all the islands. Yeah. I see what you're looking at. Private airstrips. And now look at our air bases up here. And they're telling us that they're protecting us from natural disasters here. I ain't buying it. We're talking this is going to be at least an hour and a half to two hours away from what they say they're protecting. who in their flipping right mind would, would stage something like that? I mean, I wouldn't, I wouldn't hire any of these people if that's exactly the goal that they're doing to, to manage a, uh, a remote office because they're lying. They're ever living behinds off. Something's going on here and we need to investigate into this more. But the connection I see is the potash and salt company and, uh, and, and stealing of the resources by, by, uh, the powers that be behind Eagle and behind, um, uh, the Gretchen Gretchen Gretchen, the, the, Gretch the wretch here in the state of Michigan and our unconstitutional government of tyranny that all of them need to be tried for treason. Every single one of them has violated their oath of office. They've done terrible things to this state. And it's not just the governor. It's there all the way down, including the the township boards who are in bed with them. and stealing our land and allowing that to be funded, giving the land just like Goshen was part of it. Now look at what they've gone after. Goshen, the Air Base, the Potash Company and such. This is all about stealing our nation and giving it to the globalist powers. If you're not pissed, there's something wrong with your head. I can't find any. I think the state of Michigan owns these. Yeah. Makes sense. It's like DNR here, Eagle. Eagle has commandeered four point six million acres. They own the mineral rights as well as the logging rights. And all they do is keep raising our taxes here. Why is it that Michigan is is with every single one of us is a plus eighty five percent tax rate in the state of Michigan? When you look at the discretionary taxes and start lining them up. I'll tell you why. Because you're paying for their trading, our state, our country. You bet we are. And they're stealing our coffers. It's extortion. They've got a little extortion racket going on here. Money laundering, the state is probably one of the biggest money laundering operations in the entire world. All you got to do is look at it, follow the money, and you'll see all the players and how they're connected. One question. So one thing I did here in Texas, you're talking about the money laundering and such. Now, this was twenty twenty two. I started looking at the Texas campaign finance reports and I had the question. It's like, OK, let's see where this money is going. And so I took all the payees that had like an LLC or ink or. Anything like that and their pay name on the lines that extracted those out and started looking the companies up in the Texas state comptroller because in the state of Texas, you have to be in good standing just like most states with the comptroller to be able to transact business in the state. And a lot of the payees I found, especially on the rhino and blue side, the payees, after receiving millions of dollars, were not set up in the state of Texas to be able to transact business. So technically that could allegedly be tax evasion, right, on millions of dollars that's being funneled through these political campaigns. And so point being, I just wonder if you've looked at the same for Michigan, that might help to identify some of the sketch players at the bottom who don't have all their ducks in a row, right? Because there's always going to be some. Well, I'll tell you what, the Republican Party of Michigan is an absolute cluster. I'm just going to say that, okay? They don't have anybody that's a good, strong leader. They're divided into three factions, right? And then they put up too many candidates and the candidates are bad that they put up. Tudor Dixon was involved in the smurfing stuff, but they went ahead and did it because it was DeVos money that funded her. And DeVos pulled their funding as soon as she won the primary and left her because they all wanted it to stay the same with Whitmer. If you look at Tudor Dixon's campaign finance, she had a whole bunch of little five dollar donations that were coming from where? Where are people? Arizona. And so, but Arizona, but what they were doing is they were doing smurfing. Uh, someone was doing smurfing, which is basically identity theft. And, and what they do is they donate under somebody else's name, small, small amounts and hope nobody's looking at it. Like for me, when I started getting hit with my personal credit card through, um, through, uh, uh, uh, the red one, the red donation. I got to think of it right now, but they actually hit my credit card with between five hundred and two thousand dollar donations to campaigns I'd never even heard of. They hacked it. And I called the campaigns up and said, you right now are involved in absolute fraud. And I would suggest you check your records. So I gave them a running start. But the reality was that they thought that the credit card they were using was a campaign one where nobody would look because that's their M.O., is to hit campaign finance. And they think that nobody's going to be looking at it. Well, when it hit my personal credit card, it was absolutely easy for me to find. And I turned that in. And I'm like, you got to you got to you got to look at what they're doing here. I said they literally charged between a bunch of transactions on candidates I'd never even heard of across the United States. So Act Blue and then then I can't believe I can't remember the name of of the Republican side. But yeah, they're all doing the same thing. And the state of Michigan, the Republican Party in the state of Michigan had better get their head out right now because I don't know. I don't see a lot of real actual traction there to take care of business. And it's very concerning to me. that I really think that they are dead center in front of it. Because why didn't they go after impeachment for Nessel, Whitmer, and Benson? Why have they done pretty much almost nothing except for a few low-level lawsuits or taking things instead of taking it to the mat? Why are they just kind of dinking around out there? I don't know. But this also might be part of the setup to take it down. They may have a plan. I hope they have a plan. They're all in the club. That's why. Yeah, they're all in the club. They're in the club. Okay, guys. So I've got architect Richard Gage coming on here in a minute. And I love you people. I love you people so much. It's amazing how smart and amazing you are. And I'm so glad that we're friends and actually able to go through this. So we'll be seeing you guys on Monday at ten o'clock again. And we're going to go beat this thing up a little bit until we get the actual truth out on everything. Thirty seconds. Any thirty seconds for Chris, Melissa and Christina. I think that, uh, first of all, that, that, that airstrip needs to be looked at. Um, you know, when ABC jumps in and says, that's not true, that's not going on. Uh, and when are we going to listen to the media? You don't trust the media when, when they start telling you to look left, you better look right. So I think, well, um, on on that air base to find out exactly what's going on because I don't believe anything that I'm seeing on there but the fact that they raised it yeah I think I think that that's true okay melissa your turn yeah so um like I said I'm gonna be headed to austin so here this afternoon uh ladies let's kind of reconvene via phone call and Let's maybe get a work session together to start digging and using all of our different skills here to kind of see what we can find. Christina. Listen, I don't I don't I'm going to back out with what Chris said. This fucking media. It's like Elon Musk said and. We are the media now. If you want to know what the truth is, you don't turn on your TV and watch that because they're just telling you a script. And I think it all comes from the CIA, but that's my personal opinion. But if you want to know what's really going on, then you need to be paying attention to us, the Brandenburg News Network, the people that are out there. willing to put everything on the line because that's what we do. We know, putting this information out, that we can be targeted at any time. So just stay away from your mainstream media unless you just really want to be programmed. If you just really want that programming, then that's where you're going to get it. Well, and I'm going to do a little bit of a segue here because we're going to be going into nine eleven analysis here a little bit. And what happened? I think that the biggest thing in watching the appointments by President Trump and he made a great appointment. I'm going to put this up here just a second because I think. This is significant. I like Tom Holman a lot. And he's a good guy. And hang on. Let me see if I can get this up here a minute. I will share this. I'm going to stop here. And I'm going to present. Ta-da. best appointment yet right there tom holman as the borders are and I I know the guy I think that I think the world of him I think he's gonna get in there and he's gonna you're gonna see some fur flying down there and things are gonna get um that I was like okay this there you go now now I'm I'm happy now I'm happy seeing what you've done right there And so, but the other thing is, and we're going to, we're going to have to move on here a minute, but the other thing is, is watching who else involved in this, his, his connections to, to AIRPAC, the, the APAC, APAC. APEC. We need to we need to watch the APEC connections because this is what's going to tell me that's what I'm looking for. So thanks for being on, guys. I'm going to go to a quick break and we'll talk to you guys in a little bit. OK. Love you, Donna. Love you, too. Bye, guys. And I'll be right back after thirty seconds with Richard Gage. Good morning and welcome to the second hour of Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg and it's the fourteenth day of November twenty twenty four. And welcome back to our show. My next guest is San Francisco Bay Area architect Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder and former CEO of of architects and engineers for nine-eleven truth he now leads the charge for the new world trade center investigation along with his courageous wife gail who I love gail gail's cool and uh richard gage says I love gail gail's cool We're just listening in the background. Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the world traits that are high rises after hearing the startling conclusions of the reluctant nine eleven researcher David Ray Griffin on the radio in two thousand six, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about nine eleven, the organization he founded. A.E. nine eleven truth now in numbers more than three thousand six hundred architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the destruction of all three trade center high rise buildings in nine eleven. And welcome, sir. Welcome back to our show. And I know Gail sit in the background and I I love Gail. So hi, Gail. So she says, hi. How are you doing this morning? Oh, it's a great morning. I'm excited and ready to go. Today, we're looking at a deep dive into the Twin Towers. The last episode that you and I put together, we took a whole hour and more and went into Building Seven, the third skyscraper that collapsed on nine eleven. And today it is indeed the Twin Towers. So, yeah, I'm all excited. There was a lot of controversy, which was great after you came on, which I'm glad people are paying attention, right? And so it was really interesting to watch the comments that came back on the last show. And what I've told everybody is that pure journalism should give everyone a voice to speak. And it's up to ourselves to dive in and listen to what people say. I don't think any of us are looking for a new a new savior or, you know, something like that, because we already have one. And his name is Jesus Christ. And so we can listen to each other as brothers and sisters and learn things that maybe our conditioning has has told us not to listen to. And I love listening to people that want to talk about Dr. Judy Wood. I listened to her right at the beginning when she came out. I love listening to what you have to say. And I think that we're putting a puzzle together of different pieces. And the assumption is that we're all on opposite sides trying to hide things. I'm not exactly thinking that that's the way it is. I think that we each have, we're looking at an elephant and you know, you eat one, you eat it. How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time. So I'm going to go ahead and I'm going to put this up here and let you do your, do your Richard gauge thing and go through this so that we can learn what you know. Yeah, let's absolutely get into it. Let me find my, I got discombobulated here for a second. Looking for you. Where'd you go? Hold on one second. Yeah, you're right there. I can hear you. I got the wrong screen up. There we are. All right. So when we talked about World Trade Center Building Seven, Donna, what we found was that it was unmistakably, irrefutably a controlled demolition. Now, this happened on nine eleven. It's part of the conspiracy. However, we define that word of nine eleven. It is. a real problem for the official narrative. And so if building seven was a controlled demolition, we have to ask ourselves, is it possible that the Twin Towers could also be a crime of unimaginable proportions? So we have made the docuseries, nine, eleven crime scene to courtroom to bring all of this evidence to bear in a special grand jury investigation. That is what we have done now with Episode One, already having been released at the website CTC, excuse me, nine one one CTC dot org. And people can watch the first episode, which is an orientation to the public. Now we're working on and we'll issue in a couple of weeks the. Second episode, and that we dive into the first part. There's twelve or more episodes here. Half of them are on building seven. We go right into the fires and what they were actually like and could they have brought down this building? And of course, the answer is no, but the details are incredibly provided with the expert witnesses. Altogether, about twenty four throughout this whole series, as Mick Harrison of the Lawyers Committee. For nine eleven inquiry their litigation director and I present this evidence in the setting of a special grand jury investigation so today we're taking we're showing you are giving you a sneak peek the audience here of the deep dive into the. the the evidence of of the world trade center twin towers and yes it it is in fact extraordinary uh what we're gonna find and first just looking at them we note that gosh they were hailed by some as the crowning achievement when they were built in the mid-seventies, early seventies. And others thought it was just heartless modernism, right? You extrude two squares until they become the tallest buildings in the world. Well, compare that to what we had as high-rise architecture before the modern era with the beautiful unfolding massing of the Art Deco design of the Empire State Building. So just to give us a little bit of perspective here, but there were many engineering innovations associated with this new design of skyscraper reaching heights never before reached. These were the tallest buildings in the world at the time that they were built. So one of the things they had to do was get fifty thousand occupants in each tower and one hundred and forty thousand visitors per day. up to their places of meeting and working. And so they did that by dividing the tower into three stages. And you take an elevator up and then transfer over and take another elevator. This was never done or had to be done before. An extraordinary feat. But the The structural innovations were even more startling. We had a forest of columns in all the skyscrapers before this. And what we had was with the Twin Towers, they moved half of those columns to the exterior, creating an exoskeleton with these prefabricated, welded in the shop panels. exterior structural steel perimeter sections with three vertical columns, three stories tall, and three horizontal spandrel panels holding them all together welded. And they were bolted in place. In the center was the forty seven massive core columns, and they created an incredible opportunity for a lot of space between the core and the perimeter by laying these lightweight steel trusses between the two, spanning sixty feet on one side, on two sides, and then the other two sides, thirty five feet. So that created an open office planning. Each tower had three point eight million square feet. Each floor was an acre in size. So you can see that And you can imagine, compared to the Empire State Building, we had wide open office areas now without all this forest of columns that they had to deal with. However, the ceilings were relatively low, nine feet for such a long space. And this was... intimidating for for some psychologically as was the marching of these columns all the way around the exterior felt like a jail cell uh to too many of them they were likened So these were some of the drawbacks. There were other drawbacks, such as the asbestos, which in the late sixties was put into all of these buildings, including this one, which required a three to five billion dollar abatement that the city of New York was requiring the port authority to get rid of all this asbestos in this building, according to federal law. So these buildings were, for these sorts of reasons, only about half occupied by many researchers' estimates at the time of nine eleven. They were white elephants. Nobody wanted them. And yet Larry Silverstein went and purchased them for three point two billion dollars, having invested only fifteen million of his own money and leveraged that highly, putting massive terrorist insurance that was never on the building before he acquired these properties just six weeks prior to nine eleven. We keep this in mind because this sets a context for these crimes that we're going to be taking a look at that the nine-eleven commission mostly ignored, but they did admit that they were set up to fail in this review of the crimes of nine-eleven. That this is not to be considered the last word on the attacks, the report, but only a beginning. and Tim Romer, citing, we were extremely frustrated with the false statements that we were getting. That means lies. Max Cleland resigns from the commission, citing, the investigation is compromised. It's a national scandal. America's being cheated. The White House wants to cover it up. Well, these alone are reasons for requiring a new investigation. Their own lawyer John Farmer cited in his book, The Ground Truth, I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described. There was an agreement not to tell the truth to the American people. So we're setting a context for doubt here. He says what the government and military officials told Congress, the commission, the media, and the public about who knew what and when was almost entirely and inexplicably untrue, meaning the whole thing was a lie. Well, let's start looking at that lie. We had shock and awe on nine eleven. We were put back into a place psychologically due to the trauma to all of us, especially those in New York who were tuned in to what was happening. We were subjected to these attacks, destroying our cultural icons, killing thousands, people jumping out of the buildings. Well, we have had a lot of time, twenty years now to look back. to begin to be willing to look back, because this was very, very painful for the last twenty years. When we do, we find, as we step out from our shock-induced trance and evaluate this new evidence that most people are unaware of, as we found out in our episode on Building Seven, most architects and engineers are completely unaware that a third tower collapsed on uh if you haven't caught up with donna and my podcast about building seven uh you will realize that this was the third tower to collapse uh which wasn't hit by a plane but it dropped straight down symmetrically into its own footprint very suddenly after witnesses heard explosions And it fell at free fall acceleration as fast as a bowling ball falling out of the sky. so all of that alone absent even the forensic evidence that we went over in some detail uh points to and is proof of a controlled demolition so now we're going to look and see and just remind ourselves you know what happened that morning on september eleventh we learned that four passenger planes were hijacked and taken radically off course Within an hour, two of the planes had flown into the enormous steel towers of the World Trade Center, creating fires and eventually toppling them. Dazed by the news, the American public soon believed the fires in the towers had burned so hot they caused the steel frames of the buildings to give way. A myth developed, fed by official sources through the media to a bewildered audience. Elements of the myth. The impact of the airplanes, gallons of burning jet fuel, steel melting, the buildings failing and suddenly imploding. In a mere ten seconds, one hundred ten stories hurtled earthward, pulverizing into dust. Right from the start, on the street itself, the official story was born. come out of nowhere and just stream right into the side of the twin tower, exploding through the other side. And then I witnessed both towers collapse, one first and then the second, mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense. The myth bled into the FEMA report and was echoed by the experts. It was the combination of the impact load doing great damage to the building, followed by the fire that caused collapse. Well, there's the official story in a nutshell, and we should examine that. And that's what we're about today. Is that true? Is it the fires that brought the towers down? The North Tower was hit at about eight forty six by the plane. It collapsed over an hour later. So it's not the planes and the massive explosion and the broken columns that brought down the tower. Nor was it the jet fuel because NIST acknowledges that ninety percent of that jet fuel was burned up outside the building. The rest of it was gone in ten minutes. It merely started the fires that are blamed for the collapse of these towers. The South Tower was hit about nine in the morning. It collapses about an hour later. hour and a half later in the case of the North Tower, an hour later in the case of the South Tower by flight one seventy five. So there were some investigations into this into the failures of these, of these towers, starting with volunteers from the American society of civil engineers, very well-placed volunteers who worked themselves into the subsequent FEMA report, which finally received a little bit of funding, six hundred thousand dollars, hardly enough to set them up. But the New York times notes that they're, investigations were hampered with bureaucratic restrictions. They couldn't get access to the blueprints of the building or adequate access to the site. In fact, they described it as a tour guide. They couldn't get out and really investigate. They didn't have access to the public to request photographs or videos. And so they produced a report in led to a real, well, an increased amount of funding by NIST, twenty million dollars anyway, who produced a report in two thousand and five about the Twin Towers. What was their essential report? That fires caused the weakening of the steel trusses and they sagged. And when they sagged, they pulled in the perimeter columns. Well, sagging trusses can't pull in perimeter columns. There's not enough force there. But in their computer model, they added a five thousand pound lateral force on each of the columns, forcing them to buckle all of them. And then the top came down and drove the rest of the building down to the ground. We'll look at that in some detail. But this is the official story in a nutshell, and this is how they sought to prove it by computer models. Because most of the steel, as we'll discover, was sent to China for recycling before investigators could get their hands on it and do a proper investigation. The fires, though, we have photographs of them. They are shown to be diminished at the time of the collapse. The thick black smoke indicates oxygen-starved cooler fires. So we have a problem. The fires aren't going to be able to produce what NIST said they produced. So we have to use the scientific method. What is that? We have a question. How did the towers collapse? We do background research, make observations, construct a hypothesis. That's our best guess as to how the towers came down. We make predictions. Was it the planes that brought them down? Maybe it was the ensuing fires, or maybe it was the ensuing explosions, which NIST has not solved. documented whatsoever in their final report, but you'll see plenty of evidence of, in fact, controlled demolitions with explosions. So these are all hypotheses that we can test with experiments. We analyze the results. We draw conclusions. If the hypothesis is corroborated, we report the results in an open, transparent manner so all can build on the body of the work. that we're doing here. If the hypothesis is not corroborated, we go back. We construct a new hypothesis. And that's what we're doing today. A new revised hypothesis to replace the faulty fraudulent hypothesis that nist the national institute of standards and technology who was tasked by congress to explain these collapses to the american people produced so let's do it let's start with some background research what are the forces that destroy buildings fire is certainly one of them it's an organic chaotic process it burns in an certain area roughly about twenty minutes and then moves on looking for fresh new fuel sources. And NIST even acknowledges that the fires don't persist and didn't in any one location for more than about twenty or thirty minutes. Okay, well, that's very helpful. Have we ever lost a skyscraper? No, never have lost a skyscraper due to collapses. And we'll look at a few of them. But wood frame buildings, for instance, they would fall over. Any structure collapsing due to fire would fall over to the path of least resistance. not straight down through the path of greatest resistance. And not in Los Angeles, where we had a sixty two story building burning three and a half hours over five floors, nor in Philadelphia burning a thirty eight story building over eighteen hours on eight floors. So fires when they cause there was a fire in this building. The structure sags, as we saw in our last video. a podcast on BNN and with building seven, we saw the Cardington test. They actually lit on fire, an eight story building, a steel frame building, no structure, no, no failure at all. not even since nine eleven with these fully engulfed fires have we lost a steel frame fire protected structure so how in the world then did these relatively small and cooler fires bring down the towers. Well, we'll find that they didn't, and we'll find the evidence for what did. But in natural collapses like these due to earthquakes, we have the building falling over to the path of least resistance. It's recognizable, though damaged, as a building. The columns and beams are not severed one from another. and the concrete is not pulverized to a fine powder. So this is another type of destruction that we need to keep in mind Because it's a precedent, as is buildings that have been blown up, where we have thick, billowing, enormous pyroclastic-like clouds of smoke and pulverized concrete. Sounds of explosions heard and seen by witnesses. We have flashes of light that are seen by witnesses. So if you have these features, you know you have explosions. Well, explosions can be harnessed quite well. control demolitions to bring buildings down like you see here it takes a team of experts to bring these buildings down with precisely placed and timed shaped cutter charges placed next to the columns and beams in the building starting at the lower levels usually and then bringing them up this is a feat that only a handful of companies in the United States can even accomplish. And FIRE never has. Not even in The Mandarin Hotel, where it's fully engulfed in Beijing, China in two thousand and nine. So it just simply does not happen. These this building survived. All these buildings survived. Steel frame fireproofed structures do not collapse due to fire. Not even a World Trade Center five, which was fully engulfed in fire. Did it collapse? No. No collapse. So we have an understanding of the precedent here that NIST is up against when they try to present a collapse by fire theory in a few broken columns in the case of these towers. So last week we looked carefully at the typical features of controlled demolition. And how they amount to proof thereof. And so we have to look carefully now, today, at the features at the World Trade Center towers. Beginning with feature number one. Is there a sudden onset of destruction? Well, the North Tower is at rest and all of a sudden it's in downward continuous motion. There's no jolt or hesitation upon meeting the cold, hard, intact steel below the point of plane impacts. What's going on here instead? Look at the South Tower. No jolt or hesitation. It's at rest and all of a sudden it's in uniform downward motion. No jolt, no hesitation, no impact. Well, let's look at the official narrative because NIST claims that this upper block above the point of plane impacts drove the rest of the building down to the ground and then destroyed itself. This is called the crush down, crush up theory, but it suffers quite miserably from Newton's third law of motion. We'll come to that. But this author, Zdenek Bazant of Northwestern University in Chicago, submitted this paper, very complex paper, a paper that took engineers ten years to decode. He submitted it just two days after nine eleven. The rest of us were in shock. Right. We're we're trying to figure out when's the next plane coming? Who did this to us? What's going on here? And yet this gentleman, no, he's in his den creating the most complex paper ever, ever put together for building collapses. And he is creating the theoretical basis for NIST's column failure theory. So this paper remains interesting. the key support for NIST's theory. What does it rely on? Well, what it doesn't rely on is Newton's third law. There's an equal and opposite destructive force when two bodies collide. Run a Mack truck into a Volkswagen. What happens? The Volkswagen gets destroyed. Does it matter if we drop the Volkswagen onto the Mack truck? No. The upper part is the lightest part of any structure. It cannot possibly destroy the cold, hard, heavier, intact steel below. It's not going to happen. These towers were virtual pyramids. At the top is the lightest structure. structural column sections which you see here changing and getting heavier and heavier as we go down the building and larger also in the core columns until at halfway they're fifty two inches by twenty two inches and then almost solid steel fifty two inches by twenty two inches down at the bottom so these are virtually pyramids So we have to ask ourselves another question here. Is the top part destroying the lower part? Or does the top part get destroyed in the first three seconds? Take a look. It's being destroyed. Let me make it easier for you. Actually, let's look at the lower red line. This top part is telescoping in on itself. The lower red line is not moving down. This structure is not destroying the structure below. It is being destroyed, just like the Volkswagen would be destroyed. In this case, what's destroying it, though? Because if it were there, we would see it driving the rest of the building down to the ground. But none of the photos, none of the videos show that. They show instead that it is gone after three seconds and gone. something else was happening something terrible some if if the upper structure was driving the building down to the ground it would have destroyed these few remaining columns core columns that stand a thousand feet in the air but no something else is happening here and you get a sense of it by looking and trying to guess which one of these photos is a volcano and which one is the World Trade Center North Tower. Just take a guess. I'll give you a hint. The one on the right is the volcano. With upward, outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks freely flying, solid objects trailing thick white smoke clouds. in each case why is the twin tower ejecting solid objects trailing thick white smoke clouds steel is not flammable in office fire conditions nor by jet fuel as we'll see so what is what are these thick white smoke clouds well Thermite can give us an answer because the other byproduct of thermite, we saw that molten iron was one byproduct in our last episode with Donna. But what is the other byproduct? Aluminum oxide ash with these thick white smoke clouds. That is the only reasonable conclusion that can be drawn from From this, especially when we look, as we did last week, at the evidence of thermite throughout the World Trade Center dust and in the aftermath. So this theory is wrong altogether. We don't have the upper part driving the rest of the building down to the ground. What do we have? The building is exploding, hurling laterally ejected structural steel sections out away from the core columns, and they survive that somehow, and then they come down. So none of this was acknowledged in the NIST report. who had twenty million dollars to study this and determined, tasked by Congress to determine how and why all three towers collapsed. But let's look at feature number two of controlled demolition, explosions. Are there any witnesses of explosions? NIST says no. other than the explosion, of course, of the plane impact. And what they say down at the bottom in the lobby are explosions due to jet fuel coming down the elevator shafts, which is just ludicrous. We'll come to that. But let's look at these witnesses. What do they say? This is extraordinary. There's now one hundred and eighty six of them. Twelve thousand pages of testimony were produced by the oral recordings of these first responders. Graham McQueen, a professor, the late professor, read every one of those pages. This is what he found in a hundred and eighty six of these. I won't read them all to you, but a couple of representative examples. We felt the ground shake. You could see the tower sway and then it just came down. All of a sudden, the ground just started shaking, felt like a train running under my feet. The next thing we know, we look up and the tower is collapsing. It shook my bones. Shortly before the first tower came down, I remember feeling the ground shaking. I heard a terrible noise. And then debris just started flying everywhere again and again. You're going to hear this same order of events where the first responders are seeing something, feeling something, hearing something. before the tower actually collapses. Now that's extraordinarily important and completely ignored by NIST, every one of these expert witnesses. I saw flash, flash, flash at the lower level of the building. You know, like when they demolish a building, With each popping sound, it was initially an orange and then a red flash that came out of the building. Then it would just go all around the building on both sides. Saw a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors ten and fifteen. He saw about six of these brief flashes accompanied by a crackling sound before the tower collapsed. I saw low-level flashes. I saw flash, flash, flash. And then it looked like the building came down. An explosion appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides. Materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse. There was an explosion in the South Tower, one floor under another. When it hit about the fifth floor, I figured it was a bomb because it looked like a synchronized, deliberate kind of thing. Seemed like on television when they blow up these buildings. Seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt. All these explosions. The building was blowing out on all four sides. We actually heard the pops, you know? You heard the pops of the building. I thought the terrorists planted explosives somewhere in the building. That's how loud it was. A crackling explosive. Another loud boom at the upper floors. And then a series of smaller explosions which appeared to go completely around the building at the upper floors. and another loud earth shattering blast with a large fireball that blew out more debris. The lower level of the building, you know, like when they demolish a building, that's what I thought I saw. Did you see any flashes? I said, yes. I thought it was just me. He said, no, I saw them too. Everybody I think at this point still thought these things were blown up. So I was fully expecting anything else to blow up. You were there when the planes hit? No, I was there when the building exploded. You mean when it fell down? No, when it exploded. The widely held belief that the Twin Towers collapsed as a result of the airplane impacts and the resulting fires is actually revisionist history. The vast majority of reporters on the ground who witnessed and reported the event firsthand cited explosions as As the cause of the collapse. So in addition to all those first responders we just heard from, we're now looking at thirty six different TV reporters on the day of nine eleven who reported this as an explosion based event. Most people have no idea because the story changed. abruptly the next day when local TV anchors and national mainstream media outlets reported a different story. Fire Marshal John Coyle and Christopher Fenyo explicitly support this finding. He says, I thought it was exploding, actually. That's what I thought for hours afterward. Everybody, I think, at that point still thought these things were blown up. At that point, a debate began to rage. about whether to continue rescue operations in the other still standing tower, because the perception was that the building looked like it had been taken out with charges. Well, this gets even more interesting. Donna, there's some feedback from your side. If you don't mind muting until you want to say something or ask a question or somebody over there, that'd be helpful. Thanks. Graham McQueen and Ted Walters, new research here in this report is the systematic effort to collect and analyze news clips from more than seventy hours of original coverage from that day. And there's three categories of reporting. which will come to eyewitness, narrative, and source-based reporting. Let's listen to a few of them. But as I was looking up, I saw the entire explosion. It looked exactly like the first two, but we certainly had the most perfect vantage point for that explosion. It was unbelievable. There has just been a huge explosion. We can see a billowing smoke rising And I'll tell you that I can't see that second tower. We're not sure exactly what happened, but it was another explosion on the far side of one of the buildings from where we're standing. The reverberation and another explosion on the right-hand side. Watch the right side. It's exploding. On the far side of the building, there seemed to be another explosion. And also on the right-hand side, there was also another explosion. We're not sure if that was extra reverberation from what happened at the World Trade Center or if that was an added explosion. We heard a very loud blast explosion. We looked up, and the building literally began to collapse before us. Again, there has been a second explosion here in Manhattan at the Trade Center. And believe it or not, there was another major explosion. The building itself, literally atop of it, came down, sending smoke and debris everywhere. Do you know if it was an explosion or if it was a building collapse? To me, it sounded like an explosion. A huge explosion, a huge rumbling cloud. We're taking photographs and securing this area. just prior to that huge explosion that we all heard and felt. But it literally exploded and came down as though it had been hit. We heard an explosion. The explosion happened with shooting pieces of the plane. There are pieces of the plane on Church Street. There's another explosion as we speak. Something either exploded or fell off the side of the one building that was attacked. Then the entire top of the building just blew up. Just seconds ago, there was a huge explosion, and it appears right now the Second World Trade Tower has just collapsed. It was just a small explosion, and then rocks and debris and everything started pouring down. We were about two blocks away when the second explosion hit, and all we heard was just this small explosion. Then we saw a roar of an explosion and all kinds of smoke coming, billowing out, debris falling down. It's unbelievable because you hear these explosions. In fact, I just heard another one. I don't know if it was like an aftereffect or whatnot, just while you were on the phone talking about the school closings. Well, we just heard another explosion go off a couple of minutes ago, Chris. I don't know what happened with the audio there. I'm not hearing it. Are you hearing the audio anymore, Donna? Yeah, I can hear it. I just unmuted. Okay. Thanks. I don't hear it. That's crazy. When that last bomb, when that last collapse happened and they... When the first tower collapsed, it was a massive explosion. When that explosion occurred, it was like the scene out of a horror film. Another explosion, a rolling blast of fire, a rolling column of fire towards us. You saw people being wheeled on gurneys away from the site of the explosion. I looked up and that's when I heard the... pardon me that's when I heard the explosion that's when the second tower came down there was it was an explosion two or three minutes ago there was yet another uh collapse or explosion but at a quarter to eleven there was another collapse or explosion following the ten thirty collapse of the second tower saw the explosion and also the the collapse of the tower and with subsequent explosions and uh... explosions were coming down the building it looked as if charges had been set on each floor and they were in succession going off he received word of the possibility of a secondary device that is another bomb going off uh... he tried to get his men out as quickly as he could but he said that there was another explosion which took place and then an hour after the first hit here. But the first crash that took place, he said, there was another explosion that took place in one of the towers here. So obviously, according to his theory, he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building. But the bottom line is that according to the chief of safety of the New York City Fire Department, he says that he probably lost a great many men in those secondary explosions. Put us about a block and a half They lost many men in those secondary explosions. I was actually in the subway heading towards the World Trade Center right around Franklin Street and after the first explosion the subway station started to fill with smoke. The subway cars started to fill with smoke and the subways actually stopped And I was walking on Broadway at Fullerton, and suddenly we heard an explosion. It was the first tower coming down. I started to walk out. I walked down Broadway towards Canal, and we heard the second explosion. Covered in the debris and the dust from the explosion itself. It was rocked with a lot of the explosion from the force of the Twin World Trade Centers when they came down. I was out front as you were when the second explosion occurred because the explosion threw debris on top of a lot of people. That was when the real panic began. Sequence of crashes, then explosions, and then the collapse. This must have been ground zero where this thing blew up car after car after car. Buses completely obliterated and burned straight down to the steel. That's the first time we're hearing that. So two planes and explosives that were in the building, is that correct? That is the working theory at this point. The first wave of rescue workers who went in were trapped, many of them killed by the second blast. And escaped through the lobby where they report they believe there was a bomb in the lobby. I believe the bomb hit the lobby first and a couple of seconds in the first plane hit. Well, this is incredible testimony, and we have to take it seriously, unlike NIST, who ignored all of these accounts of explosions, save the airplanes into the buildings. So, and claiming there were no other witnesses of explosions. Well, how many did we just see? Well, in terms of the anchors themselves, there were twenty one eyewitness reports. what they personally perceived as explosions before and or during the destruction. There were twenty-two narrative reports wherein they refer to the destruction as an explosion-based event in the course of their reporting. And three were source-based reports from the FDNY, the NYPD, and the FBI, the three most important government agencies involved. who said they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers before the story changed. The FBI even called it their working theory. So there's only four reports that describe the collapse as a result of plane impacts and ensuing fires. What about those? Their individual accounts add very little support to what very soon became the official collapse hypothesis because two of them were more than twelve blocks away. The third actually stated in a different context, the entire building has just collapsed as if demolition team set off. When you see demolitions in those old buildings, The fourth was quite close to the South Tower, near Ron Insana, another anchor, who vividly described seeing the building exploding and hearing a noise associated with an implosion. So they seem to get discredited. In fact, they're expressing either uninformed opinions or else carrying out someone else's instructions about the cause of the collapse. So what do we learn? Unlike the one hundred and eighteen firefighters, now one hundred and eighty six who provided their accounts weeks or months after the event, it was the job of reporters to spontaneously communicate their perception and interpretation of events. Thus, when their reporting is compiled into one record, we're left with a rich and largely unfiltered collective account of what really took place. Considered alongside the FDNY oral histories, these reporter statements constitute strong corroborating evidence that explosives were indeed used to destroy the towers. So the hypothesis was of explosions bringing down the towers was not only prevalent among the reporters, but clearly the dominant hypothesis of the day. So we have other witnesses of explosions, i.e. the equipment at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, twenty-one miles north. There were seismic waves generated when the towers came down and near the time of the plane impacts. So what do they really reveal? Because the first plane impact is associated nearly associated with a . nine magnitude event. Let's look at that event. The event, they say this is due to plane impacts because it occurs like pretty much right there. But if you look really carefully, you find that the event itself occurs at eight, forty six and twenty six seconds. But the plane impacts don't occur until fourteen seconds later. So how can the plane impact be causing the seismic event fourteen seconds earlier? It's not. And in fact, NIST says the plane impacts as identified by the National Transportation and Safety Board radar, which the nine eleven commission used. So it's pretty darn accurate to within a second. But NIST says, no, we think the plane impacts happened ten seconds earlier than that. Because we looked at the videos and we studied, you know, what we think really happened. Okay. Can you prove that? You're still four seconds off, right? What gives with that discrepancy also? Well, they got... L-D-E-O, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, run by Columbia University, to move their data back three seconds in a private contract, which we do not get to see the results of, the report from. And that's where they make up three of those four seconds. So, okay, that's real interesting. What else can we learn from their work? The South Tower, we have an event occurring at nine oh two and fifty four seconds near the time of the plane impact. Well, the plane impact in this case doesn't occur for seventeen seconds later. Well, NIST comes back and says, well, we think the plane impact happened at a different time. Twelve seconds earlier than the NTSB radar. Okay. Can you prove that? You're still five seconds off. Nope. We're just contracted with LDAO to get that one moved back three seconds also, which brings them to within two seconds. So you can see the kind of science that NIST is up to here. Well, it gets worse. What could... caused the seismic impacts if it weren't the planes well let's look at some testimony from eyewitnesses like mike percaro he says the whole building seemed to shake and there was a loud explosion when the two arrived at the sea level they found the machine shop gone nothing there but a rubble mike said we're talking about a fifty ton hydraulic press gone the two made their way to the parking garage but found that it too the parking garage was gone There were no walls. There was no rubble on the floor. You can't see anything. Well, this is down in the basement. NIST doesn't acknowledge any explosions in the basement. But here's a witness, one of several, of one. He says a steel and concrete door that weighed three hundred pounds wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil lying on the ground. A bomb had gone off in the building, as speculates this witness. Oops. Okay. Let's go to this witness, Willie Rodriguez, who was a janitor in the building and was actually given a Medal of Honor by the President of the United States for his courageous actions that day. I think a bomb went off in the lobby first, then a plane hit the building. The bomb hit the lobby first, and a couple of seconds in the first plane hit. Okay. Now we'll go to Willie Rodriguez. On nine eleven, I came in late. I went straight to the basement and I was there with my supervisor, Antonia and fourteen other people. When we here at eight forty six, an explosion that went boom, very loud, push us upwards. When they push us upwards, all the walls cracked. The full ceiling fell on top of us. The sprinkler system got activated. Everybody started screaming in horror because we didn't know what happened. And the first thing that comes to my mind is that a generator just blew up. On the mechanical room, the mechanical room was located right below us. The building has six up levels of basement, B-one, B-two, all the way down to B-six. I was on B-one. The explosion came from between B-two and B-three. That's how we felt it. Now, I work in the building, Carl, for twenty years. I would know exactly the difference between an explosion coming from the bottom and one coming from the top. This one came from the bottom and prior to the plane hitting the towers. Now, when I went to verbalize it, because everybody is screaming in horror and in total despair at that moment, when I went to verbalize it, we hear, bah! This is six or seven seconds after the initial explosion. And it was the impact. It sounded like an impact all the way on the top of the building. And then an explosion. And a person comes running into the office saying, explosion, explosion. Hands extended, burned thirty-three percent of his body, all the skin hanging from under his armpits peeled off. all the way to the top of the fingertips, and missing pieces of his face. And I said, what are you doing? And what happened? This guy was Felipe David, a black guy that I never met before from Honduras, who worked actually filling up those vending machines with supplies, soda, candies, et cetera. And he was burned, of his body, from that first explosion. Now, when I see this, everybody's screaming in horror. I said, don't move, because I was going to pick up the phone to call the emergency medical unit that was located on the south tower. When I went to pick it up, bah, another explosion. And the building shake so much. And remember, the building was designed to oscillate because of the wind factor. But it oscillated so much that the wall started cracking. You could hear the cracking. And everybody started running inside the office Well, this is an incredibly important testimony because it proves that there were indeed explosions that NIST ignored in the basement. But expert Andre Rousseau, applied geophysics expert, author of more than fifty published peer-reviewed papers, says, hey, these are not from plane impacts. The frequency of these seismic waves, Raleigh waves, attributed to LDO, to the impacts, were on the order of only one hertz, one cycle per second. But aircraft crash impacts have much higher frequencies, above ten hertz and often up to about a hundred hertz. These frequencies were filtered out by the point six to five hertz bandpass filters used by LDO because they just want to record explosions. meaning earthquakes and things like that, which explosions produce similar results of. So he says the range of the instruments cited by LDO doesn't even allow further recording of these frequencies from airplane impacts. The seismic equipment is designed to detect seismic events like earthquakes and explosions around one hertz. Okay, well, that's helpful. He also says the actual waves generated by the crash, the airplane crash, had to have been deadened even before hitting the ground. So he's exposing something here that's very important regarding the planes. What about the actual collapses? Because there were seismic events associated near the time of the collapses also. The collapse of the South Tower created a two point one magnitude event. Let's look at it. We have the event occurring at ten twenty eight that morning and thirty one seconds. The tower starts descending at ten twenty eight, about nine seconds earlier. And the first debris, which is the lightest debris, hits the ground about a second later. But the heaviest debris doesn't hit the ground until about four seconds later. So that's what would have generated these waves. But it's four seconds later than the seismic event. So how could it have? Well, NIST, as you can imagine, has an answer for this, too. They contract privately with LDO, Columbia University, and get them to move their entire data back three seconds yet again, a third time. No report. But this helps them account for most of that problem. Well, what else could have created that seismic event? This is important, right? Let's look at the waves themselves. On the left side of the purple dashed line, you see, which is when the tower starts descending. So before the tower starts descending, in fact, about four seconds before the tower starts descending, we see very well-formed P waves, primary waves. Where did those come from? Because before that, it's just random background, the earth doing what the earth does all the time. Well, There, in fact, are explosions going off near the Twin Towers, as documented by camera shakes, six and ten seconds before the tower starts descending. Hmm. What does that remind me of? How about the testimony of the first responders, one hundred and eighty six of them or so? Well, fewer of them than that were this specific about explosions many seconds before the tower collapsed. Well, here is a camera on the ground looking at the North Tower on a tripod. It is. And it shakes six seconds before the collapse. Professor Graham McQueen did this research. There's the shake. That's not me. I'm not shaking the camera or anything. This is all available publicly. And then the tower comes down. So six seconds before that shaking, here's another tripod-mounted camera on the top of a roof this time looking at the North Tower. And that North tower, you might want to go on mute. Who's ever not on mute. Cause we're here in your cell phone. And we have the camera shaking, right? Oh, I missed it. I'm going to go back and look carefully. This camera shakes, right? There. And then, in this case, ten seconds later, the building begins its sudden uniform downward descent after all these clouds begin to erupt on the top. So this is evidence of seismic signals happening. before the collapses and the cause of them, which is corroborated by the first responders. Let's look at the first one. In the case of the South Tower, a two point one magnitude event happens at nine fifty nine that morning and oh four seconds. The start of the tower collapse happens five seconds earlier and the first debris doesn't even hit the ground until seven seconds after the seismic event. So how can it cause the seismic event? The first debris is the lightest, the later. So what can cause that? Well, NIST says, hmm, we actually contracted yet again with LDO and got them to move their data back three seconds. So that's what happens. That's what we think gets us close enough to answering the question. Well, it doesn't. It's a clear case of fraud, especially when you consider what really could have brought down the South Tower. In this case, yet again, we have at nine fifty eight and fifty six seconds. another camera tripod mounted shaking in this case three seconds before the start of the collapse again corroborating those first responders who described explosions before the collapse let's look at this one this is tv station ny one new york one tripod mounted camera and this one's more subtle so watch very carefully right there is the shake and three seconds later, the building begins its descent. So yet again, corroborating the first responders. Well, there's a problem here. They say it's due to the debris hitting the ground, but let's look at the reality. This is not ground. It's concrete floors dampening yet again that direct connection of this collapse to the seismic equipment, the concrete floors. floor trusses, and gypsum board walls, these building contents were actually, as we'll see in a moment, pulverized to concrete powder. There's no seismic component hardly at all from them. The steel frame itself is shattered into individual wall units, as we'll see, that are four to eight tons each, which is relatively small, seismically speaking. They don't even hit the ground all at once, but they're scattered over a period of fifteen seconds. and on a seven-story concrete basement structure. So this all comes out through the work of Andre Rousseau. It's equally distributed over the entire superblock of the World Trade Center. And note that as you see the towers coming down simultaneously in this case, so we can compare them, they are nearly identical. or destruction, as we'll see, yet they have an identical buildings, they're twins, but the yield strength is a one point six times greater in the North Tower than the South. And so that is dramatically different. It's on the logarithmic scale. So it's one point six times greater energetically. Well, how can that be? if they're identical collapses in identical buildings. So the answer must and can only be that there were different quantities and or placement of explosives in the building. Andre Rousseau says, identical buildings and nearly identical collapses can't possibly produce seismic events of extreme different energy releases on an order of magnitude. Well, that's very helpful. Well, this documentation of the seismic evidence is actually very carefully pointed out in point TT seven. Why did the twin towers collapse? The seismic evidence in the consensus nine, eleven, the best nine, eleven evidence. You can see this work at consensus nine, eleven dot org. Elizabeth Woodworth and David Ray Griffin assembled this group very carefully. to present only the best evidence of all. And you're looking at it in this presentation substantially relative to the World Trade Center. Feature number three, is there a straight down symmetrical collapse? Well, let's look at it. It starts out as if it's tipping over. So it's tipping over at twenty two degrees, the South Tower. But so how can With asymmetrical damage from the airplanes and the fires and asymmetrical damage from this load that's falling off the building, how do we get complete symmetrical destruction all the way around the face, all four faces of these buildings? It makes no sense. It's incongruent. just like the firefighters described, all the way around the building, like a belt, all these explosions. So something else is happening here very specifically. Let's look and zoom in on this looped video to the leading corner of this destruction. What do we see? We see what can only be individually pre-placed explosives at the perimeter structure I see a dozen of them just right here. So what is this not? This is not energy weapons weakening the steel so it could have a natural collapse. No, this can only be pre-placed relatively small structure explosives it's not a nuclear weapon destroying the towers, right? These are, this is not big. It's not bright. It's not full of the radiation that we know to expect from a nuclear weapon going off. So these are theories that have been put out there that are, and have been debunked by the evidence we saw last week with the extreme heat from the molten iron from osha documenting Twenty-six hundred degree temperatures in that case. Molten metal, molten iron and steel, which takes three thousand degrees almost to begin to melt. So this is extreme heat, which is denied in the directed energy weapons theory that we looked very carefully at. The explosives are denied in the directed energy weapons theory. No explosions, no extreme heat. no nanothermite no thermite that is what they say and yet what we proved last week was that we have all four of those forensic evidence of all four of those phenomena at the world trade center towers so this is the evidence that has solid proof for it when somebody comes along and provides theories for which they have literally no proof and which the evidence shows otherwise, I begin to get suspect. And they say there's no evidence of isolated explosive ejections from the towers but you're looking at it here twenty even forty stories down below we have these squibs or isolated explosive ejections occurring sixty stories down below there's no accounting for these in the official narrative or any uh unofficial narrative other than the one that we're presenting here today out of the left side of the south tower During its collapse, we even see isolated explosive ejections, a dozen of them in this looped video, destroying the internal rigidity of this structure, which allows it, even as it begins to fall off the tower, it then settles down because it's lost its internal rigidity and just begins to fall back into the tower as a mass. Well, how fast? Do they fall? Well, David Chandler, physics teacher, actually clocks this. And this is very important because it falls near free fall acceleration. It's accelerating straight down through the path of greatest resistance at two thirds of free fall acceleration. which equates to the fact that ninety percent of the structure had to have been removed so that it could fall and through what through eighty thousand tons of structural steel beneath the point of plane impacts as if it weren't even there these columns and the core columns forty seven of them massive columns again at halfway down fifty two inches by twenty two inches gave almost no resistance. Only ten percent of their strength remained. Compare that to the World Trade Center seven, which did fall at free fall acceleration, indicating not one of those eighty columns gave any resistance to that building's collapse. So what happens to these perimeter structural steel sections? They are ejected laterally, four and eight ton perimeter steel framing. landing in the buildings all around them, ejected six hundred feet in every direction at eighty miles an hour, clocked by physicists. Landing six hundred feet away. This is not energy weapons. This is the result of explosive force, a massive explosive force that can move these four and eight ton structural steel sections that far. And they are freely flying. This is not like a banana peeling off the side of the towers like some debunkers have tried to hypothesize. This is hundreds of structural steel sections freely flying, laterally ejected. Look at this one, back two, forward two, back two. This is laterally ejected. How does gravity work? Gravity works down. What's going on here? Out. And this one is in fact hitting building seven. So, which did some damage over there as we looked at last week. There's enough energy to hurl a two hundred pound cannonball three miles. This is an amazing quantity of energy that completely covered the the and beyond the boundary of the world trade center towers impacting building seven to the north and the world financial center to the east west to the left by the way if a hundred thousand tons of structural steel framing is distributed outside the building's footprint we have to ask ourselves the question What's destroying the building? What's crushing the building? Almost all the steel is well outside the footprint of the tower. How can it then also crush the building? Well, maybe it was the concrete because there were a hundred and ten floors of concrete. We're going to be looking for them. Each an acre in size. Poured concrete on metal decking over lightweight steel trusses. We're going to be looking for a hundred and ten acre size floors. But we don't find fifty. We don't find twenty. We don't find ten. We don't find one acre-sized floor. We don't find a half or a quarter or an eighth of an acre-sized concrete floor. What we see at the bottom is a pile, four or six-story pile of concrete. miscellaneous metal columns. Hey, in a real concrete, in a real pancaking collapse like this one from an earthquake in Mexico, we see pancakes. We're looking for them, but we don't find them. Where are all the floors? Where is the concrete? What happened to it? Oh, there it is. It's pulverized in midair. ninety thousand tons of concrete all the videos all the photos show pulverized in midair to one hundred micron particles and distributed laterally across lower manhattan in a three square mile area in a blanket three inches thick so if that's true and you're looking at the proof of that truth and ninety thousand tons of concrete is pulverized and spread from river to river across lower manhattan what's crushing the building it wasn't the steel which was a third of the weight of the building it's not the concrete which is another third of the weight of this building where is bizant Zdenek Bazant getting all of the weight to crush the building below. Well, not only did he use all of the weight of all that concrete and all that steel, which wasn't there, but he multiplied it times two. Because engineers finally, after ten years, decoded this obscure piece of mathematical wizardry. And they found that he doubled the mass up above and he decreased the column strength below by a factor of three, rigging the entire equation in favor of a collapse. And yet, this paper remains the key theoretical basis for NIST's column failure theory. There are many errors, not just six. But here's six that were put forth by this team of engineers that decoded his work. Tony Zambotti, Richard Johns, Gregory Zutulinski. And the American Society of Civil Engineers said, we're not going to publish this. What? Why? It's out of scope, they said. Well, wait a minute. How is that out of scope to challenge science? the concepts and facts in a previously published paper in the Journal of Engineering and Mechanics in this case. That's the whole idea of peer-reviewed science. We challenge each other's work through the peer-reviewed process. So there's a lawsuit and an ethics violation proceeding from this. As you can imagine, We have to have a way to get explosives and incendiaries into the building. How do we do that? Well, Kevin Ryan from his blog, digwithin.net looks at demolition access to the towers. Could it be that the nanothermite, which we saw proof of in our last episode was installed during an an operation that was said to have been fireproofing because there were fireproofing upgrades in the year before nine, eleven. In fact, those fireproofing upgrades occur coincidentally at the location of the plane impacts in each case. So that's got to be investigated by a real criminal investigator who could get to the bottom of it. but our government has not done that. How else could explosives have been brought into the building? Well, if you had access to the elevators in the building, you'd have access to the core columns in the building. And wouldn't it be convenient if you had the largest elevator modernization in the world going on the nine months prior to nine eleven which they did documented in elevator world march two thousand and one and why would the port authority have given one of the largest and most sophisticated elevator modernization programs in history to a small maintenance company ace elevator with basically only one contract one uh... customer Well, this has to be answered, too. We certainly want an investigation of Ace Elevators, whose employees were missing that day, curiously, from this elevator modernization work. There was a labor dispute, and the members of that company, fifty of them, were pulled out to a union meeting to discuss some business. Well, yeah, we got to get to the bottom of that, too, as well as a disposition of one hundred and eighty thousand tons of missing steel and easily the largest and most perplexing structural failures in history. We have four hundred truckloads a day lined up to remove this debris starting just two weeks after nine eleven. In fact, starting the day of nine eleven. This is the forensic evidence. It was shipped to China for recycling. This is the illegal destruction of evidence in a crime scene. Prompting Bill Manning, editor-in-chief of Fire Engineering Magazine, to cry out, crucial evidence that can answer many questions is on the slow boat to China, showing an astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough scientific investigation. The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately. Did it? No, it continued unabated. And that is just one of the many, many reasons we have a real call for an investigation based on the evidence of destruction with explosives, which is the only thing that can answer these ten key characteristic and some very uncharacteristic features of controlled demolition. Fire doesn't account for any one of these features, let alone all ten of them. And so we have what becomes proof of controlled demolition, proof to three thousand six hundred architects and engineers signed on to the petition demanding a new investigation into the destruction, many of whom will appear in episode two, the next episode to be released from nine eleven crime scene to courtroom. where we present to a special grand jury, as I mentioned, and which you can co-produce this film along with us. We've already filmed it in two separate trips to Washington, D.C. in the special grand jury boardroom. And we... are now in post-edit, and so all we have to do is edit it, and that takes time, as you can imagine, more than a dozen episodes here. So we've already got, if you just can't wait for that, be sure to look at our existing documentary, Nine Eleven Explosive Evidence, Experts Speak Out, in which we've also included forty high-rise architects, structural engineers, metallurgists, chemists, physicists, controlled demolition experts, all laying out this evidence for us. And the documentary, fifteen minutes long, World Trade Center Building Seven, narrated by actor Ed Asner. And he, in this documentary that we made, is very careful. Just in fifteen minutes, you can get the essence of what happened at Building Seven. But we also have, as we talked about last week's podcast on Building Seven, the very special finite element analysis performed by the University of Alaska at Fairbanks, one of the top forensic structural engineers in the world, Professor Leroy Hulsey, who is featured in this documentary made by Dylan Avery. And all of this evidence is outlined in a brochure. It couldn't be easier. All of this is on our website, richardgage.org. You can buy a hundred of them for fifty bucks, or you can download and print it for free right from the website. Why is this so important? Well, we've spent fourteen trillion dollars on the longest war in U.S. history. We've killed well over a million people in Afghanistan and Iraq, a thirty eight million people displaced in the ensuing global war on terror. And thirty seven thousand US soldiers killed. Three times, four times that many. Killed by their own hand later. Absolute tragedy. Nine eleven was it's given us the invasions of these Middle Eastern countries, the goal of the project for a new American century from those neocons in that think tank that were brought in by the Bush administration to run all of this mayhem. loss of our civil liberties through the patriot act the military commissions act the national defense authorization act of in which any of us can be arrested without a right to a lawyer a trial a jury we can be tortured we can be assassinated even and that's all quote legal uh now that can happen so the truth about nine eleven is very very dark where do we draw our line in the sand Really? I mean, how long do we wait? Do we wait for the next nine eleven? I'll tell you, we've had two of them since nine eleven. We've had covid over the last three years with a false disease and the false solution to it, which is killing people on a massive scale. And we have Gaza on October seventh of twenty twenty three, which was an inside job, another false flag operation designed to eliminate the population from Gaza, which is happening with the destruction of seventy percent of the housing there. Genocide by any definition. So when are you going to start speaking the truth? about these false flag operations. We'll get to Gaza and we'll get to COVID in subsequent presentations here on the Brandenburg News Network. But look what power you can have. You may feel like a millimeter or two millimeters size domino. What can I do? Well, watch what you can do. Boom. That was thirteen dominoes. If I had twenty-nine dominoes, the last domino would be as tall as the Empire State Building. And that's what we're up against. The deep state is completely entrenched and bigger than we have ever imagined. But working together, sharing the information in podcasts like this and the other incredible podcasts that Donna has brought to your attention, you have immense power because you can ask two people. to share this with two other people who can share it with two other people. And all of a sudden we're taking down the deep state. Look what happened, for instance, in the recent election. All of a sudden the deep state is in a panic because we have used our power to move the needle in the right direction. OK, some of us don't have complete faith in Trump, but do we have faith in some of his key appointments? OK, so. It's getting better. And we got to realize that we have our own personal power here for finding out who we really are. We discover that we're not trapped in the matrix with agents, demons, vampire energies in the deep state. They are trapped in here with us. And working together, that's what we get, the takedown of the deep state, ultimately. It's going to take work, right? Because we've been lackadaisical for, what, fifty years? More? Well, that's what I wanted to bring to the attention of our listeners today, Donna. Well, that's wonderful. And I just, every time I talk with you, I feel like I learned things that I thought I, that I thought I knew the subject matter pretty well, but I'm learning something new every day and just really, really amazed with, especially like the seismic information you brought forward today. And anytime that the universities are involved in anything, I have a lot of question because the integrity is not there. And, and I think that that's, something that we need to really focus on is the connection with our indoctrination camps in raising the next generation of non-critical thinkers who can be swayed on both sides of the argument. That's a huge concern of mine. They've been involved in so many things. I have so many questions. I'm like a five-year-old. I could sit here and pummel you with questions all day. But I really want to let some of this settle so that I can go over this again. And all I can say is I'm very, very thankful and grateful for you and Gail and for you coming on and bringing this technical information forward. Because What I see in the narrative that's out there, the overall narrative, that if you're listening to mainstream media, okay, not like podcasts like this or alternative media, is that people are spinning things all the time, right? And I think it's so important and it's on both sides. You know, Fox News used to be regarded as reliable. Now, most people I know on the conservative side just say Fox News is just complete crap. Right. Because you can see them spinning things. So it's not just CNN. Even CNN is right occasionally, you know. But the point being is that we have to listen to every bit of information that comes out on on. Because I think nine eleven is going to be the it's going to be that that stick or that card that gets pulled, that brings the whole house of cards down because so many different things are connected to it. And and the amount of the amount of hiding, the amount of of connected people is just incredible. You know, I'm going to go back to the the dancing Israelis that were dancing off to the side that came up. the Silverstein connection and the connection there. And also there's more connections that we can put together here and a lot more questions that we need to ask. And I'm just really excited about it. And I'm excited about going through this on Thursdays with you because I think that there's so much more information that needs to come out. And I really appreciate your technical expertise on this a lot. Thank you. Yeah, there's a few things that I've seen over the years that I have a lot of questions about, and you brought it up here, that there's probably more than one way that these buildings were brought down. Is that correct? Not sure what you mean. We certainly have the forensic evidence of explosives, high-energy explosives, and also thermite and also nanothermite, as we've discussed last week. Is it possible that there was other methods that could have brought some of it down too that would answer questions that other people have or is that something that you either don't have, haven't looked into and you've stayed within this scope or have you looked at some other things that people will allege that might have happened? Yeah, I've looked at quite a few alternative hypotheses that have been brought up over the years, and I've had the opportunity, as we discussed halfway through this presentation, to just about readily dismiss directed energy weapons and nuclear weapons. But I'm not saying something is impossible. I'm just saying we haven't seen credible evidence for it yet, other than what we presented in this series. And I appreciate that because I think that that's going to answer some people's questions because, of course, the discussions have been provoked here. And so a lot of people are speaking up and saying, hey, what about directed energy weapons? What about this? What about that? What about that? And my answer to them was, I think that Richard is staying in his area of expertise, which he can he can absolutely provide the receipts on. Doesn't mean that there might be some more stuff outside of that, but what you're focusing on is the things that you can conclusively prove And I kind of appreciate that approach because I know that, say, like if we're trying to prove something in a court of law or bring charges against the people who perpetrated a crime, though there may be things outside of that, you want to stick to those things that will hold up in a court of law so that when you do bring the hammer down on them, that it is within the scope. So like, for example, we can go ahead and say that fraud was committed within the elections in the state of Michigan. And I believe that to be true, that there was intentional fraud, but in a court of law, malfeasance and maladministration and some of those other charges are just bam. Those are so quick to be able to prove that you can go after the ones that perpetrated a crime. Doesn't mean that fraud isn't, isn't, um, involved in this but it's harder to prove uh the intention such or harder to prove some of those things like directed energy weapon I've I've I've often had a question on and you had it in one of your videos there's a piece of of metal that's sticking up there's like a girder sticking up and all of a sudden it goes and it falls into dust. Well, what it does, that specific set of interior core columns standing a thousand feet in the air for six seconds after the tower has come down and blown out around it, it doesn't go... What it does very carefully, we've analyzed this, it drops frame by frame through the concrete powder, which has been shaken off of it. It doesn't go poof into concrete powder or steel dust. It is clearly falling through that. So there's another explosive charge, which finally removes the base of it. Go ahead. That's good to know because, I mean, I'm pretty open-minded on stuff. You know, I'll consider everything, you know, and that's the first time I've actually heard that explained because, you know, most people that I've seen said, look, it's directed energy weapons that have brought it down and that – that there's never been an opposing viewpoint, which to me is always concerning. You should have a little bit of push and pull where you finally go like this and you get to the truth. But just like with our elections, we have to take everybody's opinions and address them so that everybody's heard and then bring the receipts. And that's the first time I've heard that. So I always appreciate people bringing things that we can consider and that we should be looking at. But I think that the actual proof of explosions is so compelling and seen on the inside of the building. I mean, I've seen for years because I'm totally nine-eleven obsessed. Okay. And to see the fuses that were in the buildings and boxes of fuses that were there and the way that the building was shut down. for like, I think it was three months, they were shut down and there were vans bringing things into the building, but it was shut down during certain hours of the day. You should be asking a lot of questions on why. And I mean, not you, but everyone needs to be asking a lot of questions on why. And the ejection of the materials laterally is absolutely kind of like, it's a clincher for me that there absolutely were explosions or explosions and charges that were planted in the building to bring these buildings down. And all of which is denied by the directed energy weapons proponents, by the way. They say there were no explosions. They say there was no extreme heat. Well, we spent thirty minutes looking at evidence, lots of different points of evidence for extreme heat. They suggest that the beams were softened and by the directed energy weapons, and that caused a collapse. Well, that would have been an organic collapse, not an upward-outward volcanic eruption, as you're pointing to. Also, they suggest that the steel was dustified, which is a contradiction to the weakening of the steel by directed energy weapons. But anyway, if that was true, where would all of the... that steel dust would fall in with the rest of the dust, right? Which was rigorously analyzed by numerous different agencies, which don't find any steel dust in the World Trade Center dust, right? None. What do they find? They find evidence of thermite incendiaries, which can only be that, the previously molten iron microspheres comprising up to four tons of all of this dust. So all of this evidence is ignored and twisted by the chief proponents of the directed energy weapons theory. I think it's all good to cover, and I think it's really good for everybody to have their points of view talked about because it is in everything that we are dealing with right now that we're going to have to listen to all sides and then have the evidence provided so that we can You know, we can know what really happened because I still believe that nine eleven, we get to the bottom of this and who was involved in taking these towers down. When you see the weirdness that President Bush had in that school where he started doing, you know, the the words and I pet goat and something, you know, you can see that the powers that be. brought these towers down and it wasn't two lower level pilots that couldn't even hardly fly a Cessna and make a perfect corkscrew turn into the buildings. It is absurd. And the claims that we're going out there immediately, the finding their passports and like a whole city worth of dust and paper, it's absurd. It's totally absurd. And I think that this is, as you said, it was to start the conflicts in the Middle East. And surprisingly, the question isn't who it brought into the fight. It's who it didn't bring into the fight in the Middle East is where we really should be looking. When you're looking at spaces as, I don't know, an architect, for example, you're not looking at just the positive spaces. You're looking at the negative spaces and what's going on there. And I understand that, okay? And I think that we should be looking at not only the positive spaces, but the negative spaces on who this conflict was brought to and why they weren't involved in the conflict. Why did they go to Afghanistan? Why did they go to Iraq? Why did they go to these areas? And why did they specifically leave out other areas in the conflict? What were they after or what were they trying to destroy or what chaos was involved in being created in those areas? And interestingly, that is the subject we're diving into next week on this podcast. Well, that's good that I'm going in the right direction. Yeah, the parallels between nine eleven and Gaza, the strategic policy of Israel and United States are interlinked and not in a good way. Well, I got to say something, and I'm going to bring this up, and I know I'm going to make a bunch of people either love me or hate me right now, but I don't care. I really don't care what your opinion is of me because this is my country too, and I want to get to the bottom of this because there's too much that we don't know. And honestly, I'm looking at President Trump's appointments because I believe that he is the greatest president the United States of America has ever had. With that said, his appointments and his endorsements, in my opinion, have pretty much sucked, okay, with the exception of a few of them. So you have to look at them not at face value, but what are they accomplishing? And I think that President Trump is incredibly smart and brings things to the forefront, not for face value, but to direct our attention. And so I have to go back to the art of war We're bringing down a how many thousand year death cult that has been honestly like invading our spaces from top to bottom. And you don't just bring something like that down in one shot. But we're going to have to ask some questions. Now, I want everybody to watch this. This is Pete Hegseth, Trump's pick for secretary of defense. And he's telling a Jewish group about anyone who wants to talk about dual loyalty is dead wrong. Zionism and Americanism. are intertwined. So watch this a minute, and I think this is going to bring it to the forefront. Anyone that wants to take the stage and talk about dual loyalty is dead wrong. What this organization represents, what Western civilization represents today, is an understanding that Zionism and Americanism are the front lines of Western civilization and freedom in our world today. And what better time for that relationship? From the scrapping of the terrible Iran deal to the embassy move, the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish state, and the recognition of the Golan Heights. This president is a true friend of the state of Israel. It is an eternal bond. an unbreakable bond that represents faith and freedom and fidelity to historic religious and cultural traditions, the opposite of secularism and Islamism and anti-Semitism. I don't want to be Jeb Bush, but it's okay to clap. So with that said, I think we have a lot of questions to ask here and things are never what they appear. I do believe that President Trump is working on a whole nother level on the art of war here and keeping our enemies closer as part of that deal and talking to them and such. And so Right now, I'm kind of watching everything with a just kind of like, well, well, well, let's just wait and see. I love Tom Holman. I know him as the borders are. He's going to get down there and things are going to get real, real quick. And I thought he was an outstanding pick. But some of these other people he's picked, I'm sitting here watching and going, hmm, this is interesting. When you have, you know, some of the packs and such. that unite them and the big money donors and such. I think we need to be watching this. And I think we're going to find out that there's a lot connected with this globalist structure. Now, with that said, I absolutely stand with the Chinese people, the Jewish people, the people of this world. I stand with the people as God's creation. But I'm going to tell you what, we, the people, are at war with a global evil entity that is so far above what we think of as nation states that they have obscured the line. I believe when they say China, we're not talking about a geographic China or the Chinese people. We're talking about an organization that's linked with our own government and our intelligence organizations, as well as the global bankers and such. And that it's above what we think is nation states. And so we have to be very careful on defining who we're talking about. Because I'm not anti-Semitic at all. I have lots of friends who are Jewish. And I also have friends who are Arab and Jewish. and muslim and that sort of thing and there's no craziness going on there that of the people that I know but it sure is coming from these um these uh proxy countries that the globalists are operating in and when I see ukraine ukraine is a proxy country of our intelligence organizations And you can lob that in with Mossad and GCHQ, the British Intelligence Organization and that sort of thing. They're all linked in together and they're all working with a globalist agenda. And we can see that across the world. So our enemies are not the people. And I want to make that clear to everyone out there that when we're talking these things, it's not like, Grab your torches and pitchforks. The people that are trying to get to the bottom of all of this stuff in different areas, we are not at war with each other. We are at war with a global power that wants to enslave this entirety of this world. And we need to stand together because when you look at what communists and Marxists do, which is truly a death cult, it's a satanic death cult at its core. When you look at how they operate, that's what we're at warring against right now. It is not the people. We stand together, united. And I think that we're going to get into this a little bit more in how they have utilized All of these structures to make us fight against each other so that we can't recognize or fight that without. With how we started this off with FEMA invading the state of Michigan and that Wurtsmith Air Force Base that they have taken. I'm going to tell you right now, I'm not buying this bullshit and I'm just not going to buy it right now because it looks to me to be a huge distraction and they would, there's something else going on there. I don't know what that is right now, but I'm going to tell you what I'm going to dig till I find out. And we're going to continue to bring the truth to Brandenburg News Network. Whether you like me or anyone here or not, I don't care. It doesn't matter. Matters nada to me. We need to have these discussions because the powers that be that are out here to absolutely destroy all of us, they're not after just President Trump, which they were clearly after. They're not after Trump. the United States of America as it stands. It is after we, the people, and when we look at the people globally who have been killed in these conflicts, It's across the entire world that this virus, this virus has crept in to destroy people. And we're going to go back to what's operational. You know, we've got the World Economic Forum that they are bringing to Detroit here, and that's through Whitmer. And Whitmer, Soros puppet Whitmer and such, that we have here, but also look at what's going on over there in Israel and the Palestinians. And we're going to talk about this Ben-Gurion Canal, continue to talk about this. And we have to talk about these structures that are uncomfortable and not try to protect protected classes of citizens. But look at the evidence that is out there in all forms, whether whether because I know that there's directed energy people, there's there's In all things, you've got directed energy people, you've got explosion people, you've got this, that, and the other thing. I don't care about the groups you're involved in. We're going to have to look at all the evidence, evidence-based, and what happened in order to get to the truth because some of this is being programmed in on both sides in order to keep us divided and fighting. I think we should have an honest discussion about this and not go into crazy world in defending our territory. But bring the receipts, bring the receipts, and let's look at who's behind these receipts to destroy the narrative that's here to keep us divided, stupid sheep running around and running right to our own demise. So, and that means we got to stand together on the basis of the truth. And that truth is got to be under God. And I firmly believe that. And I just really appreciate, you know, you and everyone else that has the guts to step forward, to challenge the narrative, to bring uncomfortable subjects forward. And, oh, and be willing to be attacked personally on bringing the truth forward in order to get to the ultimate truth. This is the house of cards that brings the entire narrative. entire thing down all points will converge on nine eleven all points do all the players there were were sitting at the table on nine eleven on the attack on american soil all of them were so and we're going to continue to challenge that to to knit this thing all together and and and bring the whole damn thing down because we have to do that and prosecute the ones that were involved. To the Democrats, George Bush was involved. There's no two ways about it that he was involved behind this. And so you can say that the, that, you know, for people that want to say, Oh, it was the Democrats, it's the Republicans. It's, it's this, it's that the other thing, they were all sitting at the table, all of them, deep state actors that had invaded into every single nook and cranny of the, of what holds America together and where America goes, the world goes right now. So, so, um, I'm not willing to hold on to castles built in my mind or the way I think it went. I'm willing to look at everything and try to be objective and open-minded to find out. We might find out that there's something else crawling in from the shadows that was a bigger player than what we ever imagined. And so in order to find the truth, we're going to have to let go of some of those castles we've built in our mind. and find out who actually was responsible for this attack on American soil. It's probably one of the most important investigations we will ever go through ever. It knits everything together. So with that said, I hope that also resonates with the directed energy weapon people because I am open to that. I am very open to directed energy weapons. I think it's highly possible that there was more than one way that they attacked the towers. I think it's highly possible. And I think we need to explore that to just make sure we settle all questions. It's like the elections. There wasn't one way they cheated the elections. There's hundreds of ways that they cheated these elections. And so to point at one thing like the voter rolls or or, you know, the machines or which the machines are definitely behind it. But that wasn't it. We have to have a thorough landscape so that we can bring all the players that were cheating in a hundred different ways down and prosecute them all. And so until we get to the bottom of it, we're going to continue to go down that. And I'm willing to listen to each and every one of you in order to bring the truth forward. But also ask you to consider what those things that are outside of the areas that you have been focusing on, because it may be a combination of all of them. And I think that that's something that we have to chase down. So anyhow, thank you so much. Let's end this with a prayer. Would you like to pray or would you like me to? Please go ahead. Okay. Dear Heavenly Father, we come before you wanting to know the truth in all things, because we know that the truth is found entirely in you. You've got the vantage point. You can see exactly what's going on from every angle and every perspective out there. You know what happened. And this is not going to go unpunished, the direct attack on the United States of America. It's going to be punished and your justice is going to come down on us at some point in time. And we have total faith that you will lead us through this. And also the aftermath that happened with the Patriot Act and the traitors that are within our own government that refuse to make sure that this is investigated, the traitors that hid what happened on J-Six, the Fed's direction, the traitors that happened with the nonsense that killed millions of people through COVID, the vaccine, all of this, all of this is coming forward. And we know we want the truth, wherever it may lead, we want the truth. And we know that You know the truth and that you will, in fact, lead us through that. Help us to stand strong and that it's your strength that comes through it, that the absolute truth, the healing that will come after we have all of our questions answered, the elections and the stuff that's gone. We live in a world that is highly deceptive and it's bombarding us like we're in a ball crawl of information hitting us with. from every side, from different people who are in there that are just rearranging things constantly. And we know, however, at the end of the day, that you're with us. You will never leave us nor forsake us. And that your precious son, Jesus Christ, came to write this world as a savior of this world. And each and every one of us individually. And we thank you so very much for everything you've done We accept your gift of salvation. We accept that you love us and that you want to be with us and that there is never anything that's going to separate us from your love. All we got to do is turn towards you and that you'll never leave nor abandon us. And you know what? Our stability comes from you in all situations. We can go look at this and go, well, this world is temporary. We knew it from the beginning. If we didn't, we weren't paying attention. and that you have given us all the answers and that someday we will be with you in glory. But while we're here, we're here doing your work on this earth, which is your creation, your sandbox. You make the rules here. But we're here to do your work and see that your will is done. Work towards that end on earth as it is in heaven. Whether we see that day or not, as Abraham did, he believed that you were going to give the land to his descendants and we believe that you are going to see through this through and that your will be done on earth as it is in heaven and we will work towards that end unwavering thank you so much for everything we love you and I ask for your favor upon everyone who is listening to this and give everyone peace knowing that this is a process you cannot fix things when people have philosophical differences on things but we must sit down and talk in a civil way and And with deep respect for each other, not letting them divide us, but standing together as one nation under you. And we're so thankful for you. In the name of Jesus Christ, we pray. Amen. There we go. So here you go, boys and girls, we go to that part of the show. Go to bing, bing, bing, bing, brandenburgforgovernor.com because I'm the best non-conseater who has ever not conceded in history of the United States of America. And I want to have a discussion with the real president, the rightful president of the United States, President Donald J. Trump in cowboy boots about this. So someday that's going to happen. So but at any rate, God bless you all. And God bless all you who all those whom you love and God bless America. Make it a great day. You know, the way we do that is mental toughness and strength of heart where we don't let things discourage us or make us crazy. Don't go crazy land on everybody because we have a law on our side and we have God on our side. That's really all we need. So have a wonderful day. I will be on tomorrow with another tough topic, health and freedom. in in america and we this is kind of going to probably tie back into the same bad actors that probably had a hand in nine eleven so we're going to continue to uncover and see what this little global death cult crime syndicate has been doing to our world unwavering thank you for being on today richard stay on I'm going to end the broadcast and we will see you tomorrow