Published May 26, 2026, 9:01 a.m.
9am John Tatar - Lawful Defense Tatar Tuesday with John Tatar. Studying the Constitution. Know the law and use the law - using the law to defend yourself. All things Constitution and Lawful Process. Tatar Tuesday with John Tatar 10am Mike - Mike Bambas will be talking about the citizen's rights and process of holding to the law. We will be taking the Trading with the Enemy Act, as well as, other lawful practices not followed by our government including a lawful path to convict political criminals of concrete violations of acts leading to treason X/Twitter: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1YxNrrbOqRPxw Rumble: https://rumble.com/v7aejuq-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-5262026-lawful-defense-and-prose-mike.html https://rumble.com/v7aejqy-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-5262026-lawful-defense-and-prose-mike.html BNN Live: https://Live.BrandenburgNewsNetwork.com Guests: Donna Brandenburg, John Tatar, Mike Bambas
Good morning and welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg, and it's the twenty sixth day of May twenty twenty six. Welcome to our show. You know, we're going to just jump into it this morning at nine o'clock. I have John Tater on at ten o'clock. Pro say, Mike, we haven't done Tuesdays in a little while. So here we go. Morning, John, how you doing? I'm doing good. How about yourself? I'm doing good. I'm kind of we had a very busy holiday weekend, but you know how that goes. But it was fun. So I ended up, brother and sister-in-law, brother-in-law and sister-in-law have a boat. So we went cruising up the Mississippi River. So that was kind of fun. I think the next time we do that, we're going to go through the lot. We're going to lock through it. So we'll go through the locks and we're talking about going all the way up to Wisconsin, which should be a lot of fun. What kind of boat does he have? I don't, it's a, some sort of a souped up pontoon boat, but I'm not a boat person. So it's, it's a boat, you know, but it's, it's very, very nice. And so we had a great time. It goes like sixty miles an hour. So part of it, we were making tracks because we were trying to get somewhere for dinner in a marina. And then we turned around and came back. It was very, very nice. Beautiful. You know, the United States is an absolutely beautiful country. And since they've been trying to destroy all the dams, of course we don't have, you know, locks or, or such, but we've got two thousand five hundred dams in the state of Michigan, which the DNR is hell bent on wrecking. So it's kind of a kind of a interesting thing to see and to happen. I guess they've always got it dredged to nine feet on the Mississippi. And we got to see eagles and pelicans and all kinds of fun stuff. And It's just beautiful because they really haven't developed the shores. When you're in the northern part of the Mississippi, the shorelines aren't really developed. So it's just beautiful and you're out in the outdoors. So a lot of fun. So did you have a good weekend? I did. Went to my daughter's house. She lives off of Manitou Beach. And my sister from Tennessee came up and my other sister was there and One of the daughters was there, my niece, and, of course, the little baby, Barron. He was running around. That was a lot of fun. We went up there. That's awesome. Susie says, we went up there, yes. Well, it's been a while since I've had you on on Tuesdays because I've been so stinking busy with the U.S. Taxpayers Party. And I got to tell you, we are just having people flock to us because the candidates on the Republican Party are so bad. And they're terrible. And, you know, I'm sorry, but the Republican Party and the Democrat Party, they act like a cult, not a cult, a cult. And so it's sort of like, go sports team, go. And if you don't fall in line with them, they're going to ostracize you and kick you out in the whole ten yards. You know, if you don't play with their little money game of raise money to raise money to have a fundraiser, to have another fundraiser, another fundraiser. So, but we're having a great time. And I tell you what, we're actually getting things done. I don't know if you heard, but I went to the national committee meeting. And the national party, which we are, we are the part of the Michigan affiliate of the constitution party has approved a resolution for separation from. the Uniparty as well as a formal declaration of separation from the Uniparty. And I think I think it was well written because being in Philadelphia, we were looking at the Declaration of Independence. I got to recite it in the signers room and Independence Hall, which was really fun, meaningful, really meaningful. I mean, several people were in there crying, just thinking about what the people gave that fought for this nation. And we recounted the stories, too, of how many people had their houses burned down and lost their fortunes and their family members and how much division there was through the history of the United States. Civil War was poster child of it. But at the founding of our nation, the Americans were pretty united in their effort, except for in commerce. And I think that that's a lesson we should all be taking with where we are right now, because only like three percent were really fighting, fighting. The rest of them were selling their goods, their services, their crops, their land, whatever it was to the British, to the highest bidder. And that's exactly what's going on right now. And anyone that's doing that should see that as being a traitor because it really is. If you're not fighting for the people of America, so I'm going to give you an example. People who sell their farmland out to the Chinese so they can build and have control of the land, right across from our military or next to our military bases, that's being a trader, okay? And you don't sell out to the highest bidder just because you get the money and can run. Same thing that happened in Goshen with the Goshen plant up there in Mecosta County with the farmers selling to the highest bidder, they were getting mega bucks from the Chinese up there. And if they sold out to the Chinese, they're traders. They're traders. We're not supposed to be selling our land to a foreign government. But Michigan has already done that because Singapore owns five percent of our U.P. and the DNR and Eagle. act like they own the land, public-private partnerships, you know, and are prohibiting Michiganians, Michiganders, from going on the land. I've seen it. And they're harvesting, they're taking all of the resources, they're clear-cutting it. And it looks like a scarred landscape up there, which should be enough to make everybody absolutely furious. They leave the stumps, they leave everything just sitting there. It is a trashed land. Very sad. The process is still what it is. In other words, the way to fix this problem is not fighting those people that are selling the land, but fighting the government that's allowing it. And because the government is the one that has the power that we've delegated the power to, To do this, we've delegated them the authority. We haven't really delegated the authority to sell off America, nor to destroy America. But they believe that they're in charge and we are the servants. And so we have to flip that. And the only way we can flip that is to start putting pressure on them. And as you were saying, you can't get the voter registration information from Detroit or from from Lansing. Yes, you can. Well, see, this is what happened. We tried to pull the voter information for the taxpayers party, and it's legal to do that. And they have a they've got a form for it. But they turned it down because they said, no, you can't do that because there's sensitive information on it, which the form allowed for. So I got to dig into this a little bit, but they're absolutely trying to prohibit anyone who's not their chosen people from being able to move forward. But that's okay. We're just going to still outperform them because they're kind of stupid, really. I'm trying to explain to you that the way to do that is to start with the three letters and then sue them, but sue them individually. and since the party is at this point fairly big in michigan or there's a few members in there then a few members need to be doing this not only the party but the party can spearhead it but the party has to have two or three people four or five people writing letters and demanding the release of this information and putting them in their place their public functionaries They're not officials. They're not leaders. They're none of that. They're public functionaries. And they get their delegated authority from the people. And it goes back to Norton versus Shelby County, which is extremely powerful. And those people do not want to deal with that because it puts them in their place. It shuts them down. But we have to do that as public as the people in order to get this to change. Otherwise, they're going to continue to do what they do. They've got the power, they've got the guns, and they can push us in any directions we want because we go along with it. Well, I think the base level of this, though, think about this. They created a form that you could FOIA this information on. It doesn't matter. It could be us. No, no, I mean, listen to the deception on this. It does matter because they put a form out there that says basically, you know, go ahead and FOIA it. You can FOIA it. You know, these are the things you can FOIA for. But then they turned it down. It was intentional to stall you out and such. So we just got to go back and figure it out. You're playing in their ballpark. They're playing games, though. We got to get out of their ballpark and get back into our ballpark. We've got the Constitution. We've got the Declaration of Independence. We can use that and work and make them come to our part. But they're violating their oath of office right off the bat. And the Supreme Court's already said, you violate your oath of office, it's going to be serious. So we can force them to do what we want them to do, but we have to push on them. Just writing a letter once and going away is not going to do anything. So how would you address this particular FOIA situation? would you do first what i would do is i would write the foia but i would put a cover letter on there explaining to them that they're the public functionaries and that they need to follow the delegated authority that was given to them or they're violating their oath of office put that stuff down on writing and start sending it out and putting pressure on them but not only you the party itself can do that and that's why you guys could have been called up the uh constitution party long time ago i said here's how you do it but nobody wanted to do it you push them because they will fall they have no choice because they go to court and they violate their oath of office that is in fact treason yes it is and so the only way you can do that is to put pressure on them i know it takes a lot of time and a lot of energy But you've got enough people in the taxpayer party that could get together and say, this is what we're going to do. OK, I'll write the first letter. I'll write the second letter. You write the third letter. You write the fourth letter. And we continue to pound them until they do what they're supposed to do. And we don't let up. We don't let up. Well, I tell you, I sued Jocelyn Benson, and they basically just had it dismissed, right? But hold on a minute. And then I also talked to another guy that worked in the office that was kind of instrumental in changing things there a little bit, because I think they've had somewhat of a staff change, not entirely, but some. And basically, he said, too, he said, no, she's got the right to tell you you can't change your name. So she told us. Instead of doing administrative change, which it should be because there's other the precedent set across the United States and I think eight other states, they just did an administrative change. You just just change name and that's all that's all there is to it. So we should have the right to do it. But she said, no, you got to collect forty five thousand signatures in order to get on. And I'm like, how's that going to work? You just they just kicked off. They just kicked off. Ralph Revant is challenged and like likely he's not going to make it through the next the challenge part of it. Perry Johnson and John James had the challenges on the signatures because they're rigging it. They're rigging it just like the judges rig the courts. So it's stacked against us no matter what way we do it. But that doesn't mean we stop. We just have to keep going and find a smarter way to do it and explore all options. I'm annoyed, aren't I? The way to do it is to put together a letter. We could have changed the tax. I know we could have changed the name of the taxpayer party two, three years ago when I was talking about doing it. I know we could have done it. It would have required effort and time and energy, but it could have been done. The reason that we're not doing or not being successful is we're giving up. We're not fighting the battle. We fight the battle, but we don't fight the war. We have to decide that this is what we want to do and come hell or high water, Excuse my southern expression. We will do it because there's no other choice. And Benson will get sued and Nestle will get sued and Whitmer will get sued in the process. And maybe twelve or fourteen suits. Maybe not just one. You should spearhead this. How do you sue them? You don't sue them as a governor. You sue them as an individual. Now, i started my lawsuit back in i've been losing right along but i have put together another lawsuit this is the same basic idea but now i have on my list one two three four five six seven eight nine ten judges that i'm suing and not including the uh assistant attorney generals and attorney generals and the clerk of the court They're all getting it. This lawsuit is going to go forward probably in a week or so. It's about. Fifty pages long. Fifty five pages long. And it's all about violating their oath of office. Treason. And here's here's the other thing. We're heading into a new era where Trump and that whole. crowd up there are going after judges i want these judges names right on the top of their list i want them to be i i'm suing them each time because even if i lose this suit the doj the uh fbi trump's team they're going to have these judges and they're going to have this lawsuit in their hands And so that time will come when if I don't win this battle, then they're going to apply the pressure. They're going to get rid of these judges. But if we don't we don't push, then it doesn't nothing happens. And yes, we can wait another year or two or three for them to get to Whitmer because they're going to eventually. Whitmer's a criminal. They're going to get to her. They're going to get to Nestle. They're going to get to Jocelyn Benson. But we really don't want to spend that time waiting for that to happen. We want to push them out in front, let everybody in the world know who they are, and by lawsuits, by whatever, by publicly announcing them on BNN, by publicly announcing them on our website, on our Zooms. Every time we get a chance, we push them out there in the public eye. And if nothing else, we'll humiliate them to a point that they won't want to run for office. and trump has been doing this with a lot of people that are running for senate uh this time around he's gotten rid of massey he's gotten rid of a lot of other uh public functionaries that are not doing their job uh and how is he doing it he's publicly humiliating him he can't see did you see that aipac there's an aipac and um there's also an anti-aipac organization out there, and I believe they're being run by the same people. Got to keep the fight going. It's just like the Democrats and Republicans. Probably. Probably. I don't know. No, I haven't seen them. I don't know who they are. Pretty interesting, actually. But I do know this. I do know that the public functionaries are leaving me alone. The police are leaving me alone. The sheriff's leaving me alone. All of those public functionaries out there, the governor, the mayors, anybody that I had problems with, the ordinance officers, nobody's bothering me. I wonder why. Because they know that I'm going to come after them. And the judges in Livonia don't want me in their courtroom. And the judge in Plymouth doesn't want me. Placus doesn't want me in his courtroom. Why don't these judges want me in there? Why won't I? Why can't I get into the federal court and argue my case orally? I haven't been able to do that since two thousand twelve. They won't. They say we've got all your documents are done. We're going to base it on your what what your documents are. There's no need for oral argument. Why? Because I'm going to embarrass the attorneys if I get in there. And they know that. They know that I know the law probably better than most of the attorneys know the law. And I'm not trying to pat myself on the back, but this has been the trend going on for a long time now. I'm not being bothered by anybody out there. So the U.S. Taxpayers Party, the Constitutional Party, needs to do the same thing. They need to be such a thorn in the side of the executive branch that the executive branch doesn't want to deal with you. Give them their name. Let them have their name. We don't want to deal with this anymore. And that's what's going to happen. But but you got to. Well, I'd like to see you take that up because you're part of the party. So maybe you should take that up as your pet project, because I've got about a million going. And, you know, suing suing them is I've got so many lawsuits going right now that that it's actually kind of interesting how how things are playing out. But I think we just need more people that are willing to stand up and fight it. I mean, I don't think anybody's backing down. I just think that there's so many things to do that we need all hands on deck. Well, if I took it on, I would want free reign. I wouldn't want to be like I did when I wrote the letter to change the party system and whoever was in charge of the party back then said, oh, we can't have you speaking for the party. I can't deal with that. I don't have time for that. I'm not going to fight with the party to do something. The party is going to say, yeah, go ahead and do it. And then I'm going to do it. but I'm not going to go back and try to play games with them. You can't speak for the party. You can't do this. You can't do that. That doesn't work. The thing of it is that I don't know how you can do it for the party because they always say, well, if you do it on behalf of the party, you've got to have an attorney to represent yourself. You can't do it for a say. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. That's a lie. That's a lie. You don't need an attorney to represent the party. That's a lie. The attorneys are nobodies. And that's the way we look at it. That's the way I look at it. I think you should take it on. I think you should take it on and see what you can do. Because you wouldn't be doing it on behalf of the party or would you be doing it on behalf of yourself? Well, I can't change the party name if it was on my own side. I mean, I'd have to do it for the party. I'd have to be part of the party in order to do it. But I'd have to have free reign in order to do it. Like I said, I wrote the letter and I was shut down. This was, I don't know how many years ago, two, three years ago that I wrote the party. I wrote a letter to Jocelyn and somebody said, well, you can't speak on behalf of the party. I said, okay, done. I'm not going to go. I can because I'm the chairman of the party, which is kind of, it puts me in a unique position. That's why I sued them because I was able to sue them because They were violating my ability to carry out my job as the chairman of the party. But they don't really care about that because they just, they come up with, you know, immunity and blah, blah, blah, this, that, and the other thing. There's no immunity for public. I know. I'm not arguing with you, but they have their little interns doing AI lawsuits and they never read them. And the judges go, okay, I guess we're going to do that today. I do them. I don't do an AI lawsuit. I don't even use AI. I write it myself. Yeah, the state does. When they come back and they reply, all the reply briefs, they look like they're AI. They plug it into AI and they hand it out. I don't even think they read them, you know, because they actually gave me evidence. different different cases and not just evidence but some evidence but also they've given me uh different cases that prove that prove my point which is funny i will write a letter again i'll i'll resurrect the old letter i'll look at it i'll adjust it i'll give it to you and if you give me the go ahead i will start pursuing this issue But only only if you're going to only if we're going to decide that we're going to do this, because we haven't as a U.S. taxpayer party agreed to change the name of the Constitution Party mentally. Yes, but physically, no, we have not pushed the issue. And we can. Yeah, we have an agreement. We have an agreement that the party asked me to try to change the name. So I've tried it in a couple of different ways. And we haven't gotten anywhere with it yet. But there's always a way to do it. And I don't have reverse gear. So that pursuit is not going to stop. But there definitely are some road bumps in the way that are interesting. Well, you tell me to go ahead and do it, and I'll put together the first letter, and we'll see where it goes. Okay. Well, I'll talk with everybody and see. As a chairman, it's not my tyrannical say I'm not a Gretchen Whitmer. It's got to be everybody's got to be on board with it. Well, all right. Like I say again, I'm not playing games with these people. I'm not playing games with these judges. Not at all. I've told them exactly what I'm doing. And I'm suing Berg, who screwed up this whole thing, who could have fixed this thing. And the last time I'm suing him for twenty million dollars. I'm not playing games with these guys. I've wrote in my brief why I get twenty million from this guy. And I'll let him try to figure out how to get out of it. Nugent the same way. Cole the same way. These are all these are all criminal liars. And I have them on record, and I don't know how they're going to decide to get out of this, but they might come up or they might hire a new judge that's going to come up with another game plan. But I've already destroyed their idea that they have absolute immunity. They have no immunity. And I've read all the court cases that they've thrown at me. and none of them say they have absolute immunity all of them say they have immunity qualified if they stay within their jurisdiction or they stay within their job description and none of them have it and if lying is part of their job description i'd like to see that in writing So this is the point that I'm making. You guys come up with all of these stories and you come up with all of these ideas that this is a possibility that we have this immunity because we wear a black robe. No, the black robe isn't the immunity. The immunity is your behavior in your job. And I've got all the court cases that prove my point. And they have none. So this is the new tack that I've taken on the first, actually, it's I think the first three pages of why they do not have immunity. And this other, this Judge Yonker out of your neighborhood in Grand Rapids that handled the case called it a de jure republic theory. He says, Tater's got this de jure republic theory. And he goes on to expound on prove how stupid he is so i've i've written that in there also and i pointed those points out that these judges have quoted in the record it's on the record so they can't say well i never said that no it's on the record you guys have dug your own hole now i just need to throw some dirt over it and that's what i'm doing but in order to do the uh taxpayer party thing the same thing You got to put them into a box, which they can't get out of. And then what are they going to do? They can continue to fight and they can continue to stay in that position, but if enough pressure goes on them, those people are done. So as you talk to your committee and your committee agrees to do this, I need two or three people that are willing to jump on board with me to have this thing happen. And that doesn't mean that we're sitting by the computer writing all the time. I don't have a problem with writing. As one of the attorneys asked me when I went into court on a license plate that you couldn't read and they gave me a ninety dollar ticket on it. I went into the court and I sat in front of the prosecutor and he's looking through my paperwork and he says, you really didn't have to do all of this work. We have easier ways of dealing with this. And I said to him, it's not about confrontation. It's about education. And then he continues to go on and on and on. And he says, what do you do for a living? And I said, I'm retired. And he says, you got way too much time on your hands. So eventually they dismissed my ticket. I didn't see the judge. He just wrote up a dismissal. And I was out the door. And he shook my hand on the way out. And he said, hey, by the way, are you interested in coming and teaching my attorneys how to write briefs? With all that said, you know, we're on the right track. We just need to continue. The train needs to continue running on that track to get it to fix. And we can fix these public functionaries and put them in their place, but we have to do it. They're not going to give up their reign of power unless we force them to give it up. And the only way we're going to force them to give it up is to keep coming at them like a freight train. We're not stopping. You have a choice. You can continue to fight with me or you can give me what I want. There's no other option. So you want to change your name? That's the way to change it. Benson has no power to stop it. There is a guy that does, I got to think what it is. It's a newsletter. It's Richard Wagner, I think. And he is out of California. And he sent me paperwork that showed how many states change their name through an administrative act. Years ago, the party was trying to go through one of the legislators, one of the representatives. die. They kill it. It's like, it's not, it's not even hardly possible to get anything through unless there's going to be money attached to those people in the legislature that is going that way. So right now what I'm trying to do is get, get people to run for office and every single open seat in the state. That's, that's what we're doing right now because we've got to have an option and be able to get the people together to vote against the uniparty and get some new people in that aren't corrupted by the system. The problem with this is, and it all sounds wonderful. There's a problem with everything. There's a problem with everything we do. But the problem is that they're corruptible. And until they know that we are in charge, which we are, but we just have to take that power back. Once they realize we're in power, then they will do what we tell them to do. But right at the moment, they think they're in power and you get a new newbie in there and the newbie gets massaged and groomed to be part of the old system. And they do that. I mean, you know what? We actually saw that with a million dollars to do what we wanted to do. Yeah, I actually saw that in the water wars thing. We had neighbors that were fighting with us, and guess what? All of a sudden, somebody's got pipe on his land that was one of the most vocal people, and he's become real quiet about this whole project. Wonder why. He seems a little suspicious to me. Yeah, maybe he's got a few bucks now. I'm kind of wondering, I mean, they would have had to rent the land, I'm sure. So somebody got, you know, I'm sure somebody got paid for it, which is one of those things that we go back to traders. But honestly, you know, it goes back to is a spiritual problem above all of it. It's a lack of virtue and integrity. When you go back and look at the forefathers, they were they were finding ways to do it. But they were they were looking in ways that required an extreme amount of virtue. And that's unfortunately, that's something that America and the world has been taught is it's all about me, whatever I can get. If I can get more, more, more for me. And they don't realize that their actions have long range consequences to tear the nation down. Personal integrity is so important. And we can't do that unless we have God in our life. I'm completely convinced of that. Well, that part is true. But the problem we have is the people... are only on this earth for a short period of time. And and they realize that I'm going to live the high life and have the have the cash to do what I want. And I don't really care because six years from now or ten years from now, I'm going to be dead and it's not going to matter. And that's their attitude. It's not long. It's a problem. Yes, that's part of the spiritual problem. It's part of the fake system that we live in right now because it's all fake. They can print all the money in the world. And what happens when you get to two hundred and everybody gets two hundred and fifty thousand dollars? Inflation then takes over and you're really back where you started from. And they don't they don't see that long range. They don't understand it. When John Engler was in office and he pushed for the. six percent sales tax because we're going to reduce the property tax. I said, that's really a stupid thing to do because now you're going to raise the sales tax to six percent and you're going to offer the people a short term reduction in their property taxes. But the way the inflation is going, that's that's going to go away in a few years and you're going to be paying the same amount of money you paid for that you were complaining about paying five years prior. So they don't get it. They don't get the long term effects of their behavior. It's it's not in the it's not in their mental capacity to understand that. So they're going to sell their land to the highest bidder, make as much money as they can, go out and have a party. And then six months, six years from now, it's going to be gone and they're going to have nothing. That's the philosophy. It's just like most people who win the lottery, they're usually broke in five years because it's like, woohoo, this big windfall, you know, and it's really not very intelligent to think about things as immediate gratification because it's You know, we're going to leave this earth and we want to leave it better than hopefully what we found it. And it should be for the people around us in service, not just who me a big party for me, me, me, me, me type thing. But that's kind of where it's going. You want to I'm going to make a point on on what you said to your point about John Engler. You know what that guy said to me? And I was in Terry, Terry Lynn lands. We were at an event at Terry Lynn lands place. And I meet and talk with everybody. Doesn't mean I like anybody, but I talk with everybody. It's not about liking them. It's about getting a job done and the goal of restoring the United States. He had the gall to say to me, yeah, I can't believe you ran for governor. You should have gone and worked for Mike Rogers for a few years so you could know how the system works. And so I'm like, so you want me to go work for Mike Rogers so that y'all can groom me to be a little puppet of yours? Yeah, that doesn't work for me too well. I thought that anybody should be able to run for office, but clearly not in the Republican's eye or mindset because you got to go work for somebody so they can groom you before they're going to let you progress. Same thing. It's the same thing with both sides of the parties, the major parties. That's my point. So if you bring in a new Republican... a new newbie, that newbie is going to, if that newbie isn't groomed before they get to that position, they'll be groomed in that position. I'm not saying bring in Republicans. I'm saying bring Americans in and use a minor party to do it, to flush the unit party out. I mean, that's like the ultimate protest. And if we have all of us, you know, that can kind of coach him a little bit and say, yeah, it's not really constitutional. You're going to get yourself in trouble. And, we're going to be the trouble that's going to clean house first. So, you know, help us clean it out. And then we've got somewhere to go, you know? We need to do that now. We need to go after those groomed people now. We need to let them know that we are in charge, not them. And the only, like I said, the only way to do it is to be that freight train and to continue to go after them. And that's the way we're going to change the system. But we have to have the people that are willing to do it. Well, everyone has to be willing to do it because everybody is so lost. There's a personal responsibility for every single person that is in the state right now. It's not somebody else's problem. It's our problem. And we all have to stand together to fix it. But that's difficult because there there's a lot of difficulties there because people don't really, they don't really know what that means. Even if they're willing, there's a lot of people that are willing. So I don't know. I think that what we're doing right now is we're on a really good track where we're making it into like bite size amounts so that people can process it. Because, you know, if you dump an entire lifetime, worth of knowledge on people like say that you have, or even the knowledge that I've gained from actually being a first person in, you know, in the seat running and watching the criminality, it's too much for most people to process. And so then they get overwhelmed and, and, and that's, that's not good either, you know? So, but I really do think you're, you know, you're definitely right. We can't quit, but we got to find the quickest, most effective way to do it that, that people don't get overwhelmed with because it's overwhelming when you, when you step into this, you know, for, for a lot of people, it's very overwhelming. I understand. I understand that people that have not done the battle, people that have not been in war, don't get it. I do understand that. It's not something that you pick up a pen or a gun and you go into battle for the first time and be expected to be successful. That's pie in the sky. That doesn't happen. But what you got to understand is, hey, I'm willing to jump in the battle and do the fight. I need a couple, two, three fringe people that are willing to fight with me and willing to follow along and do the battle with me. And we can get it accomplished. because I won't stop until it's done. I won't stop until it's accomplished. But I need people that are going to say, yeah, we're going to do it and we're going to spend some time and we're going to work at it. Now, with the technology we have, we don't have to meet in a house or anywhere. We could be on Zoom. And yeah, that's hopefully the public functionaries are listening. and in on us, which we know that they are, and they're going to get a first-line program as to what the battle plan is. So that's in our favor, not against us. Let's get this thing going is my argument. And if you get your taxpayer people, your committee, to say, yeah, let them run with it, then I'm willing to run with it. Yeah, it's kind of like ours, as you remember, the taxpayer party, too. I mean, everybody needs to stand together and get talking and see what we want to do. And I think that that's a wonderful thing right now. It's really amazing to me how many people are jumping towards the the Constitution Party, the taxpayers party. They're excited, too. I get calls every single day of people that are so excited to be doing something. that is outside of what the normal fundraise to fundraise to fundraise and do nothing and both the same people back in. And I think that it's not only are we having a lot of fun because everybody's so excited about it and seeing that we can make a difference and do things in a different way. Other than just being a bunch of, you know, being following while they're telling me to vote for this. They're allowing me to vote for this person. It's like, no, you need to step up and run for something. And you can do that in the in the Constitution Party, the taxpayers party, which is which is kind of cool because normal people who have good hearts and want to see things changed. If they do step up in any way, whether they fight a legal battle or they actually put themselves in a position to be voted in, that's where we make the real change right there. If we have good people in office who are willing to do what needs to be done, And that they are the ones from the inside doing the right thing. If we could flood the state with candidates like that, we could absolutely make a fundamental change. So that's what we're looking for. We've pulled all of the open positions in the election. And we're seeing a lot of candidates step up, which is just extraordinary. It's so, so wonderful. It's just extraordinary. So I'll probably be talking to, you know, many people, even the ones that have been kicked off the Republican Party. I'll probably be talking to say like Ralph Reban. I know him. You know, I know him and his wife, Carol. They're very nice people. And honestly, the United States needs to come together as Americans rather than than little silos of people who who, you know, are are. trying to have their own glory or their own gain. And I think that, I think we're ready for that. I do. Don't you think so that the United States is kind of ready for that now? Well, I think that most of the people would like to see change, would like to do something, but a lot of people are not willing to see it through. Um, example, uh there's a lot of people that not a lot of people but some people that have decided to not fight for trump and that that doesn't mean there's a lot of people but there's a few people that i've heard rumblings that well you know the gas prices are up they don't get the story that, yeah, gas prices are going to be up for a brief period of time, but what is he doing behind the scenes? Or he's not moving fast enough. He hasn't arrested anybody yet. Yeah, that's true. He hasn't. But why? But what's behind the scene? You can't arrest people and put them in front of judges like Judge Berg and Nugent and Cole and Yonker and Larry Dugan- Parker and Murphy and all these other creeps because they're criminals and they're not going to hold these public functionaries. Larry Dugan- responsible for their behavior so you got to get rid of the you got to get kind of you kind of build a foundation first you got to get rid of the criminals first. And so that's what he's doing. And so what are we doing in the process? Well, we're sitting and watching on the sidelines. And that's not me, but that's a lot of people that are rather than saying, what can I do to stop this process, to change it, to turn it around and make it for us? Yes, supporting Trump is important. But what else can you do? What else? What other processes can you do? Now the police have this new process that they're going to drive around in, what do they call it, ghost cars? They're driving around in a car and they're watching. And if you're on a cell phone, they're going to call a police car ahead of them to pull you over and give you a ticket. It's a ghost car. It's not a police car. You don't even know that they're next to you until you get pulled over. Is this a lawful behavior of the police department, of the Michigan State Police? Well, the Michigan State Police is not a lawful organization. Well, I understand. You can be a de facto organization and be lawful and be the jury. You cannot be. I agree that the office doesn't exist and the department doesn't exist. But that's another whole battle to deal with. You got to be able to fight that battle. But there are these, the stuff is going on and they're now, I don't know how one of the states, I think it was Illinois, was bragging about how much money they were making on tickets that they were giving out on left and right for whatever reasons. They had a ton of different reasons. Is this a lawful behavior of them? Is it a right to drive or is it a privilege to drive, a privilege to travel? Is it a right to travel or is it a privilege to travel? People can't figure out the distinction. And then they figure when they get a ticket, they're going to give up, they'll pay the fine, whatever the fine is, but they won't get any points. They think, oh, I won. I don't have to get any points on my record, but I ended up paying a hundred and fifty, two hundred, three hundred dollars for the system. The thing is so screwed up right at this moment. People aren't getting it. People can't figure it out. The police have an important point to go after criminals. i'm driving i'm traveling in my vehicle i don't consider myself a criminal even if i don't have my seat belt buttoned that's not their business that's my business and so uh you know if you pull me over for a seat belt ticket you got to fight on your hands police officer be willing to go to court be willing to read norton versus shelby county because i'm coming after you because you don't have that authority But we don't know where their lines are and our lines are because they've been fuzzing it so long and making it very unclear, and they think that they're in charge. They're not in charge. We're in charge. It's frustrating when you have that knowledge and watch people not act. I understand that. It's very, very frustrating. But I have some good news. You want to hear some good news? So Patrick Burns was on last week. And they actually indicted Maduro's bookkeeper. When they arrested Maduro, they also got, he turned his bookkeeper over. He was indicted in New York. They turned him loose. He's re-indicted and he's down and he's indicted in a court in Miami where there's other election cases going on. And I guess there's seventy-two other countries that they've tied into this, plus cartels, plus, plus, plus, plus so many different entities, the Serbian programmers have confessed that they were manipulating our elections for twenty years. It really feels like we're getting close to a large, large fundamental change in the United States. And I really think it's coming. And I think it's not not too far off, you know. So so I think the arrests are definitely happening and the indictments, too. We just not not hearing about them because there's ongoing investigations. So I there are four of them in Florida, grand juries that have been convened. I believe that there are some here because there's a couple of individuals in law enforcement that kind of let me know that there were some grand juries going on, but that the indictment that the investigations were also going on. So I think there's more going on than what is public and it can't be public yet because of the process of investigations and protecting the rights of those who have committed crimes to make sure that the convictions are bomb-proof. That's really good news. So we just got to keep going. I'm not arguing about that. They're doing their job. What jobs are we doing? This is a great time to push for the name change because you're putting them right out in the public eye. You're putting Benson right out in the public eye. you're you're making it very uh difficult for her to hide behind her her uh position as a secretary of state you're going after her specifically you're not going after the secretary of state you're going after her specifically for violating her oath of office for violating her duties as a secretary of state uh person you're going after the situation and making it very public and pushing on her really hard. While all this other stuff is going on with Trump and everybody else, now her name is in the public eye. That's what you got to do. Got to do it. Yeah. She's actually threatened the party, too, that if we went in that direction to try to get the name changed, if we sued for that, she has made a public or a threat to the party that she would see us kicked off the ballot. So this is a complicated time. You got to ask the previous chairs and what they said, because that was from the previous chairs to be careful with that, because the state has been threatening people for years on all different levels and they and they they will do it. And I know they can't do it legally, but they're doing it because they're not paying attention to the law. She has threatened every single Michiganian and Michigander in the state by saying, if you look into election crimes, we're going to get you, that sort of thing. That's one that needs to be sued, too. But I don't I don't know, John, I really not sure. And I'm not arguing with you on this point, because I really think that there I don't know the best way to do it. But I really don't think you can get remedy in the state courts. And by the time you get through the state courts, which is what I did when we went when I got kicked off the ballot in twenty two, made it to federal court and they said, yes, it was an unlawful. awful removal, but they drag the time out so far. They did the same thing with the water wars case. They, they drag the time out so far that you really have a hard time getting remedy. I don't think you can do it in the state court. And, um, my, my one attorney that was, that was helping me on this, who they found dead in his house, in his basement on December eight. I really, honestly, myself and several people think that they got to him because, uh, uh, of the, uh, fact that he was a good guy and he was trying to do the right thing and he was he was looking at kind of working on the name change he was looking at the water wars thing and you know offering to help you know represent me in in court the whole ten yards whether i filed pro se he said we can just add me in and such and all of a sudden he's dead and they find him dead in his basement so i mean the the process of is so complicated right now that I'm not afraid of it at all. Not at all. I mean, if I was afraid of something, I would have run a long time ago and I'm just not, you know, like you, I have no reverse gear, but it is, it is for new people. It's a little bit more complicated than, than, you know, than just walking in and deciding to do it. You do have to have the education, which you clearly have, but it's, it's a, We're at a crazy time right now, and I'm ready, honestly, to watch the whole thing melt down. I've been praying for years that, honestly, that something happens, whether it's a... You know, some sort of act of God's probably going to happen to turn this thing around. But we're all learning a lot in the meantime. You know, we've heard the military is the only way. That doesn't give us an excuse to stop. That means we need to kick it in harder because, you know, the argument that was there for so long is the military is the only way. I believe there's some truth to that because the problem is so deep and so entrenched in systems. that one person can't make it work. A bunch of people probably could if they'd stopped fighting for five minutes, but that's the problem. You get people in a room and everybody wants to fight to have their opinions be right, and the party systems typically is the worst. But I really do think that we're seeing things come to kind of the end of the story here in the criminality. Because I can see, can you see it? I can see the winds blowing in that direction, that people have gotten sick of it. They're wanting to see that change. I don't think they're going to fight it as much as they would have twenty years ago or ten years ago. So those things all factor in. But certainly more people have to understand the system of governance and how to hold people accountable and what to do on a personal level. You've always got such good encouraging words for people to get involved and to do something and not just sit back. I always really appreciate that. All the education you've done is just extraordinary. Well, thanks for the compliments, but I'm still in the battle and I still want to fight. I'm still willing to take on the mantle of changing the name of the Constitution Party if the committee wants that done. But that done means that we have to push to have it done. We can't just go by her threats because they're going to threaten. That's their easy way out. They can threaten and if they can scare you off. But really, they don't have any power. They really can't do anything. They have no power to do it. And yes, the court systems are corrupted and it's going to take some time and maybe have to go through the state courts first and then get the federal court and then maybe the Supreme Court. But the problem is that we have to start somewhere and we have to pursue it and not quit and not give up. Every time the public functionaries open their mouth, they stick their foot in it. And I've been noticing that with these judges that I'm suing on the federal level, because every time they open their mouth, the last battle was that they have absolute immunity. And they proved that they don't. Now what are you going to do? We close this window, we close that window, we close the other window. and eventually they're going to run out of arguments they're going to run out of battles that they can fight run out of ammunition they're they're they're through eventually and so we unfortunately have to go to that point but i've learned an awful lot i've learned what they've done i've learned how to deal with that uh and each time i file a lawsuit and they back out I find out why and I go and I do the research and I find that they're wrong. I had five judges recuse themselves from this case, from the last case. And I'm suing those five judges because they recuse themselves because they might show that their integrity is intact. I said, what kind of judge are you? If your integrity is in question, you can't be a judge on the bench. Because then you would be biased on any particular. You follow the rule of law. If you follow the rule of law, there is no gray area or no possibility that your integrity could be intact or not intact because you followed the rule of law. And if you do that, I'm happy with you. If I'm wrong and you can show me by the law, then that's great. But you can't because the law is on my side, not on your side. And they know that. So we go after them. And Benson will come up with some argument that she's got absolute. But before she even comes up with that argument, it's going to be in the lawsuit that you don't have any absolute immunity. It doesn't exist. You don't have. You can't get out of it because you're sitting in that position because you violated your oath of office. You've lost your immunity, whatever immunity you've had. So that's how we go after them. We let them close the window, let them open the window that they think they can jump through, and then we close it behind them, and they can't come back through it again the second time. They've got to come up with another argument. They're going to run out of arguments eventually, like these federal judges did. They're done. I think this next case is going to be very, very difficult for them to deal with. That's good. I know Mike is going after the attorneys too. I'm going to add Mike in here a minute. Mike's going after the attorneys. Good morning. Or I mean the judges. Good morning, Mike. How you doing? How you doing? Lots of stuff going on. Everybody's got something that they're doing that's important to bring the nation back, which is kind of cool. So hang on a second, John. Let me find your little banner here. I'll see if I – I have some skills. Oh, yeah. We're going to be discussing a new – we're going to be discussing Norton based on the Supreme Court documents and the battle that went on between the – defendants and the plaintiffs, plaintiff at error and defendants at error. We're going to be discussing that on Wednesday. We're going to start the reading with this new document, which is now thirty pages long. Larry Dugan- From Norton because we've been basically using the. Larry Dugan- Twelve page document, but the. Larry Dugan- Twelve page document is a semi confusing so we're going to try to bring the. a thirty-page document in and try to show everybody why it really isn't that confusing and what really went on in that case and how you can use that case in your battle. So that's going to start on Wednesday. Hopefully we'll have some people show up that are interested in it, not just our normal crew, but some of the new group from the Brandenburg News Network which we've been picking up here and there and new people all the time so that's kind of cool yeah we're definitely growing it's amazing all of my channels have been growing and uh that's a good thing i've had several people say that you know we're the ones that brandenburg news network is the only one out there that tells the truth consistently so i really appreciated that i thought that was a nice compliment so it's good Yeah, I think we're going to continue to grow too. And so I've got a bunch of friends across Canada right now. I've been working with the people in Alberta for the Alberta secession group, the independence group, and pretty much a whole bunch of people across Canada are in agreement with us. And they said they, the last meeting that I was at, they were talking about wanting to become a state of the United States and, or a dual, dual citizen state. having dual citizenship of both or whatever. I mean, they've got all kinds of great ideas on how to do it because they, they keep getting just like good candidates keep getting denied through the uniparty system to be able to have ballot access. And it's happening. It's happening all over again. It's The it's, it's the entrenched establishment that you, you have such a hard time that you personally, but that people have such a hard time picking away from, and the wheels of justice and the court systems are so slow that, you know, sometimes you can't, you can't get remedy before it's irrelevant. And so, I mean, we all have to be fighting like the third monkey trying to get on the arc here because they have entrenched themselves so deeply in all the systems. And just a word to the wise, to all the attorneys out there, realize that you're committing a fraud against the people of the United States by saying you have a license to practice law. No, you don't. There is no such thing. Mike has said it. John said it. We've proven that over and over again, that you don't have a license to practice law. It's no such thing. And that means the judges, the judges are, have committed a fraud upon the American people. by setting up a little fiefdom that they can just go and steal what they want. It's really too bad. I mean, it's a system of theft from taxation all the way to what's happening in the judicial system. It's terrible. There is no justice. So that's why we have to fight harder, I guess. Yep, exactly. Any other last words here, John? Are you ready? Nope, I'm good. I hope everybody has a great day and I hope everybody had a great weekend. I know I did. And so that's all I got to say. I'll see you Wednesday. That sounds great. Thanks for coming on today, John. It's always a, you know, always so much to learn. So I appreciate that. Appreciate your time and your knowledge. All right. Take care. Bye everyone. Yep. You too. Bye-bye. See you, Jen. Hey, Mike, how you doing? Not bad. How you doing? Doing good. See you out there all over the place right now. I is. Yeah. Fifty states, fifty veterans. All that. Yeah. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. That thing that's going on. You guys have been so busy. How's that going? Doing good. Real good. And, uh, They did another report on it yesterday on Fox. And yeah, it's taken off real well. There's a lot of money being raised to help these veterans. They're helping them with medical bills, helping them from losing their homes and a lot of other things. If everybody gets on there, checks it out, GoFundMe, I believe, has everything set up there where you can go and review all the veterans that are out there that have been selected this time around. And if you can donate five bucks, ten bucks, whatever you can do. It all adds up. I literally shed a few tears for the guy that was in Indiana, that you chose in Indiana. That is, I don't remember his name, but that was such a touching story. Yeah, they're all touching stories. I mean, for what they've done, they sacrificed themselves for everybody to be able to sit in front of their TV and channel flick. They put their lives on the line so that you can air your grievances, that you can do a lot of different things. You can go to the Dairy Queen and get an ice cream without any hassle. Everybody takes that for granted. And it's time that everybody take a look at this and realize that these people are being mistreated in enormous different ways. And, you know, the children of Congress, and I call them the children of Congress for a reason, because they act like children. They can delegate funds to go to other countries. They can delegate funds for things that deprive you of your rights, but they cannot delegate funds to help the veterans that secure their security in this nation. That's a problem. That's malfeasance, nonfeasance, and misfeasance of duty. There's no other definition. And we have to start holding these public functionaries, their feet to the fire to say enough. You have to take care of the people that secured our wellbeing. And there's just no excuse for it. There really isn't. And if any politician out there, I don't care what level, whether it be the fed state or local that doesn't see this for what it is, they need to be removed from office immediately. So not to get down that rabbit hole, but that'll be another time, another day. But that's something that has to be done. That's why we're going to try to seat candidates in every single open race in Michigan in the twenty twenty six election. I mean, we're going to see what we can do and people are flocking to us, which is which is really, really amazing. You know, I think we just need to have non-politician, just good people to fill those seats, to bring back the common sense. It's all in. You know, I keep telling people, if you're an honest person, if you have some virtue, if you, you know, if you live to see God's good purposes, you know, lived out in this nation and get rid of all of this criminal stuff. I don't know, transnational crime syndicate crap that's out there, you're qualified. And, you know, everyone will come alongside of you and help you too. So, I mean, I think that's important. You know, you don't have to do it with money. You don't have to do this with money. We can do this without performing them. And with standing together, we can outperform them. Yes, they can't even they can't. You know, it's really retarded. I mean, so ridiculous is that this whole thing is like, well, don't split the vote. Don't split the vote. You couldn't split the vote any better if you would if you tried. Then what the Republicans have done, there's three different Republican factions in the state. None of them get along. They're destroying the party from within. In my opinion, get rid of all the parties. I think so, too. Get rid of all the parties. If you want to run for an office, you run for office. Plain and simple. You put out your platform. Everybody knows where you stand on things. And you run. Putting a title in front of your name, to me, is corruption in itself. Show me one of them that isn't getting paid off by some special interest group. Show me one that isn't getting paid off. The taxpayers party is one. And the one thing about us is the Constitution Party, the taxpayers party in Michigan, we do not take funds and we're not raising money. And we're not going to do that. That's the way it should be. And so the thing of it is, is that we're the only one that hasn't taken the filthy money. And so, you know, the reality is, is that I'm not below, you know, I'm not. I'm not above picking up the weapon on the battlefield that the enemy uses and uses it to beat the hell out of them, you know? And right now, the taxpayers' party is one way we can, in fact, use the weapon that's on the battlefield beat them and then abolish the parties. I think every single person who is, who is part of the constitution party, I have not heard one of them that has ever said, Oh, we got to, you know, we got to, you know, all of them, every single one of them has said we need to get to abolish the party system. Have you ever heard of the wig party? The wig party? Yeah, I have. You know who their opposition was? That was the Democrats, wasn't it? The Democrat-Republican Party. Democrat-Republican Party. How do you even do that, right? So when the Greek Party was no longer around, what did the Democrat-Republican Party do? They split. And made two parties. And that's where we're at today. Hello. Isn't that one in the same party? Yeah. Yeah. Started out that way. Going to end up that way. Still is. I mean, you look at each other, you know, they make it look like they're on opposing sides, but they're on the same side. It's all theater. It's all theater. It's a show. And that's all it is. God forbid should we speak out against it because, you know, we're going to mess up the little club going on there for the free coffee and cookies that never gets anything done. Well, I come today with remedy. Okay. With remedy. Okay. I come today with remedy because I'm hearing a lot of complaining grievances regarding the AI data centers. So let's start with that one. That's an easy one right off the bat. I don't know if you saw what happened in Texas. Texas challenged the data centers and asked, where do the components come from? Now, the data centers are claiming to be for national security purposes. Well, guess what? They have Chinese parts. Because they have Chinese parts, they can't be used for national security purposes. Goodbye. That shuts them down. So if you're fighting the data centers and they are using foreign parts, they cannot establish. That shuts them down. Now, I'm going to circle back to this. The other issue that's been going on are the flock cameras. Let me tell you a little story. About a week and a half ago, one of my associates was stopped in Milford. And when the cop, Milford cop approached him and said, you know, do you know why I pulled you over? My associate said, no, I have no idea. He was informed that he had a bench warrant out for him from Livingston County. Now Milford is in Oakland County. Livingston County had issued a bench warrant for his arrest. So he's like, for what? He goes, I haven't received a ticket in like, fifteen years or so. And the cop informed him that the bench warrant was for something that happened fourteen years ago. What? So, he was taken into custody. He was transported to Livingston County Jail and his wife came and posted bond. Took about three hours for the bond process to be to be completed and he was released. The reason for the bench warrant, what happened fourteen years ago, and not to get into the weeds on this, but a bunch of people were out at a lake, they were horsing around, some lady accused him of assault because she got pushed into the water. And people testified, he didn't do it, didn't happen, he's still lost. He was given the option of probation or seventy days in jail. He took the seventy days in jail. So he paid his debt. So thought. The bench warrant was for his stay in jail. They were charging him three thousand dollars for his stay in jail. They wanted their money. So they issued a bench warrant for him to be detained to get the three thousand dollars. And show why he didn't pay the three thousand dollars. Well, last time I checked your jails prisons are all paid for already. Aren't they? I mean, where do they get the money to build the facility? Where do they get the money for the food? You know, all your tax dollars are already paying for this. So what are they doing? They're double dipping. They're double dipping on everybody. So he's got to go to court on this. Um, but in addition to that, the three hours that he was in jail waiting to be released on bond, He was charged another forty five dollars. Now, last time I checked, this is extortion, racketeering and money laundering, plain and simple. Now, how did they know where he was and how to stop him? Flock cameras. His truck had gone through Milford. Flock camera picked him up, read the plate, tagged him and the cop pulled him over and he was arrested. Now, what crime did he commit? for that to happen? None. First off, it's not a crime for failure to pay a debt. Two, we don't have debtors' prisons. Three, nobody was physically injured, no property damage, and no one was deprived of their rights except him. That's the crime. They're the ones committing the actual crime. That's where the element of a crime is. So this whole thing with the flock cameras is unconstitutional. Now, I've spoken here before a lot of different things, and I'm going to talk about and put together, I'm going to give you a step-by-step here on the remedy that can be made here. And everybody should pay very close attention to this because everybody's now on camera. You're being monitored a hundred percent. How to stop this. There is a way to stop it. The scenario that I'm gonna put forward here is a stronger argument. You don't have to do it this way, but this is an extremely strong argument because it adds more ammunition to your argument. So I'm gonna read this through here so that everybody gets this. And so the question in this scenario is this. I have a biometric trust that contains all of my biometrics. For the government to demand that they have the right to take my biometrics, is that a violation of the trust and my rights? Here's the analogy that came out. This is a serious Constitution and natural rights issue, not a trivial complaint because it touches on property rights, Body autonomy, natural rights, trust law, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, the Ninth Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, and the limits of state power. So with that said, we get into the first part of the breakdown. If you created a biometric trust, and I've talked about trust a lot on your show, and I teach people how to do trust and such. If you create a biometric trust, that is your property. A trust is a private legal instrument. Your biometrics, which would be your fingerprints, DNA, iris scan, facial geometry, are your biological property. And you have placed them into a trust, then your trust owns that biometric data, you are the grantor, the trustee manages it, and the beneficiary receives its protections. This means that the government has no automatic right or access to trust property. Because it's private property. They just can't at will do that. So for the government to demand your biometrics, they must have a constitutional basis. What constitutional basis could they possibly have to take your biometric property? Zero. I want you to listen very carefully to what I'm saying here and how I describe this. They must have a statutory basis. They must have a compelling state interest. It must show due process. And the demand must not violate your retained rights. If any of those fail, the demand is unconstitutional. Now your biometrics fall under rights retained by the people. This is where the ninth amendment becomes powerful. The enumeration of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. So your biometrics are your body, your identity, your personhood, your private property. These are all retained rights, not delegated powers. Now, the government cannot claim ownership of your body. I'm pretty sure we did away with slavery, didn't we? The government cannot. Well, that's another argument. But look at the taxation. I mean, we're kind of right in the middle of it now. Yeah. Yeah. The government cannot claim ownership of your identity. Isn't that what they kind of do with, you know, there's, you know, the arguments of the all caps name versus the upper and lower case name, the birth certificates, all that kind of stuff. Isn't that one of those arguments? The government cannot claim ownership of your biological data. How could they possibly take possession of that? They can't. Now, if they do, then they're violating the Ninth Amendment, as stated earlier. The Tenth Amendment, which is no power to act. The Fourth Amendment, unreasonable search and seizures. The Fifth Amendment, which is the taking clause. And the natural rights doctrine, which covers your unalienable rights from God. And they're also violating trust law. So the government often claims biometric authority under police powers. but police powers have limits. Now, I'm sure we've all heard some of these arguments. The state uses the Tenth Amendment. They love to use the Tenth Amendment to say, we have the right and the power. Whoa, whoa, whoa, let's back that up. Government does not have rights. How does something that's artificial have a right? It doesn't, it can't. And if it does have a right, where did they acquire those rights? Did you give it to them? I sure as hell didn't delegate that authority to them. I didn't delegate them a right. I grant them some limited authority to do something, to administer laws that are constitutional, but I don't give them any rights. And they sure as can't get their rights from God. So only a living man or woman can acquire rights from God. Government cannot. It's an artificial entity. especially if they declare themselves a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity. So they use the Tenth Amendment to justify your fingerprinting, DNA collection, facial recognition, and biometric datas. But here's the constitutional problem. Police powers applies to conduct, not identity. So your identity is not a crime. Your body is not a crime, and your biometrics are not a crime. So when the government demands biometrics without probable cause, they are exceeding their authority. They're usurping their authority. Hello, Norton. Here's where Norton starts coming in. That pesky little case that they just hate. Yes. And I'm going to circle back on that too. So this is the usurpation of the government. And this is why they fear it. So if your biometrics are held in a trust, The government demand to take and seize your biometrics is a violation of trust law. It violates the property rights, bodily autonomy, the Fourth Amendment protections, the Fifth Amendment protections, the Ninth Amendment retained rights, the Tenth Amendment limits, and your natural rights doctrine. A trust is a private legal boundary. The government cannot simply pierce it because it wants to. So, The government likes to use word salad and trickery. And a lot of people fall for this stuff. So for the government to demand your biometrics is a violation of your trust and your rights. If you think that, that's not wrong. It's a legitimate constitutional argument. Now, the government's position a lot of times, they'll use things like, we need your biometrics for identification purposes. Now I hear banks in other countries where you're not allowed to access your bank accounts without them having your biometrics on file. Wait till that starts coming here. Really? Yes. So they need your biometrics for safety. It's for your safety that we have your biometrics. Really? How does that make me feel safe? My friends Smith and Wesson makes me feel a lot more safer than they do by having my biometrics. Okay. They say that we need your biometrics for administrative purposes. Well, let's be clear about that point. Administrative law is unconstitutional. Why? Because it runs through, what's the APA? The Administrative Procedures Act, for these administrative courts to enforce. Now the Chevron doctrine has already been overturned. Humphrey's is about to be overturned, hopefully very soon by the US Supreme Court. That destroys their administrative world. It really does. Explain how. Because these departments and agencies will no longer be able to proclimate a rule with the force of law. And these fake judges, especially at the state level, where they sit there with their black satanic robes. I'm a judge. I have immunity. I have the power to do whatever I want. No, you don't. And no longer can those administrative proclamated rules be enforced as if they were laws. They're bypassing the legislative process is what they're doing. They're creating laws from that. Yeah. What they've done is created a quasi form of government. And nowhere do they have the authority to do that. So it shuts a lot of this down. Now, these administrative judges, now we're going to have to start acting as Article III judges, okay, which means the Constitution, which we're supposed to be ratifying here coming up, and that's another issue that we need to probably take a hard look at. Who gets to change? Who's going to be nominated to change the Constitution? Right. I'm sorry. Well, they screwed it up last time. They only had one tenth of one percent rather than what was required to ratify a new constitution because they did it. Yeah. And if the people that are going to choose to make these corrections, I, for one, do not want one single bar card in that meeting. No bar cards allowed. Period. Because why? They're a domestic terrorist organization. I'll keep saying it and I will keep saying it until someone proves me wrong because I got the documentation. I have the proof to substantiate that the bar and their members are a domestic terrorist organization working in conjunction with the FBI. Agreed. I'll say that till the day I die because I can prove it. And I've got them admitting to it. So, yeah, no bar card should be in the process of ratifying a new constitution. We need to take things out like Article VI, Section XIX, where a bar card is required to be able to sit the bench. If I want Donna Brandenburg to be a judge – Donna Brandenburg in voting, she gets enough votes, then she should be a judge. Okay. A bar card should not make the difference between someone being a judge and not a judge. Oh, well, how do they know the law? Well, you know what? Those judges don't know the law because if they did, they'd be enforcing and they wouldn't be doing what they're doing now. So, you know, it's. I still would like you to consider running for attorney general. I think that would be a really fun time. Well, I, I would rather have an advisory position, like a Michigan Doge office. I know you said that, but I still think you'd be great. I'll expose them all for you, and we can clean house that way. But as far as... being an elected official, one, I'd probably be assassinated. Two, because of my status, I'm out of their system. And therefore, I can't run because I don't meet the criteria, the qualifications under their standards. But I could be in hold of an advisory position, like a Doge, Michigan Doge office. which is just advisory. I just look into things and advise the proper departments like the AG or whoever of what wrongdoings are going on. And I can expose a lot that way, too. So advisory position I can do. But as far as an actually elected position, no. So I don't I wouldn't qualify. So just get that out of the way. So these excuses that they use to take your biometrics doesn't override your natural rights, trust property rights, bodily autonomy, fourth, fifth, ninth, and tenth amendments. Now, unless you're under arrest, now let's be clear. I wanna touch on this. A lot of people don't know this. When you are arrested and you're taken to the jail, what's the first thing they do? They search you. Well, they're searching for weapons. I want to make sure you're not going into jail with weapons. I get that. I understand that's for everybody's safety, not only yours, but others. But here's what else they do. Now, have you been convicted of a crime? No, you're innocent till proven guilty, right? Yet your fingerprints are taken. Your photographs are taken. Their medical history is taken. Listen to the words I'm using. They took your fingerprints. They took your photos. They took your medical history. One of the taking clause, if they take something, they have to give you just the compensation. You haven't been convicted of anything. Case in point, I was supposed to testify at a trial in Tuscola County. As soon as I walked into the courthouse, I'm a witness. I was immediately surrounded and arrested on a bench warrant issued by Livingston County. They transported me from Tuscola County Courthouse to the Livingston County Jail. I instantly demanded to see the magistrate. They finally got me in front of the magistrate around three o'clock in the afternoon. Now, mind you, the trial was going on this entire time. I get before the magistrate and he says, well, you're here on a bench warrant, yada, yada. I said, can you show me proof of service? So he's thumbing through the files. There's no proof of service. He's like, you're not supposed to be here. You have to leave now. No shit, shine all up. So what do they do? They drag another three hours before they actually released me. They waited until the trial was over before they would release me so I had no chance of getting back there to testify. And the question here that this is organized crime. I don't know how clear we could make this, that the judicial alleged judicial system is organized crime. Yes, it is. You know, you're talking about the mob. The mob had more principles than the government does. So what did they do in the meantime? They took my fingerprints. They took my photos. They tried to take my medical history. I flat out refused. I never signed anything. But they still took it anyway. And now I advise them, I do have a biometric trust in place. And if you, Officer Dum-Dum, take my prints, take my photos, you personally are now liable. So I will be bringing suits against these officers in their personal persona because they were warned. And the court and the sheriff, Sheriff Michael Murphy, who claims to be a constitutional sheriff, what a joke. have on record a copy of my biometric trust, the certificate of trust. They know it exists, but they're choosing to ignore it. Well, it's going to cost them because built into my trust and the attached fee schedule, every violation is one million dollars. So you took and that's for each incident. Each incident means, well, you took ten of my fingerprints. That's ten different incidences. That's ten million dollars right there. plus the photos, plus palm prints, plus other things. So yeah, they're on the hook big time and that will be coming. But the point of the matter is they took all this information from me, never gave me just compensation. And what did the magistrates say? Oh, you're not supposed to be here. You have to leave. So they took my personal property. They took trust property, no compensation. And I wasn't supposed to be there in the first place. See how that works, folks? They take from you even when you're innocent. And oops, sorry. Yeah, exactly. Oh, gosh. You know, so sorry. We're just going to say sorry, and this is just going to go away. No. No. Can't do that. Got to go after them. So the deeper issue is the government treats your body as if it belongs to them. Remember what was the Pennsylvania, the school board, told the parents, your children belong to us. Hello? This is their mentality. This is their mindset. This is how they think. These are your enemy. This is a war, folks. You're at war with your government. And they're here to try and conquer you. They're here to pillage and pirate you. And that's what they do. When you get stopped and the cop says, well, we're gonna impound your car, that's piracy ashore. There's a federal law prohibiting that. Do they follow the law? No, why? Why aren't they following the law? They proclaim to be a law enforcement, but they're not enforcing the law. Instead, they're enforcing proclamated rules or they're enforcing administrative. They're being told by the bar what they can do and what they can't do. And the bar in the Michigan Supreme Court, I've got a document, sovereign citizen behavior in the courtroom. I have their seminar print out of what they're teaching. Now, how is not every court biased? If they're teaching that if you stand up for your rights, if they're teaching that if you come in and declare yourself a man or a woman, under God, if you come into court and challenge their authority, you're automatically labeled a sovereign citizen per the FBI anti-terrorist division who claims that anybody who challenges the authority of government, anybody who challenges the courts is an extremist and a terrorist. Really? So they're labeling us as terrorists. Hmm. What's wrong with this picture? Is everybody grasping this? So this is the crimes. They are the ones committing the crimes. They're causing harm. No way around it. They are causing a harm. So unless you stop consenting, they're going to keep doing it. It's like a kid. Hey, get your hand on that cookie jar. I said, get your hand out of that cookie jar. Really? You're still going to take that cookie after I told you to get your hand out of that cookie jar? Until you stop them from doing that, they're going to continue doing it. That's why I say the children of Congress, they think because there's checks in the checkbook that there's money in the account and they can do whatever they want. No, they can't. And we have to stop allowing them to do so. We have to stop allowing them consent. So to finish this, When the government demands fingerprints, DNA, iris scans, facial geometry without consent, probable cause, a warrant, a crime, or a constitutional basis, they are acting as if your body is state property. This is incomparable with natural rights, Declaration of Independence, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth Amendments, trust law, and biological doctrine of self-ownership. If you have a proper trust in place, and I've talked about this on the show before, the trust that I use, I've had attorneys. I went to a bank, went to open a bank account, and they said, well, we need to see the trust. Okay, here it is. Here's a copy of the trust. The attorneys for the bank, it was Key Bank, came back and said, we have a problem. I said, what's your problem? Number one problem, you must remove God and the Constitution from the trust. Why? Why would I have to remove God and the Constitution from the trust? Because that's a governing jurisdiction. You can't have that in there. We must have it under administrative jurisdiction of the state. And they said that straight out. I have it in writing. I have it in writing. So folks, this is the bar trying to manipulate the system. They want all your trust, your wills under administrative law, under the thumb of the state so that they can pillage and pirate your assets. Your heirs will get nothing. Your heirs will get nothing. What they do is they pillage your trust to say that, oh, well, yeah, we're going to remove your trustee. We're going to put a court appointed guardian in place. And oh, that house. Yeah, we're going to sell the house to pay for the guardian. We're going to have to sell the other assets to pay for the guardian. And by the time they're done, the attorneys have stolen everything. You might get, you know, I don't know. the paper plates left over from a picnic that you had ten years ago. You might get that. But the rest of it is going to be pillaged and pirated by the bar thugs. Plain and simple. And now the judge, oh yeah, bar member. The guardians, bar members. They're all bar associated. They protect each other. I've got an associate who is fighting to get property back. The judge is refusing to give the property to the sole beneficiary. The judge appointed a trustee who is not an interested party to the case. direct control over all the assets and is not forcing that trustee who has a fiduciary responsibility to the beneficiary to release those assets to the beneficiary. Instead, that trustee is now pillaging those assets and they're like, what is going on? And they keep raising the issue before the judge. The judge says, I've already made my ruling and I'm not changing it. So the judge is what? A co-conspirator in the piracy of the assets. So this is what people don't understand. This is what's going on. And until you are actually neck deep in it, you don't even realize it's going on. And that's why I harp on this stuff is because I'm trying to bring awareness to people that this is what is going on You need to do something before it's too late. You need to do something before it's too late. You don't know from one day to the next what's going to happen. And if you're not protected, if you don't have things in place, if you don't have your T's crossed and D's odded, you're going to end up in a situation that you're going to like, what do I do now? Oh, my God. And believe me, I get phone calls all the time. From people who are like, hey, I got a situation here. I'm supposed to go into court tomorrow. What do I do? It's like, seriously, really? You know, talking about, you know. Kind of too late at that point in time. It is too late. It really is. I've told people, I said, if you would come to me even a week sooner, we might have had a chance to do something. Now, fortunately, in that one scenario, we were able to put a stop on because of what they were trying to do. There were properties involved and they're trying to sell the properties. We managed to put in place a way of stopping the sale of those properties. And the attorneys on the other side, court appointed, are livid because we were able to put a stop on the sale of those properties. But folks, you can't wait to the last minute to do this stuff. You got to act now. And putting a biometric trust in place is the number one way of doing this. Now, how does this stop flock cameras? Well, because you have all these violations, you now can bring a claim in federal court, okay? Don't do the state courts because you'll receive zero remedy. That is a hard lesson to learn when they say, well, you know, you've got to seek all remedy. You go through the state courts. You do not. You have no chance of getting remedy in state courts. Zero. Nada. Right. Yeah. The state courts. Listen, you know, I've said this before. You know, these satanic individuals wearing the black robes. who claim to be a judge, they're not a judge. They don't have a proper oath of office pursuant to Article XI, Section I of the Michigan Constitution. They're in non-compliance with five USC, thirty-three, thirty-one. They're in non-compliance with twenty-eight USC, four-fifty-three for oaths of office. They don't have an anti-bribery statement. They don't have a foreign registration statement. And because under Article VI, Section XIX, they do not have a license to practice law. They are not judges. They're administrators. That's all they are, administrators. Now, with a trust, When dealing with a trust and you're doing trust law, when the executor of that trust appears, guess what happens? All administration stops. If you were to walk into a courtroom and say, hey, I am the executor of this trust. You know what that judge is gonna do? You know what the clerks are gonna do? They're gonna get up and walk out. Why? Because they have no authority to proceed when the executor appears. None. So shut them down. Trust law is very powerful and people have to understand how to use it and how to enforce it. So your trust, biometric trust, when they're violating that, now you have a claim in federal court. And these are all the issues that you're gonna raise. All the violations of the constitution that those cameras are committing. That that county or city, by using those flat cameras, all the violations that they're committing. You can bring a claim against that cop in his personal capacity. Not just the cop, but his spouse. Why the spouse? Because? maxims of law it is an unjust enrichment because the spouse is benefiting from the fraud that the officer is committing the same thing with city council the same thing with your county commissioners you don't just name them you name their spouse as well because they're all benefiting from the fraud so you bring these federal claims against them in the federal court now do you sue right away for money damages no We have several of us who have federal cases going on right now. We're all getting the same reaction that the cases are not moving forward. Now, we're coming from different angles, different reasons, but ultimately, these cases all expose the fraud that's being placed upon the American people. What I'm looking at doing now and what we're going to be starting to try now is instead of coming out and suing them, oh, forty two USC, nineteen eighty three, nineteen eighty five, all that kind of stuff. No, don't do any of that. There is one way to go after them where immunity has no jurisdiction, they can't declare immunity. Injunctive relief. You file for injunctive relief. I need this officer, I need this department, I need this county commissioners to cease and desist from using flock cameras, we'll stick with that subject, from using flock cameras because of all these violations of my rights, all these violations of the trust, and so on. You spell it all out. And all you want is injunctive relief to cease and desist from any further activity. They must shut it down. The program must be shut down. And you're asking for injunctive relief. And get the court to give you that injunctive relief. Now, why is that important? What happens if you get that injunctive relief? Well, if you got that injunctive relief and you got that court order saying, yes, they must be shut down because it does violate the fourth, the fifth, the ninth, the tenth, and so on. Well, now you just got the federal court to admit those violations. The federal court has now done what? The federal court's now on your side. Now, once you have that injunctive relief, now you go back after them for money damages. Because the federal courts already ruled that they weren't supposed to do that in the first place. So they don't have standing. They don't have any merit to their argument. They didn't have the constitutional authority. They usurp their authority. All that now comes into play to where now you can come after them for money damages. But you get the injunctive relief first. and get the federal court on your side first. And that's something that we're now going to start doing. We're going to ask for the courts to give us injunctive relief to cease and desist. Once we get the courts on our side, what argument do they have now to justify what they've done? None. Why? Because the court already ruled they're not supposed to do it. That's why the injunctive relief was granted. So this is an end run on going after them, because otherwise you go after them for money damage right off the gate, right out of the gate. Oh, immunity. I have immunity, qualified immunity, absolute immunity, whatever. And you're going to get shut down or your case is going to be sitting there indefinitely, not doing anything because they're not going to rule on it because they know if they rule on it, they expose themselves for who and what they really are. So what else are they going to, you know, how else are you going to force the court to rule? Well, it's on the dock and we'll get to it eventually. You know, I thought we were supposed to have a speedy trial. Well, yeah, well, it's our interpretation. And that's what they like to fall back on, their interpretation. They don't follow the Constitution in the context and intent that it was originally written. What they do is say, well, in today's world, this is how we interpret it. What do you mean today's world? The Constitution does not bend to circumstance. I don't give a crap what today's world opinion is. You're going to change the Constitution every time the wind blows a different direction and the public opinion changes? No, you can't do that. But that's what they're doing because they fall back on that administrative side, claiming that under the Tenth Amendment, we can and the courts have the ability to reinterpret or interpret this however they so choose. No, they don't. They're supposed to. The Supreme Court is supposed to apply the Constitution. not reinterpret it. I actually threw this in Grok one time, and I said, you know, I put that scenario into Grok, and Grok's like, well, they have the authority to reinterpret. I said, oh, great. So I should become a Supreme Court justice, and that way I can reinterpret the Constitution any way I want. You know what Grok's answer was? You'll never be Supreme Court justice because you'll never be appointed into that position. That was the answer I got. So, but to back up a few weeks ago, a bunch of us went down to the federal court in Detroit. Yeah, because we all got cases down there. And we got this letter saying that they'll, you know, we have, they have attorneys to review and discuss your case. Well, I knew it was a setup from the get go. All they're going to try and do is either get you to hire an attorney. or disparage you from moving forward on your case. In other words, they want to try and talk you into just dropping the case. So I see that as an opportunity to milk for information. So we went down there, several of us went down there, and that's exactly what it was. They were trying to get you to hire an attorney and whatnot. But some of the comments and answers I received from those attorneys down there who work at the federal court, the attorney I had, I asked her a question. I said, When I have a judge who flat out on and for the record states that the constitution does not exist in the courtroom. And if I keep raising that issue or keep raising the constitution, that I will be held in contempt for raising, you know, the constitution in his court. I said, how is that not a violation of his oath of office? Her answer, it depends on the circumstance. Oh, I love that. It depends on what they just decide they're going to do that day. Circumstance, what circumstance could possibly exist where a judge can declare that the Constitution does not exist in the courtroom? There's only one. One, he's not a judge. Two, it's an administrative court, not an Article III court. And they're only doing administrative law, which is unconstitutional to begin with. That's the only circumstance. So are you going to sue that individual for even for the comment or the denying you remedy? No. Instead, what we're going to do, this is why we're looking at doing the injunctive reliefs first. We'll get the injunctive reliefs and then come back and go in. Because believe me, I would be filing multiple lawsuits every single day. for the comments and crap that I get from these people every single day. And I don't have time to file that many lawsuits. So I'm going to pick my battles. You need staff, Mike. You need staff. You need help and a staff. So, you know, we're going to after certain cases. And what I look at are I'm looking for cases that will not only give us remedy on this specific topic, but I can also get remedy on other topics in an indirect way. So every case I do, every time I appear in court, And believe me, I've had judges and I've had attorneys for the other side looking at me cross-eyed like, where in the hell is he going with this? Because I will pose challenges to the court. I will raise questions that are so wacky and out there. They don't understand it. I was in a case. It was a property dispute case. We were doing a prep. That interrogatory, we were doing deposition. It was a deposition. And the attorneys for the county were there. The gal who the dispute was with, she was there with her attorney. I was there. And so the other, the county's asking questions and they're going back and forth. And it came to my turn. I only had a few questions for her. And one of the questions I asked her was this property was had a manufactured home on it. Okay. So I asked her, I said, do you have any personal property located at this address? And her answer was no. So, okay, fine. And the attorneys are looking at me like, and so we'll begin to court and the judge, uh, started in, I was dingbat get us out of Livingston County and they were raising all these issues. And I said, well, objection, they're like, what's your objection? I said, she doesn't own the house. I said, she might own the property, but she definitely does not own the house. And just like, what are you talking about? She, she, she, she owns the land. She owns the house. I said, no, she does not. And she testified to that in her deposition. Now her attorneys, both the accounting and her attorneys are looking at me like, what are you talking about? I said, check the transcripts. Here's on this page, this transcript, here's where it says in the transcript. I asked her a specific question. Does she have any personal private property on that land? Her answer was no. This is a manufactured house. Nowhere recorded with the County Register of Deeds is an affidavit of affixment, which means that house, being a manufactured house, is still classified as a trailer, not a dwelling in that context. Therefore, without the affidavit of affixment, it's a trailer. And I asked her if she had any personal private property, and she said, no. Therefore, she's claiming she does not own that trailer. nor does the deed specify the trailer being on that property or attached to the property. Therefore, she doesn't own the house. Well, the judge, everybody just went, they didn't know what to say. They had nothing because he or she had testified. They didn't understand my questioning until we got into court. And this is where they got zinged because they didn't realize what was being said until it was too late. So this is the stuff that I do. This is how I approach things. You have to think outside the box when dealing with the courts and with some of this stuff. And with these flock cameras, again, you have to think outside the box. Get up and get yourself a biometric trust. Put one together. If you don't know how, contact us. We'll help you. Now, do you have that on your Telegram page or the documents there? Or where would they go to find that out? Yeah, if they contact us through the American Equity Group, you can email us at americaneg at proton.me. And we can get you set up on that stuff. And so... Yeah, get yourself a biometric trust because this is a very strong argument to shut down the flock cameras because these cameras aren't just reading your license plates. They are taking your biometrics when they drive by because the cameras are taking pictures of you in the car also. And that's a taking of your personal private property. They don't have the authority to do that. Put the car in a trust also, by the way. Everything you have should be in a trust. So put the car in a trust, your biometrics in a trust. That way they can't be stealing your personal private property. And you can bring a claim. The trust brings a claim in federal court against them for stealing the property and violating the terms and conditions of the trust. So. That's some kind of brilliant. That's all I can say. So anyhow, I put the ticker up there. to, uh, let everybody know where to get ahold of, of American equity group. And, uh, it's, it's American EG at proton.me. And then past that, you can find them on telegram as well as there's the, their Thursday zoom, Thursday zoom link and such. And, uh, So they're out there. You're having trouble with the water out at your place. If your property is in a trust, that water is protected as trust property. Well, should it also be protected as your own personal property, though, too, outside of trust? I mean, a trust, too, but I mean. The trust is a stronger argument because now you can bring forward the executor and it shuts down all their administration. Got it. Got it. Huh. So it's amazing. They're still drilling. They're still taking water. They're still dewatering. The last time I said, I don't know what happened, but one of the guys came up and said that they were having problems getting the permits, which they never had last time. Guys, there were no permits and they went ahead and did the job anyway. And it was, it was so everything there was so wrong. So, but at any rate, they, the machinery has been sitting right where it's, it's been for about a month here, right. And most of it in front of my house, which has a, which has a sitting right out there in front of the house on the street. They haven't moved or has it been just sitting there? It's just sitting there. Have it removed. It's been parked. Call your township and say, hey, there's an abandoned vehicle out here. I need it removed from the property. Yeah, but they're all in on it. That's the problem. It would be great if they would act, but they're all in on it. You have to get that stuff on record. If you want to expose them, get it on record. Hey, you guys left all this stuff out here. It's an eyesore. It's abandoned property. It's causing a hazard. You know what else they did? They came on my property, passed the trespassing signs again after they were told not to this past week. You can't believe it. I think I'm actually going to call the sheriffs on him this time and file a trespass. I thought I would be nice about it to a certain degree, but I should have called on him right away because they just don't listen, nor do they care. Right. So to your point, you have to get it on record because they're just going to, like a kid with a hand in a cookie jar, they just keep going. Like the children of Congress. That's right. That's right. I got to show you something. So do you know who Chris Long is? No. I'm going to switch gears here. Chris Long has been kind of a thorn in the side of the Republican Party, and I think he's amusing, okay? Most people, I don't get offended very quickly. I think that he's kind of amusing. He put out a video this week kind of in the same – way that that Spencer Platt has done it out in California. And I think it's hilarious. Would you like to see this? Sure. This is funny because you want to talk about a clown show. He's kind of done a real good job. Let's see if I can find it here. He's done a real good job framing this and the clowns that are the cast and characters of criminals in the Michigan political system. You will be absolutely shocked. at what he put out here. But I think it's kind of funny. So here it is. We're going to end the show with some humor here, okay? Okay. For twenty long years, Michigan has been without Cox. People have been left hanging, frustrated, and honestly, a little blue. Back when Mike Cox was Attorney General, criminals were terrified of Cox. These days, everything feels soft. Too soft. Like that Johnson. I miss waking up every morning knowing Michigan had Cox protecting it. Damn right. Lord, this state needs help. I pray for Cox every single day, sometimes twice on Sundays. Strong leadership, law and order, lower taxes, that's Cox right there. If we don't get Cox back in Lansing soon, we're all going to suffer. Where's my tractor? Me, Sean! Where's my Cox mug? That's better. Vote for Cox? Why not? Where's my Bible? Oh, that's better. That's better. I'll finally vote yes on something. Vote for Cox. Vote for Cox. Vote for Cox! Wait, where's John? I wouldn't fly with him. He always loses statewide. And he never shows up. You better not put kill switches in my tractor. When I ran statewide, I got beat by Peters. But when Cox ran, he beat Peters. Yeah, I'm voting for Cox. Why not? I lost twice statewide. But Cox won twice statewide. We all need to fly with Mike Cox. Yeah, I'll vote for Cox. Why not? Why not? We love Cox. Vote for Cox. And if you support Cox today, we'll send you a commemorative cocksucker. Why not? Me, Sean, I want a cocksucker. We love Cox! If Cox wins their primary, we're screwed. We love Cox! I don't like Cox. This has gone way too far. Cox! Can you stop it? No! No, no, no! We planned for the easy! We prepared for Duggan and James! And now there's this much Cox goes everywhere! We love Cox! Who wants more Cox? People seem to really love Cox. Come on, girls. We gotta win this for Cox. We love Cox. He's gonna lower taxes and fix education. We need Cox! Sweet lord. This thing's gotten bigger than all of us. What the hell? More AI shit from Chris? How about we get Johnson Suckers repaired? No, no. We're going to need more money. Brandon, you better make a post and go after Chris. That's it. I'm calling John. We love God. He's going to lower tax and fix that. I'm Mike Cox and I had absolutely nothing to do with this video. However, I am the only one running who's beaten Democrats statewide. Just saying this is an AI generated political ad, not paid for by any candidate or candidate committee. Not, I gotta say, I was just like, you've gotta be kidding me. This is, this is what, this is what it's got. It's come to you guys. I can't say he's wrong at all points. However, it seems it's funny. Parody is for entertainment. Purses is only created by Chris Long. Yeah. Yeah. I think it speaks for itself. It speaks for itself. I can't even comment on it. This came out and it's all over the place. I can't even comment on this. But this is where we are. This is how we got here. And this is the current political climate right there. Yeah, I'm not sure how Benson or the other witches are going to put a wrap on that. So there we go. Did you see, have you seen that yet? I saw it yesterday. First time I've seen that. I was, somebody sent it to me yesterday and it came with gross. It came with this and I actually contacted Chris long because parts of that are pretty funny, but it's like, it's like, uh, if you look at it just for entertainment, however, and I don't know what to say here, but at any rate, I hope you guys all got a good, good, like pause in the seriousness of everything and just looked at it and it was either laughing. or sobering in some of the truth that came through to this but at any rate that's where we are so uh you know windows in there that were pretty pretty good the what the innuendos in there were pretty good i think they're pretty funny you know when nestle said that she doesn't like him i can understand why that is just because of you know her uh her uh Position on certain things, you know, as, as it were, but at any rate, we can, we can stop with this right now because I'm sure both of us could come up with more jokes off of this than would feel. Yeah. I'm trying to bite my tongue right now. So. You can say anything. So it's like, you know, it's clear that they're all involved in this, and it's kind of funny, but I don't know. It's funny. Just throw a zinger out there, Mike, because it'll make me laugh even further. Well, right off the bat, you got what's-her-name from Ask My Tax on there, and I'm like, are you kidding me? So, you know, it's like, you know, it's – I'm not going to go down that rabbit hole. You're not going to say anything, right? I don't want to go down that rabbit hole. So there we go. Well, at the end of the day, this is going to be a long season of elections. And I would encourage everyone to come to the U.S. Taxpayers Party, which is the Constitution Party in Michigan, and take a look at what we're doing because we're actually doing a ton of work. And there are people that are flocking to us. which I think if you want some seriousness in government, you're going to have to get off the two-party system and do something different. Because seventy-four percent of the state of Michigan is unaffiliated. They hate both parties. They hate the uniparty because they're smart enough to know that they're being lied to. It's not going to change. If you vote one of theirs in, they've been vetted. They've been groomed. as was evidenced to me by John Engler telling me at an event at Terry Lynn Lance, why would you run for governor? You should have gone to work for Mike Rogers because, you know, then they could have groomed and vetted me for it. To which I said, yeah, that doesn't work for me very well. You know, I'm not a person who's a good puppet. You know, I think for myself, I say what needs to be said. And there's no way that I would fall in with any of these people. Not not no way, shape or form, because they're criminals. They've broken the law. So if you want to break the law, continue to vote for him. And you're complicit. If you vote for people that have broken the law, you have become an accomplice to the crime. It seems pretty easy to me. That's all I can say is it's a it's a joke. It's not just a joke. It's a criminal joke. What's going on in the state? It's it's criminal activity. It's a crime syndicate and they don't they're going to do it again. But at any rate, there you go. So after we've gotten off of this incredible. incredible effort by Chris Long, who part of me thinks it's just absolutely hilarious. I have laughed about this. I do think this is funny because there's more truth to it than there is parody, right? So here you go. So bravo, Chris, for calling it out. I think it's actually a good job. But at any rate, let's go ahead. They took some thought to put that together. What's that? They took some thought to put that together. It took some thought. It took some skill. It took some ability to create that together. And I can honestly say that. I don't think that AI is completely a bad thing. I think it's a tool, but it has to be used like everything. Everything has to be approached with questions and integrity and virtue. If you don't have that, it's going to have a bad outcome. But I think this by Chris Long is absolutely hilarious. I just, that's, I'm sorry. This way too. What's to prevent. Now I'm not, I don't know squat about AI and how it works or be able to do any of that stuff. Um, But what would prevent these architects of AI, like that video, from putting together footage that says or shows that someone committed a crime when they never actually committed the crime? Well, it's going on now. You're right. It's already going on. How do you trust a video now? Because it can be doctored and altered with AI systems. So... You know, this crap about, well, we'll accept a digital signature. Really? I don't think so. I do not do digital. Oh, and Mike just got disconnected. Let's see if he comes back on. This is funny. They literally kicked him off. It says device is not connected. That wasn't our show. Let's see if he comes back on again. See if I can get him to come back on. Hang on a minute because I want to hear what he has to say. So I would love to hear what everybody out there has to say about this, about this, you know, parody, ad, whatever you want to call it. Let's see if he comes back on here. Yeah, they kicked him. They kicked him right off. So here we go. Let's see if Mike makes it on again. Here, I'm just going to call them a minute. We'll finish it up with a call. That's okay. We can do it one way or the other. They can only kick you off for so long if you let them, but the reality is you can run around outside of their nonsense. Hello. Hey, I've got you on camera on phone here. I figured I'd bring you back on so you can say what you want to say to finish this, and then we'll move on to our day. Okay. I don't know what happened there. I don't know what happened to the i'm not seeing anything here well you know what they kicked you off because you were over the truth and that's the problem but we just endeavor to persevere and keep going so just got to be a thorn in their side you know this is the never quit no reverse gear group here you know right yeah um yeah absolutely i was gonna say was yeah i don't do digital uh signatures or any of that stuff because how do you prove it's you So if you don't ever do it, then you can stand firm that if a digital signature or anything else pops up for that matter, they're going to have a hard time proving it because you make sure that you don't ever do that. I don't do any online banking, and that's actually saved me because someone actually did hack into one of my business accounts and eroded money from Michigan to Florida, Arizona. and raise the immediate red flags because I don't ever do online banking. So we were able to get the money back and all that. We caught the guy, but, uh, People got to understand that, you know, yeah, it's, you know, it's more convenient. It's this, it's easy, blah, blah, blah. But it can come back and bite you in ways you can't even imagine. And if you don't get into the habit of doing it to begin with, then you won't have that worry of it coming back and haunt you down the road. So that's my advice. That's my two cents. And that's, that's, you know, what I do. So. Well, and I think it's good advice. Well, let's say a prayer here, Mike, and then we're going to go on to our days. And I so appreciate you and your wisdom and all the great stuff that you and your dad are doing right now. It couldn't have happened to a better person, in my opinion. than the fortunate circumstances that came your way and the way of your dad. I just love your dad. He is such a sweet soul and I'm just very happy for him. And of course, he did what I would have expected from somebody who's just a very giving, good, wonderful person. He turned around and used that money to bless others. What an awesome thing to see. Thank you. Thank you. And, you know, being the vet himself, I mean, he felt that this was his way of saying thank you and to bring awareness to how other vets are being treated. and what they're going through. So, you know, one percent of the populace are in the military, and they're being mistreated by our own government. And, you know, we need to bring more awareness of it. We need to do something more about it. And our politicians and the children in Congress need to stop their shenanigans and honor those who have protected our rights, protected our way of life, and stop feeding the monster of going and funding other things that really benefit no one but themselves because they're all doing backdoor deals on a lot of that stuff and putting the money in their own pockets. They're not helping the American people. They're certainly not helping the veterans. Yeah, that's true. That's one of those things that we all have to fight because you're not really helping anybody. It's all threat, coercion, and duress, as you always say. So let's say a prayer and go on to our day here today, okay? Dear Heavenly Father, thank you so very much for Mike and John and all the good people out there that are that are doing what they are directed to do there's not one way that we know you have us going that you've gifted us in so many different ways and we're so thankful that you have given us you know other people who have knowledge that we don't have that we can learn from each other that we can stand together and help each other through this through this time of transition and I really I really do know I know and I trust that your hand is moving us along that you are going before us, behind us, and alongside of us, making our paths straight. And all we got to do is just keep going and walking and never give up. Thank you so much for always being with us. We put our trust totally in you. You've been so good to us, Father God. And we're thankful for everything you've done for us. And we just want to let you know that we love you. In the name of Jesus Christ, we pray. Amen. So, and with that said, boys and girls, I'm going to go to that part of the show that we end with. Ding, ding, ding, ding. Go to BrandonBurfordGovernor.com because I'm the best non-conceiver or non-conceived in the history of the United States of America. And I'd like to have a discussion with the rightful president of the United States, President Donald J. Trump. And Cowboy Boots will win that contest because they wear them every day. And then we'll talk about how to fix things and such. And I just want to say thank you to President Trump, General Flynn, and Admiral Rogers, and all the good people. that are standing together. There's so many good people and Mike, I know you're on the phone here, which is good because I want to give everybody some information that is going to change. It's going to change everything. There's a gentleman that I'm talking to who is a microbiologist and he has actually run and proved that the, the, uh, what was in the vaccinations, it was intentional murder. He is scheduled to come on this week. He is hiding out right now, but he's scheduled to come on this week. And lo and behold, yesterday, there was a power outage where he was, as well as right around where my house and my barn was. And it was a very, very small, the entire state of Michigan. We had a power outage yesterday. He is not in the area. He's actually out of country. And he had a power outage. And in his exact words, it popped his computer. Now, I don't know exactly what this is, but I know enough to be able to talk about this at this point in time. But just like we have with election integrity, the receipts are going to be here. I'm planning on him being on Tuesday morning or Thursday morning, but I don't know if he's going to get the computers up and running by then to share the research. The research is in depth. He's incredibly thorough. and i can tell you one thing i'm going to tell you is that they poisoned those people that took the vaccination and he's got the proof with cyanide so um and it's complicated but it's something everyone needs to understand and when this comes out because they've silenced him in every single way possible when this comes out it's going to shake it it should shake everybody right to their core because he's he's dead on accurate he brings the receipts And we're going to have to come to terms with this because he was not only in Wuhan, he was in different other key places. And more and more of this stuff is going to come out. And I got a feeling that it's going to come out like a freight train here over the next, as Patrick Burns said, it's going to come down like a sheet off a glacier in the next about two to four weeks, which at this point in time, it's about three, you know, one and a half weeks to three and a half weeks because we've already passed a week here. Almost a week. We're almost down to one to three weeks. So as this stuff keeps coming out, I wrote a post this morning about coping. and understanding what a real threat is and what the difference is between that and just seeing people be people because people do irrational things. They have irrational, irrational reactions. The post that I did this morning, let me read it to you a minute because I'm going to tell you right now, you're going to have to prepare. All of us are going to need to prepare a little bit to help those people around us get rid of this a minute, to help those people around us who maybe are coping so well. There's no two ways about it. So let me read something to you to just give you something to think about. Mike, you're still here. I appreciate you hanging with me. Praying and seeking discernment has to proceed actions. And I did write this this morning. We live in an imperfect world where the weak react while the strong respond. There's a difference between psychopath evil intention and just being evil. Most people aren't a true threat. Humans are imperfect and have a hard time controlling their tongues and reaction while coping with a difficult world. Take a few minutes before you react, before reacting to a potential human reaction. it's a teaching opportunity when you go to no reaction the harassment game it just becomes no fun for them they have to come face to face with their own irrational reaction and also the future regret that usually modifies their behavior you ever seen that where when you don't react or you come to the table with some Common sense, lack of reaction, but you're responding, but you don't get angry. You don't get your emotions tied up into it. And then watch what happens. They will generally go to the place of regret for being a crazy person or acting poorly towards you. Almost always that happens. So I'm going to go to the Bible right now. A gentle answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger. That's Proverbs. A gentle answer or often just a simple acknowledgement changes everything. Even if someone is raging, my response is usually, tell me more. I'm trying to understand. I will engage with them, but not in an emotionally charged way. And I had a discussion with somebody yesterday who was trying to be right and defending the position of being right. And I said to that person, I said, Well, I don't try to prove I'm right. I'm trying to get into their head. I want to know how they think. So I will say things like, tell me more. I'm trying to understand because my goal isn't to be right. It's to disarm the situation every single time. We need to go to disarming because when somebody's in crazy mood, it's like an alcoholic. You're not going to win the argument. Okay, that's just fact. So I let them talk until they spit that poison out of their minds. Let them spit the poison out. It's not going to hurt you. It's not a real poison. It's the stuff that's rattling around in their head. And as soon as they've had time to talk this out and spit all of their anger out of their head, watch, they'll decelerate. And then they become more productive and you can have a discussion with them and you can take away that pain that they're feeling and as panic, anger, rage, or whatever, but you get them to accelerate. And it's very important when we do that. It makes most people feel better. And all of a sudden they're like, oh, I'm so glad we talked. And then you're like, yeah, come on over here, buddy. I'm going to give you a hug, right? So let's talk about a few more Bible verses here, because all solutions to all problems are found in the Bible. It's just the way it is. It's God's word. It's our instruction manual for life. Proverbs fifteen, eighteen. A hot tempered man stirs up strife, but he who is slow to anger quiets contention. James one, nineteen. Let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger. In Matthew five, nine, blessed are the peacemakers. We can break the cycle of offense in ourselves or breaking the cycle of offense in ourselves. Usually it breaks it in others. And then all of a sudden we can talk and be friends. And that's what's happened within the political system, within families, churches, everything. I mean, everybody's fighting all the time. Everybody's in crazy land all the time. We don't need to go there. And it really proves our service to God when we just stop with the offense. Don't let people get to you. Don't be offended. It doesn't serve any purpose. So when somebody talks, you can do the Brandenburg method, which is let them be crazy. Let them talk off their stress. They actually might have a good reason for feeling the way that they do. I saw it with a lot of the videos I posted about water wars. People were going, she's a Karen, she's a this or that, before they even found out anything having to do with the water wars, the AI data centers, the offense, the threat, and all of that going on. They went right to, let's go get a Karen, right? I'd like everybody to realize that a lot of the Karens that are labeled Karens are probably right. And where are these people? Because it was never the women that attacked me. It was all the men. I didn't have one woman that attacked me. It was men. They assumed they went right on the attack. And so my point here is maybe we should all find out more about what we're attacking than just go straight to an emotional reaction. You know, sometimes it's justified. Sometimes it's not. But where are these people that claim to stand up for other people's rights? Where are they when they see people going to a little bit emotional reaction? Why don't we just be quiet? listen and find out if there's something real behind what they're saying. They have literally brainwashed the United States into calling anyone who objects to something a Karen. And it's not okay. It is not okay. So I think we need to just stop that nonsense, find out what's going on. And for all of you guys out there that attacked me, And in such, maybe you better pull on your big boy panties and actually figure this out so you can defend instead of all of a sudden go to butthurt land and going after people. It's not OK. And I don't really care. I just think they look like I think they look like idiots. It doesn't bother me one little bit. I got a lot more traffic out of it. They gave me all kinds of advertising. Perfect. Love it. Right. But in real life, when we see things we don't disagree with, and I think you can probably chime into this, Mike, a reaction from women towards men or men towards women shows a huge amount of ignorance. I've constantly said, bring on the toxic masculinity. I haven't seen anybody. Somebody that goes right straight to calling a woman Karen is a little bitch in my in my world. OK, and I do see it that way. It's cowardly. It's not masculine. It's not handling business. It's just being a little bitch. And so that that's where that's where I'm going to I'm going to say it because you haven't found out enough about the situation to make an honest, good response instead of an emotional crybaby response. a lot of times if you notice uh the drive-by media uh is all reactionary okay so you got a lot of people who sit there and watch the news on the dummy box and they're they're constantly being flooded with reactionary uh reporting of the drive-by media so after a while that becomes embedded in them to where when something happens, they do the same thing. They become reactionary. Instead of analyzing the situation, doing some research, getting some education under their belt before they do or say anything, they just bore out a reactionary scenario because that's what they see on TV every damn day. And it's the drive-by media that's conditioning them to be reactionary. And that's where everybody has to understand it. dummy box because you're not getting a proper education you're getting an opinion that's not the news that's an opinion right and so you're getting a reactionary opinions so get off that thing you have access to to a computer you have access to the internet do some research do a deep dive educate yourself you know that actually means you have to have to do something other than watch a football game sometimes or or anything else for that matter. I mean, you know, I like sports, you know, no different than the next guy. But I understand that, especially since Vegas took over all of sports, it's all show. It's nothing but entertainment now because they bet on everything from, you know, what color underwear they're wearing to, you know, um... It's just stupid. So people have to educate themselves, and they've been conditioned not to. They've been conditioned to be reactionary, and they've been dumbed down. And I'm not saying that to be derogatory towards anybody. I'm saying that you are a victim of the system that wants you to... to not pose a threat to them. They want you not to ask questions. They don't want you challenging their authority. They don't want you knowing any of this information. You have to go educate yourself, okay? Right. You obviously want to because you're tuning into shows like this. If you're tuning into a show like this, then take the next step and go educate yourself on this stuff, okay? I wasn't born with all this knowledge. I had to go out there and learn. It was trial and error. What works? What doesn't work? Believe me, I've tried a lot of different things that don't work. Do I talk about it? No. Why? Because what good would it do? It doesn't work. I want to teach people what does work. I want to show people what and how to educate themselves to where they can better themselves i.e. the government. You know what? That's what we have to do. And so here's another thing. For all of you guys out there that hear people calling other people Karens, do you realize how many – I didn't realize this, but Karen the River Rooter brought it up to me, and she's a very secure woman, right? But she said, too, she said, you cannot believe how much it affects people's life. There are people that have committed suicide over this that are named Karen because they were picked on so much over this that they literally committed suicide. So I'm going to challenge everybody. When somebody calls somebody a Karen, it's your responsibility to stop it because this is not okay. It's not okay. And get in and figure out what's going on and try to be a peacemaker, not this nonsense. You know, it's just ridiculous. Well, you should test their sense of humor, too. If you run into someone who's acting as a Karen, hand them a Snickers. I'll tell you their personality right there. Well, you know what? Maybe, you know, a lot of times, and it goes back to not reacting but responding. If somebody's very upset, sometimes a gentle word can turn away wrath. And it may be, it may be irrational. I mean, we all seen a lot of irrational behavior out there, but, uh, you know, that, that doesn't mean it's all irrational. It is some of it, some of it, you may be seeing somebody who's been horribly, horribly mistreated that needs somebody to come to their aid. So I guess my point here is before making a stupid reactionary move and looking like an idiot, Take the time to find out more things about the situation and not just do a knee-jerk reaction. I actually went to some of the guys that were attacking me, and I told them, I said, you don't understand the situation. My well was the first to go. Twenty-five more wells were killed in our area or damaged where people had no water because they were doing a land grab. And these people are criminals. They literally destroyed the water. Think about how you'd feel if all of a sudden you couldn't turn your water on. And I was the only one that was really, really super vocal. I mean, there were a few of us that were vocal, but most of the people were too afraid to say anything. about their land grab in our area so that they could put god knows what on the land we know that they destroyed the wetlands so they could build on it i don't know what's coming there yet i do know that there's there's contracts on it of the wetlands they destroyed and we just had another well because they started phase three and started taking the dewatering again we had another house who lost their well about two weeks ago two three weeks ago So it hasn't stopped. And because people refuse to stand up for other people unless it comes to their house, they're not going to do anything. I've heard that so many times. What a gutless response. Just totally, totally, totally self-absorbed in a gutless response. The biggest problem that I saw, we had one family whose wife went into chemotherapy the day that their well went dry. The township, crickets, nada. It wasn't our fault, they said. The dad or the husband in that family had to go to the cemetery every day for fifteen gallons of water for them to be able to stay in their house. because that's what they were gonna try to do. They put sewer in, no water, so there was no recourse. They threatened and told the well diggers in the area not to drill any more wells after I told them to shove it up, you know, shove it where they couldn't see it again. I'll be polite here. I wasn't then. But I told them to shove it, drill the new well, and told them to stay off my land. The other people didn't have the courage to do that because they were too afraid of recourse and being attacked, which is exactly what they did. The township threatened to lean This woman left the township meeting in tears. She lost her job because she couldn't go to work because she was so upset about not having water. And the township is saying, it's okay. It's August. Your water should return in December and refused to do anything about it. Could care less. She lost her job. She walked out crying. And the township decided to, they brought her some water. They had some well services come in to look at it. And, and, uh, give a, uh, give a, uh, biased opinion. And so they dropped twenty, they dropped fifteen thousand to twenty five thousand dollar bill on her and said, wasn't our fault. Sorry. Now, I mean, think about... I would have people camping out on their front lawn. I'd be using their water in their facilities until the problem was fixed. They didn't care because they make too much money out of it. They wouldn't have cared. That's the problem when you get into these things. I think sometimes John doesn't quite get the grasp of how... how uneasy it is when you're in a situation like that, where you have a farm, you have animals, you have crops, you have people. There were two homes that had disabled children in them. They didn't care. And this is Byron Township, where we go back to the fact that we're watching a township takeover of our state. If it's not affecting you now, it's going to be until we fight this. with the AI centers and everything else because they're not listening to us. Those AI centers, they're obsolete the day that they're built before the day that they're built because the equipment is obsolete. It's a joke. The whole thing is a joke. It is. they're trying to put a a grid system in place to monitor everything that everybody does absolutely and you know we can go back i'm tempted to pay play chris's video again i i think this is actually fun so listen i i get going here yeah well thanks for being on today mike and for sharing everything and so we're gonna go i'm gonna gonna do the god bless you all god bless all those whom you love and god bless america make it a great day i plan to be back on tomorrow So please join us tomorrow and we will continue bringing real news forward and tell people about this microbiologist that's going to be on because you need to hear it, how they did it. If he can get his computer back up and working, it will be Thursday. But this needs to be screamed from the top of every mountain because they've tried to silence it. He has the receipts. He's had death threats. He's hiding out outside of the country. And he has the receipts of what they did to every single person that they murdered. It was intentional. It was intentional. They murdered them. with intention and we need to get this out to everyone so I'll let you know I'll let everybody know when he's going to be on and hopefully you know their little power outages aren't working as well as they would have thought because some of us have hardened to it and have redundancy in different states and different areas so keep trying guys you're just going to get a bigger fight every time so what's that Can he post it that way if he's going to be on Thursday? As soon as I get word back from him, I will let everybody know exactly when he's going to come on. He said he can't get a voice anywhere to get this stuff handled. And he literally stumbled on to the answer of cyanide in it. And that's what killed everybody. And now they're going to use that excuse for Ebola. Because what it does is it has the same results as liquefying cells. He said, if they come out with Ebola, he said, it's not, it's not Ebola. He said, it's not Ebola. He said, because both of the mechanisms that they had in the shot, as well as what they claim to be in Ebola, he said, both of them, it's the same mechanism. So I hope you guys are good and pissed off over this. You should be. Every single one of us should be absolutely furious about what has happened and they all knew it. They all have to be, they all have to be removed because they didn't stand with Americans to protect us. They made, they made money off of it. So anyhow, I'll let everybody know what's going on here and I'm going to end the broadcast a minute and then we're going to do a bunch of AI generated clips so that I've actually found how, how to do, um, let let ai take clips out of these long videos i know everybody is like these videos are too long i can't get to the meat of what we need to know unless i do a long video it's impossible it takes people too long to get to the point and to get to the meat of what needs to be said That's why I do the long, I give people the time to say what they need to say. And short clips is just headlines. I'm not going to do it. So we're going to go ahead and do these AI clips. And I've got a bunch of them. I've been doing it for a few weeks now. I just haven't posted them yet. But I've been doing them and generating them through AI. um, in the software and it's, it's a great tool. If it's used correctly, it's a great tool. So have a great day today and we'll be, we'll be back tomorrow. All right. All right. We'll see you. See you, Mike. See everybody.