Published Oct. 6, 2025, 9:03 a.m.
9am Vicky Davis Technocratic Communism The United Nations as an organization is world communism. The strategy to impose world communism on the people of the United States (and the other countries in this hemisphere) has been economic rather than military as the people were led to believe it would be. It's our own leaders who were the Pied Pipers leading us to this demise of the U.S. I'm working on a timeline that shows the who, when and what. 10am Cognitive Carbon - Eric Tilton ECDO Solar changes and Retrospective Charlie Kirk X/Twitter: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1DXGyWMkMkWxM Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/636616148890812/videos/1465870357859604 Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6zxsvk-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-1062025-technocratic-tyranny-and-cognitive-car.html https://rumble.com/v6zxt0o-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-1062025-technocratic-tyranny-and-cognitive-car.html Odysee: https://odysee.com/@BrandenburgNewsNetwork:d/bnn-2025-10-06-tech-tyranny-and-cognitive-carbon:b BNN Live: https://Live.BrandenburgNewsNetwork.com Guests: Donna Brandenburg, Vicky Davis, Eric Tilton
Good morning and welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg. It's the sixth day of October, twenty twenty five and welcome to our show today. We're going to start out with Vicki Davis with Technocratic Tyranny, and then we're going to be going to Cognitive Carbon, who is a friend of mine, Eric Tilton, and talking about solar flares and what this really means. But we're also going to do a retrospective on Charlie Kirk because we all have a lot of questions and the shutdown that's going on right now. I think it's a good time to be talking to each other. and trying to figure out what's really going on because I'm not sure we know the exact answer. So exploring all things is important. How are you doing, Vicki? I'm doing just fine. Thanks. How are you? Good. You're a little quiet this morning. Is there a way you can... Let me see if I move the microphone up. How's that? That's much better. Okay, good. I'm still trying to get everything up and running here. I got up this morning and I have not had all my coffee, but this morning I've got my, my Hulk mug that I'm drinking out of or my Hulk cup or my iced coffee. So I think we'll be there shortly. So, uh, so what's, what's going on in Vicki world today? Well, I've been, uh, What I've been trying to do, because I have over five hundred articles on my website. It's amazing. If you guys go to her website, you will be absolutely shocked at how much content Vicki has. Yeah. And it's all oriented towards the computer systems of government and what they did to our government when Clinton and Gore, quote, reinvented government. And in the reinvention of government, they integrated a lot of the computer systems of the government at the same time that they were working on the Y-to-K fix, you know, the correction of the systems for that. And... I think they screwed up a lot of systems. I got a question about that Y-to-K stuff that happened. What's your opinion on that? Well, they needed to do that. And it has to do with the evolution of computers. Initially, like in the nineteen sixties and early seventies, computers were far more expensive than labor. And there was a time about mid-seventies when that flipped, when computer programmers and analysts became cheaper than, well, no, I reversed that. In the mid-nineteen seventies, the cost of computer equipment started to come down. And so, initially, when computer systems were designed, they only put in one position for the year. You know, like for nineteen seventy, it would be like you'd put a one or a two, whatever the year was. they expanded that to two positions so that you would have seventy-two. And so a lot of the systems were developed with only two positions for the year. And so when Y-to-K came around, now we needed, we had to have four positions for the year. And so that's what the Y-to-K project was about. Were you alarmed when that was going on at all or did you change anything in your life? No, not at all. No, I was not alarmed at all. I don't know who was behind that big hype that something disastrous was going to happen. Actually, the disaster in our government computer systems was not visible to the public. Well, and that's a really good point that most of the stuff that we see, I don't think, is they're only letting us see what they want us to see at this point in time. Yeah, but I've been very encouraged because in the past two weeks, there have been several stories about how badly the data is screwed up. There's one article about the DMV in California. and how bad their data was. And another story, I forget which agency it was, but that's what Doge is about. And all they're talking to people about is lack of integrity in the data, but they aren't talking about the systems itself. What's the source of that data? Because it's really the source that's important. If you take in data where the source doesn't have good, clean, honest data, then you're corrupting the entire system. Poster child for an entire nation is the election system right now because it's all being rigged at the operating system level. Yeah, we should not have computers involved in our election system at all, period. Not at all. But that's what that whole dialectic was in Florida. I think it was the year two thousand, the hanging chads and all that crap. I mean, that truly was a dialectic. Those machines, they were old, but you wouldn't have that many machines failing at the same time. You know, maybe one. But yeah, that was a created crisis. Yeah, I was kind of done with it before it even started. So, you know, and I think that's important. It's important not to believe what we hear. The disturbing thing that I see right now is how many people are believing the alternative narrative. And I'll tell you what's really got me going here. I want to throw something out there that I saw this weekend. Now, I like President Trump. I like some of the policies. I don't think everything he does at face level is what should be being done. And some of it, I think, is optics. I think it's mostly optics. And I think that President Trump is the bait here. to see if criminals will bite on it. He kind of shows who people are, but his policies are very interesting. And so I like President Trump, but I don't take everything at face value. So this weekend, if you jumped on the White House site, let me see if I can pull this up a minute, because I do think that this is a fairly significant happening. Let's just put it that way. And I want to show you what I saw. Okay, we're going to start here today, and I put it out there because I kind of think he's kind of hilarious because what President Trump does is it's politics. There are things that are like politics for idiots going on out there. It doesn't mean that he's an idiot. What I'm saying is that – all right, let's not – Oh, we're swimming in propaganda. It is all propaganda. All right, let's see if I can just – I'm just going to put some numbers in there, random numbers in here. This is not actually an email address. I just want to get past it. I have no idea what I typed in there. And let's see. No. All right, what do we do? because I want to get past this. Anyhow, if you look here, it says the Democrats, let me see if I can get, oh, there we go. We'll go past it. The headline here is Democrats have shut down the government. Okay. What is wrong with this scenario? And I'll tell you what it is. First of all, the White House should be above this kind of partisan nonsense. If the Democrat Party right now is involved in illegal activities, designate the dang thing as a terrorist organization, okay? But to use the White House... And it doesn't even sound like President Trump. It really doesn't to me. So I'm like, who's writing this and what have you done with our president? Democrats have shut down the government. This is so much crap. And then to go down here, go down here, go down here. And you see all of these different little areas. Americans don't agree with the Democrat actions. Well, freaking do something about it. But I see this as using the White House, which should be a solemn statesman-like entity, as a partisan bunch of propaganda, actually. I've got a problem with it. Do you have a TV going on in the background? Oh, yeah. It's in the other room. Let me go turn it off. I can hear it. I want to go over this with you because I've got a problem with this, guys. I've got a big problem with this. The White House and the President's Office should never be used for propaganda but to serve all people. If there's a problem, OK, I'm back. OK. In my opinion, the White House, the office of the president should never be used for propaganda. This is supposed to be something that stands above that. That's a statesman like organization and that serves all people because there are Democrats that are out there that I believe are really good people. The party itself is corrupt, but so is the Republican Party. OK, absolutely. This is why I have a problem with this. that it's become a partisan show, and I'm not okay with that. So let's look at how many of these things. Shutting down the government is bad for business. Well, you know what? Let's get her fixed instead of sitting here demonizing one or the other. And if you're going to go after the Democrats, then – Drop the freaking hammer and designate it as a terrorist organization or at least something that has, it really should be abolished because they've taken foreign money in our elections. So let's go after both of them because they're both bad and they're only going after one side. I have a problem with that. Well, and another thing you haven't heard from either party. The tax credit, that is straight out of the taxpayer's pocket. And what does it do? It bumps up profits for the insurance companies. It's money that goes right straight to the insurance companies. This is such a bad look. I can't even believe it. It's like the left is willing to shut down the government. Why don't you just name the people in the, the, uh, Congress or whatever that just are playing. And I mean, it's both sides. So Democrats are willing to shut down the government unless their demands aren't met. It's like, all right, there is no, there is no, um, uh, There's no leadership to what I'm seeing here whatsoever because somebody should go in there and drop the hammer on all of them. And I mean all of them. There seems to be an ability. I pulled something the other day, and I can bring it up in a minute. But just look at this. It's like the entire thing, the entire thing is about the Democrats, the Democrats, the Democrats. I'm like, guys, this is a really bad look. Uh-huh. Democrats' refusal to pass this. Senate Democrats, really bad look. Then what are the Republicans doing to do a runaround on this? And let's just call it what it is. Let's abolish both parties because they're both criminal. And nobody's doing anything except the blame game. And I don't like this on the website of the White House. This is a shame. This is shameful. And I don't think it's President Trump. I don't at all. It doesn't sound like it. Oh, I don't be too sure about that. Because it was President Trump that appointed Howard Lutnick to his cabinet there. And it would take a while to explain the significance of that. Well, you and I went through that before. And, and I know, I know the, you know, the significance of this and I'm seeing a lot of bad, I'm seeing a lot of bad, uh, alliances there. I get it. And, uh, I've got a lot of questions. However, I don't think that they're taking the straight road to, to, uh, getting to the end game on this, but I think we're getting there. I really do. But it's also sifting through people to see whether they're going to be helpful or they're going to fall into, I don't know, I think it's a sifting of people. Let's put it that way. And I think it's multi-leveled right now. But one of them is, we have to question everything. Even President Trump and the White House for certain, the White House website, if we're not questioning this and we're saying, oh, yeah, yeah, it's the Democrats, it's the Democrats. And like, you know, I don't know, guys, I think it's all of them. Yeah. Well, the whole Affordable Care Act, that's a racket. You know, remember the Republicans tried to repeal that legislate to get rid of it. But the Supreme Court ruled that it was a tax. And it is a tax because what they do is subsidies behind the curtain. So let's take you, for example, if you bought insurance through the Affordable Care Act, you would be paying more than somebody like me. But the subsidization of insurance is behind the curtain. So you would be like directly subsidizing me, but you don't know it. And that's the way that Affordable Care Act was written. It's an insurance program to provide subsidized insurance to poor people, but the price of it is so high, poor people can't afford it. And so it defeats the whole purpose of what ostensibly it was originally set up to be. So and who are they really subsidizing? They're giving money to the profit making insurance companies, health insurance companies. That's another thing that we need to talk about. You look at Gretchen Whitmer here in the state of Michigan. Her daddy was the head of Blue Cross Blue Shield in Michigan. Oh, his successor, Dan, Dan Lope, ended up getting a payoff. And I think it was eighteen or nineteen of about eighteen million dollars. forgetting daddy's little girl in the government's office. or in the governor's office. And then if you follow the trail of his wife, Amy Tatry, there's a bunch of foundations and this kind of crap they hid the money in, which is the way it goes. I mean, there's all sorts of things they do with it, but they usually go through the wife. So if anybody's out there suing these people in office, go after their wives, because that's where you're really going to find the pain point. But look at this next one. It's if Congress shuts down, moms and babies pay the price. this is a bunch of emotional propaganda crap. And every single one of these things that I looked down through, I was like, are you kidding me? Tell me that the American people aren't, are, are smarter than to bite on this stuff. Americans for prosperity. That's a crap organization. And so, you know, it's like, it's like, uh, I don't know. I don't like this organization at all. And I know too many people that are involved in it. And I'm like, no, isn't that one of the Coke organization? That's a Coke organization. So you've got, this is all propaganda crap and it's on the white house website. And I'm like, are you totally kidding me? I'm so insulted by this. Well, People, I'm not sure people would under, well, if they could get a simple explanation for it. And the simple explanation for what's going on is that we have an insurance racket. a syndicate, an insurance syndicate in operation in the United States. And if you don't regulate insurance, especially like health insurance, then it turns into a racket because they take your money and then they decide whether or not to pay out on their obligations. Yes. And I don't know if you remember Katrina, the whole big deal with insurance that went on there. the insurance companies were all of a sudden saying that, oh, if your roof blew off, well, you should have had a writer for that. A writer. Yeah, it's like, are you kidding me? So I'm going to I'm going to propose something else on this, too, before we move on. Let's let's say that President Trump is the bait. And let's just say that he puts all of these things up here. And let's just say that all of them are to point to the traitors who are putting out this nonsense. Potentially to bleed this out in front of it or call attention to. What would you think of that? Possible? Well, I think all crap. And so it's possible that he's putting this out for to point out or they're putting this out because I, you know, President Trump is there, but he doesn't run this thing alone. All right. He's got to have people around him. And if these people around him are bad, he's going to have bad information. President Trump, if you're listening to me, you know what? I'm going to tell you this. I will never lie. I will never do anything wrong. intentionally. I might do something wrong just from the lack of knowledge, but for the sake of everyone in the United States, please start talking to everyday Americans instead of these for-profit entities that are nothing more than, I don't know, money laundering NGOs and, and, uh, market one C threes and all this kind of crap. I don't, I don't stop talking to these people. These are, these guys are the problem. They're part of the problem. Well, yeah. And they've, uh, over the years there, there are just thousands and thousands of nonprofits and NGOs that have been set up. Well, you the taxpayer are subsidizing that system that's burying you. All of it. All of it. Look at this piece of crap here. Okay, Gulf Tower property owner. This is a bunch of crap. Okay. And I'm going to tell you why it's a bunch of crap. We don't have a housing crisis in the United States. We have neighborhoods that are empty, that they're parking cars in front of. We've got developers that are are eating up our farmland while they let the cities that are just falling down into shambles. All you got to do is go into Detroit where the builders are building in the center of the city. It's great. You go two blocks away from the center of the city and it looks like, you know, downtown bombed out Beirut. And Gaza there, the houses are falling down, the roofs are falling in a crack. But these these developers and property owners are, you know, making a killing on this. And look at this as a property owner working to revitalize historic buildings and provide new housing all on the taxpayers dime. I might add. The gold power of Pittsburgh urges Congress to avoid the government shutdown. Addressing the housing crisis is a bipartisan issue. Yeah, because they're stealing us and robbing us blind. However, a shutdown will stall critical housing programs. Yeah, that they're making money off of. Well, they let everything fall absolutely right to the ground and refuse to... Refuse to do it the right way. And then at the bottom, Chuck Schumer is threatening a Schumer shutdown if he doesn't get one point five trillion dollars. Well, what are these guys making off of it? They're all making money off of it. It's all government. It's all government corruption. I would I guess I would encourage everyone to look at this list here and start questioning and looking into how much money are these people making off the government? Well, the whole redesign of our government was around the concept of market. Yeah. And what did they see? You and most people, everybody, I for a while. were fooled by the word market. That makes it seem like it's a capitalist kind of thing. Well, no, it isn't. Market is the centralization of whatever the function is. Chrony capitalism. It's crony capitalism what we have right now. It's not pure capitalism at all. It's basically... It's not even capitalism. It's communism. It is. It's fascism. We already have it here. Look at this. Democrats who want to claim the shutdowns would be dangerous, disastrous, and self-inflicted harm to seniors, veterans, service members are now actively trying to force one. Well, you freaking Republicans, why don't you get in there and do something instead of complaining and putting this propaganda on the White House website, which should be a sacred website, instead of putting all this up and blame, blame, blame, blame. But none of you are doing anything. Democrats are taking the people's... uh government uh people's government ransom it's like are you kidding me you know what i i think we're being divided intentionally darn right we are let's see who's dumb enough to bite on this because i there are a lot of positions that the democrats have that that i agree with them i may not agree with their solution but i agree with their definition of the problem um the Republicans, they're just all in it for the money, you know, for corporations and for themselves. Well, they both are. The problem is that they both are. It's just they appeal to the bias of two different groups and keep trying to pit that bias against each other. Well, that's because, you know why that is? Because they have political consultants in the background that formulate the messages for each and they are coordinated. I guarantee that. When I was listening to the Democrats this weekend, I can't tell you how many times I heard the term everyday people. Well, what the hell is an everyday person? You know, I tell you what I saw at the RNC convention because I was there and I actually got threatened to be kicked out. And I was so mad. We were sitting in one of the venues there and just sitting down and having a few things to nibble on, that sort of thing. And I was with a bunch of my friends and such. And so it was a nice time. I had a good time with my friends. In fact, Boone Cutler was there. He just died. And I just loved that guy. He was such a nice, nice guy. And so we were sitting there talking and all of a sudden something came down because somebody didn't like my post that I put out there and said, you know, Secret Service is saying you got to take that post down or they're going to remove you. And I'm like, how am I going to take that post down? I'm not taking that post down. I sat there and the more I had time to mull this over. My blood pressure was getting up and I don't mean that in a bad way. Let's say my resolve. I don't have high blood pressure. So I mean, I mean, it's probably a good thing because I'm actually low blood pressure most of the time. And so as I'm listening to this, I'm just like, you know, I'm like ready to just fight. And I was like, there's no way I'm taking this down. So I responded to it. Like, if Secret Service, in fact, told me to take that post down, you can go F yourself. That ain't going to happen because it was true. It was accurate. And I'm sorry if the people there were insulted by what was said. They needed to be insulted by what I said because it was – um if they were insulted i didn't think it was insulting actually i thought it was just maybe maybe i'm more autistic than i thought i was you know it's like i didn't think it was insulting i thought it was just accurate and truthful and i serve no one except for god almighty And if we, the people need to hear it, I'm going to put it out there and I don't give a crap who wants salt. I, you know, it's like, I don't care if I ever get an office on anything. I have way more power outside of office than you would have in office. If the truth be known. I mean, that's the truth. And it's the, you're not, you're not muzzled. And so, you know, I don't know. It's just kind of crazy. But I think everybody better get on this thing, and people need to just call the White House out. And I don't think it's President Trump that put this thing together. He doesn't have enough time in the day. Are you kidding me? He's got people that handle everything. Bring it to him that he's appointed, and he's going to sign it. He might look over it, but he's going through too much stuff. But whoever put this together, I'm going to tell you, whoever put this White House together, house site together is a piece of crap. This is not just brownies made with dog crap. This is pure dog crap that's on this site. And they should be all of them ashamed of themselves. Well, they don't know the difference between government and a private corporation. No, they do because they're involved in it, all of them. Well, but they're acting as if the United States is a corporation for business, and they are in partnership with corporations. Now, people would say, yeah, it's a corporation. And I would say, yeah, go F yourself. We have a country, a nation state. And the government's partnership with business is a violation of everything that this country stood for. Okay, yeah. And I'm going to just say it. I'm going to put it up right now. And I am going to make a demand as a citizen of Michigan, a resident of Michigan, and an American. Whoever put this crap on this site needs to be fired immediately. Immediately fired. And they need to be taking a task for their, and whoever stood with them on this, they need to be fired. The United States of America doesn't stand for this partisan crap, and this is as partisan as the Democrats are, and it is a shameful exhibition of lack of statesmanship, lack of leadership, lack of anything that I personally feel good about at all. This is not what the United States of America is about. Now, get it fixed or get the hell out of the arena that you're in. This is a shame. This is shameful. This is not America. You don't represent us with this kind of crap. You know, I think they're doing it intentionally because they do intend to break up the United States into economic regions. I think, did we ever talk about your- Fire them all. They need to be, all of them fired. Fire them all. Send in teachers to teach them the difference between government and business. I think they know, Vicki. And I think it's intentional. They don't act like it. Yeah. Well, yeah. I think it's intentional. I think it's intentional, too, because they intend to break up the United States. Yeah. so they really don't want people thinking in terms of what should the structure be of the united states under our constitutional form of government what is the role of government government is not the butler of corporations it shouldn't be and Because people don't think about that, what should be the role of government, you get this kind of crap. Democrats in Congress get independent women. You don't represent me. Shut the hell up on the White House site. I don't want to see somebody else putting their propaganda up here on the White House site. This is nonsense. Go pound sand. I don't want to see this. You've insulted every single American up there, or you've insulted every single American by this nonsense. Keep going, Vicki. Let's just rip this apart, because I think you and I right now are in a great place to rip this whole thing apart. Let's rip the Band-Aid off and fire them all. Yeah. Well, when they did the restructuring of government, they bifurcated our Agencies of government, they built international divisions within our domestic agencies. And if you want to talk about insurgencies embedded in government, it's the international divisions that are in our domestic governments. And people should really take a hard look at that because the interests of, like take CDC, for example. CDC, it's external to government, but yet it isn't. They're tied at the hip with HHS. And they built a global system of laboratories. And what do you think the Wuhan lab was? That was one of the CDC's laboratories for medical research. So they distributed medical research all over the world, you know, so they could have laboratories. Well, quite frankly, most of the third world countries did not have people qualified to run those kinds of research laboratories. You know, you really have to be a highly trained person to run like a level four research laboratory on deadly diseases for crying out loud. I interviewed a guy who he's had several assassination attempts on his life. And his family funded the research in Madison, Wisconsin, University of Madison. and their family was basically in with the bush crime syndicate you know the bush crime syndicate i mean think about this and think about where desantis is and i like some of the policies that desantis is but i don't believe it's the original desantis look at how he changed from a basset hound into military buff overnight and then all of a sudden three point oh comes up you know i'm like I'm like, we got to start watching this stuff because I don't even know, you know, you don't know who you're talking to or who has been removed. You know, nothing is as it appears. And I do believe there's good people behind the scenes that are trying to write this system. And they may do it in some unconventional warfare tactics, but. It's like it's going to rely on us waking up and stop going along with the stupid wagon of destruction with the Republicans or the Democrats or this crap on the White House website. Total and utter crap. Yeah. Yeah. Whoever put that up doesn't belong in government because they don't understand what government is. No. Or they're trying to tear it down, you know. Well, they definitely are doing that. I'm going to say it's intentional, but all these women's organizations on there, you don't represent me at all. So sorry. Yeah, I have never joined an organization. I'm not a joiner. And the reason why is because I can't buy into anything. One hundred percent. So I'm not lending you my name, you know, for maybe the ten percent of whatever it is I agree with you on. The only thing I really joined is the Constitution Party here in Michigan, UX Taxpayers Party, and now I'm the chairman of it because I can make sure that nothing is going to go on that's going to be criminal and try to serve, you know, keep it on the ballot to give people another option so that these two, the uniparty nonsense, if they want to go and do something else, they can run for office, you know, and I pray that we have a whole bunch of people that are just ordinary Americans, which is what they had at the RNC, ordinary Americans. I'm going to explain that to you because I think it's significant. No, it was everyday Americans. Or everyday Americans, that's right. And so when I was at the RNC, What I thought was really interesting, because I'm talking to everybody, going into everything, and I think most of what I see is just a bunch of crap. That's really how I feel about most situations, most things that I go into. It's a bunch of crap. It's kind of sad. So we're watching this whole show, and it was a show that went on there. And they had different speakers that came up. And as these speakers came up, they had things like the pyramid on the back of the dollar behind them. And you could see they would change from somebody with the money, the money person with the money behind them. And then they go to everyday American. And if you listen carefully to the speakers and what they were saying, there was a vast difference between the ones who were just the money people that were in it for the money and the people who really cared people and their messages came across very, very, very seriously different. I mean, you could see the difference there. So my thought on it is that there may be a message that we're, if we're paying attention, that we can see that the good guys are probably actually in control, but they are working through the insanity that the people of America have been bombarded with to try to help wake him up a little bit and say, hey, you got to start questioning. And that means what is put out by the White House, which the White House isn't just President Trump. And he's got some bad people around him. He doesn't have all good people around him. That's certainly true. So who's putting this out? And is he, is he, I'm going to say it, you know, We don't know who is in place. Yeah, and we don't know who the power is. But my suspicion is that it's insurance industry executives. Because I don't know how much you've noticed, but everything is buy this insurance, buy that insurance, buy this, that, and the other. Well, after nine eleven, I don't know if you remember this or not. But George Bush, it was suggested that what we needed in this country was terrorism insurance. And George Bush supported the idea of terrorism insurance. Well, you'd have to be out of your flipping mind to be an insurer against terrorism. Because terrorism is a random act of violence. You don't know where, you don't know when, and you don't know how. There's no way to set up actuarial tables for it. Well, and in the insurance policies, quite a few of them have it that the policy is null and void in the act of terrorism. Exactly. So what should I do with that, you know? When I started seeing that, I was like, okay, what have they got planned? Right. Who's hearing it? Yeah. And there were hearings held on AIG after nine eleven. And that's where I I found some really good information there listening to to that. to those hearings. They were really very interesting. But one of the most important things was that I found out that the pharmaceutical industry had a plan for pharmacists to become frontline, first-line medical providers. which means rather than going to a doctor and getting a prescription, you just go straight to the pharmacist and say, you know, I need this, that, or the other, which I don't know. It makes me wonder if we can do that, then why is it a prescription? Why even go to a pharmacist if it's something that people can get like, Oh, there's one drug I buy periodically for congestion. And, you know, it's one of those controlled substance things. Well, why is that? Because it's not a drug for recreation. It just helps me clear my lungs. So why is that controlled anyway, you know? There's a lot of stuff that they've made controlled substances that are just absolutely ridiculous. It's ridiculous. Yeah. So we have industry cartels is what it does, like the veterinarians. You got to go now through CoVeteris or some of the other stuff that's out there to get things that used to be buy over the counter. Well, did you know that Albert Borla is a veterinarian? No. No. Yeah, he is. And so that's one of the hidden things about our healthcare system and the internationalization of it is that they've merged the systems of human and animal health. Human is just another kind of animal, right? According to them. Well, anything that works on a horse pretty much works on a human being, though I'm not advocating that check with your doctor, you know? Uh-huh. Yeah. Well, yeah, but the idea that they would even entertain such an idea... is indicative of what's happened to our health field, you know, under the, under the WHO is where they have those put together. And that was the deal with Wuhan and the bat, you know, the, the supposedly buying the bat and, and getting the virus from the bat and, um, they made it a global dialectic so that they could bring those two fields together, veterinary medicine and the human animal medicine. And so, well, there's so much, there's so much out there that we don't know, but asking all the questions is probably the smartest thing that we can do. So like when I look at this crap on the white house site that, you know, doesn't represent me at all because I'm neither a Republican or a Democrat in, in, uh, I'm an American. That's it. I'm done with these people. I'm so done with the partisan crap. All it does is divide us. And it's like, I don't know. I don't know what to say other than I'm I'm so disappointed in this. And I'm just disappointed in all of it. You know, people people need to stand together. And this isn't what it looks like at all. It should be horrifying and saddening to every single person out there to see this. And people need to start speaking up on this and say, no, we're done with this. You know, it's just like all of the land that's to the west of the Mississippi. I think that in the western United States, fifty two percent of it's owned by the federal government. And I know I know I know you're out there. But when I was out there in Promontory and I was you know, I wanted to see the you know, where the Transcontinental Railroad met. We took a trip out there. We were out there and said, let's go there and drive around up there. So we did that. And I saw the amount of fencing that's fencing all of these mountains up. Who knows what's going on behind that, number one. But number two, how is it that the federal government literally took all of the lands in the United States? Look at Michigan. Four point six million acres in Michigan are owned by The DNR and they claim ownership over it. And you watch what DNR and Eagle are doing here. It's basically just pilfering all of our resources and putting us in this fifteen minute cities, which they're building through the water wars infrastructures. You're right. That's exactly what they're doing. That's exactly what they're doing. Heard people into the cities. I don't know. Do you remember the sagebrush rebellion? What is it? It was called the sagebrush rebellion. No, I don't. Well, between Nevada and Idaho, there was a road up to a lake somewhere, and it was a very popular place for people to go. But when they started fencing off, locking people out of our public lands, people got together, you know, people in that area, and they just went in and tore down those fences and And one of the supporters was a woman named Helen Chenoweth. She was a representative here in Idaho. But they were beginning to lock down all the federal lands, which, you know, if you... Michigan through the DNR. Mm-hmm. And people are out there in the state, instead of taking care of business as adults should, they're playing all the time. Well, I've got this going on and I've got that on. We all do, okay? Nobody is outside of having stuff going on in our lives. But if we don't get these problems solved, you ain't going to have your playtime because they're going to stuff you into whatever they want to stuff you into in their Yeah, well, that's their objective is to have everybody controlled, you know, and that's the way computer systems operate. If you look at the way computer systems are, they control every function, every, you know, everything about an entity that's in the computer system, the system controls it. And that's what they're trying to do to people. They're trying to just turn you into an entity in their computer system. And guess what? If the robot can replace you, they don't have to feed you anymore because you're worthless. You're right. And that's what I've been worried about for a long time with this medical research system that they built. Because if you take a cold-blooded look at it, you could say, well, You know, we can get some value out of these useless eaters by using them for medical experimentation. And they will be able to do that through the way that they've set up the health care system with the insurance companies determining what's covered, what's not covered. All they have to do is send you to a clinic that happens to be a research clinic. Well, the guy up in Canada, they stopped his heart recently. I posted an article about this. One of my social medias, I don't always post the same thing. And in each social media outreach that I do, I've got telegram is the one I like the best because I can post longer stuff in it. And, uh, but the, I, so I don't know if I posted there on X, but they stopped his heart. So he's clinically dead for, I don't know how many minutes and then restarted it and harvested his organs. What kind of a Frankenstein bunch of crap is that? Yeah. I mean, doesn't that like I hope I'm not the only one out there that is like, oh, my gosh, can the nightmare get any worse? Yeah. Well, they're competing with China. China just, you know, they they have all the records on people. And if they if the person happens to be unfortunate enough to have. blood type and, you know, healthy organ that China wants to be able to sell, they, you know, just kill the person, take the organs. Yeah, I heard a doctor interview at one point in time, too, that said that he was told to remove some kidneys. He was brought on site to like a work camp of the Falun Gong. And they said, you know, we need you to remove this organ. And he got there and heard a shot around the corner. They shot the guy and he was, and then they put basically a gun to his head and said, go ahead. And the guy was, the guy was enough disabled, but was still kind of alive when he took the organs out. And he's spoken about it. You can find him out there somewhere, but this is, this is the level of criminality going on in the world. I think that a lot of people couldn't even handle the knowledge of how much is going on. I agree. Our mental institutions are already full. Where are they going to go? You know, there's, there's, I know a lot of people that can't handle it. And, and, uh, They'll be like, I can't handle talking about this subject. I'm like, sorry, it's just reality. We have to deal with this. And then I go find somebody else that's a little more adult to talk to that can handle the problems of dealing with the realities of life that have to be handled. I'm going to go back to that White House site again, which has got me absolutely pissed off right now, and say that with that said, The American people, I think, have got so many distractions to look at. And I don't think it's all the bad guys that are doing all of it. That doesn't mean we get to stop and just say, well, somebody's handling it. It could be that they're giving the useful idiots out there something to focus on while they're taking these systems down. I know that Venezuela is being kind of surrounded right now. And Venezuela... With the crap that I uncovered with Byron Township last week, with him rigging the public accuracy test, which wasn't a public accuracy test at all, because he did it in the basement and nobody in the public could see it. And I was there and I couldn't see it. And then they kind of coerced and threatened me to sign the tape. And I'm like, I'm not going to sign it. A friend of mine that was there that's a Green Beret said, just sign it, sign it, sign it. And I'm like, why would I sign this? We didn't see anything. It was just the demo of what they did in the basement. And then we was like, just sign it because you now have a witness that you were there and witnessed the fraud. So if they're down there surrounding Venezuela, which they are, which was kind of a critical piece of information going on down there, and Dominion, which was rigging our elections, you know, they're part of it. It was all of them doing it. It wasn't just one. If they're down there surrounding Venezuela, I hope they light this thing up. I really do. It's done. I mean, it's like the Venezuelan gangs that were up here. I mean, this was an invasion. It was an army. You can call it whatever you want, but they were sent up here to do damage to the United States of America and call it out for what it is and light them up. We're done with this. So they're down there. So the potential is that they're using some of this crap to distract those people who have no critical thinking skills, the NPCs that are out there, and clean it up. Because it may be that they have to get people who have been brainwashed out of the way in order to get the job done, too. I'm pretty sure that there's plenty of that going on. Well, they're trying to build a globe. Elections is a global system. Sure is. And that's what they want. And once they control all the election systems, they control the world, right? And they can say democracy, democracy, democracy, and it won't mean jack. because they control the, quote, democracy. And they wanted to do it with computer systems, with electronic voting systems. And people have been fighting them right after the hanging Chad debacle clear up through to today. trying to expose the idea that voting machines are a direct line to fraud. I mean, they can't keep people, they can't keep the electronic machines from being used to control elections. The only thing that will work is paper. That's it, period. And a stiff penalty if someone cheats in the elections and have that be a fast track to being no more. That's what has to happen. I mean, this is so serious. If you cheat in elections, not only is it maladministration from the supervising entity, It is a personal attack against the United States of America. It needs to be called out as such. It's an attack. I think that the federal elections should be separated from the state and local elections and just have a day for federal elections because we know they're trying to rig the system. Well, I don't know if you heard what happened last week in Byron, the criminal township, that I've got lawsuits going on against them for water wars. But last Tuesday, so we didn't talk since last Tuesday, what happened is went down there for the public accuracy test, brought my cameras and made sure that I was recording this. It was being run by ElectionSource, which is a... I'm going to call it a Department of Dominion. OK, they've got a legal separation, but there is no separation there. It's just like it's a it's like it's just a legal separation. But they work they work in partnership with Dominion. OK, so this was run by a bunch of I'm going to say young adults. kids they were very young that was running this they i found out it started at one o'clock but what happened is they were actually working on the machines in the basement from eight third from eight o'clock until ten thirty in the morning outside of the public purview okay so what happens is they get there at their public accuracy test And they actually admitted it was a demo of what they did on the actual machines. It wasn't an actual public, it wasn't, it was public kind of, but it wasn't an accuracy test and they really weren't working. It was just a demo. So, and they admitted this. And so when we got there, you couldn't get within ten feet of the machine. So you couldn't see what was on their alleged ballots. All we could see is that they were loading paper into the, into the machines. And then said, well, this is what this ballot tests for, this is what this ballot tests for, but you couldn't see it and you couldn't look at it, you couldn't audit it, you couldn't nothing, right? It was a show, it was all theater. So then it kicked the tapes out And so kick the tapes out and such. And then Peggy Sattler, our clerk, appointed, said, hey, Kim, you go up there, you know, to compare the numbers in this public accuracy test. And I'm sitting there going, who the hell's Kim? Right. That was my question. And why did Peggy, who is the you know, who has been. caught doing some things that she should have been done, including she she destroyed some election records in the twenty twenty two election because I FOIA it and they didn't keep it. They sent it up to the state. Wrong. Wrong. Couldn't do it. That's breaking the law. So at any rate, she she points Kim. Kim goes up there and dutifully checks all the numbers, which we couldn't see and says, oh, yes, this matches. Oh, yes, this matches and such. We could see nothing. It was theater. And then Peggy says, OK, everybody has to sign the tape. And I'm like, well, I don't even know what's on the tape. So why am I signing the tape? I can't sign for the accuracy on this. You have to sign the tape. Everyone in this room has to sign the tape. Well, that's when I got a little testy, of course, and said, I'm not signing it. And then my green brain friend says, sign it, sign it, sign it. And I'm like, are you out of your mind? And he's like, no, you're just signing that you were a witness to this, which kind of shot him in the foot. I'm like, okay, I can sign on that, but it doesn't mean that it was accurate. Or I can tell you, none of it was public. It was just a demo, and they admitted to that. So that's what happened there. And so they went and put their ballots on another table. And I went over there and I tried to get my camera in to see what was on the ballot. Peggy Sattler, the clerk, took it and was real nervous and started shuffling it off to the end of the table where you couldn't see it. And so they gave the entire demonstration with their backs towards us. This is what we have here. It was a sham. It's a lie. It wasn't public at all. It was just a demo of what they allegedly did in the basement in private. It wasn't a public accuracy test. So anything that comes out of the next election, I'm going to contest it. And I'm going to probably sue these people for it. Good, good. I'm done with this. They're lying. And the results of the next election, no matter what it is, should be absolutely negated. Yep. Yeah, machines. We should not have machines involved in our elections at all, period. And whatever we have to do to do that, that's what we should do. I hope that they're listening right now because the lawsuits that I have filed are just the beginning. We're not going to quit until I see people go to jail because they deserve it at the minimum. Well, and I really do think that federal elections should be separate from state and local elections. And just a special day for federal elections. And the reason why is because the stakes are so high. You know, they try to do things for efficiency or whatever, at least that's what they say. But How much is our country worth relative to the pennies that they would save on elections? It's not worth it. It's not worth it at all. Well, I appreciate you being on today always. I just love you as a friend. and somebody who I've really come to get to know and have huge respect for you. Everyone, go ahead and get on Vicki's website. It's the Technocratic Tyranny. And she has so much information on there. If you really want to know the truth of how they use these unconstitutional agreements and these international agreements and who the players were, I will tell you right now that there isn't a better resource out there. There just isn't. Well, thank you. I really appreciate that. I don't endorse things very, very quickly, but I'm going to tell you right now, she's solid and everything she's done is absolutely solid and bomb-proof. It's been researched. She's probably one of the greatest researchers that I've come across recently. that just sits at her computer and works. She's not out there, you know, hawking a product. She's not doing any of this. She just works. And she just does it very, very thanklessly and tirelessly out there. And because people don't even know who you are. And I just appreciate it. And I appreciate the fact that we're friends. Yeah, well, thank you, Donna. I really appreciate that. So in your last words? Have a good day, everybody. Have a good day. And we will see you next Monday again. And tell your friends to come on and listen to what we talk about on Monday mornings. It's kind of like, you know, I'm a nerd. All my friends are nerds. You know, every one of us is somebody who enjoys actually going through things. So I'm going to go for a real quick break. And then I'm going to bring in another friend, Eric Tilton, Cognitive Carbon. And we're going to be talking about all sorts of things, which is going to be a great nerd conversation I love. Morning and welcome to the second hour of Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg, and it's the sixth day of October, twenty twenty five. Welcome to our show today. And I am going to welcome Eric, my friend Eric Tilton on this morning, and we're going to talk about everything. How are you doing, Eric? Good. Can you hear me? Awesome. So Eric and Emily and Evelyn are dear friends. And not only not only do I think he's one of the smartest guys I've ever known in my life, And we do work together, which is kind of cool, but he's solid too. So what are we talking about this morning? I mean, we did bees together yesterday, which was pretty fun, wasn't it? Yeah, it was. We got some honey that looks pretty good, but not as much as we'd hoped for. So we're going to try to figure out why that was, but... Um, after we kind of finished and cleaned up, we were sitting on the bench and just talking about all kinds of stuff. And we wandered onto this, um, topic that I've, um, spoken about in a couple of different places and you were interested in it. And we, I thought we would, um, explore that more and share it in a way that maybe some other folks can absorb something from it. It's a pretty dense topic, so I have to forewarn folks that this is, um, you know, this is a thick topic with lots of facts and things. If you're a nerd, you're going to love it. Okay. And in that, and I mean that in the best sense, you know, and, and if you, if you like, if you like all different types of topics, this is going to be amazing and, And my whole thing, too, to look at this is when you look at the weather that we've had this summer, there's things that are not making sense. None of it is making sense at all. Michigan is the second darkest state in the nation. And we have had absolutely gorgeous, pristine, you don't see these kind of skies here. You do in the West, but you don't see the skies we've had as long as we had here. We have water. and we have lots of water and it's, it's just, it's been eerily sunny and cheery out. Yeah. And, you know, we've, we've had a drought that, uh, is affecting the farmer's yields this, this fall. Um, our own landlord's soybeans, you know, he brought them in and, um, he was saying it's been a, it's been a challenge. Um, unusually dry and that may be what was going on with the bees but what was um kind of in my mind and we talked about is there may be some connection to um what the sun cycle is doing right now and and these um shifts in the weather and um one of the topics we'll talk about is an even more significant shift in climate and what might be causing that but uh one of the things i listened to in the car a couple days ago is from a guy who he's a pretty um mainstream science sort of expositor so he tends to stay away from you know topics that are um too sensationalist or the aliens did it kind of stuff. He sticks to the facts and analyzes papers. But he did a show on what he calls extreme solar activity. And it says, were we wrong about the solar cycle? And what he's talking about is the fact that this particular solar cycle, which is number twenty five, was supposed to be weaker than the ones before that. So we're we're in a phase of the sun where the The solar anomaly is the strength of the solar storms and whatnot should be diminishing, reaching a minimum, and then it turns around and goes back up to what they call a solar maximum. This has to do with sunspots and coronal mass ejections and storms on the sun and all that. And what he's talking about is that in twenty twenty five, to everyone's surprise, the sun is extremely active compared to what it was expected to be. Twice as many sunspots as were predicted, for instance, and a very large one a few months ago that was just enormous in its magnitude and. solar tornadoes taking place this year, which is not uncommon, but it shouldn't have been happening in what was supposed to be a calm solar cycle. And yet we're seeing solar tornadoes of significant magnitude. So something's up with with the sun. And that may be why the skies are looking different. One of the things he talks about in this video is that the noctilucent clouds so that clouds that appear at nighttime will be reduced because of this effect of the sun. And if you kind of extrapolate that, you know, if that effect is reducing the cloud cover at night, it can also reduce the high altitude cloud cover during the day and have bluer skies as a result. Your sound got a little different there, just for a minute. Oh, okay. Yeah, that's a little better when you're closer to the mic. Let me just adjust that just a bit. So anyway, we got onto this topic talking about weather. And I was connecting it to this solar cycle phenomenon that's happening. But there are much bigger things going on with the sun. and we spoke about one of them, which is there's an account on X called Space Weather News, and the guy who runs it is a solar weather expert and a geophysics expert, and he has postulated some theories about What could happen to the earth as a result of abnormal behavior on the sun? So one of the things he focuses on is called solar micro nova theory, which is this idea that the sun may blast out a wave of extremely intense energy like the Carrington event in the eighteen hundreds or worse. And that that may dramatically affect life on Earth when that happens. He also focuses on something called the geomagnetic excursion. And we talked about this and you were kind of surprised to hear this fact. But since the year two thousand, the geomagnetic North Pole has moved more than six hundred miles. That was really shocking to me because I'd never heard that. Yeah. So it was in the year two thousand. It was closer to Ellesmere Island in Canada. And now it's moving in the direction towards Siberia. And in recent years, it was moving at fifty five kilometers per year. Now it's slowed down a bit to thirty five kilometers per year. But there's some indication it's going to accelerate and start picking up movement again. So six hundred miles is a long way. And that's a fact most people don't know. And the obvious question one should ask is, why? What causes that? What is the underlying mechanism that makes the North Pole move like that? And I don't know that anybody has the exact answers, but it has something to do with the Earth's core. It has to do with the presence of iron, which is the magnetic inducing material and other magnetic compounds. But something in the Earth's core and magma is different. And that is causing the magnetic North Pole to move. This messes up our own navigation. So there's a group that publishes updates on where the North Pole is so that airlines can adjust their compasses appropriately. And they've been having to make these adjustments more often than in the past because of the movement. But it affects migratory birds. Canada geese, for instance, rely on a number of things. They look at star patterns, they look at rivers and oceans and geography, but they rely heavily on the magnetic pole. And because that pole has moved six hundred miles, it's affecting their migrations there. They're finding themselves tens of miles off from where they thought they would be. So when they come to land in a pond that they used to know, the pond's not there. And it's because of this shift in the magnetic pole. So you take those two things together, the fact that the North Pole has shifted, and you think about why that is, and you combine it with the data that they're finding about the sun's behavior changing. And that's another good question to ask is, If the sun is more active now than it was expected to be, why is that happening? What forces can cause the sun, the sun's own weather, to be substantially different? And Ben Davidson from Space Weather News, he would aim at something called the solar or the galactic current sheet. So he would say that there's something happening in the galaxy that's affecting our solar system and that that causes changes in the sun. he would also say that those changes in the sun have a direct impact on the earth's magnetic field and um you know we ourselves have seen uh aurora at times of the year and it you know distances south that we've never seen before i hadn't actually ever seen aurora until this this last year um i'm almost at sixty so it's been quite a while but um I saw Aurora two or three times significantly, and that's unusual for that to be happening. It's unusual for people in New Mexico to see Aurora, Florida to see Aurora. And yet that happened this this last year within the last twelve months. There was a lot there were there were a lot of events in Michigan. So, you know, all of these these things kind of pop up and makes makes you kind of stop and think about what the bigger picture is here. What's your thoughts on where this is really going for in the short term and in the long term for us? Well, I've I've been, you know, reviewing what Ben Davidson's been talking about for many years, even the science papers directly. And I can't find anything wrong with his thought, his thinking on this. So his argument is that we're entering a phase in Earth's history where the effects of the sun are going to be significant, disruptively significant. He's convinced now that he says it's ninety nine point nine percent certain that the signals he's seeing that would indicate what he calls a disaster cycle have been observed when exactly that happens. He won't commit to either. But if you give him a few beers and you chat him up, he would probably say something around twenty thirty to twenty forty. And that's interesting when you frame that against, you know, the World Economic Forum and those folks like why did they pick twenty thirty? What was significant about twenty thirty? Why that date? and there's some reason to believe that the ideas about what are the notions about what happens with the sun has has been known through ancient times for thousands of years if not tens of thousands of years that the earth's gone through this before and people have made note of it let's talk about the pyramids and and the uh the orientation of the pyramids So I actually, when I was in D.C., I talked to a gal who's an Egyptologist. I can't say Egyptologist. And she does archives for museums and some pretty in-depth study of Egypt. And I asked her, you know, I ask all the questions that I don't really care if they sound stupid or not. But I ask all the questions and I asked her. how old do you really think the pyramids are? Because I'm not seeing how they could possibly be only six thousand years old. And she's like, they're at least thirty five thousand years old, at least, and probably much, much older than that. Now, this is a person who's been on the ground there, who has been studying pyramids across the world and such, but also in Egypt. I mean, this is what she does. This is her profession. And for her to come right out and say that, and she's not a person that's trying to gain notoriety. She's just a person that enjoys the subject matter. So when she said that, I'm like, okay, I wasn't there. So I'm listening to her. But there's some key bits of information about, say, the pyramids, And they're everywhere. They're across the globe in different locations. So you kind of have to ask why, what were they? What did they do? Who would have built them across the globe? They're very similar. Very, very similar. How could they even build them? We couldn't build them now. How did they, how were they built? And I've got all these questions. So yeah, that's been a topic of interest for hundreds of years. People have studied the pyramids and these other so-called megalithic structures. One of the intriguing ones is a place that the Romans called Heliopolis. that before that was called Baalbek in Lebanon, B-A-A-L, that Baal, right? That one. And what's interesting about that place is there are these giant stones at the foundation of that, one of the structures there that are just enormous. They're so large, nobody can figure out how they were excavated, much less moved and put into place at the base of this building. so you know interest in in and study about that topic has happened for a long time there's a guy zachariah sitchin who wrote some books back in the seventies that were pretty popular having to do with um you know the sumerian clay tablets and what that tells us about history and what the babylonian tablets tell us that he integrates that to the biblical stories and to the stories from the quran and the torah and he tries to build a big picture In recent years, we've learned about this place called Gobekli Tepe, which is another big mystery. I think that's cool. That is such a neat thing to look into. And people didn't even know that it was there. They were taking water out of their wells down very, very deep. And then all of a sudden they realized there's a city underneath there. They were going right through it to get their water, but they didn't even know that the city was there. Which brings up all sorts of questions across the globe. So they've been excavating that site now for a couple of decades. And they're only, by some measures, five percent of the way done. Like, ninety plus percent of that site is still unexcavated. And for some reason, they're not moving very fast. And that's kind of raising some hackles. One of the things that some of the archaeologists discovered is that that site was intentionally buried. They know this because when they look at the soil and the pottery fragments and the way the dirt was piled up, it was clear to them that they brought buckets after bucket after bucket and dumped stones and dirt and pottery shards to bury this place. And then that brings to the question, why did they do that? Why did they bury this? But who did it? Who buried it? And why did they bury it? And when did they bury it? As best we know, that site is at least twelve thousand years old. And. You know, when it first came to public consciousness, people really wrestled with that because we thought twelve thousand years ago. Humanity was wearing loincloths and, you know, picking berries and wheat. You know, we were just barely surviving. And yet here's evidence that there was a gigantic city which would have required tens of thousands of laborers. And it was built and abandoned twelve thousand years ago. This is much that was a much more advanced society than we had any idea existed at that time. So across the world, there are a number of these so-called megalithic sites, large stone sites, Indonesia, Egypt, Malta, Turkey, you name it. And a really recent Publishment publishing from ethical skeptic kind of brings in a whole new light to all of this so ethical skeptic is he is an anonymous person. He has a website called ethicalskeptic.com. He was a strong voice since about COVID and the injectables and cancer rates. And he's done just a stellar analysis of all that stuff. But he also has an interest in ancient theories and something he calls the ECDO hypothesis, which has to do with the Earth's core. I'll just briefly touch on that. I don't want to go into a lot of depth on ECDO, but I want to talk about these megalithic sites that he just mentioned. The ECDO hypothesis is an idea that's backed up by history and geography and geophysics. It is a hypothesis, so... It's a until an event happens, it's just an idea. But what it suggests is that the Earth's crust and the Earth's core aren't rigidly attached to each other at times. And there is a mechanism by which the Earth's core can slip and rotate around the Earth's core. And there's some evidence that this has happened in the past on six or ten thousand or six or twelve thousand year cycles. And his theory says that what is now the North Pole. So what do we mean by the North Pole? What we mean is if you stand on that spot and you look up at night, you're going to see this star called Polaris. And of all the stars in the night sky, that one, it doesn't move. All the other ones move around it because the Earth's rotating that star because of its position is fixed and it's called the North Star and it's been used for navigation for centuries because it's the only star in the sky that doesn't move. So you can take sightings against it. What he says is that six thousand years ago or twelve thousand years ago, the North Pole was not where it is now. It was about one hundred and five or a hundred and nine degrees shifted, which means some spot in the Indian ocean right now is where the current North pole is. So that spot in the earth would be underneath the Polaris star. Um, and he calls this alternate North pole NP prime. So he, he says, this is. There's the current North Pole, the one that we are familiar with, and there's this other one that exists when this crustal displacement occurs, and that becomes the North Pole. And so then the question is, well, when and how long does that last? When does this shift occur? Is it permanent? Is it just temporary? And he believes that this shift occurs cyclically, but it's temporary. It lasts from fifty to four hundred years. And then the shift goes back in the current geography that is the North pole is back where it was before. So. What that implies is that there would be giant tsunamis and earthquakes and, you know, huge events on the earth that would destroy cities, you know, wash away or or flood areas. So this explains many of the world's flood flood mythologies, the Bible's flood mythologies, the Chinese Uh, so he recently put a, um, an update to his article out called, uh, part two, the stones themselves cry out. And what he, what his team did is they looked at, um, of these megalithic structures. So the Giza pyramids and, um, um, the, uh, the pyramids in Indonesia and a whole bunch of them. So in total. And in each case, they looked at them and they said, what is this site aligned to? Because we believed that the peoples who built these structures aligned them to certain things like when stars would rise in the equinox in the spring or what have you. We theorized that Stonehenge was arranged the way it was because the certain stars would appear at certain times in the year. So we thought that these were solar calendars. And so then the question is, well, in which direction are they aligned? What's the primary axis? What does that point to? And in our modern era, we would align things with the north and the south because of Polaris, right? We would pick that guide star because it's fixed in the sky, and we would rotate our buildings, our structures, so that some primary axis aligns with Polaris. having nothing else to line up with, we would do that. What he discovered is that thirty eight of these monuments line up with a different point. It's not the north, the geological north. It's not the Polaris Point. It's a point that's one hundred and five degrees off of Polaris Point. These ancient structures align with the other North Pole. And he did a statistical analysis of the probability that that would happen by random chance. And it's inconceivably small. So he's convinced that they were purposefully aligned with this NP prime North pole. Um, and that is significant that at the time they were built, that was North this, this axis. Um, so he ties that into the rest of his, um, thinking about this ECDO hypothesis, which includes the pyramids. So he points out the fact that if you're inside the great pyramid of Giza, there are these, these shafts that we don't even know why they were built in conventional archeology, but there are these shafts that go off to one side or the other. And you know, the, um, conventional archaeologists would tell you that they were air, the ventilation shafts or who knows what. Right. And then some other folks came along and they said, no, those things point to certain stars. They point to the belt of Orion at one point of the year, and they point to Sirius and another point of the year. And so they were used for astronomical alignment. You know, they align with these stars. And what ethical skeptic says is, nope, they don't. They point to NP prime. they point to where the North pole will be after the shift. And he, he's convinced that the entire purpose of the great pyramid is to tell us about this shift, which direction it will occur, maybe even how to tell when it's happening. That's his theory. Well, there's a lot of things that just don't make sense. Like, um, you know, the, the statues and such at Antarctica and the, the, uh, stairs that are underwater by Japan. And we've got a little Stonehenge here off of Traverse City in Lake Michigan and all over the world. There's, there's evidence of civilization underwater that you, I mean, you can't just ignore them because you want to believe in a bias. You have to take in all the information and say, why, why does this not make sense? Why does this not fit in our current world the way it is? So probably a good idea just to keep an open mind and look at all this stuff. And maybe it is a warning. Maybe it is something that deserves some merit or some consideration. I like talking about this, and I really do. I think this is fascinating because I don't think we know hardly anything. So take the example of this underwater structure off the coast of Cuba. So this has been known, I think, since the late seventies and people have done radar images and they say there's pyramid shaped structures down there. Who knows, but. What's it called? That's a great question. I don't remember. All right. Let's see. If you look for submerged city off the coast of Cuba, you'll find it. So, you know, the first question is, is it natural geology or not? And if you, you know, study it and you conclude that it isn't natural rock formations, then some people built it. And then, well, when and how did it get buried under three hundred feet of water or however deep it is there? Right. How long ago must that have been at the surface? What caused it to sink? We don't know. That, I believe, is one of these thirty eight sites that Ethical Skeptic analyzed, too, and that one also has an alignment to this NP prime, this alternate North Pole. The one that you mentioned in Traverse City, I didn't even know about that till last year. And it still kind of astonishes me that there is a Stonehenge-like arrangement of materials under the lake off Traverse City. And they're thinking that it's nine thousand some odd years old. And supposedly there are carvings of mammoths or bison or something. Who built that nine thousand years ago? And why did it get buried in Lake Michigan? What does it align to? Yeah, so just so everybody knows, looking at these pictures, I would say that some of them could be AI'd. So we're not getting sucked into all of them. But there's, you know, so just remember that that, you know, things may look one way, but they may not be exactly accurate. But it's worth considering. And look at the difference between the pictures. So right off the bat, you have to kind of ask some questions. Not that I negate that it's there, but to negate the validity of some of the images that somebody wants to capitalize on or make it into a legend that far exceeds what the truth is. So that's always something you have to be vigilant about. Yeah. There's several reasons why people do that. One is they're just... It's clickbait. They're trying to gather views. They're doing it to... Usually it's money. Money, right? They're trying to monetize that. So there's that motivation. Another motivation that we're familiar with in our group is having to do with fifth generation warfare. Sometimes you will make a big deal out of something like that to get people to... throw the whole thing out, right? So I call that, I call it coating a nugget of gold with bullshit, right? So what you do is there's a nugget of truth and you wrap it in ten pounds of bullshit and you get somebody to say, ah, that's all bullshit and they throw it out and including that nugget. They ignore the thing that's actually interesting because all the rest of it that you attach to it is bullshit. Exactly. Well, I think what I what I'm what I like to say is you got to use critical thinking and start questioning. And so but that doesn't mean you throw the baby out with bathwater. But here's the here's the Michigan Stonehenge. Right now, how many of these images are real? I don't know either. Yeah. We don't know. I'd like to see the actual thing. But when you dig into it, what are you told? You're told that the people who know where it is keep it a secret. Well, why is that? Why is it that Donna Brandenburg can't throw on a scuba gear suit and go look at it? Why don't they want you to know where it is? That bothers me. I love looking at this, though. We know that there is one down there. Yeah. So there is. And so, again, the natural question is who made it and when and why. Right. Right. So let's talk some more about these pyramids and pointing to that, to that, the NP prime. Yeah. So I put a notes page together for you with a link to the paper. But what he's got here and this this part two is a new edition. He didn't have that. until recently, but he goes through site by site in this section and kind of shows you the analysis of each one. Here's the axis of interest for that site and here's where it points. And he goes through and basically shows that for all of these sites, they align within a few degrees of this alternate North Pole position. um so he talks about for instance major monuments of mexico and yucatan sacsayhuaman in peru that's an interesting place you know people have studied for a long time sacsayhuaman because it's got again those stones that are too large for us to figure out how they built it right that place in peru how did they build that the um Machu Picchu. We know that the stones that were used in constructing that by looking at the chemical makeup of those rocks, we know where they were mined. And the place they were mined is across the valley at the top of a mountain. How on earth did they dig them out over there and then bring them down into the valley and up the... Why would they do that? Why would they transport stones from a quarry at the top of another hillside to build a structure where it is. Why was that done? Let's see. Alignment of the Sanctuary of the Great Gods at Evros, which is in Greece. Kajorumi Mountaintop Observatory. So this is, I'm not sure where that one's located. Pumapunku, another big mystery. Napta Playa, another mystery. Arbery Point, Louisiana in the United States. There is a plaza built out of stone in Louisiana, and they date it to around seventeen hundred years before Christ. So seventeen hundred to eleven B.C.E. And he writes here, this one shocked me when I saw it. I was always puzzled as to why this plaza was not aligned with any solstice, any cardinal direction, meaning north, south, east, west. or equinox when it would have been so easy to construct it that way. Now I know why. Plaza axis is eighty five degrees T falling right on our NP prime axis. That's an independent earthwork based culture in North America aligning to the same global geometry as old world megaliths. So right here in Louisiana. Then he talks about Gigantia in Malta. This was thirty six hundred to twenty five hundred years before the birth of Christ. And we we spoke about Malta yesterday for a bit. That's a really fascinating island in the Mediterranean. And there's a place there called I mispronounce it. Right. When you do the translation, that's from the Maltese language, the island of giants. Why do they call it that? Why do they call Malta the island of giants? There's some curious carvings on one of the structures there that he points out that shows a spiral. And the explanation for why the spiral looks the way it does with the star patterns is that, again, it aligns with this alternate north pole axis. So Malta. That's really interesting. Yeah. So why, right? Why all these places? Gunung Padang in Indonesia, the temples of Malta, Cholula, Mexico, Teotihuacan in Mexico, Tikal in Mexico, Chichen Itza in Mexico. All of these places. monuments align within one half to one degree with that alternate North Pole axis. The Nazca Lines, New Grange, Ireland, Poverty Point, Louisiana, Sacsayhuama, Sacsayhuaman, Peru, Mount Pleasant Engine in England, Puma Punku. All have an axis that aligns with that alternate North Pole. And what we know is that whichever civilizations built them, they disappeared in large part. We don't know what happened to the people who constructed Gopakli Tepe. We don't know what happened to the Aztecs and Incas and the people who supposedly built those structures. in Central America? What happened to those civilizations? What happened to the one that built the structures in Japan? There are these giant stone circles and megalithic structures in Japan. Where did those civilizations disappear to? Why are there pyramid-shaped structures all throughout China? Why does the CCP keep such a tight lid on that? Why don't they let people visit those places? What does that signify? We don't know. But now we have an interesting data point, which is there's something interesting about their alignments. Yeah, that's really fascinating and When you brought up that the North Pole, the magnet North Pole moved six hundred miles, I was like, this kind of seems kind of significant. I'm kind of shocked that that it wasn't anywhere of note to be able to see that. Yeah, it's been studied since the fifteen hundreds. And it was interesting that if I recall kind of the story about how how it became noticed in the eighteen hundreds or so. There was some I think it was a German scientist and somebody else, and they were using compasses to determine where the North Pole was. and comparing it against documents that had been written relatively recently. And they're like, wait a minute, these don't agree. My compass says the North is over here, and this document says it's over there. What do you get? And they sort of stumbled onto this fact. And they were like, wow, this is a notable discrepancy. And they started investigating it and looking through historical records. There's a guy who has an ex-account. His name is Craig Stone. He's kind of a peer with Ethical Skeptic, and he has a website. I linked it in my notes that I shared with you, too. Craig Stone's website is on my my Telegram channel as well as on the. Yeah, you can you can cut and paste that whole thing if you want. OK, thank you. Nobular on X, he talks about this geomagnetic north wandering. In fact, I'm looking at a chart right now that's an Ethical Skeptics page showing something called the Earth's celestial north pole wobble and wander. So that means that not only the geomagnetic north pole moves, but so does the physical north pole over time. there's a chart showing you know its location relative to other parts of the of of the earth and how that has moved right so the earth itself wobbles in its rotation right it's not a perfect top it it has a wobble there's this phenomenon called the procession of the equinoxes which has been known for quite some time which is that the um The star patterns, you know, that align with the equinox in the spring, right? The vernal equinox. The constellation that appears aligned with the east direction moves, right? And that has a thirty six thousand year cycle. I'll get this wrong, but, you know, tens of thousands of years ago, it was Leo. And there's speculation that that's why the Sphinx is oriented the way it is, because Leo was in the spring equinox, in the sky, rising over the horizon on that day in March. And that's the direction that the Sphinx's gaze is pointing towards. And that's how some people date it. And they say that's why we say the Giza complex is thirty-some-odd thousand years old, because at the time we speculate that the Sphinx was constructed, it was looking at the constellation Leo. There seems to be a lot of consensus too, that it didn't look like the Sphinx of today, but that it had a different head on it, that they kind of like chiseled and chopped down. What, what is really kind of shocking is how much history has been erased. The buildings that they've torn down, you know, I don't know how you feel about the, the, uh, the, uh, I can't think of the name right now. The fairs that they toured, they had all these huge, the world fairs, the world fairs that they tore down. I cannot possibly put any credibility into the fact that they say that they built this for a temporary fair and then tore it all down. I think it was something that was there that they just grabbed. And then they were looking for reasons to destroy what was there and how many buildings, that were just beautiful, that were built for the long haul, that they've torn down to put these Marxist, nothing, square-shaped, minimalist buildings that are actually pretty ugly compared to the architecture and the beauty and some of the older stuff. Yeah, for instance, Obama's library in Chicago. I mean, that's a That's a concrete trash can is what that is. Well, you know, reflected the president. So there you go through. But yeah, you know, fair, fair point is there are speculations that some civilizations like the Egyptian dynasties didn't maybe build these things, but Um, you know, they, they took them over, they were already there and they built upon them. Um, that theory in, in, in Peru, right. That, uh, when you look at the stones, for instance, in, in, um, some of these central American monuments, the older archeology is more precise. You know, the stones are cut, um, more square and the fittings are very tight. Right. And the ones that came along later are kind of, you know, round cobblestone with mud stuck in there. So how is it that humanity lost the ability? Like, why did we go backwards? If we had the skill to create these large monuments, ten thousand years ago, why is it that four thousand years ago we were slapping together, you know, mud and in mortar to try to build on top of them. Why did we lose that skill? That's a great question. You can see it right there in front of you. You see this. I have a lot of questions about Washington, DC, quite honestly, when, when you go there and you see such a mix of styles, it's, it's a radical, it's a radical mix of styles that you wouldn't normally see that were built in such a close, allegedly close timeframe. And my whole thought of it goes with what you had to say, too, of where did they quarry the marble and the sandstone when they were like shooting from squirrel guns behind trees at the British and such? You know what I mean? It's like it doesn't it does within within like a hundred years of this. It doesn't make sense. None of it makes sense. And the the iconography that's there, too. it just doesn't make sense. So I've got a lot of questions that I can't answer, but what I see doesn't make sense. And I think that's a good thing. It's a good thing to question these things instead of being afraid to say, this doesn't make sense to me. And Have everybody say, oh, you're just crazy. You're a conspiracy theorist. Well, anymore, if you're a conspiracy theorist, which was an engineered term, you're probably going to be right in about ten minutes. Because more truth has come out, and we've got more ways to find the truth. And I know I'm going to get a lot of criticism from this from people that are like, I thought you were a Christian. That always comes up. Well, I don't see the disparity in that, quite honestly, because, you know, which day were the sun and the moon? This is my argument. Which day were the sun and the moon created? What happened in the days preceding that? How long? Because that was only to mark the day and the night for us. And so it's like, how many years were actually before that? I don't know. Nobody was there at the time. However, there's an awful lot of evidence that a day in God's time can be, it says it right in the Bible, but we want to conveniently ignore that, can be you know, a thousand years or whatever. I mean, it's a, it's a measure of time, but not, I'm not so sure it was a literal day and it couldn't have been a literal day until the moon and the sun were created anyway. So the whole argument falls apart. That doesn't negate that God is here. He's in control that he, I believe he created everything. It, even if you believe in the big bang theory, who created this stuff to create the big bang theory. I mean, it's, it's totally the arguments that, fall apart entirely. When you leave God out of the picture. I mean, we were talking about physics yesterday some and I love our discussions on this because because they've never proved anything. I mean, I have some friends who are who are physicists, and They kind of a lot of people that are in that realm, they lose their minds. They absolutely lose their minds or they end up becoming, you know, they become Christian, honestly, because they they you can't look at it without God and make sense of any of this. You know, what works on the earth doesn't work in astrophysics, doesn't work in quantum physics. There's no explanation for so much of this that unless you realize that there's something way bigger than what we can scientifically prove or that is consistent, you're going to lose your mind trying to figure it out because it doesn't work. Yeah. Plenty of examples through history that, you know, I mentioned the name of one guy yesterday, which is John Nash. He was the founder of game theory, the mathematical branch called game theory. And he went through many years, like there was a movie about him, actually, I can't remember, I think it was called A Brilliant Mind. But was about his life but he yeah he went um stark raving mad for a decade until he eventually recovered but um you know we we were talking about um the ancient text the Bible and the the Quran and such and I was kind of curious because I didn't remember the the facts on this I know that the the you know the biblical timeline puts an age of the Earth at around six thousand years and so I wanted to kind of refresh myself on how that six thousand year number um was derived yeah that's the one right there um and so i kind of got a you know refresher on on how that six thousand years is calculated you know from the from the time of adam and uh you know no and such in the generations What I didn't realize is that there's also a calculation independent in the Quran and they look at it in a different way and it's not quite as clear, clear cut, but it's also six thousand years. And that's interesting to me because the six thousand year cycles are showing up in ethical skeptics. Point of view about the, you know, the ECDO event and how often that may occur in Ben Davidson's work, in Craig Stone's analysis, when they look at what we know from archaeology and ancient texts, there does appear to be reason for these cyclical numbers, the six and the twelve thousand year cycles. So that's fascinating to me. Of all other things, I'm curious. I think that's one of my defining characteristics is I'm curious. I try to, you know, Ethical Skeptic has a great piece about this. He calls it, I'm not sure I'm going to pronounce it right, but E-P-O-C-H-E, Yiposh. What it means is kind of holding yourself in abeyance and avoiding jumping to a conclusion too quickly. Be willing to just listen and absorb information and put the puzzle pieces together without feeling compelled to rush to complete the puzzle. Just be content that you're collecting pieces and that some of them seem to fit together. And there might be a pattern, there might not, but don't feel pressure to jump to a conclusion, right? Right. And they may fit somewhere else in another time. Like let's just say you go down your life another ten years. You may have more information that all of a sudden this little bit of information you picked up might make sense. So this is it's really interesting to me because younger Dryas was about eleven thousand to twelve thousand years ago. Right. Everything that points to that was a major shift. so that's interesting yeah i was gonna i was actually gonna bring that up so from oh i beat it to that that was amazing this guy's like way smarter than me guys that's just the way it is you know i'm good with it i just shovel horse manure so From a variety of archaeology and geophysical studies, we know that some significant event happened. Thirteen thousand years ago, so eleven thousand years before Christ. And right now, a pretty popular hypothesis is that a fragment of a comet hit the ice sheet. Right. A comet. So it was an icy body. So a fragment of ice, a very large fragment of ice impacted the North American ice sheet. So somewhere up in Northern Canada or Greenland or somewhere up in there. That's the theory. And that the resultant catastrophe that was caused by this big piece of ice shattering into the North Pole region caused these floodwaters and there's a phenomenon called the what do they call it a melt water pulse a and b so there's geological evidence that the salinity of the oceans changed significantly around that time we had salty oceans and then for some reason all of a sudden there's this big burst of fresh water right about thirteen thousand years ago right then that ties into the Younger Dryas and the impact hypothesis. But an alternate viewpoint might be that that this meltwater pulse occurred because the Earth's crust shifted thirteen thousand years ago. And what is now the South Pole is at the equator in this new alignment. And what is now the North Pole is one hundred and five degrees in the Indian Ocean area. And that melted. And there's your fresh water source that causes the meltwater pulse. Right. So That may be it. What's interesting is if you correlate that to history, we've got these these documents written by the Greek historians, Herodotus and others. And Plato himself talks about, you know, the whole origin of the idea of Atlantis comes from Plato's writings. And Plato said that there was and he's he's actually relating a story about someone, someone that Solon talked to in Egypt. He's he's relaying what Solon heard from Egypt. And they said that this event happened eleven thousand years ago or nine thousand years ago relative to their time, which puts it in that same time period, you know, twelve to thirteen thousand years ago, our time. And that that is what caused the city of Atlantis to disappear beneath the waves. Right. And this is in Plato's own writing. There are writings from the ancient Greeks that say that the sun rose in the west and set in the east over the Mediterranean. So we've got these ancient texts saying that. And we all always were taught that, oh, that's just metaphor, and it's a storytelling, and it's not really true. And now there's some reason to believe that it actually was true. And the person who observed this was seeing the result of this ECDO shift. Because when you look at the Mediterranean after the rotation, that's exactly what the sun would look like. with respect to the Mediterranean in this alternate state. You would have a sunrise in the west that sets in the east. Ethical skeptic looks at the patterns of the erosion on the tops of the pyramids, and he's convinced that that is a sign of ocean water erosion, the wave shaped patterns at the very top of the pyramid is best explained by ocean waves. Well, then the question is, why would there be ocean waves, you know, several hundred feet up from the base of the pyramid? When did that happen? Why did that happen? But he's he's got some very compelling evidence that that is what happened that it was ocean water. that eroded that limestone that's up there. And back to Gobekli Tepe, when we look at that, was it people that filled it in, or was it a natural thing, such as the floods and such filling in. And I have a lot of questions about all of this and we just don't know, but it's fun to explore that because there are a lot of places in the world which have been covered over by mud and and that sort of thing and i you know clearly there's there's pottery shards down there and such they may have been using it as a dump too you know and uh there's yeah i mean when you when you when you acknowledge that we've only um unearthed five percent of it who knows what was actually the cause of it being inundated. But of the five percent that they dug out, there is clear evidence that there were buckets used to cover things up right there. There is unmistakable that at least in that small part, it's an intentional use of buckets of material. I can see that like little mounds and. But that's only five percent. We don't know what the other ninety five percent maybe was covered by. Maybe it was. flood, a mudslide, who knows what it could have been. It's curious that the Turkish government is stonewalling and sort of slowing down progress and continuing the unearthing. Why would they not want that to continue at a fast pace? It's all of our history. As human beings, we're entitled to know what happened there, and yet they're obstructing it. In fact, they planted olive trees on part of that ground and people put up a hue and they cry and they said, you know, those roots from those trees are going to destroy some of the archaeology that's underneath the surface. And they were taken out, but they did that. Why did they do that? Yeah, what's the big cover-up? And that's something that I have to ask about everything around us all the time. What's the big cover-up? Why is it that fifty-two percent of our lands west of the Mississippi are now federal lands and they're all fenced off and you can't fly a drone over them? What are they hiding out there? Why is it? that there's so much being hidden. And, you know, I was telling you yesterday, one of the times that I was in D.C., which this is kind of this is kind of bothering me. It's kind of disturbing to me because, you know, we got down into the tunnels a little bit, which was really very interesting. And nobody really walks above ground there. They just don't. Right. And so when When you go there, you can walk from any of the buildings from one to another underground. Okay, that's just the way it works. So I ran into one of the guys that was part of the Capital Architects. of course me you know i got to go out there and poke them a little bit because to see what's really going on because i'm like a five-year-old i'm curious about everything like so how many layers underground do you actually have and uh he just looked at me and he was kind of he was very grandfatherly about it though it was it was kind of beautiful and he said ollie said you know i can't tell you that and i'm like why not we own this place why can't why can't you tell me anything other than what we're being shown. I want to know. And it's like, I know somebody who's been at least six levels underground and such. Doesn't tell me a whole lot more than that, of course, but I know that I know there's at least six levels underground. And I know that out in Dulce Air Force Base out there, there's at least eight levels underground out there. And I've had a pretty good report into what those levels are by somebody who was there and in conversation, you know, as you do. And he just looked at me and he was very like empathetic. Like he kind of, it was like a grandfather that said, you're not quite ready to hear this kind of thing, you know, that you would do to like a small child, which really, really annoyed me, right? He just said, he's like, it's to protect you. And I'm like, I don't want to be protected. I want the freaking truth. OK, what is it? And I see this in politics all the time. These people are scared of something. I don't know what they're afraid of, but I'm going to tell you what they are afraid of something. And no one will talk about it. They sure as hell aren't going to say what it is to me because they know that I will literally tell what needs to be said because the American people have a right to know. And if we're being sold a lie on the entirety of what the United States is or stands for or the world, I think we have a right to know. I really do. And I think people are going to get this thing figured out. I don't think a lot of people are ready for what is actually the truth. And that may be part of it. But I don't know because when you look at even the weaponry that we have right now, Whatever we're seeing, we're a hundred and fifty years behind or more what they actually have. Yeah, this this whole idea, you know, we we talked about this, too, in my early career. I worked in, you know, the national defense intelligence sectors. And so I am. I have some viewpoint about the silos and the desires and intent to maintain secrecy. The problem I have with where it has gone is that there are gatekeepers of knowledge, and I'm not entirely clear on what all their motives are. I think in large part, they're not good motives. The example I gave you when we were on this topic yesterday was there was a hearing in front of Congress a couple of weeks ago having to do with UAPs and there's this panel and Paulina Luna is on there and some other Congress people and they're talking about this topic about UAPs. And in this one part of it, they show this object that's flying over the ocean in Yemen. And apparently, an American fighter craft shot a Hellfire missile at it. And the claim was the Hellfire missile just bounced off of it, maybe fragmented. So they're showing this video clip. And they're talking about, well, why didn't the American public see this before? Why now? What is that? Is that true? Blah, blah, blah. And they've got this expert witness up there in front of the microphone, and there's some congressman that's interviewing them about this event. And the guy says, he says, I'm not sure I'm I'm not sure I'm legally allowed to say what this is or what I know. And I'm also not sure you're legally allowed to hear it. And that infuriated me because That's a Congress person, right? Granted, it's the House and laws are made in the Senate, but still Congress makes the laws, not these gatekeepers and whoever's setting up the classified system, blah, blah, blah in the military industrial complex. They're not making the rules. It's Congress. And so my radical viewpoint is they should make a law that if you don't disclose that, you go to jail. If you go in front of Congress and you're testifying and you put up some bullshit smokescreen about you're not allowed to know this, you go to jail. Turn it around one hundred eighty degrees. I tell you what, I've met a lot of people in my travels here. Like I met Stephen Greer down at Mar-a-Lago and and such. And I've got a cell phone. I mean, I communicate to him occasionally. But when when you meet all these people and like the senators, I've met most of the senators and and some of the people from Congress, I actually sprinted. And I mean, I sprinted across the Senate building to get a picture with Adam Schiff. I'm like, there ain't no way I'm going to miss this out. And then I threw it out there. And of course all the village idiots that want to, you know, that want to divide, divide. And I really think most of them that, that, that go into the division, that they're political operatives. She's turned, she's in with shift. It's like, guys, if you would have known how fast I was trying to run across that, that Senate building to get a picture of them, you would have laughed. It's like, you know, you would have been laughing. And I just wanted to see what people's reaction was on it. Honestly, if they were going to jump to conclusion after listening to me talk for how many years, are you kidding me? It's like, it's like, I've been pretty clear into the point on, how absolutely criminal our government is right now. The entirety of it is absolutely one big money laundering criminal organization, which is using three NGOs and through a five, a one C threes to money launder. And we have no voice because we don't have elections. We have selections and we, The people that are in those offices, too, if you really meet them, they're really odd. They're odd. I don't know how else to put that to everyone without coming out and making grand statements. But they aren't like you and I. That's a good way to put it. They're different. But there are so many people up there. You know, I was in one of the senators' office. Michigan, one of the Michigan senators, um, offices one day and his staff was trying to talk to me. Now it was a rep. It's one of the reps, um, that was from Michigan up there. And, uh, they were trying to talk to me and both of those gals who were young, they, they were probably in their, in their less than mid twenties. They wanted to tell me things and, But they couldn't. And I'm like, why don't you just tell me what you want to say instead of beating around the bush? And they were like, we can't. And it was kind of funny to see the reactions of people who you know, they are afraid and they're afraid of something. They kind of want to give you like little nuggets and hope that you're going to run with it. But you're going to have to figure it out because they can't say it. But I'm going to tell you what, these people are afraid and it's not sort of fear. It's they're terrified of something. Hmm. Yeah. You know, that sort of brings to mind another thing I saw just I think it was yesterday. It was an interview with Tim Burchett, and he's also a house member who's part of these, you know, these UAP UFO panels. And he's talking to the host and he says something about. that you know that he was told and this was not he said it was not in a skiff environment it was from some other source he said that he was told that the navy is aware of these objects i know they are football field sized craft that went into the water and were traveling at speeds of so uh football sized object is like a aircraft carrier right So he says, imagine something that's that big and is traveling at two hundred and fifty knots under the water. You know, our subs, our best subs can do forty or fifty knots. And here's the thing that's doing two hundred and fifty knots. All right. I don't know that that's true. Right. He may have been told a story from somebody. I don't know. What I do know is if it is true, that to me is the single most important bit of knowledge that there could be. We should be expending all kinds of effort to verify that and publicize whatever is knowable about that right there. I have a friend who had had an eyewitness account of exactly that. All right. So but why is that stuff still kept cloaked and in secrecy and shrouded and all this mystery and all that stuff? Right. So the questions are that there's questions, though. It's like, what is it? Is it technology we have? Is it E.T. stuff or are we living in a multidimensional universe? I don't you know, I think there's all these things that we can ponder. But truly, Jesus knew how to to defy how to defy what it is that we're able to perceive. He could walk through walls. He could appear. He could disappear and such. And, you know, it's like it's like you he could you know, he could walk on water. He defies everything that we think we can we can get our arms around here, which we can't. We can't. And and so I don't know. You don't have all the answers, but I sure have a lot of questions. Yeah. but I love, I love the discussions about this. A few people have said it was probably demonic and, uh, But we don't know that either. You know, we don't know that either. If there's demons and angels, then, you know, we may or may not have the ability to know that there's a fight going on, perceiving around us, right around us all the time. I mean, if you've ever walked into some place and all of a sudden the hair stands up and, you know, you're like, your spidey senses are well-tuned and you're like, all right, there's something here and it ain't good, right? Or if there is, you know, if there is, there's been times that, you know, I was with somebody one day, somebody died. And I was at the death with a friend of mine. She asked me to be there. It was her mom. And I knew her my whole life. And I'm going to tell you what, there were things that happened that were absolutely beautiful that you could not, you could not, you couldn't negate it because everyone there saw the same thing. And experience the same thing. So there's things here that, you know, to people who are atheists, there are things here that we can't explain. And I'm going to tell you right now. And I've talked about it a little bit. I've seen the other side. And it's nothing to be afraid of. It's something to be like, oh, man, I did not want to come back. I was like, no. I do not, don't make me go back. You know, and I was, I was Donna, I was Donna, you know, right out there and saying that I was having an argument, like, nope, I'm done with that place. Let's stay here. This is a way better place. Don't make me go back. And, you know, it's not something to be afraid of at all. I'm, I'm open to, you know, any of these kinds of, you know, uh, explanations. What I'm, what bothers me is that if there are people who know and are withholding that knowledge, that's what I'm fighting back. Right. I don't know what it is or it isn't, but if you do, and you're withholding that for some reason, I have a problem with that. I do too. I have a problem with deception, with people who lie and with people who keep secrets for purposes of control and power. Right. They're going to tell you they're keeping secrets for reasons of protection, but most of the time it's because of control and power. And those are not legitimate reasons to keep secrets. So, you know. Well, we've had discussions about this many times, about the fact that you and I are probably automatically disqualified from certain jobs because I wouldn't lie. That's one of those things that would be a no-go for me because... I want to live upright before God. That's my goal is to be God's best friend. And God doesn't work through deception or chaos or any of that sort of thing. He just doesn't. So I really I would be disqualified for a lot of things based on that alone. Yeah. But we never got into the Charlie Kirk thing either. We were going to talk about that, but maybe we should save that for another day. Yeah, but we should. The way it ties in, you know, as far as I'm concerned, it comes back to this truth and deception thing, right? There's all kinds of ideas about what happened and why it happened and whether it happened and all that, right? And I Another one of these things where I keep myself separated from reaching a conclusion too prematurely. I can't be as elegant as Ethical Skeptic when he describes this holding in an epoch, so I would defer you to read the way he writes it because... He writes eloquently about how to approach things in that way. But I don't want to reach any particular conclusion or be forced into making a choice or a stand by people who are pressured. You've got to believe this or else you're not part of my group, right? If you don't believe that what I'm saying happened here in this situation, you're persona non grata. I resist that. I want to absorb the information and reach reasonable conclusions. But it comes down to the lies and the deception and that sort of thing. Whatever the facts are, we, the people, the public, are entitled to know what those facts are. It's just time to grow up to the truth and not live in this, uh, bias, um, brainwashed fantasy land, but deal with reality. And I think that's the way to go. Uh, clarity sage says, um, in the book of Enoch, second Enoch, and I love the book of Enoch. I really do. And reference to the giants says, but the Lord has condemned them to be under the earth until the existing heavens and earth will end forever. And, uh, I have a friend who worked under, like I said, he's worked in the, the, he calls them underground cities and, and has talked about this and, and said that the men in black came and visited him and said, this is all going to come out, but it's not the time yet. And said, you know, just, just wait until people are ready to hear this, because I think they're, I think they're kind of working on the disclosure part of it, quite honestly. And we were talking about the White House. I'm totally disgusted with the White House site right now. I don't know if you were listening to that backstage, but I'm totally disgusted with this crap on the White House site. Now, I'm not going to attribute this to President Trump or anybody in general, but whoever created this propaganda needs to be fired. It may be just a distraction or something like that. But it's like Democrats, the Democrats, the Democrats. How about we just say all of them and how it is that they're using the White House is supposed to be in, you know, an institution. that serves all of us instead of a propaganda narrative building machine. And I would like to encourage everyone to look at this and I'm like, okay, if they're a terrorist organization, let's just call it out, fire them all and prosecute them, okay? I don't care who they are, what title they go under, what virtue signaling they're doing, I don't care. But this stuff is just absolutely over and over and over again. The Democrats are holding us hostage. The Democrats, the Democrats. Well, if that's the case, then the Republicans are completely worthless. And there's no leadership or going after them. But I don't like seeing the White House site used as a tool of deception or division. instead of celebrating what's good about America. If there's something bad, either fix it or get the hell out of the office and go do something else because this is really bothering to me. Now, it may just be that they're distracting us while they're tearing things down, the good guys, because it is my belief that the good guys are in control. It really is. But that doesn't mean everything's going to be clean either. There's going to be a lot of stuff on as they're routing the rats out and eliminating the threats. Nothing's going to be clean about it when you're in a war. And we are in a war. It's unconventional warfare. You brought that up, which is great. But we are in a war and nothing is going to be completely clean as we go through centuries of of deception as we fight this death cult that's out there that does horrible things to human beings. You really want to look at it. Look at the Bolshevik Revolution and what they did to people there that never gets talked about. And we want to know why all of a sudden Germany overshadows everything. which I don't believe any narrative anymore. I don't care where it comes from, because we weren't there. And everything has been twisted, and history has been written by the victors and such. But I have a lot of questions. And when they don't talk about something, that's exactly what I want to look at and go, why? This, you know, the Bolshevik Revolution and similar things that happened in other countries. um, there, there is a, um, ideology and mindset behind those things. And you, you can see that in the radical modern left. I'm not going to lump everybody on the left into that group because I know some people who are left leaning, who are reasonable, um, you know, willing to engage in debate. I'm not talking about those, those types, but the ones that, you know, um, there was a, tweet yesterday it was some some woman in fact eric weinstein posted this and he said there is a rebel these are revolutionaries but you don't realize it because these are people who go and have coffee with you after pilates and you know he he explains these are these are people you engaged with a normal society that you're just not aware have this viewpoint and the viewpoint was All y'all over here on the right, whatever they think that is, are fascists and you deserve to be given a platform. And the platform they showed was a guillotine with heads being chopped off, right? So they're telling you that from their political and ideological viewpoint, it's perfectly acceptable to round up all you fascists, whatever they think that means, and chop her heads off. because we simply don't agree with them on how to conduct civil society. That mindset is what was behind the Bolsheviks and behind the Cultural Revolution in China and Pol Pot. All of that, right, is that bloodlust, that disregard for human life, the willingness to kill, ends justify all means, all of that thinking, right? And we see that bubbling up in modern society. And it bothers me a lot because there's no easy fix for that. This isn't something where you sit down with one of these people holding up the sign with the guillotine and you have a little discussion and you're like, you know, that that's that's not a good idea. Let's talk about this. That's not going to work. They are entrenched in this viewpoint. How that resolves, I mean, I honestly don't know. You know, it's about the human. You don't vote your way out of it, that's for sure. You don't vote your way out of that. Yeah, it's a human. And this goes back to the Constitution. The Constitution only works if we are a moral people and we are not. And there starts another discussion that needs to be really, really discussed. considered because it's like we were talking about that video that we both saw yesterday when we were talking about these kids and the mom asking them a question and the kids came right back and said, is Donald Trump dead? And they were like celebrating this. Who does this to their children? Who does this to their children? She's a military spouse, and she starts the conversation with, I've got some good news. And the two young girls jump up and they go, is Donald Trump dead? And the mom says, no, it wasn't that. Is Elon Musk dead? No, it wasn't that. And there was a third person, right? So in that household, that's deemed normal dinnertime conversation. How do you fix that? You don't because it's insanity. Those kids are broken for life. How do you shake that off? How do you grow up being taught by your parents that that's an acceptable thing to think about and talk about? Maybe some of them will become Christians and convert, maybe. But in the large part, I don't know how they... let go of that toxic way of thinking. I know it's like, you know, you look at you look at the crimes that have been committed under the names of every religion on the planet. You know, there's been crimes that have been committed under under the name of Christianity. I mean, it was a Valley View Baptist Church. Those people are freaking wacko. And I was at a funeral one time where there was like two hundred bikers that showed up to protect the military family, there was a soldier that was killed and I went to this funeral and these, these bikers came and put a hundred flags all over the place and they were to protect the family and the deceased soldier from these wackos. I'm like, this is not, this is, this is not what that God ever intended for people to do. I mean, I mean, if we're not there to help people as in humble, I mean, Jesus only had two words to describe himself and that was humble and merciful. That was his words for his own character. And he also claimed to be God. He's the only one that claimed to be God of any of the religious leaders. And that's, that's why they killed him. And people will say, oh, they didn't kill him. He chose to die. Well, I'm like, he did, but somebody put his body on the cross. So it's kind of a hybrid both ways. He could have called all of heaven down to get him off that cross and to live. He chose not to. But who was it that nailed him to that cross? Who was it that put him on the cross? The Romans didn't want to kill him. It was the religious fake Jews. And I'm going to say and I know I'm good. I get a lot of flack by this. But if you don't read your Bible, you're not going to know what it says. And I'm not I'm not, you know, dinging anybody here. All you got to do is go to Revelations two nine. And I'm not sure I want to give anybody the answer because I put it out there enough. Go look for yourself and see what it says, because it says it talks about the fake Jews. They're not the Jewish people. They're not God's people. They're not Semites. Most of the people that live in Israel are not are not Semitic people. They're usurpers, just like the people that took over the United States of America. They're not Americans. They're usurpers. And they've done this in history. It's the same playbook over and over and over again. They're like, you know, shape-shifting. And I'm just going to use that term to be funny. But they're people that take on other people's identities and and and you know bastardize it i mean i know i know a lot of people who are muslim that are some the some some of the greatest events i i went to and all these people go you know let's go and tear dearborn down are you kidding me i was there and you and i talked about it i'm a first person witness to so many things and i don't know why the doors always open for me but they do They were the nicest, most gracious people that, you know, I was there with Rick Grinnell. He's gay. He's openly gay. A lot of the people there that I was there with are openly gay. They literally put a feast on for him and everyone there. And they were just the most gracious, hospitable people that I haven't seen in Christian circles in a long time. I'm going to say it straight up. And I'm a Christian. They've got conservative people. family centered values that are lying with what we, what we would, um, how we would conduct our lives. Right. And, you know, I think it shocked a bunch of the people on the Democrat side when they came out in favor of Trump. They're like, what are you talking about? You know, you're, you're Muslims, you should be on our side. And they're like, no, we're not. We're actually Trump supporting Muslims. And why? Because of that culture of valuing life and, you know, um, family and and conservatism and you know you you can't lump everybody together like that there are radical muslims there are um sects of that you know um religion that want to destroy the west as they see it but among them are people who are simply you know family people with conservative leaning values Well, here's the deal. Are we here to be right? Or are we here to serve God? This is his world. This is his sandbox. And, you know, it's like, if we're not, he was sitting down with prostitutes and tax collectors. And I can tell you what, I know somebody years ago that had a church and we were, we homeschooled our kids. So I was, you know, I can be friends with anybody. And I'm here to help, okay? You know, I've got probably as many gay and lesbian friends as I do straight friends, and I just don't care, okay? It's like we all have issues no matter what it is, and I'm not saying that's an issue or is or not, but all I'm saying is that human beings are flawed. All of us are. Anyhow, there's this Christian church that, you know, some people, and I was coaching homeschool softball, okay? I was coaching girls homeschool softball, and there's a family there, and they were... very, you know, like, I'm gonna say, I'm gonna say, probably the most religious spirit fakest Christians I'd ever met in my life. And I'm just going to say that. OK, but I thought, well, you know, let's see if I can. You know, I'm like, hey, you know, I'd love to come to your church and I'm open to anything. You know, I'll go and talk to anybody and see see what's going on and check out to see if my opinions or my observations were accurate because it could have been wrong. So. They politely and very vaguely smiled at me and said, well, I'll have my husband call to see if you will be welcome here and accept it. I was like, done right there. Because Jesus said anyone who seeks will find and that a knock in the door will open. He doesn't expect us to be perfect. He died for us in our imperfection to pay the price of anything that would separate us from God to have a relationship with us. And so who are these people that say, let's go to Dearborn and tear that down? They don't know anything. They've never been there. And they're listening to mainstream media. Now, for God's sake, haven't we figured this out that they lie and alternative media lies? They're supported by USAID. And now we're going to believe that. And we're going to believe the bombings in Gaza. What's going on there? We don't know. This is all a mainstream narrative. And now go to the White House site and see it all. The Democrats, the Democrats, the Democrats. You know what? I don't like the policies of either side. It's all crap. And it's not brownies made with dog crap. It is dog crap. All of it. It's, it's, it's politicians and those who, who seek office, you know, for Money or corrupt reasons. Right. That are the problem. And you can't just put a label and say it's this group or that group. It's those who seek political office for those reasons. I don't care what letter comes after your name. Right. It's how you conduct yourself in the public sphere and for the you know, whether it's for the interests of the people or whether it's for your own interests and. Yeah, it's. Well, and let's talk about individual introspection, because that has to happen, that individual introspection. And look at how the parties, the Republican Party and the Democrat Party, exactly the same in their function. They exist and act as a cult. They are grooming people. You can see it at the young Republicans, young Democrats and all these activists to be able to to see where they stand. And I know a guy that was actually groomed sexually by the guy that's a father of lobbying. And I'm going to get him on here sometime. He's going to be undercover because his life would be at risk if he talked about this because he knows exactly what happened and how many young men in the Republican Party were groomed and raped and on and on to groom them into this situation. OK, and I'm not going to buy the bullshit that's out there. It's a narrative. If it you know, if something smells off, it's off. And I and I know this guy enough to know that he is telling the truth. OK. So when we look at this, our own introspection is what do people get out of being involved in these cults? Because it's a cult. If you don't go along, if you're not malleable, if you don't take the money, if you won't talk the narrative that they put out there, you're voted off the island. That's why they had to get rid of me. And I have the distinction of being kicked off twice by two political parties because I was not going to be part of this lie and deception. And I won't do it. I won't be part of the Republican Party, the Democrat Party, even though I've been asked to lie just to get in there. And I'm like, I'm not a liar. I'm not going to lie. I'm going to tell everybody what I think. And I think that they should all be prosecuted because they've taken foreign money in our elections. How can anybody stand with us? They broke the law. If you stand with those organizations, you are standing by association with lawbreakers, both of them, and you should probably be prosecuted for it because ignorance of the law is not a defense of it. Okay? So it's not a defense. So, you know, you look at this stuff and go, what's the capital or the payback people get by being part of the Republican Party or the Democrat Party? I'm just going to say the unit party because it's the same. It's being accepted into a group. It's a cult. And so it's like, so what? Do you get to go to special dinners? They're boring as hell, okay? They're boring as hell. They are a waste of time. And it's the same thing. And it's like, fine, whatever. But I go to make connections and such, hoping against hope that I'm going to find some people in there that are thinking and doing the right thing, right? But it's like, what other capital do people get out of being part of it? Well, I think they're doing something. Well, I'm going to get in. And then you look at, they think they're so good that they're going to change it by themselves in there. No, you're not. You're not going to change this. This thing is a machine and it's tied into the corporatocracy. Right. Brian Cates wrote about that yesterday in the context of that judge who gave a light sentence to the person who went after Brett Kavanaugh, right? And he had a pretty good explanation for that mindset, right? That a lot of these people who run for political office, including judgeships, do it because of how it makes them feel about themselves, right? And he called out her explanation of the case, why she used a lenient sentence and all that. And it was, look how good a person I am. Exactly. Look at my... character and all that. And I exhibited my, you know, exemplary character in in dispassing justice for this person. Right. It's all about them. Yeah. It's not about integrity. Good boy. Good girl. You did such a good job. Now give us some more money. Right. So, you know, we finished the talk yesterday and we should we should talk about this some other time, too, is for me, the the the only way forward for society around the world that isn't violent, right, is radical self-sufficiency. Yes. And I've talked about this in other channels. And, you know, it has to do with access to energy and water and shelter. You know, these are topics that General Cross talks about, too, is seven pillars of prosperity. Right. He says that if humanity has access to these things, then the quality of life for everyone can improve. But it also means that we can decouple from the parts of society that we don't care to interact with. And we can say, all right, you go do whatever hedonistic, satanistic things you want in New York City. And we're going to go over here in Iowa. And we're going to have our little enclave. And we're going to live our lives by our Uh, rules, you know, kind of like what the Amish do, right. They detach themselves from, from society and they, they have their communities and they live, uh, according to their own tenants. Right. Um, radical self-sufficiency is this idea that through improvements in energy access and whatnot, we'll all be able to, to do that. We'll have the ability to have a small town where we wanna be, and we have no dependence on that other system. We don't have to burn it down. We don't have to kill those people. We just have to say, you go do your thing over there and here's the line. Don't cross it. And here's our town and we're going to do our thing over here. Right. Yeah. And I mean, you know, you know me pretty well. It's like, uh, as far as, you know, you and Emily do. And it's you know, I'm a pretty self-sufficient person. And I think that there's there's something that I've been working on and with a couple with another person that I think I'm going to start another company because it is possible to have. consistently good energy, but not in the way they're doing it now. The way they're doing it now is a centralization of electricity. Everything that they're doing, they're centralizing the food chain, they're centralizing the water, they're centralizing the energy with gas and gas. Now, so like I work in gas and oil, right? And so one of the biggest, that's one of the places I build businesses. Okay. Just cause I'm like a bored little kid. That's got a table full of Legos, which is the world in front of me going, Ooh, let's see if this will work. Let's see if this will, you know, just cause it's fun. And, and when you look at gas and oil, they did the same thing. Cause remember they used to, you used to be able to go to the independent gas station near you. And there was people there that could work on cars and, Well, they've kind of like centralized them to some small shops, but mostly it's to the dealerships now. And look at what they're doing with energy with the electric cars. This is a problem because it's centralizing our power grid. and how they're doing the nuclear power plants. One of the things I can tell you that I'm working on right now that's probably going to end up in another lawsuit because the Bar Association is nothing more than a country club card. They don't have a license to practice law. Not one of them in the United States has a license to practice law. State of Michigan, that means every single judge is nothing but an administrator, not a judge, and they're an imposter sitting in a seat. It's a country club card. That's it. They don't have a license. Not one of them. I've heard it described as a private membership club. It's a private membership club. I call it the country club club because they just exist to protect each other. But I want you to know this, that I know of one power plant that has literally stolen so much money from the American people. And by the way, Consumers Energy owns an island off of the coast of Venezuela, in case anybody doesn't know that, because I like to look into this kind of crap because it's all crap. And there's a co-op that's been siphoning energy off of one of our systems. And there happens to be a general that's involved in this, who I'm hoping that once we get a hold of him a little bit, start squealing like the little pig he is and should have known better. other than to have the lack of ethics that he has exhibited in this one instance. But it comes down to, and going back to, we have to be introspective on our own actions because there's very few people that can stand when that almighty dollar or gain or privileges is waved out in front of them. When I was running for governor, I was offered millions, billions, and unlimited, unlimited, anything I wanted. And I'm like, yeah, I'm not like, I really could care less about all of that. It doesn't interest me at all because what happens with a lot of money, you know, I've had some success in life. You know, I've lost and I've gained and sort of like whatever. I like to build. I like to fix problems. That's pretty much it. But when people get around money, they get stupid real fast. And it's their ability to think. It's like they're under a spell. Their ability to think logically and evaluate the situation goes right out the window. And, I mean, it just – It's shocking. And I think that if we look at people, when I'd have tenants move into things, I would tell them years ago when I was doing all the leasing, I'd say, remember, please conduct yourself here the way that you would want somebody to conduct themselves if your grandmother was living next door. Right. You know, are you going to be a nuisance by having parties and disturbing everyone because you're just a special snowflake and you can do what you want? Or are you there to actually take care of people? Are you thinking about this? Like, are these are the people around you? Do you see other people as you would your children and take responsibility for them? Would you want somebody to be treated that way? And if you can if you can't see people in that in that capacity, you're probably disqualified. Right there of having a personality or character flaw for actually living in and being in a position of power. And a mom or a dad will give their life for their children. Yeah. When you when you, you know, take that and you write it large, the problem is there is too significant a fraction of society that can't do that, won't do that. And narcissistic. Right. And civilization, as we want it to be, can't continue and exist unless there are significant or majority people who are moral people. And that's why I go back to that radical self-sufficiency idea, because in that world, money itself doesn't matter anymore either. If you have, here's how I explained it to my brother-in-law one day. I said, I could give you a million dollars. And what would you do with that? You would go buy energy in some form. You would buy fuel. You would buy electricity. You would buy food, right? You're going to convert those dollars into ultimately some form of energy or a byproduct of energy. You're going to buy a, an object that was made from a factory that used electricity, right? Ultimately, it comes down to energy. I said, what if instead I gave you in your palm of your hand a gigawatt? Suppose I could do that. Here's a thing, and I put it in your palm, and it's a gigawatt. Well, with that gigawatt, you could do all of those things. You could make food, purify water, manufacture whatever you want to if you have the right equipment. Right. All of those things you could do with that gigawatt. You don't need dollars. You need energy. And Americans are being worked to death by this system. We've got about an eighty five percent tax rate right now. Plus, let's just go ahead and factor in. inflation and all this other stuff that people are having to work just to survive so much that I understand a lot of the crazy behaviors we have is because they know in our hearts, we know that there's nobody out there that really cares about us. You know, President Trump did a pretty good job of that in showing Americans that that there was somebody who cared. And that he did care for us. When you look, especially in his first term, how he was out there, he was hugging children and bringing people out in front and saying, look, this person did this. And he was just like a dad. He was so proud of everybody and such. And I mean, it was encouragement. Come on, you can do it. You can do it and such. But I think that a lot of the bad behaviors we see is just because of how much oppression, lack of justice, and everybody knows it. There's nobody out there that can tell me, oh, this system's working. I'd call them a liar to the face. You know, there's no help for mental health. There's the taxes that keep growing. There's no help for people as they age. And so people are just beating themselves to death going through this, you know, trying to make it in this captured corporatocracy. And can you imagine if all of a sudden all taxes were paused? And we had more of a spiritual council that cared about the spiritual health, not the church health. And in the Bible, it talks about it. The church was going to be the first one cleaned out because this is nothing more than let's get the butts in the seat so we can have air conditioning and more programs so people can look at our mega churches and say how great we are. You know what? Jesus went to Holmes. And the congregations were more like the Essenes. They shared what they had to take care of each other. That ain't what we got going on now. Fake church, fake Jews, fake synagogue of Satan, fake Muslims that are out there, fake Islam. That has nothing to do with the people. Fake China. China is our country. We don't even have countries anymore. It's global. It's global structures of of of a corporatocracy all for money, you know. And that's not something to feel sad about. It's something to say, wow, this is amazing. We can actually, if we actually sat down together and we actually cared for each other, I think we could write this ship pretty fast. And that's why I, you know, I've been thinking along those lines for decades and that's why I loop back to the only peaceful solution is radical self-sufficiency through energy independence. Right. Um, I saw a headline just this morning. I'm looking on glance at the PC, and there's some news story, and it says, you know, it says, U.S. on verge of historic breakthrough, and it's talking about the ITER fusion facility. Oh, this is going to be great. This fusion facility will be online. And I've been railing about that for decades, right? Fusion is not the answer. Why? Because they're going to centralize power like they always have. And you're still going to have to buy electricity from consumers energy who now gets it from the fusion reactor instead of the nuclear or the gas or what have you is still around the hook to those guys. That's not the answer. That's not. And look at look at the worship, the worship that people have of these global systems expecting somebody bigger to save us instead of all of us saying, hey, look, we're going to have to get this figured out in a small group and stop looking. Oh, man, look at these great big corporations as these people are in charge of. They're criminals. They've used the system. And it's like, I'm sorry. Maybe you should look at your neighbor who's got a few cows and is making cheese that is taking care of people or taking people and their neighbors into their homes and solving the problems instead of having some of these money laundering NGOs and such trying to solve all the problems. I just think we need to have a shift in the way we look at things. and celebrate the, the everyday people that go to work every day and just keep knocking it out for their families. That's a hero in and of itself. Yeah. Yeah. They don't quit. They keep going, even though everything is just keeps railing against them and they keep hammering it out day by day to take care of the people that they love. It's extraordinary. Yeah. So, well, we're creeping up on noon here. So I got a meeting to go to, too. But you want to come back on Monday and we'll talk about some of the other stuff. Do you have time to do that? Yeah, we can. We can do that, I think. We need to follow up on some of the other things we were going to talk about that we never got to, but, you know, or whenever. Well, I'll let you know. Look at my Telegram channel or my X account. You know, I post, I usually post first on Telegram and then sometimes I'll move it over to X. Once in a while, you know, sometimes I post on X and not over to Telegram. It kind of depends on what I'm posting, but. If you kind of follow both, you'll get kind of more of a clear picture. And I try to do my TikTok videos too. So anyhow, why don't we do this? Let's say a prayer, then you do last words, and then we'll go to our day, okay? Dear Heavenly Father, thank you so much for being with us through this. It's such an amazing time to be alive that you've given us so much latitude to make choices for ourselves and to choose who... we are going to be, what we're going to listen to, whether we even follow you or not. And I ask that everyone, that you would turn their hearts and their minds to you because you are the only way. Once we get off on the road by ourself in the weeds and the jungles of craziness out there, we get kind of crazy. And I ask that you turn our focus to you, which is always good. Your path is always, always good and right. And you're selfless. And you love us and you came here for us, not because we were perfect, but because we were difficult to love. And that, you know, for us, we have a hard time with that. We really do. But we know that you're not like us and we want to be like you because you're good all the time and all your plans are good. And we trust you. We trust you. Not what we think that we know or our knowledge or anything else, but we trust that you have the next step. You've got the next day. You've got the next moment. And all we have to do is follow that path that you lay ahead of us. And somehow, even when things seem the bleakest, things just work out because you are there. And we thank you for that. Thank you so much for the guidance that you've given us and all these wonderful people who have decided to step forward. put themselves into the mix of things, not worshiping some other crazy entity out there, but worshiping you and realizing that you're going to lead us as a group with all of our individual gifts and talents and wonderful things that you put into us into a wonderful future. And I thank you every minute of what we're experiencing now, both things that are good and the things that are not so good, because you're going to take those things And you're going to turn them into something really beautiful. And you know the end of the story. So anyhow, we just want to let you know that we love you and that this is going to be a great day going forward. We don't even give you everything we have. We acknowledge everything we have is yours anyway. So we are just thankful. And we love you. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen. So with that said, how do you want to end this, Eric? I just want to go back to how we started on all this, which is it we started yesterday taking care of bees and listening to the sound of nature and seeing them do what they do and smelling the rich aroma of the honey and just marveling at how those little insects can create something so magnificent right as as honey and So that was the highlight of the day. The end of the day when we talked about these other things was after the peak. The peak was getting to do that and experience, you know, the wonder of God's plan and those busy little insects and the wonderful things that they do. And so, yeah, that was a lot of fun. they got a kind of a good thing going. If you study bees, you can see how their society works together and it's fantastic. And I want to thank Mike Boydell for helping too. So that was, that was fun. You know, we kind of had an event out of it, you know, and we're able to, you know, enjoy the day together, which was, which was really, which was really nice as friends, you know, friends can do all these things together and different people have things that they know, like, like Eric's an insect guy, right? And so he knows insects really, really well. And we all have our things that we do really well. And you put them all together and it's a really great thing. The bees know how to do that too. It was fun. So anyhow, with that said, let's go to that part of the show, boys and girls, where I do my twenty twenty two protests. There you go. It's go to for governor dot com because of the best nine conceders ever not conceded in the history of the United States of America. And I'd like to have a discussion with the rightful president of the United States, President Donald Trump. Cowboy boots. I wear them better because I wear them every single day. And then we talk about real stuff and we fix things and this and that and the other thing. And so that's there's my twenty twenty two protests for anybody who's new here today. And I just say that, you know, we've got a great, a great future together. If we get rid of the nonsense and we decide to do our jobs, which is taking responsibility for our brothers and our sisters and doing what's right and not trying to get this big pile of Scrooge McDuck gold, it doesn't work that way, but to do significant projects and things that solve that solve issues. So with that said, God bless you all. God bless all those whom you love and God bless America. Have a great day. Make it a wonderful day. And I'll be on tomorrow with John Tater at nine and then eleven o'clock with Mike Bambus again. And we're going to be beating up this legal stuff. I really like doing this legal stuff that, you know, you know, suing people that need to be sued and holding them in check. The accountability, the accountability has to happen when people When people break the law, we can't just say, oh, it's OK, we'll get it the next election. Right. Sure, that's going to work. So at any rate, there's got to be consequences for bad actions. And if we don't do that, we don't have justice. So have a great day and hopefully I'll see you all tomorrow. And love y'all. Thanks, Eric.