Published Aug. 19, 2025, 9:02 a.m.
9am John Tatar - Lawful Defense Tatar Tuesday with John Tatar. Studying the Constitution. Know the law and use the law - using the law to defend yourself. All things Constitution and Lawful Process. Tatar Tuesday with John Tatar 10am Mike - Mike Bambas will be talking about the citizen's rights and process of holding to the law. We will be taking the Trading with the Enemy Act, as well as, other lawful practices not followed by our government including a lawful path to convict political criminals of concrete violations of acts leading to treason. X/Twitter: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mrGmBqbBZgJy Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6xsfkg-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-8192025-lawful-defense-and-pro-se-mike.html https://rumble.com/v6xsfgs-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-8192025-lawful-defense-and-pro-se-mike.html Odysee: https://odysee.com/@BrandenburgNewsNetwork:d/bnn-2025-08-19-lawful-defense-and-pro-se-mike:b BNN Live: https://Live.BrandenburgNewsNetwork.com Guests: Donna Brandenburg, John Tatar, Mike
Good morning. Welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg, and it's the nineteenth day of August twenty twenty five. Welcome to our show today. You know what we are? I've been talking about this water wars nonsense that's going on and it's gotten worse. We have five wells that have been destroyed and ruined by this and all the other wells in the area. They're at about half capacity. There are people staying in hotels right now. I went to the zoning board last night and literally chewed tail on them. for the meeting and so did a bunch of other people on the incompetence and negligence going on here. I hope everybody's watching this because it's coming your way. It's just a matter of time. So, but at any rate, I'm going to bring on my new special married guests, John and Susie. All right. So this is where the harassment starts. Okay. John and I, and Susie's always in the background. We'll sit here and talk every day for how long people wait. Or every Tuesday. Almost, I think we're north of two years right now. So John calls me last night and says, hey, I don't know if you know this, but Susie and I got married. And I'm like, what? And so he popped that on me that last night. So I just want to say congratulations to John and Susie. And I'm so happy to see you guys married and happily ever after and many good years to come. Thank you so much. I appreciate it. Thank you. So not only did you tell me that they got married, but it's been about two months ago now? June twenty-seven. Well, congratulations. But next time a critical event that happens, please say, hey, Donna, guess what? We're married. OK, we'll do that. Yeah. So that's that's very exciting. So we won't do that again. Yeah, I hope not that one. That would not be a good thing. So what are we talking about today, guys? Well, I think your water wars is probably a good point. There is a court case, Supreme Court decision that is still stands as is still held and still good law. And it fits your your thing very perfectly. It fits your water war perfectly. The board of Byron, the people that are stealing the water, they're going to be paying you and everybody that they've stole it from. If the case goes through, if you file a lawsuit properly, they're going to be paying to reinstate your situation back to normal. Well, and that's- Did exactly that. Let's see, I'm trying to pull it up here for everybody to see. I need to save it for my email here first. I'll give you the brief so we don't have to read all of the very beginning of it. It's about a chicken farmer who had a chicken farm, and his chickens were laying eggs, and I don't remember exactly how many chickens. He had quite a few chickens, sixty-something, I think. I don't know. It doesn't say. He had quite a few chickens. He was running a chicken farm and they weren't laying eggs. And then the Air Force built an airport right there. And when they built the airport, the noise of the airplane stopped the chickens from laying the eggs. Oh, yeah, they're stressed. Supreme Court called this a taking. And a taking means that they've taken something from the property that makes the property, that loses the value of that property right off the bat. So in this case, it was a bunch of chickens that wouldn't lay eggs because of the noise of the airport. In your case, it's the water that they're taking away from you and the wells that are becoming dry. So it is a taking. It's the same thing. They took the chicken egg laying capacity, the chickens away, and they're taking the water for your survival. Well, they have in the second phase, they're way over three hundred million gallons of water that they literally flushed out of the water table. But this is just where it starts because there was a phase one. And I guess this is before I became aware what was going on there. phase one they laid the pipes in the ground and there was so much water in the ground that the pipes floated they had to dig them all up then they de-watered that and then they put the pipes in so now we've got two seasons of de-watering they have literally and now they're filling the wetlands and the guy there's a guy that's like been stalking me And he got in the truck with Montgomery excavating and Montgomery excavating the coward that he is, whoever was in that truck, dropped him off at my property. He's an eighty-something-year-old guy. And he walked past, there are no trespassing signs, and right into the yard, just like he owned the place. Well, last night, he kind of did the same thing. He keeps going in front of people's houses, not just mine, but other people that have been talking to the board and taking pictures. Do you know if they step on your land, you tell them twice to get off. I'm telling you once, I'm telling you twice. And the third time it's trespassed and you call the sheriff and you get them arrested. That's it. That's it. They're not allowed to trespass on your property. Certainly public functionaries are not allowed to trespass on your property. Well, the contractor, this is the weird thing, is that the contractor, I put the pictures up, literally pulled up. And he first went into my one neighbor's driveway and sat there for a while. Then he pulled up in front of my house. The older guy got out and walked in. He's a neighbor. But the crazy thing is that the neighbor and the township have been colluding on this. They have filled the wetlands on his property. and they put seven trunk lines in there so he got paid for this so he's in on the destruction of the water table and the wetlands and everything I mean it I mean everybody who's got one little finger on this is complicit in what's going on it is he wants to use his land for whatever he can that's pro that's his that's his problem or that's his issue but he cannot affect yours Yeah, but he can't. It's a wetlands area. And it was it was a the wetlands are federally protected and the wetlands directly affect the water table. So when they put in all of these, they put in like fifteen, sixteen, eighteen inch casements. I'm probably at sixteen. They pounded those in the ground forty feet, drilled those out and put those in the ground forty feet under the creek bed there. And all of the rivers, all of the streams, all of the creeks are now completely dry. And trees are dying. I mean, this is just absolutely horrific what's going on here. So, yeah, you're right. He affected everyone in the entire area of the township. Okay. Well, it sounds like a take-away. On your particular piece of property, it's a taking. And anybody else's that their wells went brand dry, it's a taking. It's the same thing. Taking the ability of the chickens to lay the eggs or taking the ability of the water from your property. That's a taking. Well, that's cool. Well, we're going to be working on lawsuits again today. So I'm pretty extra sure that this is going to come in really handy. What's that? to read this case very what's that okay and you can use some of the quoting from it um okay for example if you go to the held part on this case what the supreme court held it said a servitude has been imposed upon the land for which respondents are entitled to compensation under the fifth amendment right off the bat. And then it goes down and it delineates all of that, A, B, C, D, and A says a common law doctrine that ownership of land extends to the periphery of the universe, has no place in modern world. And what they're basically saying here is that you have not only the ground that you're living on, but all the way up to the universe, is part of that space of that property. So when the airplane flies over that, that's in your space they're flying over your space unless they're flying according to the uh aviation uh people a certain altitude but they can't from the air air base because that's a that's a a landing field where they have to take off and and fly from so those planes are flying lower than is allowed by the uh aviation people so if they're flying on your property uh in in this britain or they're flying on over the chicken farm at this particular case and that's what gave this uh uh chicken farmer the right to sue and and get compensated for the chickens and uh and the chickens not laying the eggs and in your particular case they're kind of kicking you out of your house Yeah, it's unlivable for those that don't have water. In fact, in city, Redford, Livonia, whatever, if you don't have water in your house, your house is inhabitable. Yes. That's the law. So your house basically is inhabitable because your well doesn't work and you can't get water in your house. But we got a new well drill, so... We have a new well drilled right now, so they're going to owe me for that. Plus all the days we were without water, which was about. Oh yeah, they're going to owe you for all of that. They're going to owe you for drilling the well. And if they, if that well, but you got to, but it's got to be stopped, obviously. Yeah. That's the big thing is. Yeah. These, these turds that are out there trying to steal property from people or trying to get you to move or whatever like that by wrecking your property. They're liable. They're liable. They're liable for millions of dollars. And what else happened? What else happened this week, too, was when I started talking about water wars. YouTube canceled my ability to live stream on the U.S. Taxpayer Party, the Constitution Party website, or not website, on the YouTube channel for it. And also my Facebook page for BNN is permanently suspended. Yeah, well, we know who they are. I think that's another lawsuit too. They're part of the deep state. Yeah, well, that part of the deep state, they're going to eventually be eliminated. Both YouTube and Facebook, they're going to go away. Eventually, in time, they're not going to be able to survive. I'm not sure how valuable Facebook is anymore. It's just a whole bunch of nonsense. At this point in time, I think it's a CIA op or something like that. It is. Because, you know, they've got these shorts flashing at you all the time. And there was a video I posted last week about the fact that they can convince anybody to go out and commit murder within forty five minutes. Well, Facebook is a collection gathering or data base for the government. And anybody that puts their pictures on there and all of the crap that goes on in their personal life It's like having a spy in your house telling the world what you're doing. Why would you do that? Why would you tell somebody you're going on vacation at a particular period of time or that you have a nice new little baby daughter or whatever? You're just putting that out to the public, and that is a problem. That's destroying your privacy. That's the Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment. People, I don't know. People need to wake up. They're doing stupid things, and they're playing into the hands of the deep state and the government just by doing this stuff. I have a Facebook because I ran for governor, but I haven't posted a thing on Facebook for I don't remember when. When I ran for governor, that's when I posted on Facebook, and that was the only time. And it was because I was running for governor. well and and think about this it's like it's like if you're a good person these platforms are going to cancel you so somebody that has a big a big presence on say youtube or facebook they literally are going to have um they're going to be canceled and anybody who's in with the deep state they got like the run of the coop there they can do whatever they want because it is uh It's the fake news, which goes to social media. Even a lot of the influencers, because USAID was funding five thousand different alternative media sources, just like they were fake or fake news, the big media. They were doing the same thing to fake news or the alternative media. The founding fathers put in the Fourth Amendment for that purpose. to stop government intrusion in the public's, in the people's rights. The Fourth Amendment was put in there. It says you have a right to be secure in your paper and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures. But not if you voluntarily give it away on Facebook or YouTube. You're telling everybody who you are, where you are, where you live, all that stuff. You're giving that information to the government. The Fourth Amendment was established to prevent that, to prevent the evil government from taking your rights and taking your privileges away from you. Well, here's something else. Right now I just noticed that, okay, so like I use StreamYard for the streaming service. I think I'm going to have to get rid of it because a comment came up when my Facebook and YouTube channel were suspended. that says to me, so if I don't respond to you guys on comments, it says, can't post comments to any of your current destinations. What do you mean? Well, they're not allowing me to post any comments because I used to answer people on these, you know, like I can answer on Rumble and I should be. I bet if I pulled up Brandenburg News Network I can answer them there if it's straight up. It's a violation of the First Amendment. Yeah. Why are we participating in organizations of that nature that are violating the First Amendment? This is the general public out there. Come on, people. You are the reason we are in this boat. Yeah. And we're drilling holes in our boat every single day. We can't patch the holes when you're giving this information to the government. The government is... According to Washington way back when, government is not your friend. They're an unnecessary evil, like a fire. I don't remember his exact quote, but he knows that the more information you give the government, the more rights and privileges you lose in this country. because the government wants total control over you. That's what the deep state has been going after all these years. They want to control your life. And you're giving them the opportunity to do that by posting on these open airway public medias. Well, I'm just writing something here on brandenburgnewsnetwork.com. I can post there. I can't answer comments from X, Instagram, the other Rumble channels, or Tor, and Odyssey will be up later. So I can post on Brandenburg News Network. That's actually the most secure site because we own everything on that one. There you go. So, yay. There we go. Let me see if I'm going to check out Instagram here a minute. Because Instagram is interesting because it goes up, but then it doesn't stay up. They don't log live streams. To my knowledge, maybe I need to do something different, but let me know if I need to do something differently. So interesting, isn't it? Oh, Kim Avery says, Facebook is a group of commies. If you post on those and you're giving up your private life, you're opening your whole self to becoming a slave to the government. What else do you need to know? You don't do that. Yeah, I'm going to see if I can actually post too. Hang on a minute. This has got me curious now how many things I'm banned off of. It's just kind of nuts. Well, if we take a look at this case a little longer, a little more, the Cosby case. It says on there under number two, since there was a taking of private property for public use, the claim was founded upon the constitution within the meaning of one forty one sub one of the judicial code and the court of claims had jurisdiction to hear and determine it. And then reading on the three, since the court finds that facts contain no precise description of the nature or duration of the easement taken, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the court of claims so that it may be made necessary so that it will make the necessary findings. So I should go right straight to the court of claims with us? No, you should read this case first. Okay. Before you do anything, you should go to the... And then if you're going to sue, and I still think suing individually in district court is the better way to go, not the court of claims, but federal court of claims is at least a little more constitutional, I guess you want to call it. State court of claims is a fake. It doesn't exist. It's a fake. because it was brought on by an act, not through a constitutional amendment. So the state court of claims does not exist. How do you get the federal court not to kick you back to the state courts and say, hey, you need to exhaust all... Well, you've got to exhaust your administrative remedy. You've got to write the letters to all of the board, You've got to do like a three-part letter where you – three letters every thirty days. And, in fact, since you've already been arguing, that could be your first letter. Now you're going to do a second and a third. They've got to be certified, notarized, and they've got to be certified so you know who you're sending them to. And you've got to go after the individuals that way. Once you send the three certified letters out, then you can sue the individual. Because if you do it before then, they're going to say that you didn't exhaust your administrative remedies. So you want to do that first so they can't kick it out. Greg Martini said too, he said, give them one week and send them another one. Because he said, they only give us a week to respond to anything. uh well yeah I know um I guess the first one you should give them a little longer and then then you can cut the other one to fifteen days or so but giving them a week to respond is pretty close it's making a very I mean they could use that as an argument against you and I and I'm just saying you don't want to do that you want to uh take care of your administrative remedy first so that they can't the courts won't throw it out based on you haven't fulfilled your requirements to uh exhaust your administrative remedy so that's where you got to go first almost like due diligence yeah because that's the that's the easiest way to flip you out of court and then start over again my court the the district court did that to me when they told me that, oh, the three-year suing judges are not really judges in your case, they're individuals, therefore they only get twenty-one days. Then when I asked them to put in a motion that they were in default, the court said, oh, no, no, no, they're judges and you have to give them sixty days. So then, sixty days rolls by and I put in another motion for default and they said, oh, no, no, no, you got to send it to the AG. I says, why? We're not suing them as a judge, suing them as an individual. They have to go to the AG. So this is the stall tactics that the district court on Eastern Division US District Court use. And they got away with it. So now I'm filing a writ of mandamus in the appellate court to get the judge off his rear end because he's not making a ruling on the case. ruling is very simple since they tried to do a motion for dismiss the ag and the ag put in a motion to dismiss based on they have absolute immunity so and I destroyed that in my response back to him so here's my case it's sitting there with nothing happening either they have immunity absolute immunity or they don't have absolute immunity if they do have absolute immunity according to that judge berg I'm going to sue judge berg he's going to be added to the list but he's not saying anything he's just sitting there so the cases since may twenty third hasn't had an opinion based on the motion to dismiss which is a very simple motion this guy's uh is playing the game. Well, they're all playing the game, and we don't have a judicial system. We have a bank, and that's all that the judicial system is. It's a bank to give us orders and then collect the money. There's no justice whatsoever being accomplished there. Let's see. How did they put that? The justice system is a system that makes you do something you would not normally do. And then take your money, right? Of course. Yeah. Revenue enhancement. So, yeah, write your letters, certify, notarize, and then by the time your letters get through, you'll have read this case on Crosby. You will have other ammunition that you can, and you can be putting together your final lawsuit. You know what? So the thing with my Braider lawsuit where he counseled me to commit a felony and such, which is really interesting. I think this is a lot of fun, actually. The judge actually said to me, amend your case. He said you need to put in a little clause here that says this is true under penalty of perjury. So he turned the case into an affidavit by doing that. And he counseled me to do that. So it was, it was kind of interesting. What's that? What's the judge's name? Redmond Redford. Yeah, in the court of claims. And so he actually, the judge and some of the people are actually helping me. Now the clerk for Christina Mims, she's the one that was, I'm pretty sure, slow walking this because it never got in front of the judge. The judge went on vacation. Then she didn't receive the temporary restraining order. but they never had it. And then she got mad when I told her that, you know, and she said they never, she never got it. She never saw it. I didn't bring it in. And I said, yeah, I did. And I've got a stamped copy. Give me your email finally. But she hung up on me first when I was like, yeah, I have it. And then she's like, no, you don't. And, and it's going to be blah. And she hangs up on me. Right. So I call her back and I said, look, I need your email address because I'm going to send this to you. And I believe she gave me the wrong email address. She put a period in there. or I might've written it down wrong. I don't know, but I think she gave me the wrong email address. I sent it twice and I'm like, kept bouncing, like something's wrong. So then I went ahead and looked something up and sure enough, the email address that I had put in there was wrong. And so she ended up getting it that day. And I said, now confirm that you received this. Cause I know you had it before. And just because you've got the excuse that we were working remotely was her excuse. I'm like, so how can you be working? at all if you never received something that I filed and have a date stamp on it on the paperwork. I don't think they were expecting that. And that's another thing that everybody has to remember is when you go into this venue of suing pro se or anything like that, you better have your documentation Really, really good. Make sure you get them to stamp everything that you do there and get a copy of the stamped version of it so that you know and you can attach that and say, yes, you did when they lie to you. I mean, that's what happened to the signatures when they were, when we were in the hearing and they said, oh, you didn't have that many signatures you turned in. This is all you had. And I looked at him and said, that's okay. Cheat and lie your asses off all you want. I've got two full copies. and uh mary beth that was sitting up there she was like she's like the the uh surprise groundhog up there she's like looking at everybody like oh my god what are we gonna do told me everything I needed to do to know that they were all in on it why why'd you go to court of claims I don't get it they're actually they're actually being helpful right now and well we don't we don't know if they're just funneling you into a an area where you're not going to get any traction on it. In other words. No, but they haven't had, they haven't had any responses to my, my, uh, uh, uh, declaration of, of, uh, default judgment. I asked for a default judgment and then on one, because, um, they literally did the wrong thing. That's all I can say. And then the other, the other case on Benson, they had like five things and they accused me of practicing, a law without a license and all this other thing. It's like, all right, you idiots. If you can sue pro se, which I am doing, which I declared, then how can you accuse me of practicing law without a license when there's no such thing as a law license, people? Okay. Well, I think you need to get out of court of claims and go to district court. Court of claims is not the place you want to be, especially state court of claims. They're fake. Curtis said, can I file a motion in district court for redress of grievances? I got to understand what that means. I mean, is he suing somebody in particular? I don't know. He just said, can I file a motion in district court for redress of grievances? I'm wondering if I could just jump ahead of this thing to district court and say that the circuit court is doing nothing. They're slow walking this. You're a circuit court or a court of claims? Well, I'm in both, but different cases. For the water wars thing, I'm in circuit court. Circuit court is fine. No, no. Circuit court is a constitutional court. Okay, timeout. So the one for Water Wars is in circuit court. The ones against Brader and Benson are in the court of claims. Okay, those of you who want to take out a court of claims just go to district court or circuit court. Circuit court is actually the next level above district court. District court is the lowest level of trial court. Circuit Court is actually the constitutional court that was set up by the Supreme Court per county. So the county circuit court, and then they set up the district courts later to take care of the heavier load that they supposedly had and local stuff. So circuit courts is fine. Being a circuit court is good. The problem with being in a district court, if you appeal the district court, you end up going to circuit court. If you are in circuit court, when you appeal, you go to the appellate court. So that's kind of a better place to be than in the district court. All right. And then how about jumping over the appellate court and going right straight to federal court? Can you do that? Supreme Court or federal court? You can go in federal court any time you want if it's a federal issue or diversity, meaning it has something to do with other states, other situations. If you can bring a diversity argument into it, that's a good place to be. Yeah. Well, all of this water wars bring into a world economic forum and the attack on the United States to steal our water resources. You can count it that way, that's diversity, and yes, you can go to federal court. Okay, like Nestle that's been stealing our water. Yeah, that's a federal issue. Okay. Sometimes if you go to federal court on a state issue, the federal court will say, well, that's a state issue, go back to state court. But the federal court has the power to rule on issues of state problems. So it depends. If you can bring the First Amendment, and obviously if you use Colbert, because Colbert, I mean Cosby, Cosby does bring the Fifth Amendment right into it on undertaking. So that is a federal issue. Okay. Well, that's good to know. Violation of the Fifth Amendment. OK, Curtis also said the nineteen sixty three Michigan Constitution was unlawfully ratified with just eight percent of the vote by Michiganians. I said that with a narrow win of point two percent. Yes. And it was spearheaded by George Romney, the lone liberal socialist Republican. Well said, Curtis. That's true. Yes. And hi to all my friends over on Instagram. And I will try to get my schedule together to said one person. so that I'm not, uh, not, uh, delaying things that I have been so freaking busy. It's like yesterday I started out with a broadcast and I went right from that into a meeting that lasted five hours by a gentleman who is a professor and also wants to help the, uh, the taxpayers party, the U S taxpayers party in Michigan, which is the constitution party. And it was an interesting meeting. It really was in, uh, in doing gap analysis and, and how to address what would be helpful to people as far as to see where it needs to go. I mean, for me, it's so clear-cut. It's just go to nullification, bam, you're done, right? And that sort of thing. But I'm not sure that everybody is ready for the... the adjustment that's going to be necessary to write the United States. You know, everyone wants to grab onto things that are familiar and they're thinking about the things that they've lost instead of what is possible. And until, until we can look forward, instead of clinging to what we have or what we had, we're never going to fix anything. And that's a really a spiritual problem. Yep. I agree. I agree. Um, I got to tell you, I got to tell you an issue that happened to me. I'm wearing my, every Trump is right about everything hat. And I walked into an ACO. Ace. Oh, Ace. Ace Hardware. In an Ypsilanti. And this woman is standing, a woman or man or it, I'm not quite sure, but a woman at this point. Tattoos all over the place. Tattoos all over, bone in her nose, the whole routine. And I'm standing at the register, but I have to get another item. So the guy at the register says, can you move over here so we could take care of the other guests or the other customer? And I, yeah, I moved over. And she said, well, I would have asked to excuse you, but I don't talk to fascists. How does she know you were a fascist? I wanted. But she was so fast. She said it and she was out the door. So I didn't have a chance to respond to her. I was going to say, do you even know what a fascist is? But I didn't have a chance. All you got to do is go and stripe your head like like this with like something pink or blue or something. And you're in you're in the weirdo group right there. I don't. I don't have anything with people, any problem with what people do. I mean, you know, that's not a problem. But anybody that's in the I just want to be mad at everything group would look at that immediately and just say, hey, you're in the club, you know, which is kind of crazy. Well, the ace people had a good laugh at it. I did, too. And, you know, I don't. First time I had a comment like that before. So because you're a Trump supporter, you're a fascist. I mean, where do you get your information from? Well, you want to hear something funny? So when I was running for governor and we went through East Lansing at an event one time and I had my billboards and such and we were going through there and it was a football game or something else was going on there. So we decided to just take a run through all the tailgating areas and such. And everybody thought it was funny because you could hear him whisper, hey, she's a lesbian, that sort of thing. And I'm like, what? how is it that they thought that I was, because I've got like, like short hair. I didn't think it was, you know, I was like kind of surprised at that. I'm sitting there with my kids and my kids are all just laughing their heads off because everybody was whispering, she's a lesbian. And like, like they were rallying for me at that moment in time. And I'm like, no, no, I am not a lesbian. And I think girls are yucky just for the record. Yeah. Well, the problem we have is that people are not understanding the First Amendment, number one. They don't understand that other people have a right to do what they want to do. If I want to wear a Trump hat or if I want to wear a Democrat hat or a Nazi hat, I have that right to do so. That's just my, that's me. My rights end at the end of my nose. I can't bug somebody else on how they dress or act. And if they want to dress or act a certain way, as long as they don't interfere with me, they have the right to do that. But people don't understand America, and this woman obviously has no idea what he, she, or it, what America is all about. Because she would make a comment like that rather than, you know, hey, you know, I really don't like Trump and this is why. But she won't get into a conversation because she only knows the snippets of what the TV says. She doesn't understand the real picture of what's really going on. She she would rather be in the world of. one world government she'd rather have the fake money system she likes this fake system that exists is that what it's all about do you understand the difference of what what this war is all about it's not about trump versus biden or or Kamala Harris. It's about the system of government that we're going to live in. We're either going to be free a hundred percent and you have to be educated to be free, or you're going to be a slave to the system. And if you want to be a slave, that probably you should pack up your bags. So there's a hundred other countries out there that you can be a slave in. England is becoming that England is, is, uh, uh, stopping freedom of speech in every direction. They're monitoring everybody's speech. There's a lot of other countries that are doing the same thing. You want to do that? Go there. I'd even probably buy you a ticket to go there. We take up a collection. Yeah. Gee whiz. Not a problem. If you want to be free and you want to learn how to live as a free individual and be intelligent... then stay here because that's who we need. We need those kinds of people here. Right. And it's like, it's like, I don't really have a problem with anybody. I really don't. And, and people's personal choices. I believe that's important for us to uphold those. But, uh, Yeah, every day it gets weirder for me. I want to show you something. I just posted this video. Let's see if I can put this up here. You're going to think this is funny. But this goes back with the root cause problem of what is wrong with our society. It's people who just want to hate instead of figuring out how to get along. Let's just find more reasons to be mad at each other because that seems like a good idea, right? Hang on a minute. Let me see if I can get this up. watch this is going to be some like hemorrhoid medicine commercial coming on here first I think it's pretty funny let's see look at that the humans are developing tools uh they're using that as weapons okay awesome the humans developed fire that's going to really they're using that as a weapon look what they got there they found a new way to transport themselves across the oceans of that planet that's pretty cool that's going to help the travel out there Pretty solid. They're able to fly across the world. And they're using it as a weapon. Look, they're using nuclear technology. They must be able to travel across the stars to other planets. Oh, my God. They're using it for bombs. What the hell is wrong with this planet? Look at that. Humans are developing tools. They're using that. That's pretty funny. I thought that was pretty funny. There's a song out there. I should find that song and maybe sing it one of these days. What the hell is wrong with people? Why do they just want to be mad at each other all the time? Even driving. People are crazy. They get more and more angry every day, it seems. But I'm going to excuse myself. I've got another appointment. So it was wonderful talking with you again. See you soon. Thank you. Well, thank you. And congratulations, John's beautiful bride. Absolutely. This is leaving. Susie is leaving. There you go. You married up, dude. So they say. Susie is just a lovely, lovely woman. What a happy time. I'm so happy for both of you. Well, we do well together, so it works out. Got the same political orientation, got the same ideals of what the world is supposed to be like. So that helps. I can't understand people that have a wife that's, if they're a Republican, the wife is a Democrat. That nonsense, I don't understand all that. But anyway, I don't have that problem. I just had a friend whose marriage failed because there was so much hostility from the spouse about supporting President Trump and really just kind of wanting to be American. And it was oil and water by having somebody who has more of a Marxist mindset over somebody who is a patriot. And I feel for people who are in relationships that are going in that direction. It's like my husband and I, we talk about things and we're pretty much aligned on almost everything. And, uh, I, and my husband is not yucky by the way, you know, it's like, it's like, uh, he's a, I said, women are yucky. I don't mean that in like, I like my girlfriends, but I ain't sleeping with my girlfriends. Okay. That's just the way it is. And, uh, my, my husband is just a woman. He's a wonderful person and he's really smart. And so we have some wonderful conversations and very meaningful, purposeful conversations and trying to figure out the world together as a married couple. And, We actually spend a lot of time talking about the push and pull that happens a lot between men and women and how that tends to be. a desire for control instead of edifying each other. And that is a real problem in our society. We should be out here edifying each other, supporting each other, and not trying to dominate each other or better each other or compete with each other. That is a real, that's kind of the crux of it right there. I agree. I agree a hundred percent. Yeah. And I'm real comfortable with that. It's like, bring on the toxic masculinity. I would, if I'm going to go in a situation, cause I'm, you know, I'm kind of a smallish person I've been told, you know, and it's like, I'd rather, if I was going to go into a hostile situation, I literally would like, dear God, please give me about, uh, yeah, I don't know, ten, thirty-five year old, thirty, thirty-five year old Marines who weigh like two-fifty a piece that can go in there and have like, uh, have like a countenance of steel. You're not gonna want grandma in the mix at that point in time. I'll negotiate before or after, but we have to be realistic. And I always feel that way for women. It's like women feel a lot of times very vulnerable and or they would really, a lot of women would really rather have the strength of men. And I think we got to be realistic. We can be very, very strong in some areas like knowledge and talking and And that sort of thing. But I'm going to tell you what, when I go shopping, I love having my husband there because he carries heavy shit, which is cool. You know, I mean, I mean, there's all of the and he loves doing it. And it's a good it's a good time. So, I mean, stop competing. Just stop competing. I can outspend him. I'll give you that. so what else do we want to talk about curtis brought up that that we were oh he's another coming from curtis islam is not a religion it is an ideology that seems to subvert and conquer governments and it seeks to subvert conquer I I that's very that's a lot of wisdom there and uh canada is insane always being canceled said denise I think x sucks too They are all data collection sites. I agree with that. But, you know, we use their weapons against them, and that's why I'm on so many different platforms. But just so you know, if you go to brandonbergnewsnetwork.com, I can comment there, and they don't – well, because we own the whole thing. That's a completely no-censorship platform. Nobody's saying you shouldn't use the platform if you are – doing something that you want to the public eye, but understand that every time you do something on that platform, if you use it for your own private life, you're putting your private life on the line for everybody to see. That's the issue. don't want to do that you don't want to put your pictures out there you don't want to give them any personal information if you want to argue something politically uh religiously for all I care I mean those kind of things you can do because that that information can get out there and you want it to get out there but you got to use it wisely and people are not using it wisely they post all kinds of stuff on those sites And that I think is a detriment to them. And it makes our government more dictatorial than it is presently. We wouldn't be in this boat today if we would have people, wiser people, that understand what's going on and understand the freedoms that were given and understand the Constitution. There's so many people that don't know the Constitution. It is shocking. Absolutely shocking. Yeah, I'm going to bring Mike on a minute here and we'll talk a little bit then. Hey, Mike, how you doing? Hey, morning, guys. How you doing? Good. I like the new title. Michael, a national. That's right. We'll get into something a little bit about that Yeah, regarding posting on networks and that, I did a post once on Facebook and they deleted it on me. They censored me on the information I had put out there. And it was factual information. It was firsthand information and they censored it. So I sent a notice to Facebook and said, hey, Please be advised that your censorship not only deprives us of our rights, but I use this as a medium to my previous, current, and future clients. Therefore, if you continue this act, you will be charged with interfering with interstate commerce and obstruction of commerce. I will drag your butts here to Michigan under Michigan jurisdiction, because this is where you're committing the offense, and you'll have to answer here in the Michigan courts for your actions. Never had a problem since. Hey, so I need to do that to both Facebook as well as the YouTube account for the U.S. Taxpayers Party, which is a constitution party in Michigan, of which I'm the chairman of. And so share that notice, if you would, with me, and then give me the steps to what I need to do, because you've already done it. There's no reason to reinvent the wheel, everybody. The stuff is already out there. Hey, did you guys notice this? We all got the memo. Red, red, and red. That's totally coincidental, too. That's funny. Even Susie had red. Yeah. Well, she's more pink, but that's okay. She's in the same ballpark. Yeah, there you go. It's all good. So, too fun. Well, yeah, because I think that we need to take Facebook. Well, I'm definitely going to need to take Facebook and YouTube to task because they subverted a political party's free speech also by taking it down and saying I can't live stream. So, it's kind of crazy. So, I need some help. Show me the path, oh great, ones that have gone before me. Not a problem. Yeah, I mean... You know, they think that because they have this alleged self-delegated authority, they can do whatever they want and they can't. Yeah. Okay, Mike, I got to ask you a question. All right. You know, John, we're friends. Did you know that him and Susie got married? I just found out. yes that was it he and susie called me last night and here you go I said oh the horizon is gonna start tomorrow I said oh yeah we we want you to come to something and he's like he's like uh did you know that susie and I got married and I'm like what we're on like every tuesday and it just kind of slipped your mind to tell me that you got married you know oh by the way by the way by the way we susie and I got married congratulations john susie oh thanks Very excited. I told John, I said he married up. Susie makes him look really good. Susie, does he drill you on Norton every day? She's in the other room. No, but she is interested in what we talk about. She's read Norton. She knows the court cases. John wakes up in the middle of the night and all of a sudden he's talking to sleep. Norton versus Shelby County. Ron might. I don't think that. So, oh, too fun. Well, anything else you want to talk about, John, or you want to stay in for a while? Yeah, I'm going to let you go. But I wanted to let you know that we're going to be at Nicola's on Wednesday, this Wednesday coming up. Nicholas is in Southfield. If you can make it, anybody in your group want to make it over there. It's north of Ten Mile, and we'll be there between five and nine. Come in and have dinner with us. Nicholas is a reasonably priced restaurant. You going to go, Mike? They got good food, yes. Okay. You know what? I'm supposed to do an interview on Wednesday night from another guy that beat cancer naturally. I might reschedule so that I can go because I've got the ability, I think, to actually go there. Between five and nine? Five and nine, yes. We start at five and we end at nine. Okay. Well, that might be a lot of fun. It would be nice to have you there. See all my buddies there. I love everybody in that group. And it's like I've been so stinking busy with my own lawsuits and such going on. It's amazing how complicated the system is, you know, as far as – Everything should be easier, but they've intentionally made it difficult so that people cannot have redress of grievance or a voice in anything. Yeah, that's their intention, to take our rights away. That lady that called me a fascist, she doesn't have any rights. She doesn't know what they are. So we do have a lot of ignorant people in our society out there that just don't get it, just don't understand what America is all about. Yeah, and I don't think they even know what's going on. Curtis sent me some more links that said, I think that this has been going on, the brainwashing has been going on for so long that people don't even know that most of what they believe is fake. Way back in the seventeen hundreds this started, according to the book I'm reading, I can't remember the name of it offhand, by Greenway. He talks about back during Aaron Burr's time in Jefferson. That's where it started. Socialism came into being at that point in time. They destroyed New York. They destroyed New Jersey. And they're trying to destroy the U.S. And hopefully we have enough people waking up that that's not going to happen. But knowing the history of our country and how we got to where we are and what to do to fix it is important, tantamount. If you've got nothing else to do in your life, that's what you should be doing, figuring out how to save America because we are losing. I think we're winning now, but we could have had this. This could have been way behind us already if we would have had enough people awake back when. My father would have been awake back then. He was smart. He understood what was going on, but not like we are really getting into it right now. We're really learning what's going on. He played with the fake money system and didn't know any different, as many parents did. They dropped the ball. They didn't follow through with the Constitution. He didn't know the Constitution. And consequently, we are in this boat that we're in. We've got to fix it. Stop drilling holes. Yeah, and everybody needs to get in the game on this, too, because it's, you know, a few of us, I think this is what people think. They think, oh, I'm not smart enough. I don't know enough to fight. I can't do this. Somebody else is smarter than me. They're going to fight the fight, and they just sit back. You know what? You are smart enough and you can get in this fight and there's so much you can do that. It's, it's amazing. And if you just jump in the Jordan, if you just go forward and you you'll get it figured out along the way. It may be a little, you might trip and fall a little bit. You might make some mistakes. You're going to make some mistakes. John's made mistakes. Mike's made mistakes. We've all made mistakes, but we learn from that and we get up stronger. The next time you just learn as you go. Well, thanks for being on today, John. You know what? I'm going to take a quick, uh, quick break here I just uh hi everyone helpful for me to get up and stretch a minute so give me like one one minute I'll be back with mike and we're gonna be talking pro se and beating up the bad guys Thank you. Good morning and welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg and I don't know where Mike went. Hang on a minute. Let me see. Hang on there, Mike. Where are you? Where did you go? Let's see, please. Let me give him a quick call because for some reason he got cut off here. It's going to take a minute. You never know. Real news for real people by real people at the kitchen table. Hey, what happened? You're gone. I don't know. We got disconnected. Can you jump back on? Yeah, I'm trying to right now. Yeah, they're screwing with us. Okay. Give me a second. I'll be back on. No worries. So I have something I can read to you while Mike is disconnected and coming back on. So my friend Sean Starry posted this this morning, and it's on my ex-account, and I think it's worth reading through. I posted his link. What is China CCP influence on the World Economic Forum since nineteen seventy nine? As of twenty twenty five, this dynamic continues with China's third plenary session resolutions reinforcing these values and foreign engagements, including the World Economic Forum collaborations, alignments and contribution to the CCP core values. Here's Mike. Let's see what happens here. Prosperity, democracy. These are all these words that they're using, the World Economic Forum is using, and their alignment with the CCP. Here's the socialist core values. If you hear these words, this is what you're going to have the instant recognition of who you're actually talking to, a communist and someone who wants to destroy this nation. prosperity, democracy, civility, harmony, freedom, equality, justice, rule of law, patriotism, dedication, integrity, and friendship play a significant role in shaping China's engagement with the World Economic Forum. So they're using... So they're using all of these things as a weapon against us. And you have to really think about what people are saying and what their intention is. And so something to think about as we go into our day. Anyhow, so where are we going? I don't know what happened there. I don't know why we got disconnected. Oh, this is interesting. So, um, just a few updates and I have a major announcement here for you. Okay. Um, Carl Wagner, MIA. She's MIA. Well, there's a surprise for you. So we're going to go, let's, let's talk about this minute. Carla Wagner acts my tax. And all of the connections there that tell me that this is nothing but a asset capture and maybe a distraction because it doesn't get rid of your taxes at all. It just shifts them. Well, not only that, but I was, you know, since she announced that she wants to run for governor, was this nothing more than a political stunt to leapfrog her position? for the election. These are questions that need to be answered. And you know what? If she's going to run for governor, these are questions she's going to be confronted with. Why did she do what she did? Why is she not answering questions? I mean, she wants to run for governor. She better learn to be transparent because we're going to hold her feet to the fire. If she were to be elected, I guarantee her feet are going to be held to the fire. And she better be transparent. She better act as jury at all times or we will hold her accountable. And the title is not going to protect her. Those titles are not going to protect them anymore. We're going to shoot down those titles. So, you know, if they're not going to do what they're supposed to do, then they're in breach of contract. Now, let's take this into consideration. There are those who believe that them being a corporation is not a big deal. Okay. Fine, let's run with that for a moment. If they're acting as a corporation, then these have to start acting like a corporation and they have to do everything like a corporation. What does that mean? Well, if you run a business and you have clients, don't you have contracts? Yes, you do. And what happens when you breach that contract? You're held accountable. So when they take an oath of office as a public functionary under a corporate veil, then they must act as jury. They must fulfill that oath of office. Failure to do so is a breach of contract. So we can now hold them accountable for breach of contract. Now, as it applies to property taxes, and that's something I want to go over here in a minute, Taxes are based upon what? Oh, products and services that your local municipalities or the state provides to you. Where's the contract? If they're acting as a corporation and it states right in their codes and statutes that they're a corporate body, then where's the contract? Where's the obligation? Absent a contract, there is no obligation. So how can they charge for property taxes when there's no contract and there's nothing affirming the obligation? So they're forcing us under threat, duress, and coercion under assumptions of presumptions that there's a contract that exists. There is no contract. Never was. But everybody's threatened by them. If you don't pay the taxes, you can raise whatever argument you want. But if you don't pay us, we're going to take your property. No. Well, that's what they've been doing. They put a lien on your property, and then the next thing you know, you're in trouble. Now, let's talk about the lien. What's the lien based on? The lien is based on supposedly a debt that's owed. Well, if we're the creditors, not the debtors, then how do we owe a debt? How do we pay that debt? MCL, twenty one point one five three one five four. They can only accept lawful money, lawful currency to pay that tax debt. We don't have the ability to do so. That's been taken from us. So what else? How else are we supposed to do this? Oh, you can do by check. You can do by credit card. You can do whatever. No, those are forms of payment. That's not a specie of payment. Are they willing to take coffee beans? Hmm. Why don't we pay them in coffee beans? Let's see what happens then. If everybody were to pay your tax assessor in coffee beans and they refuse the payment under state law and federal law, refusal of tender of payment is tender and full. Hmm. Something to think about, huh? So, you know, it doesn't just apply to just court cases. The courts are a bank. That's all they're doing. They're dealing with securities instruments. So if the municipalities are going to claim that there's a contract, that they're a corporation, but they're not acting as such, well, then don't we as the people have the right to do what we do as sovereigns? Oh, yes, we do. So let's start paying them in coffee beans. That's the only one. Coffee beans, rice, something has intrinsic value. Hell, draw a picture. That's an art. That's a piece of artwork. Here you go. It's worth something. So there's various ways to tender a obligation. There's also a debt discharge process that can be done as well. And that's a deep dive that we wouldn't be able to do on this show. But yeah, there's different processes out there that can be done to tender an obligation. And because we are the creditors, we can't be the debtors. Under Fifteen U.S.C. Chapter Forty-One specifically states we can never be denied our own credit. You go to the bank, ask for a credit card or a loan, and they deny you, they're committing an act of discrimination because why? We are the creditors. How else are they getting the money? Where's the money coming from? What generates that money? So that's everything that we need to take a look at. Further, again, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on this. I sent you an email this morning. that you can pull up if everybody wants to follow along and read it. And this is something I actually used in a case here in Michigan before the Michigan Supreme Court. And it states that in Gonzales v. Reich, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fed had Commerce Clause authority due to the aggregate effects of non-commerce activity, growing marijuana at home for personal medical use. upon potential interstate commerce, meaning if individuals are allowed to grow marijuana at home for personal medical purposes, this opens a Pandora's box for increased illegal interstate sale of marijuana. Nevertheless, the High Court has never held that the Commerce Clause, even when aided by the Necessary and Proper Clause, can be used to require citizens to buy goods or services and to depart from this two-hundred-year history permitting national government to require citizens to buy goods and services would deprive the Commerce Clause of any effective limits contrary to the limits set in Lopez v. Morrison. So right there, they're showing and letting us know that we do not have to buy their products or services, that we have the right to refuse So when they come and say, well, police protection, millage, well, we know millages are unconstitutional, but you know what? If I don't want their fake police department protecting me, if I don't want to pay for a bike path, uh that goes around you know the whole township or whatever I can opt out of those and I have the right to do so I am not mandatorily bound by those uh agreements so there's where the contract comes in they're a corporate body they want to act as a corporate body then you need a contract with every single landowner independent, and they get to choose what products or services they want to opt into. And they if they want to, they can opt out. That's how it runs. That's how you do commerce. This is not what they're doing. They're just cramming it down everybody's throat and saying you pay or else that's a gun to your head. The mob The mafia used to do that. Are they the mafia now? Is that what they're proclaiming? Is that their intent? They put a gun to everybody's head, and if you don't do what we say, we're going to take you out. We'll force you out of your house. We'll take your stuff from you. That's what they're doing. That's called piracy ashore. That's a federal offense. They cannot impound your stuff. They cannot take your stuff. And it's a violation of the Constitution because if they take your things, they're supposed to give you what? Rightful compensation. So this goes on to say that authorizing the Fed to force citizens to buy health insurance under the penalty of law would create police powers, which are indistinguishable from those reserved by the states, by the Bill of Rights, and support the constitutional scheme of a few enumerated powers assigned to the federal government. Concurring with the majority opinion in Gonzales v. Reich, Justice Scalia, ruled that regulation of non-economic under the Commerce Clause is possible only through the necessary and proper clause, but this clause establishes that the means by which laws are instituted must be appropriate, plainly adopted to that end, and are consistent with the letter and spirit of the Constitution. Plainly stated, Congress cannot... use unconstitutional means to execute the laws they pass. In other words, you cannot be deprived of your rights. They cannot legislate a law that deprives you of any of your rights. The Constitution is never suspended. Your rights are never suspended. They cannot by any means do so. Now, how does this affect us on other things? Well, let's take this into consideration. Can the Secretary of State Demand that in order to operate your personal automobile, not in commerce, demand that you have a driver's license. What's the term driver's license? Driver means you are in commerce. You're a traveler unless you're in commerce. These are technical words that they use. It's their word salad that they like to play. So can they force you to do that? Well, under threat, duress and coercion, yeah, they do. Well, you're gonna get a ticket and you have to go to court and the judge is gonna impose a fine on you or put you in jail for ninety days for not being in compliance. No, these are our rights. Your rights cannot be turned into a crime. They cannot take a right and then change it to a privilege and charge a fee for it. And that's what they're doing. How do we know this to be true? Well, I've got a letter from the State Department to the governor of North Carolina stipulating that the officers and the courts are doing just that. They're doing unconstitutional acts against the people of the North Carolina by requiring them to get a driver's license and have to register their autos. And it has to do with their status as well as a national. And there's an actual affidavit that the State Department will issue that you can fill out that exempts you from having to get a license and registration. So I put a letter into the State Department. I haven't gotten a response back yet, but I'm waiting on it. And requesting a copy of that affidavit. And also whether or not the letter that they sent to the governor of North Carolina is applicable to the state of Michigan. It should be. So once I have that in hand, now we can take that to the Secretary of State and we can take that to the courts and go, guess what? My status as a national is that you have no jurisdiction. When we can show and prove, because this will be the next step, when we can show and prove that departments like the Michigan State Police, by their own admission, are de facto, have no authority, does the court have jurisdiction? No, they do not. Do your city and township police departments have those, give the court jurisdiction? No, they do not. So now the courts have no jurisdiction. Now, when we go to court and the judge says, well, I don't care what you say, this is the way it is. Now they've acted what? In their personal capacity, not their judicial capacity. Now we can take them in the federal court and the federal courts cannot take institute the absolute immunity clause why because we've proven that there is no jurisdiction and if we can prove there is no jurisdiction the immunity clause goes out the window so these are the stepping stones to getting there so in your case with the water situation where did they have the authority to take something that wasn't you and I tried posting you a um I couldn't get it to post. There's a court case. The owner of a piece of land owns everything above and below it to an indefinite extent. Isn't that a maxim of law? No, this is case law. It's case law. I'll send this to you. They just can't undermine. They can't just Come under. Now, I've got property and they brought in and they were trying to do a well and they've set the well on the property adjacent to us. And they're saying, oh, well, we can diagonalize it. Oh, no, you don't there, Skippy. I own everything down to the to the core of the earth. And so we fought them and they never I don't know if they just didn't feel like taking on the fight or what, but they backed off. So I don't know if I hit a nerve. You know, that's that's one of the problems that, you know, I hit them with so many different things. I never know which one thing actually is the kryptonite that that does the job. What I'm really concerned here with the water wars is that you need to have a tremendous amount of water for data centers as well as for chip manufacturers and such. So when you are out there and everybody's out there in your community, Watch and see if there are deals made with, say, like some of the big names that are out there to put chip manufacturers or solar panel manufacturers or the battery stuff. But it's mostly the chip and the data centers that take so much water. And that's something that's going to become very evident in time. Well, if you want to have some fun with your public functionaries. Yes, I do. Check into public law, nine two five hundred. Okay. Clean Water Act. And not to get too vulgar. Say it again, what is it? Clean Water Act. Clean Water Act, ninety two dash five hundred, public law. And not to get too vulgar here on this G-rated family show. Now it's kind of G-rated. In essence, every time a public functionary flushes the toilet, he's in violation of public law for ninety two five hundred. OK, so what you do and surprisingly, there was somebody who charged Trump with a violation of ninety two five hundred in his first term. And he went to Congress to try and have them repeal, ninety two five hundred and Congress refused. So it's still in a force and effect. We know that for a fact. So I think Congress refused because they all, you know, because most of them didn't like Trump. So they probably said, well, we're not going to do anything that he wants. So we're just we're going to deny it. so uh ninety two five hundred still sits on the books so I don't care who the public functionary is every time they flush the toilet they're in violation of it they have to guarantee clean water they have to guarantee that the water is being properly treated that it's not being uh uh put back into the circulation as it were uh that can do us uh a harm in any way shape or form That's something you might want to take a look at and may want to experiment with as far as your local public functionaries and say, okay, we're going to charge you. You want to steal our water? We're going to charge you for violating public law, nine to two, five hundred. What do you want to do here? You have to guarantee that the water is clean. That's your job and you're not doing it. we can hold you accountable. Or maybe if you stop stealing the water, you know what? Maybe we won't press charges. Something, something along that line. All good things. Well, right now they've ruined so many different people's ability to stay in their houses. There's one family that has small kids. There's an eight year old woman who has no water in their house. And neighbors are trying to bring them water because, uh, The contractor and everybody else has so abysmally, spectacularly failed in this situation that everybody is just kind of like, this is just absolutely horrific. It's an attack on all of us. Well, there's another case. The situation and productiveness of the soil constitutes the value of the land. West River Bridge, the Dick's Howard. And so if they're stealing your water, then they're making your land what? Unusable? Uninhabitable. What's that one? Inhabitable, unusable. Gee whiz, I guess you don't get to charge me property taxes anymore because you have done a harm to the land and have diminished the productivity of the land. You have diminished the value of the land. Therefore, there are no property taxes by your act. What is that? And you're quoting what? It's West River Bridge v. Dix Howard, U.S. Is it D-I-C or D-I-X? D-I-X. It's abbreviated on my thing here. Okay. Let's see if I can bring this one up too. It's like on-the-go research happening here. There we go. U.S. Supreme Court, just yeah. Okay. Now, I got another one for you. Okay. It states that every person has exclusive dominion over the soil which he absolutely owns. Hence, such owner of land has exclusive right of hunting and fishing on his land and the water covering it. L Realty Company v. Johnson. Ninety-two, Minnesota. Nineteen-oh-four. Now, the other thing you can do is send them a true bill for the water that they've stolen. To be paid in lawful money. Now, I don't know what you want to charge per gallon. A hell of a lot right now because they all need to be taught a lesson. Well, then you charge them. You charge them. You send them a true bill for the water that they have stolen. And if they don't pay, well, now you've got a claim against them. Now you can start the administrative process like John was talking earlier about doing the letters. You do a notice of liability. And if they fail to respond in twenty one days and you hit them with a notice of non-response and you give them fifteen days and then you hit them with a notice of default ten days. And if they don't act then, then it's a final default notice five days. And now you've got everything set up to go to federal court. And to bring a claim against them. And if they don't, you know, if you're charging, let's say, a million dollars lawful money, that'd be gold and silver. You can offer an exchange rate of twenty five to one ratio. So that's twenty five million dollars in funny money if you so desire to do it that way. So it's up to you how you want to do that. But yeah. And then if they're a de facto now, my personally, I have a fee schedule and I have two different sets of fees, one for departments and agencies that are de jure and one that is for de facto. Basically, all the fees are doubled for anything that's de facto that's run through a de facto department or agency. So who's who's actually the one that authorized the stealing of the water? If they're a de facto department, then I charge them double what the normal would be. So your zoning boards are obviously de facto. Building departments are de facto. Do you go after them individually or do you go after the department? You can go after. Actually, there was a committee. So you can actually, the way you can word it, you can say collectively or severally. Okay. They're all accountable. All right. So you can do it both ways. You can do it both ways. Because as a corporation, you can sue a corporation. We have the right to sue corporations. And if they want to act and declare themselves a corporation, then they're suable as a corporation. And if necessary, you can also hit them. If you find that they were usurping their authority, now you can hit them personally. Trying to get this all up on my Telegram channel right now. At Brandenburg, the number four MI on Telegram. I've got a lot of imposters out there. So if you want to find the real stuff, that's where I am, guys. Man, yeah, it's just a mess here. You should have seen the meeting last night. I actually got in there and chewed tail pretty good. They never said a peep. And I told them all of you that touch this are on the hook for your poor decisions. Nobody's going to get away from accountability on this. So I think they see the writing on the wall of what's coming. And they're so far in over their heads. They don't know their jobs. They don't know the law. They don't know what they did wrong. But it's all driven by corruption and self-interest. They're making money off of these decisions they're making. Well, who gave them the legal advice to do it? Well, and I called that out last night, too, because the head of the zoning board is an attorney. And then they had their little city attorney sitting there. And I just laid it out to him. I said, just so everybody knows, there is no such thing as a licensed attorney. It's a private membership organization. And has anybody enlightened you to this fraud? Well, I would like to do something with your consent. Okay. With your consent, I have a challenge that I'd like to put out there. And I'd like to do this on your show if possible, if you consent. And that is this. The Michigan Bar Association, if you're listening, I challenge you to come on this show. I challenge any bar attorney to come on this show. Let's have a discussion. Let's discuss the fact that you don't have a license to practice law. Let's discuss how you're acting as a domestic terrorist organization by definition of Congress in collusion with the courts and the judges, in collusion with the county commissioners who fund it, with collusion with the city and township police departments who are acting in conjunction with the FBI report of twenty eleven, claiming that anybody who challenges your authority is an extremist and terrorist, i.e. sovereign citizen, a direct violation of the intent of Congress of May third, nineteen forty under public law. Let's have a discussion. I challenge any bar attorney to come on this show and have a discussion. I challenge the Bar Association to come on the show. And by the way, I give credit where credit is due. I would like to thank you, the Michigan Bar Association. You have entered into a tacit agreement with me that now allows me to represent anybody I want or anything I want because you failed to respond to the notice I sent to you asking for clarification. Now, you sent me a notice, an inquiry about me practicing law without a license. And I needed clarification on that. So I sent you a list of things for clarification and you failed to respond within the time given. And as such, it was a tacit agreement that the matter was gonna be closed and that I can now, buying through that situation, that agreement, that I can now represent anybody I want or anything I want. Thank you. And that's precedent for the rest. That's also precedent for the rest of us, isn't it? Yes, it is. Yes, it is. You know, this is a great time to be alive. I just got to say it. What a great time to be alive. So, yeah, the Michigan Bar Association, because one of the things I asked, I said, they said, oh, you can't give legal advice to anybody. Only a bar attorney is allowed to give legal advice. And one of the things I said, well, can you clarify that in that if a man or woman are giving advice to their son and daughter, do they have to hire a bar attorney to give them that advice? And see, they didn't respond. So I guess, you know, you're allowed to give legal advice to your children because the Bar Association must agree that you don't have to be a bar attorney to give legal advice to your kids. So or represent your kids. So there you go. We got that cleared up. So there's a few other things as well. But yeah, thank you, Bar Association, for agreeing to allow us to represent ourselves or other people or other things through your tacit agreement by failing to respond. So I'd just like to give kudos to the Bar Association on that. But I'd also like to challenge you to come on this show and let's have a discussion about these other topics and get this all cleared up. Because right now, under the Mission Constitution, Article Six, Section Nineteen, in order to sit the bench and qualify to sit on the bench, there's supposed to be a license to practice law. for a judge and yet none exists so how are any of these court cases valid where's the jurisdiction how do they have any personal or subject matter jurisdiction if they don't have a license to sit the bench in the first place that means they're not judges they're administrators or they are trespassers upon the bench they're committing a felony by sitting up there in their satanic black robe and they need to be arrested are you paying attention sheriff's departments Are you listening? The sheriff's deputies that are sitting in those courtrooms as bailiffs should be arresting those satanic SOBs for impersonating a judge because they're not judges, they're administrators. Even Gorsuch during his book signing said they're fake. That's from the, you know, he's a Supreme Court justice is saying they're fake. Hello, why are you not paying attention and why are you not doing your job? That's malfeasance, notfeasance, and misfeasance of duty. So let's start holding our sheriffs accountable for this. Let's start charging them and bringing them into federal court and saying, hey, you're refusing to do your job under your oath. Why? Hey, you know what? It doesn't have to be a monetary case. Let's just get injunctive relief. Let's just take them to court for injunctive relief and have the federal court say, sorry, sheriff, you're going to have to start doing your damn job. That's all we got to do. Let's start doing it. I'll bring popcorn. How's that? Okay. Enjoy the show guys. It would be, it would, that would be pretty epic actually. Yeah. I mean, this is what we got to do. The, the, the, you know, this, this absolute immunity BS that the U it actually started in nineteen sixty seven with the U.S. Supreme Court. They're the ones who created this crap. And I say, you know what? Let's get a group together. Let's take a case for injunctive relief to the U.S. Supreme Court, because when I've got a court court from the federal court saying, oh, yeah, a judge can shoot you dead in the courtroom, declare judicial immunity for being a judicial act. I'm sorry. We got a problem here. We have a real problem here. These judges do not have absolute immunity. And the U.S. Supreme Court who started this whole scenario is going to have to define, okay, if it is truly a judicial act, then, okay, they have immunity on their rulings. But when they don't have judicial authority because the state police are de facto, city police are de facto, zoning boards are de facto, building departments are de facto, and these court cases are being brought in there. And let's not forget one other one. The tax assessor is de facto. So how are they able to foreclose and steal your property by a fake administration? They can't. So where's the jurisdiction? None. No jurisdiction, there is no authority. No authority, there is no immunity. Well, I tell you what, we're looking at actually filing liens on public functionaries' property when they break the law. Yes, you're going to have to start doing that. You've got cases in probate court where these blood-sucking bar attorneys are putting liens on people's houses to cover their attorney fees, and they're the opposition. They've been awarded nothing. They've been awarded nothing. There is no awarding attorney fees here. They're putting liens on people's houses so they can get paid. Well, you know what? Pay attention, bar attorneys. We're going to start leaning everything you have. We're going to start leaning your house, your kid's house. We're going to lean your kid's toys. We're going after everything, okay? It's called the Robin Hood method, you know? We're just going to take back what's ours, honestly, and watch little John over there cry, you know? And as far as these tax liens and all that, well, wait a minute. Okay, wait a minute. Let's see. I'm the creditor. Okay. and I can't be the debtor at the same time I'm a creditor. So Mr. Tax Assessor, if you're still going to push this narrative, and the judge is going to push the narrative, you know what, judge, I'll tell you what we're going to do. Let me make sure I understand, judge. If I go ahead and take on the role of the debtor, would I be able to invoke my right of subrogation as such? And if I invoke my right of segregation, this case number is an account number. So you need to bring forward a full forensic auditing of all the incoming and outgoing chattel and currency that's coming in and out through this case number, i.e. account number. And I want a full accounting on this. And everything needs to be brought forward so that the beneficiary of this, well, that would be me, is properly taken care of. And judge, I'm making you the fiduciary. I'm making you judge the fiduciary in this trust matter, because there is a trust. And we're gonna express the trust. Because how did you open up this account number without consent, without a POA? Where's the power of attorney granting you the authority to do this? There is none. So I'll accept the debt and we're gonna invoke the right of subrogation on this. And I'm judge, I'm making you the fiduciary on this matter. You wanna see someone lose their mind? That judge will lose his mind. He will start flailing around like a fish out of water. No, no, no, he can't do that. No, no, no. And he'll get mad. He'll start throwing files around, slamming things around. Guess what? Oh well, too bad. This is what we're gonna start doing guys. Time to take back. And you want to know something? This is what they do to us. This is everything that they do to us. So let's turn it around and start doing it to them. And shut down this corruption that they've been inflicting on everybody. So that's where we start going. I mean, it's going to blow their minds. So far, I have people that hang up on me when I call and talk to them. But you should have seen their little attorney for the township last night. That guy is really something. And then the guy that runs the zoning board, he's an attorney. And somebody came up to talk to the microphone. And he turned around and was talking to somebody else in the room that he had a question for. He had some questions. They would not answer any questions. We're just here to take comments. Would not answer any questions at all. And told the one guy, he said, turn around. You are to address us. I'm sitting there going, what the hell? That was Tim Newhouse, and I was like, the gall that guy has is just unbelievable. See, maybe what you guys need to do is ask for airtime interaction with the board during a board meeting. bring an issue before the board and say, okay, we need to have an interaction on this and a clarification on this. We need to have questions answered and so forth. If they're not willing to do that, then obviously they got something to hide. Okay. We do have stuff to hide because so many of them have conflict of interest in all the development. We have a thirty four percent increase. in in residency here because of the out of control uh building and developing that's going on and the amount of people there who are builders developers contractors and such that are on the board or somebody that has in that had the vested interest is just absolutely shocking it is it is shocking they should have refused themselves from all of this, but none of them did because they're getting paid for easements. They're literally arranging the plans for the sewer and water development to go through their properties so that they're then paid for the easement so then they can go ahead and develop it. But they're even in on the planning of where the sewers are going to make sure that it gives them the best benefit. Well, you know what? If they want to put sewers and water in, okay, go ahead. But don't expect me to pay for it. Absent a contract, I have no obligation. But what I'm saying here is that they're developing their properties or what they own and having it. There's actually something called the depreciation fund that they have literally overcharged current clients so that to pay for the future needs of the of the sewer and water. Well, it doesn't do them any benefit because they already have it. But when the people in Byron Township and the part of this utility, this Byron Gaines utility, figure out that they have been overcharged in order to build for the expansion for these damn developers, that come in and then who gets the contracts? The contracts go to other people of which one of the guys that's sitting on the board is the project manager for the contractors that are building the schools. Yeah, when you've got a conflict of interest like that, I'm sorry, but that's got red flags all over it right there. The entirety of the way Byron Township is run is basically to give the developers a green light for everything, basically impoverish the current residents here and make everybody pay for their little game of folly and see how much money they can go home with. My question is, if you've got developers in there creating all these subdivisions, That's what they're doing. What industry is coming to that area? Well, I think that that's what this draining of the wetlands and ruining our water table for the residents is all about. They're kicking us off our land. It's like a fight for survival because it becomes inhabitable because the wells are all going dry and they can't get water to us. It's going to take too long to build the pipes. Then they're filling, they're backfilling the wetlands so they can build over the top of it. But it's all spring fed. So my guess is it's going to be something like a chip manufacturer, a data center, something like that. Something that has huge water needs that they can pump right out of the ground. and feed their own business. I see it when I when I drive across the state. Most of the two hundred acre farms are gone. They're all being eaten up by these big corporate farming or entities. which leads you right back to Bill Gates and the fact that they are buying areas over the aquifers so that they have unlimited, and I mean unlimited, access to water. And all these people that are in this don't even realize that they have literally bought into a satanic which is out to kill us because they want to erase everything that is of God from existence because Satanists believe that they can get rid of God and control the universe. Well, right now, one of the projects that I'm working on right now is... for people to reacquire absolute ownership of their property. Right now, you don't own your property fully. You have property and actually the state owns your property and they're controlling it. We're working on a process by which you're going to bring your land patent forward, acquire status of the land, remove your encompasses and move it into a trust so that they have no authority at all There's no eminent domain, and there's no property taxes. So this is a project we're working on right now, and I'm about halfway through setting up the process for it. So, yeah. I'd like to secede. I want to secede from the township. Okay. I don't know if you can do that. Start my own city. I think there's a process for doing that. We've been talking about it. Start my own city and say, okay, we get no benefit from these yahoos anyway. We get no benefit from them. Zero. Remove their lifeline. You got to stop. Everybody has to stop consenting to their corruption and stop funding them. Yes. You take their money away. They've got nothing. Do you know that one governor candidate that's honest could literally write the entire United States through nullification because the governor controls what money is spent? It doesn't matter at that point in time really what the legislature says because you can say, that's great. I'm glad it's in your budget. However, this is unconstitutional, so we will not be spending it in that direction. People cannot get that figured out. That the one office, that's why they didn't want me in there, because that's exactly what I was going to do is start nullification. And you can nullify the budget immediately. You could eliminate ninety percent of the waste in one day. In one day. And that's why they didn't want me in. That's why they cheated like crazy to get me off the ballot. Not once, but twice. They had to get rid of me because that's exactly what I was going to do. I was going to stop all taxes until we got this thing figured out. There is a way that you can generate enough money to keep things going that are critical for the people of Michigan. But you could absolutely nullify the majority of it. They'd be in a tailspin. And I think people would go, oh, no, whatever would happen. That's a lot of change. So what? You want to keep eating the brownies made with dog crap in it? Or you want to clean this thing up? That's the only question that needs to be asked at this point in time. Because if you're not willing to clean it up, you're collaborating with the enemy. Yeah. And. these public offices are part time. They're supposed to be part time, not full time jobs. And that's what we'd have to go back to is part time. How many laws do you really need on the books? Not very many. I mean, we've already got how many thousands and thousands of laws that exist on the books already. How many more do we actually need that justifies these legislators to be having a full-time job? Well, we sure as heck didn't need Ask My Tax because everything's already there and it's just a manipulation. When you look at over two thousand bills, a year going through our Michigan, it's over two thousand bills a year going through the Michigan legislature. These guys can't read that fast. I can guarantee you that. I don't even know if they can read at all. Somebody like hands them something and says, here, stamp this. They rubber stamp it and then they go back to their party. And that's all. And, you know, the last time I sat in on watching the Michigan State House election, meet, it was like watching a bunch of fourth graders on Red Bull. They were turning in their chairs. They were passing notes. They were doing anything and everything, but paying attention to what was being presented. They were not paying attention. And from the outside, it looked like a bunch of fourth graders on Red Bull. It really did. I was so shocked at how unprofessional That they were, and they're not, not only they're not paying attention, they're not reading the stuff that comes before them. That's why I referred to like Congress as the children of Congress or the children of the legislature. That's what they are, children. Okay, that's how they act. That's how they behave. That's what they are. And they're under the impression that, well, there's checks in the checkbook, so there must be money in the account. No, that isn't how it works. You're operating and declared yourself a corporate body. You better start acting like it. And you're not. How many businesses out there can operate day in, day out, year after year in the red and still continue to operate? They can't. If you're running a business and you're in the red, year after year after year, you're out of business. So what gives them the ability to not do, you know, how are they able to operate a business year in, year out and always be in the red? Why aren't they balancing their books? What comes in goes out. It's a zero out situation. Yeah, they don't want to, though, because this little corruption ring they got going on where they protect each other rather than doing the right thing. And I'm sorry, guys. I have absolutely no faith in either of the major parties at all, because if they could do something, they would have. And in one day, this thing could be turned around. But they don't. And I don't know how many of them are blackmailed or what else is going on there, but they're they're totally incapable of redressing grievances or doing the right thing they will never be able to do the right thing because no idea how many thousands of departments and agencies actually exist out there and the thousands and thousands of public functionaries that are out there you only see what you think public functionary oh that's city council that's the city board That's the governor. That's the legislator. No, there are departments inside of departments, inside of departments, inside of agencies, and they're all public functionaries. They're all milk in the system, and they're all wasteful. I'm going to do a quick search here. How many departments... If you got rid of all that, just think of how you might be able to actually balance a budget. Okay, so it's twenty. Now that's not what I'm looking for. Twenty principal departments. We all know that. But I want to know all of them. There are dozens of agencies and commissions and boards. These include blah, blah, blah. So it says it exceeds sixty. Sixty? It's in the thousands. You've got to be kidding me. And sub, sub. Yeah, that's co-pilot. Not truly very helpful. So there you go. Yeah, there's thousands of these little departments and agencies all over that people aren't even aware of. Yeah. And it's like, you know, they constantly create these little commissions that create an agency or another little department inside of a department. And it's just bloated government. That's all it is. Bloated government. It's wasteful spending. Unnecessary. Not needed. And... They're on it. It's unenforceable. They're all de facto. All these little departments and agencies that are inside of it, they're all de facto to begin with. They have no authority. So what is their purpose? Why are they there? Why doesn't somebody step up to get rid of them? Exactly. If again, you know, if someone would become governor that understood this could go in on day one, guess what? Raise your hand if you're a jury officer holding a jury office. If you didn't raise your hand, you're gone. Yeah, corruption would be gone very quickly. And they know what they're doing. They absolutely know what they're doing. This is not a surprise to anyone that's sitting in there. They know how the system works. They know how to grift off the system. They know how to get rich off the system. And if they don't, they literally will get taken out. That's their MO. Right. I have an announcement. Okay. And I want to make sure I get this up here. Is this an Ask My Tax thing? No. Oh, bummer. I love that subject. So we have been working on putting together a PMA, an educational PMA. And we have now launched the first part of it. And basically what we have is a visitor's forum. The PMA is called the American Equity Group. And we have a visitor's form, which is HTTPS, all that crap. I'll have to post it. I'll get the information to you so you can post it. Yeah, I get to do the first membership, remember? Yep. And so Thursday nights from seven to nine, we have a Zoom link. that I'll get to you so you can post on the channel here. And it's open to everybody. We're going to have a, well, we pick a topic and we're going to discuss that topic for like the first hour or so. And then we'll open it up for questions and answers to that topic. This is one, you guys, be careful of that title because there is a... a group that's, that's group equity group, Michigan, and they're about mergers and acquisitions, which is really interesting. Wow. So what's, what's the, what's the website name? American equity group and the let's see here. I'm not, I'm not the text. I'm not the techie on, on this group. So The visitor's form link is https dot dot, you know, the colon slash slash little t dot m e forward slash plus capital P, capital U, little t l e Uh, I think that's an O or a zero. I never can tell the difference. Uh, W S K one capital J little I capital M capital W capital Z little H. Is that on telegram? Uh, I believe so. Yes. Okay. Hang up. Yeah. Says it's not found there. Well, we'll just go ahead and we'll just go ahead and I'll, I'll publish that later. Cause T T dot M E is, uh, it's interesting. Brought me to Telegram, but it's not coming up on Telegram. So we'll post the link. We'll get it correct. Okay. All right. And then the Zoom link for Thursday nights is the HTTPS colon slash slash US lowercase US zero six W E B dot Zoom dot US forward slash little J forward slash eight two one zero eight zero two eight one four four question mark p w d equal equal sign capital z little a m I'm sorry capital z little a p m F, capital K, little z, zero zero two seven, capital N. You know what? I hate to say this, but I have no faith that we're going to accomplish this by typing this in. So why don't we do this? You just send me those links and I'll post it. Okay, that'd be easier. It'd be much easier because I have no faith that anybody will actually type that in correctly. Okay. I'll get it to you. So but anyway, yeah, we're going to do we do different topics. We're going to be covering a wide variety of different things, something different every week. Although I think the next couple, three, four weeks, we're going to be talking about trust. And so. information again this is something that uh everybody can come into and take a look at it's a generalization uh forum and so the information is pretty general um the sessions are recorded we ask that everybody at least have their camera on so we can at least see who you are or put your name up there so we we can tell who you are and um So if you miss one of the Thursdays, you want to go back and listen to it, you can. Now, if this is something that you want more information on, what we're going to also be doing is there'll be an application process to where you become a member of the PMA. And once you get through the application process, we're looking for donations of like twenty five dollars per person for a year to help cover the costs. And then you'll be having access to our Tuesday night Zoom sessions to where we do deep dives into a lot of these topics. We have training videos. We're going to have template forms and stuff like that. We're putting together a library that you'll have access to and a few other things. That's going to be coming next. This is about educating everybody. The more people we educate, and get people to understand these processes and what to do, how to do it, how to protect yourself, how to protect your assets. These are the steps you have to take to getting back to a republic. And it's important that you protect yourself and your assets. And then because once you get into this, I guarantee your public functionaries consider you a threat. We have emails. we did one for you to a police department. We have the emails from the chief of police instructing his officers on how to talk and interact with people that they have now deemed sovereign citizens pursuant to the FBI report of and their houses are flagged as such. And all these people did was get their land patent and they posted a no trespass sign. That's all they did. But now they're marked as extremists and terrorists, according to that police department. So this is the crap that they're pulling. And this is how we got to learn how to protect each other and protect our own stuff. And part of that is learning how to do a trust and how to operate through a trust and getting yourself protected. And that's what we want to do. We want to educate people about as much as possible. We're going to have a session on how to do a FOIA. We're going to have sessions on things like a travel package and how to act and interact on a traffic stop. Just a wide variety of different topics and subjects that help you operate in this corrupt system that we're dealing with. That's just awesome. That's so awesome. Well, it's eleven o'clock, Mike. And so let's I need to take a break because I had to go work on my my own pro se stuff right now. So that's that's my plan for the day. So let's say a prayer and then last words, OK? Thank you, dear Heavenly Father, for everything you've done for us to stay and that you've given us some really good work to do and some challenges. It's like going in the gym mentally and. and figuring things out expanding what we think and looking into things we didn't even think about looking in two years ago we're really thankful for all those wonderful people like john and mike who are willing to share what they've learned with all of us so that we can learn what they know and every single person that comes forward gets to teach what they know because they learn it from a different perspective and such we thank you so much for protecting us and defending us We ask that you would reach out to all the families here in Byron Township and across the state and this nation who have had their water stolen from them where their homes have become inhabitable because of this huge, evil, global crime syndicate. And I ask that you would bring this whole crime syndicate down on its knees because there's so many people that are being hurt right now. Even as far as looking at the crimes being committed through taxation and taking what we do and enslaving all of us. We ask that you bring the entire system to its knees and that all the people would be free to live as you intended us to on this earth, serving you, serving each other, and getting away from this greed and corruption. Please open our eyes to the fact that all the spiritual gifts, everything in your world, in your invisible world, becomes much more precious than what's in the material world. We don't want to worship the material world. We want to worship you. We want to walk with you on this earth and do what it is that you ask us to do as merely a traveler. But this isn't our home, and we're thankful for that. Everything here is temporary, and we're thankful for that. Thank you for not leaving us stuck here in a very imperfect world, but that we can go home and be with you in perfection. We love you so very much. We thank you for everything you've done for us. Help us to continue to ignore the distractions and continue to bring honor and glory to you. In the name of Jesus Christ, we pray. Amen. So there you go. So with that said, guys, that's that time. You want to say any other last words, Mike? Just tune in on Thursday if you can. If you can't, again, they're recorded so you can go back and listen to it. And just a matter of just get out there, get educated, understand what's going on and how to do and operate out there. And Wednesday, I'll see you on Wednesday. If you guys can come out to Nikolai's on Wednesday, I'll be there. And, yeah. Looking forward to seeing whoever. I think I might try to make that. So we'll, we'll see as long as nothing gets in the way. I think, I think I should be able to make that. That would be really nice and fun to see everybody. So with that said, everybody have a great day today. God bless you. God bless all those whom you love and God bless America and make it a great day. Go smile at people. You know, the toughest people are the people that go through tough times and they just cruise right through it. Doesn't bother them. They address the problems as an adult. without getting their emotions all in a turmoil. They just look at it because their hearts are set on God and what God wants, not what we want. We're very flawed. All of us are. And when we get stuck on our biases and what we think needs to be, God isn't interested in that. He's not interested in our comfort. He's interested in our growth, especially our spiritual growth. And that only comes from going through difficult situations. So you know what? Let's do this. And I will see you tomorrow. Tomorrow it is. Let's see Liberty Essentials in the morning and followed by Greg Martini with notices. And I love those. I love everybody that's doing the notices right now. I've learned so much. It's pretty amazing. So anyhow, I'll see you tomorrow. Stand in line, Mike.