Published Aug. 11, 2025, 9:02 a.m.
9am The Technocratic Communism - Vicky Davis The United Nations as an organization is world communism. The strategy to impose world communism on the people of the United States (and the other countries in this hemisphere) has been economic rather than military as the people were led to believe it would be. It's our own leaders who were the Pied Pipers leading us to this demise of the U.S. I'm working on a timeline that shows the who, when and what. 10am Daniel Richard - Daniel Richard, a constitutional scholar from New Hampshire has brought a case against the state, which claims that N.H. election laws have been illegally altered by the executive and legislative branches of the state government over the years, without the consent of the voters, thereby making the legislature’s actions unconstitutional. On Monday, October 30, 2023, the New Hampshire Supreme Court, on their own initiative, scheduled oral arguments for November 29th, 2023 at 9am, in a highly-anticipated election law case of Daniel Richard vs. Governor Chris Sununu, et al. involving the executive and legislature branches of government repeatedly violating the voting rights of Mr. Richard, and the people of this State, by altering the mandatory election provisions of the Constitution of New Hampshire established by the people by legislative fiat. This case poses the following questions. Who is qualified to voter in New Hampshire? Who is qualified to vote absentee in this State? Who is required to “sort,” “count” and certify the votes in the towns and cities? Are voting machines constitutional in N.H? Can the legislature delegate its law-making power under the State and U.S. Constitutions to an unelected body of bureaucrats (the NH Ballot Law Commission) to make election laws (including voting machine laws), and the ability to suspend State and Federal election laws? The use of vote tabulation equipment to conceal the counting of un-verified and uncertified absentee ballots and the illegal certification of the elections results. X/Twitter: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1ynJOlMlEqyxR Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/636616148890812/videos/696301536785747 Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6xfl6g-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-8112025-technocratic-communism-and-daniel-rich.html https://rumble.com/v6xfl0c-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-8112025-technocratic-communism-and-daniel-rich.html Odysee: https://odysee.com/@BrandenburgNewsNetwork:d/bnn-2025-08-11-technocratic-communism-and-daniel-richard:c BNN Live: https://Live.BrandenburgNewsNetwork.com Guests: Donna Brandenburg, Vicky Davis, Daniel Richard
Good morning. Welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg, and it is the eleventh day of August twenty twenty five. Welcome to our show today. Why do we have a lot to talk about? I'm going to tell you what. It's gotten real serious out here in Byron Township, and we're going to be talking about the water wars that are going on here. It's it's kind of crazy. I'm going to bring Vicki on and we're going to get right to it. Hey, Vicki, how you doing? Hi, I'm doing just fine. Thanks. Awesome. Do you have a good weekend? Yeah, actually, I've been working really hard on a new part of my website that I'll be putting up. And it has to do with China's infiltration into our country. And when we discovered it in Idaho, and that was in when a delegation of twenty-three communist Chinese, quote, businessmen arrived in our state to look at investment opportunities in Idaho. I mean, we were just beside ourselves. You know, what the hell were they doing inviting the communist Chinese into our country to invest in Idaho? Well, this is happening all over the United States. And this is a problem where Singapore owns five percent of the upper peninsula, which we call the UP. OK, Michigan has its own language here. So you will never hear a native from Michigan call soda, soda. It's pop. And so it's really it's kind of it's kind of funny when when you go to different areas and you realize that there is actually a language that's spoken in the state that is a little different than, you know, wherever else you go. Yeah. I learned that when I was a kid in, I forget grade school or junior high, a girl moved, a new girl moved into town and came to school. And, you know, when we were talking to her, asking her where she came from, she answered, but I couldn't understand what the hell she was saying. It sounded like a foreign language. I found out later it was South Dakota, but, but I, you know, I don't know what language she was speaking in to say South Dakota, because it wasn't anything that I could understand. Right. Well, and, and it, and that, that's a really good point is that, hang on a second. I'm trying to find my, my, I want to show you something that I've got going on here. I, I it's, it's funny because people in Michigan say, you know, a lot, you know, You know, that sort of thing. And when I was running for governor, somebody from Texas, he said, you have to stop saying, you know, I'm like, dude, I'm from Michigan. OK, this is just the way it works here. And I'm not going to change my personality. I'm sorry. You know, just the way it is. I'm I'm I'm comfortable with that. And actually, that's a bad habit around the country. I do that, too. Everybody does. But I'm not as bad. What that is, it's a what you're doing is you're buying time. You know, probably. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I went to a Toastmasters club. And what will cure you is when you have to give a speech and every time you say, you know something. they drop a bean into a coffee can. And so, you know, you say, you know, and then there's all these beans dropping in the coffee can. I was doing a count when I talked in several things that I know that I should probably correct. But I've got sixty years of habit building here. That's like worse than a chain smoker, you know, with using the words. So it is what it is. I'm just comfortable with my humanity, which is highly flawed usually. But so is everyone. You know, that's the other thing. that I think people are going to have to come to terms with. And that's how highly flawed human beings are and give each other some, a little bit of grace. Now that doesn't go, that doesn't extend to criminal behavior, which is going on in Byron township right now, which is, we're going to talk about the water wars going on here. It is so disturbing. What has happened here that I can't even put words to it. I'm fine. I filed my, emergency injunction last week. And the next step is going to be tonight at Byron, the Byron Township Hall. There is the township meeting. However, what they've done is they keep trying to divide us out. So they tell everybody, this doesn't affect you. It's only twenty houses that are being affected by this. I'm going to tell you what, it's the entire area because what they're doing is they're draining the wetlands. They're draining the wetlands, guys. Well, let me tell you, you're not fighting just your township. No. You are fighting the U.N. Because Nestle works for the U.N. And this is a U.N. initiative. So you're not going to get anywhere fighting with your township. Well, I tell you what, I think we're going to see a little action here because it's not even fighting with the township. I'm going to sue the ever living crap out of these people because they drink over three hundred million gallons of water out of our area. Sucks to be them. And they ruined my well of all people. I called one of the township supervisors and I'm like, of all the people to have had their well ruined by your illegal actions. It was mine. And everybody here is like, man, I'm so sorry to see. We finally got water back on. I think it was Friday. We were without water Friday or Saturday. We were without water for an entire week to that house. And I told them, I'm like, you are not to step foot on my property. I'll deal with my own water because I don't trust you people not to poison me at this point. You know, and that may sound a little hysterical, but they literally committed crimes against humanity and by draining the freaking water table. And they're still pumping the water from forty feet below the surface. They didn't have to go that deep. I called the drain commission and they said, that doesn't even make any sense. There's no permits for it. They started putting stab holes down into the water table There's I didn't even count how many of the stab lines they put down there. But they've got at least they had at least fifteen pipes, forty feet down in the ground that they were pumping water out of the groundwater, out of the water table. They didn't have the ability to do that. The only permitting they had was to divert it, not to just go down and drain the water table. Well, guess what? Lowered the water table so much. And I am quite a ways away from where they are. they lowered the water table. I think my well was twenty-five feet. And that's what most of the people around here can grab, twenty-five foot water. Well, not anymore, guys. And what they ended up doing is ruining my well. And I have a well company that came out and wrote us the well was ruined because the water table was dropped. Why was the water table dropped? Because they had forty-foot pipes. in the ground and they were pumping from them with pumps that were rated for two thousand gallons a minute, one million gallons of water an hour, three hundred million gallons. Well, more than that, because they keep they're continuing to pump it. So of three million gallons of water that they literally flushed out of this water, out of the wetlands from And they had no permit to do that. I've been threatened. I've been threatened by the township. I was threatened by the contractor for sure. The contractor actually went and picked up a sweep from, he was driving around and finally he went down to the end, picked up a sweep and one of my friends who happens to be a Green Beret and I were standing there. dumped and went within, I think he was within six feet of us with that sweep. And I'm like, screw you. I'm not moving. And he went right past us and dumped all. He never talked to us. He never said, hey, I'm going to go, you know, take this sweep and come down the road. He just went and got it. I didn't think he was going to have the guts to do it, actually. So he goes around the corner and just cloud over the top of us. I mean, you couldn't see two feet in front of you on a road that was wide open. And so I've been pointing out all the environmental issues. violations that are going on out there. I'm like, you think I'm going to be dissuaded by you throwing dust over me, honey? I'm a horse gal. I'm usually covered in dust. If I don't have dust and grime over me in some way, it just wasn't a good day, right? Because that means I wasn't out hanging out with horses. But yeah, it is crazy what these people are capable of. And I mean, ultra, ultra crazy. Yeah, well, your battle is with the United Nations. And if you look at the UN Global Compact and the corporations that signed on to the Global Compact, those corporations are the enemy. They are the enemy. And Nestle is one of those corporations because they're doing the work for the United Nations. Yeah, and the foot soldiers are all of these township boards, and what's really crazy is the township board here, if you look at how it's structured, they have Don Tillema's on the top, and somehow he got this shiny brand-new auto center after he was in as township supervisor. I got a lot of freaking questions. whether it was having to do with permitting or, or what, or how did, how did that happen? It doesn't make any sense. And then all of a sudden all of a sudden you've got a mortgage company in the parking lot of Telmo auto. I think it's connected. All I can say is I think it's all connected. Then he appointed a board. One of the guys, Steve Kilgore is a builder developer and he got a bit of the of what the engineers did to engineer the project that went through his property, he got paid for his easement. And remember, he's a builder and developer. He's getting paid for the easement. And then you've got Mark D. Hollander, who is an assessor. Nobody thinks of him as an assessor, but he's an assessor. And then somebody else said they're also a builder, and she knows his wife. And then you've got Joe Pitch, who is involved with the Pitch family of companies, which is wrecking and demolition. I'm like, are you freaking kidding me? And then it's like they're all connected in some way or another. And all of them have a conflict of interest. Peggy Sandler, who is our township clerk. destroyed election records and hung up on me when I was chasing this down, wouldn't talk to me about it when I was trying to FOIA information. And she said, we don't have anything. I'm like, why don't you have anything? This was before you could actually destroy election records. He did the same thing that Jonathan Brader has done. Well, we took our orders from the state. That's always the answer. We took our orders from someone else. It's nonsense. That's why you have to understand what happened to our country, because they are working for the international system. They've turned our country into a common market. We don't have America. We don't. So you think you're dealing with local town officials and state officials and that they have some power. Well, they've sold out. They've sold us out. And so we are working in a dual system. And I wrote an article called One Country, Two Systems. And in that article, I explained what they did to our country. I've got to put a correction out there. Somebody came back with Mike Tillema owns Tillema Auto. He's owned it for thirty years. I think Don is a step uncle. OK, if I was wrong on that, my apologies to all. However, this is a it's a question that needs to be asked is who owns what and how are they profiting? Absolutely. So go, go ahead. And thank you. That's the hardest part is figuring out where to look for the answers. Well, the, the, the reality is though, is that all of these people are, are like, there's even, there's a relationship there. And so you have to look at that. And why is there a mortgage companies now sitting right next door to tell them auto? Yeah. Good question. Well, when I was talking to Sean Taylor, Sean Taylor, I'm friends with Sean Taylor, the guy that's down in Tennessee that is not only he was in the sheriff's office and was an investigator. He's got this, you know, I worked with him a little bit on some other issues. And he started talking about how they're doing this to drain the wetland and build on them, targeting people. Low-income individuals, they will work with mortgage companies to give them a zero-down loan with one percent interest on what the developers and the builders are building in these areas. And then there's some interaction with the NGOs. So if they do this, it's like some sort of a program, I suspect, that's tied in with the NGOs that they're either getting paid for or that that's one of the qualifications for the loan. So then they have to be involved with the NGOs in order to keep their loans or they lose their loans. You should get the names of all those NGOs because what they are, they're a nest of communists. Well, I tell you what we did. I've got another friend who's a real good researcher, too. And she was digging this up and she said, check this out. She said it's even attached to let me see if I can pull her up here. It's even attached to the. Fifty churches in the area. Like, oh, my God, it just you can't you can't make this up. It's it's it's incredible. So Joe Pitch was project engineer for Dan Voss Construction. He believes she believes we'll have to see. But there's a there's a site. Let me see if I can pull it up here, because it just gets crazier and crazier when you look this stuff up. That's probably, they're all part of the interfaith alliance. Yes. Yeah. Keep talking here. They're communists. I mean, you know, and they're not really churches as much as they are political operatives. The church is kind of just like a cover story for who these people are. This is what is strengthening nonprofits the communities they serve, IFF champions, nonprofits across the Midwest to shape a more equitable and vibrant community through community-centered lending development real estate solutions. This is the kicker right here. And when you look at this, you can start seeing the growth I don't know, all of the... Okay, there, look, our offices, there's one in Kansas City and Cleveland. Everybody out there, whatever state you're in, you will find this same organizational structure. Yeah, and you can find them. If you dig down, you'll be able to find them and see exactly what they're doing. But this is actually, this is how they're creating the... Fifteen minute cities right there. That's equity, diversion, diversity and inclusion. Yeah. And it's all under the label of community. Community is a synonym for communism. Oh, you bet. Let's see for investors. Let's see what they have here. Who's involved in this? This is going to be interesting. I think this is, this is, this is so unbelievable, you know, and the heck of it is, is that most people will not even connect. They won't even connect this. Right. Right. That's been the problem I've had all along is because as you start researching this, you, you find there are layers and layers and layers of, what is, oh, look, North Shore Community Bank. Well, I think Northern Trust, I think that's the mortgage company that's sitting right next to Tilma Auto. Yeah. Oh, TIAA-CREF. That's the teacher's union. Oh, yeah, sure. And so what you find is that there are layers and layers and layers of what they've done, and it's all part of an organizational structure that And they are separate from us. They are different than us. They are the communist organization. Yeah, here's your faith institutions. Look, here's your faith institutions. Sisters of Charity. But if you research those, you'll find out that really they are more involved in economics than they are in religion. They're not really religious organizations. It's just a religious front. Yeah. So this is a real problem, guys. When we start looking at, excuse me, at all of these entities that are tied in and they're tied in with the developers. Let's see who the funders are. This is going to be fun. The builders initiative, of course, because they're all working with builders and developers. And how come we have any builders, developers, realtors, assessors on the boards? You got an assessor on the board and you want to know why your taxes are going up? They're freaking price setting. Yeah. And they'll sell the same house for a lot less money to a quote, poor person, but actually it's a connected person. It's a connected person that they're using. So everything is, you know, everything is dual or more. You, you think you're, you know, doing business in one world where there's a whole different world for Different people. Yeah. And they're all paying for it. I suspect that something that was said was that they think that the mortgage companies are giving zero down loans with one percent interest. Uh-huh. So let's see. Where is the Grand Rapids office? I think. So it's all through the nonprofits. So I want to see who. I want to see where they are. I'm going to almost guarantee you that there's something. Well, and Byron Township has a thirty four plus percent growth rate going on right now. There's only one area that's higher than that. And they're they're literally we're watch the housing prices like almost double overnight or more. It's crazy. That's only for the outsiders, not the insider. Right. And so. Right. You're. Let's see. I'm going to see if I've got a PDF here. Let's see if I can. Visual guide to. Oh, this is interesting. This is ARPA projects. Let me see if I can pull this up. So did you want to go to the, your, let's go to this and look at this and then we'll move on to that. I'm going to guess that Daniel's not going to be on this morning because it was kind of my bad because I was working on my lawsuit so much that I, that I, I forgot to contact both of you last night and say, Hey, we're on it in the morning. Okay. Well, It's like I was telling you, I don't think we were on air yet, but I was telling you that we discovered that a city mayor had invited a delegation of twenty-three communist Chinese to invest in Meridian, Idaho. And I about flipped my cork when I read that article. And so a group of us, I was working with Idaho Eagle Forum at the time, and we did heads down research probably for about two years on what was happening in the Boise area. because it wasn't just Meridian, Idaho. Ultimately, they created a metropolitan region of two or three counties and several cities. And what I ultimately came to understand about it is what they did with our country was to implement the same kind of arrangement that China had with Hong Kong. Hong Kong was a British colony up until, up until, when they turned Hong Kong back over to China. And the reason why they did that was because in, the UN passed a declaration calling for the decolonization of all countries in the world. So in nineteen eighty four, Britain began negotiating with China to relinquish control of Hong Kong. And that happened in nineteen ninety seven. But, you know, Hong Kong was just a powerhouse of production. And so the US didn't want to relinquish, didn't want to support that. So what happened is they turned our country into a country of one country, two systems. And what makes it two systems is that you have your normal, laws and regional boundaries, cities, states, counties, et cetera. But then under the Hong Kong system, they defined something called a special administrative zone. And it turns out that what a special administrative zone is, is an inland port under international law. You know, ports have always been, since the beginning of Admiralty Law, ports have been special places where foreigners arrive and can get off, but there are boundaries to ports. Well, since some countries are landlocked, They came up with a system whereby a landlocked country can have ports as long as there is an agreement in place from a seaport to an inland port along a particular route. So that's how you come to have international ports inland. Kansas City Smart Port, for example, it's inland, but it's a port jurisdiction. Wow, this is amazing. A key theme which has run through all our deliberations the last two days is that the continuing economic success of the region with all its implications for improved living standards for our people. Don't let that escape you, right? depends on preserving and improving the multilateral trading system through progressive enhancement of adherence to the GATT framework. This is crazy. Yeah, it really is. And you would think, how could the leader, how could the Congress... Allow this to happen. Because they're all getting paid off, right? Yes. I mean, they're all part of it. And it's the same thing with the townships. There's always a payoff with these people. There's always a conflict of interest. A lot of times it's a cool one hundred thousand dollars to get the initial buy in. And I don't know if you remember that congressman from Missouri, but he was like the first one arrested. He had a hundred thousand dollars in his freezer when they arrested him. I don't remember that. Yeah, that was, I forget when that was. But anyway, yeah, they buy off Congress. And the thing is, is that because it's an international system and you have foreign banks that operate under the charters of where they came from, I don't think they're operating under American banking laws. Yeah, so let's look at this. Here's another one. This is kind of interesting. This is what everything looks like. That's why you have to understand the system in which you're working, in which you're living. Because, you know, when I started this, I thought I lived in America, the United States. Well, no, I don't. I live in a country whose borders are being dissolved, whose laws have been bastardized to accommodate this international system of one country, two systems. Right. And what's really crazy is that when you look at how they've done this, they think, oh, you know, they've got the distraction of the World Economic Forum, which is all part of it. I'll give you that. But what they're not telling you is it's already here. Yes. And so look at this. This is ARPA Projects, Ottawa County, Michigan. I think this is really interesting. I was going to my barn one day and Steve Kilgore, who is on an oversight, appointed oversight board by Don Tillamore. He appointed these guys on it. Joe Pitch, Mark D. Hollander and Steve Kilgore. And it was weird because I see an Ottawa County sheriff pulling in to his driveway. That Ottawa County is the next county over, which, by the way, is a DeVos stronghold. so you probably have a count you probably have agreements between counties and what the way they did it here in idaho is with the nine one one system uh because they they made a very big deal that county sheriff can't cross the county boundaries even when he's in pursuit you know of a criminal so the criminal goes free so they feed you all this bs and and then they they sign an agreement first of all for a joint not a joint nine one one system a regional nine one one system and then they they build on it from there of merging the county governments, creating an umbrella organization over the top. So I'm telling you, you know, it is a major effort to find all of the pieces and parts to what they've done in our country with this two systems operating. Well, let's take a look at what they've got here. Otto County, Michigan. the guide from twenty twenty three Children's Advocacy Center expansion. These are all the projects that they've got going on. And this is a question I had with all the money that was given to the school districts across the state of Michigan. I have a spreadsheet to for the covid shutdown. They were they were dumping millions and millions of dollars for covid shutdown to these school systems. And then I can't even count how many building projects were going on. And guess what? I believe that in this area, I could probably start naming the names because you see that the names on the boards all over the place. Rockford construction or Voss construction and that sort of thing. And you have to start connecting the dots to these, but look at, so let's see, we've got direct care provider programs, Harbor Ministries, Heritage Homes, GRCC, Benjamin's Hope, MOCA, Creating Jobs for Ottawa County, Heritage Homes is a part of it, and partnership with Grand Rapids Community College and Community Mental Health Ottawa County. Here we go. What else is on this one? ODC child care, early child care, and learning centers expansion. Of course, they want to get the kids away from mom and dad as quick as they can. Yes, they're taking over the child learning. Yes. I homeschooled. I was done with this. I'm old and I was ornery then, right? So, like, I homeschooled my kids. I'm like, not a chance. And saw what they were doing in the schools to dumb everybody down. that truly they're dumbing people down and they're keeping them focused on those things, which actually disable people instead of teaching them any kind of skill or preparing them to get out of school. No, they're going to figure out something totally irrelevant to the majority of their lives. It's all social justice, crap, reach for recovery, nonprofit. And Oh yeah. Guess what? All these people, that are going to be staffing. Those are probably going to go into the economic development areas that they're doing with the housing. Yeah, it's all economic development. That's where, that's who the communists are. And that development is led by grants through the Economic Development Administration that is an agency of government that was created during the Lyndon Johnson's Great Society era. Oh, here, with increased construction material costs because of supply chain issues and interest rate hikes, it is unlikely that this project could be built without ARPA funds. Yeah, with their engineered inflation? Mm-hmm. Everything. Well, the inflation is to pay the payoff. Yeah, so... Ottawa County grew to twelve percent in the past decade. Oh, hold my beer, look at Byron Township. And because there's a need for extra housing, oh my gosh, I wonder who those people would be. Probably in one of these programs. Yeah, and my guess is that they get, well, it's not a guess. I know that they're getting assistance to help people move into these places. Oh, sure. Yeah, they're basically getting it for just almost nothing. Nothing. And the other people that do buy houses, they're paying for it. And that's why the price of houses is so inflated. Right. And those of us who actually work for a living, we end up having to pay all their taxes and the taxes keep going up. Right. Sucker, if you're working out there and you're paying for all this and you're getting nothing out of it. High-speed internet access remains inconsistent across Ottawa County. The county is working to establish a universal access to broadband. Seven million dollars, seven point five approximately, went into this. out-of-county eviction prevention program. So now they don't have to pay their enabling people not to pay their bills and make sure you keep them in there and have the rest of us who are working and paying taxes, pay bill for it. You know, I hate to say it, but there are some, there are so many problems with this. It's like a, it's like a chain. It's a big con game is what it is. It's, it's, it's a Rico. This is, this is Rico. It's racketeering. Like you can't even imagine. Yes. Yes. It's RICO. That's one of the things that Sean Taylor, when we were talking about what's happening in Byron Township, and I told him all the connections, he's like, this is a civil RICO case. He said it's criminal, too, if you look at it. Oh, it's totally criminal, yeah. It's RICO. Crime Victims Assistant Fund, okay? Yeah, that's a bunch of bull. That is a bunch of bull crap. Food access and healthy food access expansion. Now we got to feed their little minions. County parks initiative, three separate requests, six million dollars. did anybody vote on this or is this just grant money that's going to all of these organizations? And just nobody has a voice in this. And it was just like on Tilma last board meeting, looked at everyone who had questions about what was going on in the township. And he's like, and he was like this, he's like, this project is going through and you people can't stop it. That's our township supervisor. Yeah. total and complete contempt. Well, the Congress votes money for it. They vote in the budget of the government agencies. There are allocations for grants, and this is across the board. And what I noticed in my research is that they will have grants that are basically for the same thing, but It's different agencies that are offering the grant. So they can get the grant from the EPA or they can get the grant from the Economic Development Administration or the Department of Commerce or the National Science Foundation. I mean, they have so many grant programs and this whole buying off our country is through grant programs through the agencies of government. I've never applied for a grant. I haven't either, actually. I hate to say it, but I have a problem with some of this because they're doing, you know, I just have a big problem with it. I'm just going to say that. Anyhow, inflation relief payment, four million dollars. Get this. County Board of Commissioners and county employees. a four thousand five hundred eighty three one um let's see now four four million geez I missed the last three four million dollar expenditure was approved as a one-time payment to twelve hundred county employees including law enforcement officers mental health professionals and other employees this payment was to offset the record inflation of eight point two percent for twelve months ending in september twenty twenty two this is how they're doing it guys giving employees a one-time payment offers financial relief and facilitates employee loyalty without binding the county to the cost year after year as the wage increase would." Those bastards, look at this. Can you even get your arms around this? It takes a while. The first thing you have to do when you start looking, forget what you thought about living in America. And what country we're in. You've got to forget all of that. And everything you look at it, look at it with new eyes. It's a lie. And with a new mind. Right. It's a lie. I mean, the whole thing is a lie. It's a lie. Let's see. I want to see if I can do some. Talk amongst yourselves a minute. I want to pull something up here a minute. OK, and they knew exactly what they were doing. I found a video of Newt Gingrich in nineteen ninety five. He was talking to the Council of the Americas, which, by the way, the Council of the Americas is a website that you must go to and find out who they who they are. It was started by David Rockefeller. And their objective all along has been to dissolve the United States. and establish the North American Union, which when I first started researching, that was supposed to be a conspiracy theory. Well, that's why I take pains to document everything that I look at and how it all fits together so that nobody can call me a conspiracy theorist, because I will, by God, bury you in documentation. Hang on a minute. We're setting up PR for this goat rodeo of a meeting in Byron Township tonight. And they changed the meeting times and where it was going to be and who was supposed to be included and who it didn't apply to and such. They were literally telling people in the township, this doesn't apply to you. Like hell it doesn't. It's like the whole thing applies to everyone. They're just talking about their little unconstitutional charges for for running the sewer and water in front of our houses, which doesn't benefit any of us. Certainly didn't until they dropped the water table. Look at, look at this. It's crazy. Well, yeah, that's, it's just, they are so fricking evil. They are evil. What you need to do when you go to meetings like that, you need to have a group of people who understand how facilitated meetings operate. Because what they will try to do is to bamboozle you. And so you need a group of people that will put a stop to it. I have documentation on it, how you break that facilitation, because they don't know what to do. When you're in a group meeting and they're trying to ram something down your throat, make you feel stupid, there are ways to break that and blow their game. I come with things that are written. You guys want to see my emergency, let's see, emergency injunction that I filed? Could be kind of fun. I hope it works. Well, if it doesn't, I'm going to hit them with a federal lawsuit too. So, I mean, it's just a matter of time. They have a problem and a large one. So let me see. I got to make sure I get the right one up here. Nope, that's not the right one. Where are you? Where are you? Still trying to find it, guys. All right, come on, open up here. Let's see. No, that's the wrong one, too. Okay. I'm going to have to look for it here a minute. I must have filed it in the wrong place. But, yeah, it's like it is so crazy what they're doing and how absolutely complicit and well-orchestrated this thing is. Well, they're crooks. They're betraying our country, and they know it. And so they don't want you to know it. Right. So they try to act like that you're the problem. Right. And you know what? It's them. Well, if you want to talk for a second, I do think this might be really interesting to people. I just got to find it. Hang on a minute, guys. Okay. Well, I'll just tell you what I've been working on. Okay. Because it goes directly to this one country, two system concept. When we found that the communist Chinese were invited into Meridian, Idaho. There were several of us doing just heads down research, trying to figure out what this was all about. And so I have documentation on all of it. Well, when Trump, you know, did his announcement that these multinational corporations are going to be investing in the United States, allegedly. And one of those was Tim Cook of Apple. Well, the thing to know about companies that moved over to China to do business is that China requires that the Chinese government owns a percentage of the corporation. And so at this point, Apple is a communist Chinese corporation. In all the research that I did on China, what I found is that China runs a big con game. They promise economic development, they deliver buy-offs to local officials, but they never deliver on jobs. They just deliver on fleecing our country. you know, when Trump announced Tim Cook and Apple were going to be investing in this country. And there were also several other CEOs that also supposedly are reinvesting in this country. I thought, here we go again. This is another communist Chinese con game, but at a higher level than I saw it in Idaho. And so I don't know if you noticed on one of the Trump press conferences, but he equivocated by saying that they're promising this development, but it will be over several years. Well, you know, I've seen this movie before. It happened with a company called Foxconn. in, I forget what the state was, but this company from China called Foxconn was supposed to be moving in and they were given land and all kinds of perks and benefits. Well, it never happened. Never happened. So I think that that's what is going to happen with Trump's initiative. So what I've been doing is trying to gather together all the research that I did on China back in two thousand and ten and put it together so that people can see, you know, almost like step by step how we uncovered piece by piece what this whole structure is and how they divided our country into one country, two systems. And we, you and I are not part of the system that counts. Yeah. So I filed this. So this is the, this is the copy that I filed. So we do have a case number and a judge assigned to us already. So complaint for emergency injunctive relief, now comes plaintiff Donna Brandenburg, resident, affected upstream property owner, upland wetland custodian in Byron Township, because I own part of the wetlands, plaintiff pro se MCR two point two oh one MCR two point one one seven and file this complaint for emergency injunctive relief against defendant Byron Township and states as follows. So this is this is basically we're trying we're asking the township to stop. And I expected that we were going to also amend the complaint probably a bunch of times. And I'm getting really kind of having a good time with us. We're getting pretty good at being able to go in this direction. And I've got two different teams of people that are reviewing for me. So it's kind of fun. Well, if you look in the private chat thing, I reposted that Nestle water resource, Global Compact. You really need to read that and understand that because Nestle is working for the U.N. and they're stealing your water for the U.N. You bet they are so they can sell it back to us and turn it off if one area gets out of control. Did you know that Byron Township only holds about four million and change gallons of water and they pumped three hundred million out of this area in about two weeks? Think about this. More than three hundred million. And so, I mean, think about this. Why in the heck do we need municipal water if we're pumping that much groundwater out of the ground? It doesn't make any sense other than the fact that they're going to take our water and try to sell it back to us. They do, but they have to clean it and they have to dispose of it, of the wastewater. They're poisoning it with fluoride and all the other stuff. Send it back to us to poison us. The groundwater was good here. I mean, most of us in the area where I am are on well and septic. You can't have a housing development with wells. Right, but that's the point. If they didn't do these big developments and they let people, just people build houses, problem solved. Well, I think it's a little more complicated than that. But you know what I mean. It's like they're profiting off the development, taking the water. So, okay, we got to put in water and sewer because we want to pack the houses in. And by the way, I think all of us are getting at least three calls, sometimes two calls a day, people wanting to buy our property. It's obnoxious. They're doing that all over the country. And guess who? They are just fronts for the communist Chinese. At some point, you know, the Chinese are just going to... Did you ever read The Good Earth? No. What's her name? Anyway, I read it when I was a kid. And what ends up happening is that China takes over our country and basically everybody becomes a peasant. Well, we're on our way. You bet we are. And you want to know who is at the top of the food chain here in Michigan or one of the tops? It's Amway Global. They were breaking into China and moving. Look at the Belt and Road Initiative with Eric Prince. That's Betsy's brother. Yeah, well, yeah. But let me tell you this. They announced the Belt and Road Initiative. in twenty thirteen. Right. But but they they began the global transportation system, which is really a global Silk Road in nineteen ninety is when the legislation was passed in the United States changing the Department of Transportation to include all forms of transportation. So that included maritime, airports, highways, all of it, all forms of transportation under one transportation department. And it was that way, that was the way that they could design and build this integrated system of transportation that is in fact, global uh transportation system now where it really starts for um the united states is in when mexico made a deal with china for two ports in southern mexico and um the plan was to come up from southern well to have shipping ships come from uh the uh Shanghai, the Asian Pacific nations to come in to those two ports in Mexico, then come up through Mexico into the United States, arriving at Kansas City. Wow. Well, they're not letting me post in the chat. Somebody asked me about it if I was going to be at meetings, and I'm with the four o'clock meeting is a sell job. That's all it is. It's selling people to shut up. Yeah. Don't ever shut up. Yeah. Don't shut up. They're trying to shut us up and it's going to be a sell job, which includes the attorneys and the, and the, you know, the, The engineers, the contractors, all that sort of thing, they're going to sell us. And you know what? They've got a problem because those of us who are pretty educated on what's going on here, I'm not saying we know everything on this situation because it's so convoluted and such. But there's a lot of questions that have to be asked. It's selling us to say, you know, this is going to be good for you. It's going to be good for this area. Sure it is. It's good for their freaking pocketbooks. Theirs, not yours. Not ours. They're going to turn us, as you said, they're trying to turn us into peasants. And if you're a good little boy and girl, you can work for one of their NGOs. Until they're done with you. And then guess what's going to happen? I would keep an eye open for boxcars. Well, what they'll do, even if you work for them, at some point, And you can't help doing this if you're a person who has a brain. You ask the wrong question and, boy, you become persona non grata. And they make you a non-person. Non-person. Oh, Daniel's coming on today. That's cool. Hey, Daniel. I'm glad you're here. I'm sorry I didn't let you guys know last night. I was so tied up in this legal stuff that by the end of the day yesterday, because it was going over the complaints and the orders and all of this stuff, and I've got a bunch of friends that we were talking all day about how to attack this in a very constitutional way. And, uh, you know, it's, it's, it's going to go to Rico. I can tell you that. Good. Good. Um, before I go take a look at, I just posted a link in the chat and, um, I had this up before, didn't I? Uh, Yeah, not that one. Yeah, you did. Last week I gave it to you, but you said you didn't read it. So I put it up again because Nestle, who is stealing your water, is working for the UN. Sure they are. It's all the globalist economy. I mean, it's a freaking crime syndicate. Absolutely it is a crime syndicate. Okay, take a look at this other link. And guess what? The township, the township guys bought right into it. Are they guilty? Hell yes. They're guilty. They're getting paid off. You bet they are. Yep. I agree with that. That's what I've been saying all along. I'm like, somebody is getting a payback on this whole thing all the way from the top to the bottom. They're all getting a payoff. Yeah. Okay, so here's the transportation system they had planned coming from Asia to those ports in Mexico and then up into the United States. And that entire system is technology driven. So that's where you get your global, your Panopticon your global technocratic tyranny and the technocratic tyranny in our own country. Right. And I don't know if anybody knows that, but they've already got it developed because I actually have been working with some people in Alberta. And I was kind of like a liaison between them and the Trump administration. And they're talking about but it's not just there. There's several people have been talking about talking to across this whole northern border, especially the Great Lakes area there and upper Wisconsin, Minnesota, all that whole area there. And I expect that it's probably going through Wyoming, too. But if you come right up here, you're missing the mountains. So it's a straight shot. they're talking about the fact that they're seeing a lot of Saudis that literally can cross the border because there's no border control in Canada. And they'll go in there with trucks. And then they just go kind of off road for a little bit. They're in the country. When they started allowing foreign direct investment, I first found out about it with China. But if you remember, in nine eleven, who was in Florida, it was Saudis. It was the bin Laden family. So when they opened up our country for foreign direct investment, that meant any damn country in the world, any country. So that's why you have Saudis in this country. Actual countries investing in our country. Foreign direct investment. Yeah, they've chopped the United States up into their way of managing their little corporatocracy and their money making, their racketeering they've got going on. It is racketeering. It's total racketeering. Yep. Okay, now if you look at this pnwer.org and look at that logo. A bunch of Satanists too, I'm going to tell you what. Definitely. Okay, click on the history or about us and click on history. So here's another thing that was brought to my attention that I'm going to talk more about. The fact that somehow Hillsdale, Michigan, which is tied into the DeVosses because the DeVosses are funding the Heritage Foundation as well as Hillsdale College and such, it seems to be a big deal. And I'm going to be talking about this more because there are – child remains in certain areas. And Anton LaVey was extraordinarily active in Hillsdale County. You don't believe that these people are Satanists and what they're really involved in besides the money. Okay. Besides that, this is so much deeper than what people can assume. And I believe he, at the moment of dying, who was the founder of the church of Satan and the person that told me this, knew people who actually knew and saw what was going on in that area. And they were, he was walking the beaches trying to get converts down there. And also at the moment he died, he started, I guess, screaming and yelling, no, no, something is terribly wrong. Something is terribly wrong. Well, yeah, you're going to follow Satan. Guess what's going to happen. It's probably not going to be a good moment when you pass on. I'm just going to come right out and say it. You, you, uh, They have come at us through similar means to the corporatocracy to get God out of our nation and install their satanic rituals and abuse. Yeah. Well, to break our nation, they had to divide us culturally, politically, on religious grounds, any way that they possibly could. The idea, divide the people and break up the country. Same thing they're doing in Byron Township here. Oh, this doesn't apply to you. And you know what? If you guys can indulge me a minute, I want to show you the letter that they sent out. And not everybody got this letter. It's a CYA letter from Peggy Sattler that talks about this doesn't apply to you. Hang on a minute. I'm going to go get this because you guys are going to we've got to get this stuff out out of. out in front of people. You can keep talking if you would, please. Okay. Yeah. Well, that map that is showing on the screen is that's the Pacific Northwest Economic Region. And you'll notice it includes the Canadian provinces right above the United States. Well, they're breaking up the United States into economic regions. And that's what Donna and the people of Michigan are dealing with. I forget, she told me what the new name was for the Great Lakes region. Whatever area you're in, you think you're living in a state. Well, no, you're living in a region because they are building a common market. which is the same organizational structure as they have over in Europe. That's what the European Union is. Absolutely. It was a test ground. And just so everybody knows, Daniel's going to be on in a minute. So this is their plan and this is their system that's overlaid the Republic. Okay. So everybody has to understand that this is not a hopeless situation at this point in time at all. It's that we've got to get back to the Constitutional Republic and absolutely annihilate their abilities to do this. So this is the letter from Byron Township, okay? Peggy Sattler sent this out. I believe it's like the township board. Oh, it's by the township board. Okay. So here we go. And Angie Vander Ploeg is on here who is the water and sewer administrator and was telling everybody when they called into the township, oh, there's no problem with water here. Because, you know, people that listen to the show, they were calling and wanting answers because they knew that my well went dry. Oh, we have, there's no problem with water here. I'm like, okay. I think that's a direct lie because they knew it and they knew that there was a problem with water because I've been talking to Tom Hooker, et cetera, who is a supervisor. And so there's no way they couldn't have known this. Okay. Dear Byron Township resident, after several decades of growth in Byron Township, the public utility system needs additional capacity to continue to provide adequate, safe, and efficient conveyance of sewage from the township. No, they are making an excuse, and it says right on the website, and I've got it documented, that it's in order to prioritize development. This is planned to be accomplished. They never mention this. By extension of the trunk sewer of the northwest area of the township. The new trunk sewer will provide relief to the existing Goose Creek trunk sewer, which is near capacity due to its growth. I'm not sure that this is even absolutely applicable because this isn't even the project that they're doing right here, but I digress. It's a diversion. It's a diversion. The township would like to invite you to an open house at the township offices. from five forty five to seven p.m. on August eleven, where you will be able to ask questions, see the proposal of the truck sewer and review the proposed schedule of construction. You know what? They didn't notify any of us of this. No one received notice of this project until the truck started rolling. And then they were telling us that we had to hook up. As you may know, phase two of the project is under construction and phase three is planned to begin September of twenty twenty six. The township's water and sewer ordinance Ordinances are not law, just so you know, especially when it gets into private property rights, which is exactly what they did, does not require immediate connection to the sewer line or payment of fees. The connection is only required if a septic system fails And the principal residence is within twenty two hundred feet distance of the sewer easement or the right away. They can't do that. It's your private property. They can't require you to pay. They cannot require you to hook up. This is all bullshit. And it's it's you. It's it's complete and utter bullshit. Intimidation like that works, though, because people don't. They don't know the law. They don't understand the law. They don't understand how to fight the administrative system. Right. Available is defined. Okay, let's see. If the sewer is available to the residents, available is defined as direct access to the sewer without needing to cross a private property to get to the sewer line. The connection requirements come from public access to the sewer line. These connection requirements are also included in the township's water and sewer ordinance, says it twice again. We've included a map of the property owners who are within the boundaries of the new sewer line and or within two hundred feet distances explained. You know what? Tell them to freaking pound sand. If you've got water and sewer, that's a fight worth fighting. because they can't tell you what to do on your property. What they will do, though, is that they will put a lien on your property. No, they won't. Not on mine, they won't, because I'm going to sue them into oblivion here as a constitutional issue. You guys go back to private property rights and there you go. It's like when I started writing their little paper here to help them understand where they're breaking the law. Byron Township, Michigan has imposed a special assessment on homeowners, including myself. And guess what? It's they can say that you're not required until, but that's still entering into contract on our private property. To fund a sewer line installation under the street in front of our properties, the stated purpose is to enable future development down the road, not to address any immediate need of the current residents. As a property owner with fully functioning well and septic, we receive no direct benefit from this infrastructure and it doesn't even enhance our property. But more than that, they can't tell you what to do on your property. And this gets into the takings clause and, and many other things. And they want us to fund their fricking project to enable their development. And they're all involved on it because the board is all full of developers, assessors, or realtors. It's incredible. And there's one guy from the fire department that's on there. I'm like, you can't make this crap up. What is the fire department is connected into nine one one. Remember I was telling you, they start this with the nine one one system. And AT&T, I'm going to bring Daniel in a second. Don't leave a minute, Vicki, because we're going to just talk about AT&T captured the nine one one system. Well, I think they actually started it. It was started in nineteen sixty one or sixty seven. I forget which. But the nine the nine one one system actually is part of the transportation system. And the same with hospital emergency rooms. Right. Hospital emergency rooms are separate from the hospital itself. Right. But do you think that if something happened to Donna Brandenburg that I would get any assistance? Hell no. No, hell no. Well, they'll come pick you up and take you to the hospital. Probably kill me on the way. You know, it's like it's hard to tell. This is like straight up mafia crap going on here. It truly is. It really is. I swear to God, it truly is. Yep. So any, any last words? Welcome, Daniel. Thanks for jumping on this morning. I want to hear, I know that you put your, you put your, the next step out there for me to read and such. And I've been so busy with my own. I haven't been able to read anything that you guys have sent me just because literally last night I hit the wall. I was like, I have to stop. I was going to do a couple of other things and I'm like, no, this is going to be a night where I need to sit down and rest a little bit. Generally I have, unlimited energy. But last night, I was tired. And it's been so freaking hot up here. And guess what? They're pumping this water during a... It's kind of a drought situation here. And they did all their samples during drought times to be able to say, look, the wetlands are dry as they drain the rest of them. I hate these people. It's amazing, isn't it? What a racket. So... How do you like your service provider? Do you know that you're no longer a citizen, you're a customer? Ricoh for revenue. Yes, the whole entire thing is racketeering, and all the corporations, the townships, the counties, the states, they're all part of it. And as Vicki said, they're all working for the UN. That's the way it is. And anybody that's taken a payment for this is guilty. If somebody sells their land to one of these developers, they're part of the problem. They've profited off of this. No, no escape. This, the accountability has got to come. You know, every time I join you on Monday mornings and I listen to what Vicki has uncovered and I just shake my head in not disbelief at all. I'm no longer shocked by any of this, right? Because I've been at this too long to be shocked. I'm just shocked that it's taken our society as long as it has to have more people awake and pissed off about what's going on. Oh, and you know what? The township supervisor's wife said to me when our well went dry, she's like, no, no, you know, you want to be the hero here. You want to be, you know, make sure you come off as a hero. I'm like, hero? I'm like, I'm pissed off. They ruined water. We had no water to the house. And she's telling me to be calm about this. Are you totally kidding me? So we built this billboard. And I'm going to be riding around with this to let people know that, in fact, they ruined my well, including pumping over three million gallons out of the wetlands in our area. So this is going to hit the road, guys. It's going to be amazing. And then I wanted to show you some other stuff that I have here that I posted. This is... This is a calculation, Karen the River to put this out there, of what they took out of the area. And hang on, I want to show you, I want to get back to the, oh, this is me filing the injunction. I've been doing videos. That little stream is completely dry and that's uplands near where I live as custodian of the wetlands up here. I'm out here at Water Wars, the scene of the crime. And something else came up just now as I was talking to somebody that was in the engineering company that has engineered this disaster area out here, is that while we were told by the Township Council, Peggy Sattler specifically, and the rest of them, that this was going to be just sanitary sewer, or that it was going to be sewer and water. Well, guess what? I guess it's just sanitary sewer at this point in time. So they can't even get their facts straight. And when I talked to the Drain Commission yesterday, a gentleman named Joel Morgan, he said he had no idea of these casements that are going in the ground, forty feet. He goes, that doesn't make any sense to me at all. I said, why don't you come out here and look at this a minute? You might want to get your eyes on this. he said he declined to do a problem with that. Um, road commission came out there are so many differen have been done here bette say are part of this water syndicate that's going on putting their piles of materials on the road, nothing to control it on the backside, dumping down the bank right into the city or the county drain and or Rush Creek. And I noticed over here, we've got, once again, this is the caliber of the contractor and such we've got like trash that's just like thrown out of the truck windows and such but the good thing is is the what the fuel tanks that are over here that were scattered all over the right away on forks of skid loaders and such have been put in a nice little nice little neat area here so something tells me that our our bringing this to everybody's attention is maybe getting people's behavior to improve we'll see So this is how much water that they, this is one of the areas that they're doing one million gallons an hour. An hour. That's how their pumps were rated, and they had nine of the pumps out here. And then look at this. They dumped all of their materials right on the road. There's no barricades between that and the stream, and it's literally dumping down the bank. When Donna Brandenburg is here and taping, it's apparently a big problem. So, you know, there's the soil piles without any barricades. So who'd you piss off? Who'd I piss off? Yeah. Pretty much everybody. So the contractor, actually, it could be recorded as assault, actually, went and got a sweep. And one of my friends, he's a Green Beret, and I were standing there kind of like recording and taping and such. And I generally take somebody with me. And so we were there, and the contractor, which is the contracting firm that's out there, who has basically threatened me. I've been out there. He'll sit there and beep the horn to shut up the videos and override the videos and such. He has basically said, you need a hard hit vest out here. And I'm like, there's a jogger that just drove or ran past, and you're telling me I need a vest and a hard hit for standing on the road? Those rules apply to him, not to you. That's right. And that's what I'm like, I don't fricking work for you. And I own a construction company, not one that would do this kind of work. We do a different, but I know all the rules and we're much more regulated. These people aren't regulated at all. They fricking show up and cowboy up. And you know, they only had one bid on this project, one fricking bid. That's not a bid. That's a favor. Can't say it enough, right? Yeah, I'm going to continue on this path here because we got to have a little accountability. This is amazing. So anyhow, what are we talking about today, Daniel? Saturday, I filed my appeal to the state Supreme Court. There are ten questions. I wish I had less questions for the court. I wish this was not so many violations of my rights. But I have – here, I'll pull it up. And too many open windows, right? Yeah, I get that. So. You know, half as a pro se litigant for me, I'm getting to be older in my years here, and I was not raised with technology. When I was in junior high school, I took the typing class. I thought somehow, you know, being able to type on a keyboard may be beneficial to me. But that was a typewriter, a far cry from it. Did you take typing in high school? In junior high. In junior high. Yeah, I took typing two, two semesters of it. Hang on. And that was business communication also. So, um, when, when you bring up the fact that we are both pro se litigants, there's a lot of people out there that are like, you shouldn't go in pro se. Some will say sui jura, some, some people will say, you know, as a man or the woman on the land or something like that. But I, I, I'm kind of liking this process quite honestly. of figuring things out, learning differences, and becoming more educated on all the ways to hold them accountable. Quite honestly, everything that I've done pro se, they don't even know what to do with it. Right. That equals winning. Well, as far as the pro se argument versus sui juris and so on, and many of these... Yeah, all of this is... You know, Satan uses a little bit of truth in everything, doesn't he? Yep. And so the problem with it is I'm watching someone here locally go to jail here. He's going to go to jail here shortly by marching down this road thinking he's a hero about this whole sovereign citizen movement, thinking that somehow that... The part I can't get through to him and others like him are, it doesn't matter whether you're right or wrong or whether the words you use. So many of these people have advocated for years that there's a Shangri-La. There's a magic words and magic things that you can say and that certain things are going to make things correct. And the fact of the matter is, no, it doesn't matter. It's all corrupt. Are you kidding me? Top to bottom. So we're way beyond that. We're way beyond. My suit, and you're about to hear it here momentarily, is all about the fact that we have lost control over our functioning state governments. Just completely lost. They're run amok. The courts are out of control. This judge that I'm about to talk about should be disbarred immediately. And there should be no such thing as a Democrat judge or a Republican judge. Right. More importantly, the Democrat judge of the worst. How can you claim to have a degree from a law school and be a Democrat? Right. It defies logic. It means that the law school completely failed. The fact of the matter is we are a society based on the English common law as it was brought here and adopted and made its own and with it its own flawed human modification to it ever since. It started right away. It didn't start just in the last century. It started, look at the Alien and Sedition Act calling John Adams fat, right? He had a reporter arrested for it. And, you know, there was just, again, it was a new paradigm. They were leaving the monarchy type rules. of establishing the laws of the land from a monarch's perspective to sovereignty of the people, the people would be... And that's what I wanted to share with you this morning is I've been asked to address a local group of people over citizenship. What are your rights and what are your responsibilities? Because it's a two-edged thing and we'll be getting into that in a minute. People don't even realize how far we have fallen that we don't even know what it's supposed to look like. And when you tell people, they can't even leave the brain or the mind farm that they've been confined to by these very people who are literally destroying them. It's like Stockholm syndrome almost. They can't get their brain out of the fact that this is not right or normal. And it's really sad because they've trusted those people that have been imprisoned them. And we're going to have to get off of this entire thing. One more thing I want to make sure as we're talking about the judicial system, the judicial system has nothing to do with justice. It's a bank. It is absolutely a bank. And they're taking, if you really want to distill it down to the core of what we're seeing, it's a bank. Right. Right. Well, government, what is government all about? Government is about regulating commerce, about establishing, I've said it before, I'll say it again. The great Milton Friedman detailed this in a very simplistic way. He said, government should do four things. One, it should wage war on behalf and deal with all of the security needs of a nation. Two, that it should protect one citizen from another or one citizen from a group of citizens. And the reason it doesn't do such a good job at that is because it spends too much time doing all kinds of other things it ought not be doing. And I say that because the people haven't given state actors and state agencies permission to do all of the things it currently does. that we the people never authorized but I digress number three number three is to set the rules of the game what is the game commerce Private property and commerce. What is the public domain? Commerce. Why do you think in the federal courts, judiciary, the federal judiciary, anyone who's going to the federal court, what is it all about? It's all about commerce. How can I say that definitively? Let me read to you what it says here in the judicial power. It says, the judicial power shall extend in all cases in law and equity arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States and the treaties made or which shall be made under the authority to all cases affecting ambassadors or other ministers and consuls. There's a semicolon, dash, dash, to all cases of admiralty maritime jurisdiction. Now that's very specific and it has a very specific meaning in seventeen eighty eight when this was written. And what does that mean? That means the law of commerce, the law of the sea. Right. Why? Why did we create the federal government? Right. Again, back to four things to wage war on our behalf, to negotiate treaties for our common defense and commerce. Three to regulate commerce between countries. between the Indian tribes, and then provide courts of law to settle those. And that's the fourth thing here, to settle those disputes. So this is why your state government, I know here in New Hampshire, is the creation of a body politic. It's not a corporation. It's not a body corporate. It's given the authority to create corporations and to regulate commerce. And one of those entities being commercial is the government that it creates. Because it has to be in order to do the people's business. What is the people's business, right? To be able to collect taxes, to spend those taxes, and to be able to enforce the first two, right? So, That's why when you drive around, I know here in New Hampshire, because we're so old, you drive around, it says such and such community was established in the year. It was incorporated in the year such and such. Why was that? Because your counties, your towns and municipalities and cities and the federal government are all corporations. They're all corporations to do the people's business. The problem arises is that the federal government has so far gone beyond the pale of interfering with the states. It's destroyed the sovereignty of the states. The balance of power created by the founding documents are completely broken. And this is why you see all of the abuses I hear every time I show up on a Monday and I listen to, you know, the discoveries, um, You know, when I'm not on your podcast, I hear it locally, right? So, you know, we're in two different states, but I could assure you that the grievances that you share on your podcast from your home state are the same problems going on coast to coast. Well, look at what Gates is doing. Look at what Gates is doing. Gates is buying up land over the aquifers and kicking the people out. I went to a meeting this past week in Hillsdale. I was speaking in Hillsdale on the seventh. with an interesting group of people, let's put it that way, not associated with Hillsdale College or anything like that. They're pretty much not a fan of any of that nonsense down there. And I was driving through the farmland and what I saw is almost exclusively big corporate farming operations. And it was a long stretch. I should go back and drive it again just to see and be able to show people what I was seeing there. There wasn't a house for miles and miles and miles. And if there were old farmsteads or old houses there, they were in the process of being torn down. Right. Kicking people off the land. And this is all a globalist takeover. Oh, yeah. Yeah. We've been sold down the river. We've been sold down the river a long time ago. And the biggest problem we have, I would argue, the number one problem we have is our education system has been hijacked so that they can indoctrinate young people into the Democrat Party we have today. Well, I'm going to extend the Republican Party, too, because they're all in it together. I mean, the mechanism is the uniparty that's taking everyone hostage. No, no, I don't disagree with that at all. But at the school level, right, at the school level, you're not getting a Republican flavor on the schools at all. It's purely a democratic socialist indoctrination system. The two-party system is what happens when they become adults, right? They get lured to one side of the other as if either one of them is going to solve their problems. But I digress. Let me take you back to my appeal here. So for your audience, if you bring a case in the courts, here we start at a superior court level. It is a trial court of general jurisdiction. And that's where you initially seek redress of your grievances through the legal process. Those of anyone who's been following me for a while will know that I've done this on purpose to prove that writer revolution can begin because writer revolution specifically says that when all effective means of redress are no longer effectual, the people have a right and they ought to reform the old or start anew. And so that meant for me that I knew that no one had gone through the process of actually filing suit in the state courts to comply government accountability. My first one was to write a redress of grievance to the state legislature because we have a constitutional right to petition our legislature or to remonstrate its actions. And that was my first suit. And I came away from that suit. That was my first trip to the state Supreme Court. I came away with that suit with the Supreme Court not wanting to make a final decision and ultimately saying that the arguments placed before the legislature were political in nature. And therefore, it didn't have the jurisdiction to compel the legislature to hear my grievance. Well, guess what my grievance was? What's that? The selection law case. Yes. I'm going to let you continue on this because I already know the answer to this, but just go ahead. Yeah, yeah. So it was the selection law case. It was the legislature exercising power that we the people didn't give it by changing the nature. Imagine the employees changing the rules as to how they get reelected. That's what I was complaining about. That's really the substance of my lawsuit is that our elected officials don't have the jurisdiction or the authority because the people collectively are sovereign. Only the people are the author of the state constitution and only the people can change the document. So that's why understanding your state constitution is so important because only All power emanates from that basic tenet. Your state constitution is a social compact. Let me prove it to you. John Adams famously wrote the Massachusetts Constitution, and in the preamble, it explains exactly what our functioning state government ought to be. The body, quote, the body politic. Remember I said it's a political body. It's made up of flesh and blood, human beings. The body politic is formed by voluntary association of individuals, semicolon. It is a social compact by which the whole people covenants with each citizen and each citizen with the whole people that all shall be governed by certain laws for the common good. It is the duty of the people, therefore, in framing a constitution of government to provide for an equitable mode of making laws, as well as the impartial interpretation and faithful execution of them, that every man may at all times find security in them. Pretty simple and quite eloquent, right? That's Mr. Adams. That is the basis by which this social contract is put together. So if you agree to pay your fair share of the taxes and in that social contract, you are protected by what? A bill of rights that the government that you hire, that you vote for, that when you hire them, there's an agreement here. Here in New Hampshire, that meant there were thirty eight contractual terms to the contract. You've been on this planet long enough. The basic tenets of contract law are what? Offer, acceptance, and consideration. I've said it many times. I've quoted Article XII many times on this podcast, and it's worth repeating. Every member of the community has a right to be protected by it in the enjoyment of his life, liberty, and property. He's therefore bound to contribute his share in the expense of such protection and to yield his personal service when necessary or an equivalent. That's our state takings clause right there. Government just can't create new laws and new taxes and just create more government without your permission. That's what it's saying. You're doing it all over the place. Right, and it's because they're ignoring this basic tenet of the basis of the social contract. And by the way, this goes to the heart of your standing argument. If you are in a contractual relationship, and the second part is about to make the point that if the government does what? creates new government agencies and creates new taxes that you didn't, the people did not permit. What are you doing? Are you or are you not in breach of contract? Are we in commerce? You are. You're dealing with a corporation. Why? Because who are most of the entities that you're suing? They've all, they're all corporate. They're all in commerce. Absolutely. So how do you have standing in commerce? You have to have, you have to point to what a contract is. Now you follow me? Yes. You have to point out where's the contract? Because if you can prove breach of contract, you have standing. How are you? That's what I've been saying all along. And like my report, when I was trying to educate these bozos on the, on the boards is that this is contractual duress, right? All of it. They entered into contract. There's no, there's no contract. I didn't sign anything. So I don't have to do anything about this. And now that's what they literally, in a way it's a, it's, it's violence of takings clause. But think about this. I never gave him the power of attorney, which they exercised to do anything on my behalf. Right? I mean, the whole thing is just a complete and utter shame, right? It's a sham. It's a scam. It's a, it's a con. That's an understatement. That's an understatement. And Donna, how did they get away with it? Because nobody does anything. You know who's responsible for that in New Hampshire? Who's that? The State Bar Association and the State Supreme Court. They are directly responsible for the education system we have going on right now that has stripped the voters and the people's knowledge of the basic curriculum of state civics. Even all the judges in the court. The reason people think I'm smart is because I took the time to study a subject that no one's teaching anymore. The state constitution is in the archives. Right. They use it in conversation as if they actually read the document. They haven't. It's a marketing tool for them. That's it. It's a marketing tool, but they neither follow it nor do they know it. Well, it's more than that. It's more than that because it's the basis of their authority by which they derive judicial opinions. And those judicial opinions become common law. In other words, precedent. And this is how we are controlled by the Black Robe Society. And this is what's wrong and broken because We specifically gave up our right in New Hampshire to have legislative oversight over how the judiciary functions in the courts. Now, we're seeing the same thing at the federal level right now, where you saw all of these attacks against Trump by federal district judges throughout the United States to impede Trump's executive powers. What was the legal advice given over and over and over again? That the Congress has constitutional jurisdiction over the courts. Why? Because the Congress created the courts, the federal courts, other than the Supreme Court. The Congress under Article III creates federal district courts in every district throughout the United States to do what? To provide a place where disputes over international commerce can be adjudicated. But those are for what? Admiralty maritime jurisdiction. They are not there to adjudicate the president's executive powers. And so the point made by many legal scholars and analysts on all the news media is the truth on this subject matter, which is the Congress can simply strip the court of its bad behavior or nullify its existence and repanel the court. New Hampshire surrendered the power to do that in. I bet your state did too. I think we were done. Nineteen sixty three. So this is this is how you have. So what happened, what happened along the way is that they go to law school. They learn the system taught by the law school, which is you follow precedent of the court unless. And this is a big problem, too. Unless you can prove, this is what hurts lawyers and why our legal society must change or the function of how our justice system changes. Because under the ethics rules for lawyers, they are all duty bound to ensure that they don't bring fraudulent or illegal cases purely for harassment purposes that have no chance of winning, and this rule is a problem, that you are not to be challenging precedent unless there's overwhelming evidence that the precedent was in fact wrong. You have to have a good case. So What they're not teaching in law school in New Hampshire is the fundamental principles I've been teaching on your podcast every time I come on. These things are not being taught in our state university because the lawyers are all taught in law school that you are to rely on the interpretations of the Supreme Court. What did the court say about it last time? Period. Period. For example, voting machines. They said you have no constitutional right to a hand count. Well, exactly how do a hundred and three towns in the state of New Hampshire hand count ballots if they have no constitutional right to a hand count? And how did they count ballots from seventeen eighty three all the way and to sixteen twenty when they first started voting after they settled the land here, even under colonial rule? Right. How did they cast their ballots and who counted them? Human beings. How did they do it? By hand. Right? It's absurd. But the court, in order to protect the bad faith actions, parsed the words. And so now they've been running around saying that we can continue to use voting machines because we have no constitutional right to have our vote hand counted. The fact that the moderator is instructed to sort and count doesn't specify how he's to sort and count. Well, if you apply original application of the intent, what did it mean in seventeen eighty four? There wasn't any electricity. There wasn't any capacity for more than two hundred years to do anything. Then to do what? Count by hand. And it's more than that. It's because we have a social compact. We have three constitutional officers, a moderator who's in charge of the election process at the local level, a selectman and a town clerk whose duty it is to do what? I witnessed the moderator sort and count the votes. Why? Because who gets to testify in a court of law? Who gets to swear an affidavit that the moderator did the job correctly? Can a computer do that? Can a computer swear that something is true in a court of law? No. No. Well, why do you think the founding fathers were smart enough under contract law principles? Because they were writing what? A written constitution that would apply equally to everybody. So if you're going to surrender up some of your rights and let your fellow man, your fellow citizens who are going to be elected to perform a constitutional duty to sort and count the votes, and there would be eyewitnesses to ensure the accuracy of the count. Don't you think that's a critical part of the entire process? They've gotten so far away from the way it's supposed to work, it's not even funny. Right. So this is one of the simple, simple common law issues that the court overlooked to justify and protect the institution. The institution has been committing this fraud since nineteen seventy nine. No one has been lawfully elected in the state since nineteen seventy nine. And I have these people by the short hairs and they don't like it. Well, your command of the subject matter is just amazing. I can't even imagine how many hours you put into this over the decades that you've studied it. Well, that's where I have them at a disadvantage because this is- They don't know it, you do. Right, right. And that's exactly why, look, they went after a sitting Supreme Court judge, but I digress. I'm going to move over to- I'm going to move over to the chat. The chat's really active today, by the way. I've been trying to read the chat as well as listening to you. It doesn't always work well. But Denise says the lawyers in our areas have lists of recommended assisted living and nursing homes that they must be getting kickbacks from. And how about the fire department displacing elderly that fall three times? They keep track and then try to get them to assisted living. A total operation with the assisted living place is going on. Curtis is over here commenting. So has Cher and Karen. Lots and lots of comments. So continue to go. I don't want to interrupt you. So anyway, these are the basis of the several questions. There's ten questions. That's why I appealed my case. So the case began in twenty twenty two. I filed the case in Superior Court. The trial judge, the state sent the heavy hitters since five lawyers to take me on. and um we had a hearing on emergency basis over the safety of the voting machines because they modified the voting machines without uh the proper process of safety certifying uh most people don't know this but you have the protections you've heard of the united laboratories as a certifying entity for all devices sold in the open market right refrigerators and hair dryers and so on, right? You know what a UL safety certification is, right? So the voting machines had them attached to them as well. And when the state decided that it was going to remove the modems off the motherboards so that the voting machines, the Dominion voting machines couldn't be accessed from the internet, They did so by using unauthorized technicians and they weren't sent back to the factories and the factories did not resubmit new modified machines to make sure these new modified machines were safe to use. You like that hook? Well, I was actually on a team that found where the machines were attaching to the internet every fifteen minutes. And you know how we found it? We found it by looking at rural areas that didn't have good Wi-Fi and it kept returning error messages. Well, what you find nationwide is that each state, because it has different laws and slightly different forms of function, that each state had its own problems that were attacked by design. In other words, there was a tremendous amount of strategic work reconnaissance done at the vulnerabilities of the election processes in each of the fifty states, and they were all attacked based on their individual weaknesses. That's why it was such a difficult project in the twenty twenty. You had fifteen different results, excuse me, fifty different states. and therefore the manner in which they were going after them was different. What I found problematic for me was that I was right on the safety issue. The problem is I couldn't prove how I was physically injured by the machine. So I was given an emergency hearing, and I used that to point out, look, it's not only that they're unsafe, but they're also unconstitutional. So that's how my litigation began because there were two things that affect and one brought me the emergency status. So I had an expert witness to get me into court on an emergency basis to put the voting machines and go to hand counting to get through the election until we figure out the legal problems here. But I got shot down. They sent in the heavy guns. And so I tried to amend my complaint as the case after the emergency hearing because they denied my expert witness. And so it was all a legal strategy to simply obstruct the due process I was entitled to. So I would ultimately lose and file an appeal to the New Hampshire Supreme Court. That process played itself out more than eighteen months ago. I filed an appeal. It went to oral arguments. So in uh... twenty twenty four uh... in twenty twenty three I had oral arguments november twenty ninth or uh... and I prevailed uh... I was able to overturn the lower court the state supreme court found that I had in fact standing in five areas of my complaint and issued a remand order and sent it back to the trial court for a hearing on the merits Because during the hit job by the trial court and the state, the corrupt AG's office, they went ahead and refused to answer all of the federal questions, as well as to answer the state constitutional questions in a righteous manner. In other words, what we got was sophistry right there. They make a bullshit argument and call it good. Meanwhile, they know that they're controlling the court and the outcomes. I'm just a thorn in their side because who am I? I'm just a pro se litigant. I'm not going to get anywhere. They're just going to wear me down. That's the tactic they employ, not only to pro se litigants, but to people who pay. Because, see, they want to make sure that this costs you a lot of money. They don't want it to be free, quick, and a quick due process, right? Justice delayed is justice denied. And that tactic is well at hand in my case. And so we'll get to that in a moment. So anyway, I would prevail. I'd go back to the trial court. Well, the trial court judge, and that's what I'm about to share with you. I'm not going to read you the brief. I'm just going to cover the ten questions that were raised on appeal. And that issue gets to the heart of dirty pool, right? So now I've got the judge doing the dirty business, and he's completely ignoring the law, the federal law, the Constitution, and so on and so forth. It's just blatant, right? And so let me get to the nature of the case. This appeal arises from trial court Judge Ruoff's final decision, which dismissed my claims challenging the defendant's election practices, including the establishment of different practices and procedures statewide, the unequal use of voting machines statewide, the use of unverified absentee ballots, non-uniform voting procedures, and ultra-virus actions of the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission for federal elections. I allege that these practices constitute criminal conduct under state election laws, and I cite them, prohibiting willful interference with voting rights, official malfeasance, and official misconduct. and violations of federal election laws by applying different standards, practices, or procedures, different from standard practices and procedures applied under such law or other individuals within the same county, parish, or similar political subdivision of the state. And I cite the federal law. What's going on is that when they put voting machines into use in nineteen seventy nine, they made it a discretionary use at the local level. The problem is the local town in a Dillon Rule state can't make election law. They can't choose to change the manner in which the Constitution prescribes that the moderator shall sort and count the votes. So they left it to the towns and this ballot law commission to authorize the rules and the machines. So that's what I'm pointing out here. And anyway, it prohibited also, they're using voter intimidation to interfere with challenging absentee ballots because the affidavit was improperly executed. They threatened us. They physically sent out a memo threatening for legal proceedings to get our names and turn us in if we were to challenge absentee ballots because the affidavits were properly executed. that's the basis of the complaint and that I allege that the uh the problem is ongoing so here the here are the ten questions for the court did the trial court excuse me fail to follow the superior rules of procedure by not remanding or scheduling discovery, depositions, and hearings. In other words, the trial court completely ignored the remand order, and instead of moving to the next phase of a trial by jury that the Supreme Court had found that we should move to that next phase, They went ahead and said, oh, no, we're just going to ignore the Supreme Court, and I'm going to order that the defendants rebrief standing, excuse me, rebrief a new motion to dismiss. I want them to argue a new motion to dismiss, and I'm going to exclude me from even briefing or amending my complaint. And that's exactly what they did. Well, they can't do that. See, they'd already lost that argument, right? When we went to the Supreme Court and both sides argued why I have a complaint that should go forward and they argued why it shouldn't, well, they lost. That's what the Supreme Court appeal was all about. This trial court had no, this was just bad, bad. It's a deprivation of procedural and substantive due process under the state and Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It denied me a fair trial to my equal protection claims. Next, motion to dismiss. Did the trial judge violate my due process rights by reinstating and granting the defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of standing? Because see, when he ordered them to file a new motion to dismiss, he then issued a new court order dismissing the case again, claiming that I lack standing. Well, that's already been argued. You already lost. Why are you doing this all over again? Right? Then the third question, preemption and federal rights. Did the trial judge error by ignoring preemption doctrine and the Fourteenth Amendment rights, substantive due process and equal protection, relying solely on state law and disregarding the Supremacy Clause and federal precedent? That's exactly what he did. He misapplied state precedent in order to kill the case. and said, I'm going to ignore your federal rights. And he said it, he came right out and said it in the court order. He said, the state constitution offers you more protection and I'm not going to address federal questions. Number four, discretionary voting procedures. We have a hundred and three towns in the state that use hand counting. We have a hundred and thirty-five that use machines. The problem is the hundred and thirty five are being used to conceal the counting of unverified absentee ballots. And by the way, if you use the machine to count them and you separate them from their envelopes, they can't be reconciled during a recount. Lastly, they're using these illegal ballots to certify the election. You're creating a new class of people. who is doing what? Absentee voters are treated differently than in-person voters. In-person voters have to prove who they are. Absentee voters don't. How do you like that? Discretionary, that's where I get into discretionary voting procedures. That's what number four was all about. Number five, There's a thing called means and scrutiny where the judges used to apply means and scrutiny to examination of federal rights. And that would be that they would balance the government's necessity and the public interest over how much tolerance you should have of an infringement upon any of your enumerated rights. And the answer to the story is none, zero. Let me repeat that. Your Bill of Rights is a no-go zone. There is no tolerance. The only way, and this is what these new cases have done, contrary to the Bruin case on the Second Amendment, the Moore v. Harper, the election case, and the Alexander v. South Carolina legislature, all of them are about text, history, and tradition analysts. You have to look at the original text and what the people who wrote the document meant. Again, what did I say? This is a contract. This is a commercial contract. How else does government have the authority to come after you and take your home or you take your property, put you in jail or take money from you? If there's no contract, they have no authority, do they? Right. And how are they enforcing it? Through commerce, right? That's why it's so important for everyone to know what the basis, like Antonin Scalia said, look, if I get into a contract with my neighbor, And we have a dispute. Does my neighbor get to go and say, for example, I'm a lawn care service and I agree to cut the lawn and we agree upon a price, but I decide to change the deal and I decide to go buy new lawnmowers and more gasoline, hire employees and workers' comp and insurance, and then go to the property owner and say, here's the new bill. I changed the terms of the contract. and hope to enforce that contract. Well, that's absurd, isn't it? What did the original contract say? That you would use the property owner's lawnmower, right? Simple. It's a simple analogy, but it very to the point. Right. That's right. We have government, our government. We said, hey, we're going to hire you to use our mower. We're going to buy the mower. We want you to use our mower. And here's what we're going to pay you. And here's what we want you to do. But no, the employee said, no, no, no, no, no. That's too much work. We need a riding mower. We need breaks. We need workers' comp. We need all of this stuff. And by the way, here's the new bill. Right. That's a great analogy. Right? And how do they get away with it? Because the average person doesn't know the terms to the contract. Because it is a contract. Because if it wasn't a contract, they'd have no authority to do what they do. right well and the other thing is too is it's like all the people in byron township I watch them and this is just one example when the people that are sitting up there on their little stage are pontificating to everyone people are afraid of retribution they have disenfranchised so many people and they've really coerced and threatened them so much that they're afraid to speak up because they don't want further retribution and that's really unfortunate But it comes down to your point. You've got to know the subject matter if you're going to speak to it. And that's probably part of the problem. If they actually knew the terms of the contract, if they actually knew what was going on, they would be able to stand up there and say, no, no, no, no, no. This is your problem. And that's why the sheriff saw me the other week, because I was telling them the terms of the contract. They didn't like it and wanted to shut me up. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. And that's why these fundamentals are so important. So to continue, supremacy clause and avoidance doctrine. Did the trial court violate the supremacy clause, Moore v. Harper and Moore v. Harper by using the avoidance doctrine to evade review of the New Hampshire ballot law commission's ultra-veras, which means outside of the scope of their authority, actions facilitating the use of voting machines to count unverified, uncertified absentee ballots, avoiding adjudication of federal constitutional claims. Of course he did. That's exactly what he did, and I'm calling him out. Next, unverified absentee ballots. Did the trial judge Error by failing to address the use of voting machines to count unverified absentee ballots. Of course he did. In direct violation of my state and federal rights. Next. Defendants noncompliance. The trial judge error by not addressing the defendant's refusal. See, at every step of the way, the town and the state has refused to answer the federal claims. Well, there's a rule in civil court, which is that which you don't answer or deny in thirty days is admitted as true. Well, he continues to allow them, everyone involved, to evade. Well, he's just pro se, right? He's not a lawyer. He's not a lawyer. We'll just wear him down and we'll just continue to violate the rules of civil procedure and we'll use colorful language. I'm a judge. He won't know the difference, right? Right. That's exactly what they're doing. So I don't know the rules. So yeah, so next, avoidance doctrine and misapplication. Did the trial judge error by using avoidance doctrine again to avoid adjudicating federal claims with established standing under Baker v. Carr, which was the federal precedent that Supreme Court said I had standing under? And that did they violate my due process under the supremacy clause? And then finally, Did the judge order, excuse me, the judge's order, does it err, is it an error by ignoring President Trump's March twenty-fifth executive order on election crimes, undermining federal policy to protect fair elections and violating the supremacy clause? And of course, the answer is yes, it does. So then I lay out my ten arguments as to why. Then at the end, I ask for that the court render the use of the election procedure manual, which is the color of law. They've redefined the word affidavit to make that illegal, to stop the use of voting machines, and to render two things. I'm asking for six items of relief. And one of them is, again, is the declaratory judgment. So hang on, I'm scrolling to that. I'm not going to read it. I'm just going to tell you what they are. Whoops, went too far. Hang on. declaratory judgment sought. A, unauthorized modification of the election procedure manual, enforcement of non-law as law, coercive threats against voters and officials. Oh yeah, by the way, they threatened legal proceedings against us for challenging absentee ballots that were void of a lawful act for David. Isn't that fun? You draw them out of the shadows. Also make it illegal for ballot counting practices that being, you know, the town is using three counting practices, voting machines, ballot boxes, and counting unverified, uncertified absentee ballots and certifying the election with unverified ballots. and violation of federal policy. In total, I'm looking for six things. Reverse the trial court's decision and remand back to a trial by jury. Issue declaratory judgment outlined above affirming my rights. An order of compliance with the superior court procedure rules for discovery and hearing. In other words, compel the trial court to give me a trial by jury. declare that the non-uniform voting procedures violate part one, articles one, two, and twelve, and so on declare the counting of unverified absentee ballots, violate state and federal constitutions, order the defendant cease the unauthorized election procedure, manual enforcement and coercive threats and disparate practices, award all fees and costs to me and award to me all other relief that the court may deem just and proper. So that's the basis of my suit. I hit it with them Saturday night and, um, We'll see what happens next. We have a big problem now. It appears that the governor who this suit is against, Chris Sununu, is after oral arguments, went after one of the judges in my case. They went after her for trying to... Claiming that she sought a favor from the governor to influence the attorney general's office to leave her husband alone because they went after her husband to get her off my case. It's my belief that that's what they did. And that's a story unto itself. But now we come to find out during the discovery that the governor has had private conversations with all five judges of the state Supreme Court. Quite likely my case was involved because my case was the only case where the governor is a named defendant and so is the attorney general. That's why they went after the judge. They came to know how she was going to rule. On November, on November, twenty ninth at oral arguments, I did such a good job at embarrassing the state lawyers because they were caught like deer in the headlights. Anyone who wants to go see it is the last oral arguments on the state website. If you want to see it, case number is ending in zero three to five. and um apparently that they became very very nervous once they understood that I had the intellect and capacity to prosecute this case they became very nervous and then four months would go by If you don't think that the chief judge in this case didn't know what this other judge was thinking, what they all thought, you'd be sadly mistaken. Because that's what they do. Two to three times a month, they all... They all... They all... work together, right? They meet two to three times a month to discuss their opinions on the case and the judges will share the workload. So the chief judge, I believe, assigns the workload to who's going to write the majority opinion, who's going to write the dissenting opinion if there is one, and so on and so forth. So those, remember the big blowback on Roe v. Wade, right? That they leaked the internal deliberations Those internal deliberations do happen, and they happen in secret. So four months after oral arguments, the state Supreme Court would do something it never did before. It would reopen my case and order both the state and myself to re-brief standing. And five days later, the Supreme Judge's husband would be put on administrative leave. See, he's the harbor master for the Port Authority for the city of Portsmouth, our coastal international port. He's been there a very long time. They put him on administrative leave five or six days, I believe, after I was ordered to rebrief standing. Well, that's kind of odd, isn't it? And guess what happens about a week or so or two weeks later? she files into my case and and recuses herself after she sat through oral arguments and quite likely to render a favorable opinion in my case in my opinion because she la she asked a lot of relevant pertinent questions so why is she now recusing herself from my case she would go on to tell state investigators that the reason for the meeting with the governor was that she was being forced to recuse from important cases pending before the state Supreme Court. And guess who has the only case involving the governor and the attorney general as co-defendants? Her. Her. Her. Why? Because the entire Supreme Court was looking at my case. Let me rephrase that language. My case was the only case sitting in the Supreme Court's custody at the time these decisions were made to remove her from my case so that we would reduce the panel from a four-judge panel to a three-judge panel. And so two judges could go with a majority opinion with one dissenting and still get a majority opinion making the final decision that they would render in my case weaker than the strength, than the argument I did win. Some of the legal logic used to excuse the other parts of my suit make no sense. I'll leave it at that. I'll just say that had they treated my entire case the way they should have, in my opinion, that they would have been in a lot more trouble than they're in now. Now they reduced it to count two. See, I had six counts against them. So they reduced it to the equal protection complaint. And they did so, I believe, by removing a sitting judge. Because now you needed a three-judge majority in order to get four judges to render an opinion. See where I'm going with this? So Anyway, that's the story. I'm sticking to it. And that's the update from New Hampshire here on this case. Well, I really appreciate you telling us all about this because this is a great education process for all of us because you've got such depth of knowledge into the subject. And it seems like you can just pull them out of the air and wham, and they stick. It's amazing. Examples and everything. Well, thank you. And I tell people, don't wish you were me. You don't want to live in my head. No, I can pretty much extra sure that a lot of people are a little bit, how do I say this? They're probably overwhelmed with the amount of knowledge you have, which is a good thing. I mean, that's what we want to do is we want to sit down with people who know more than we do so that we learn the things we don't know. And it's a continual process of learning. That's it. That's it. So, okay. Well, let's do this. Let's say a prayer and then we'll go to last words. And then I'll expect next Monday too, if you can do that, because I've kind of set the time aside for Vicki at nine and you at ten. And it seems to be working pretty well. All right. Okay. Dear Heavenly Father, thank you so much for Vicki and for Daniel and all the wonderful things that you've shown them and taught them over the years and their graciousness to share with all of us. It is an amazing... problem and challenge that is set in front of us right now. And you know what? I know that we can walk this path that you set before us with your help, no matter how, how bad and how big of a problem it seems, you're bigger and your ability to write this thing is always, always on the table. And we thank you for walking us away from this captive system that has absolutely become a crime syndicate. It's so big and it's so complex and they have created loopholes to the loopholes and on and on. But we know that you've got this and we put our trust in you. It doesn't like absolve us from walking forward. It's walking forward with you, not sitting on the sideline going, go God, go. It's walking with you as we walk forward. Please get everybody the courage that it takes to stand against this incredible, evil and tyranny that's going on here that they would have the courage to stand up and see something say something that they would know that you are going to be with them as they stand even if they feel like they're standing alone they're not because you're with us and we just thank you for being a great friend to us we want to be a friend to you and uh we just want to let you know we love you in the name of jesus christ we pray amen amen okay any last words Yes, pick up your state constitution, read your state constitution, not the US Constitution. Yes, the US Constitution is very important. I get that. The point is you probably have already read the document. Most people become frustrated with the study. See, I'm also the chairman of the National Heritage Center for Constitutional Studies. And that program was put together many years ago with excellent resources and a great teaching on the US Constitution. Are they videos? Some of them are. Some of them are. We'll talk offline about what that entire curriculum looks like. But I came to know of the organization's existence just a few short years ago, and I got involved. We're putting together an archive library of all of our resources. But it teaches the US Constitution, which is what? A corporation created to do the external affairs of the state. And if you focus on that, you lose sight of the government that has the greatest impact on your life. Your state government has a far greater impact on your life. So it's critical for you to know what your state constitution says, know how your government was formed, and then go about putting together a plan to bring it to heel because that is a provision provided for in each state constitution. And this is what they modified. And they modified it by modifying our schools, stripping away state civics and leaving us thinking only about the national federal government because that's where this hijacking has taken us. We have gone from a constitutional republic with fifty sovereign states to a national central democracy. When the Democrats yell and scream that Donald Trump is going to destroy their democracy, listen to those words. They're telling the truth. They have, in fact, successfully created a national central democracy run from D.C. and our republic has been destroyed. All we have left are the parchment paper that it was written on waiting to be rediscovered. Right. And that's really the only way we take back our republic. Because if you don't understand that and you take it from the federal level, who created the federal government? The states, right? To do what? To do the external affairs, as Madison said, the external affairs of the states. And so that's why knowing the states and their origins that begin before the federal government was created, right? They all began what? As thirteen original colonies. Those thirteen original colonies would throw off the crown, throw off their English rule, and establish a new form of government after the Declaration of Independence. It sounds like we're due for that again. Well, it's exactly right. You look at the grievances in the Declaration of Independence and they're as relevant today as they were in seventeen seventy six. It's the same thing over and over again. Something that Curtis has been texting here, too. I've been trying to I've really been trying to keep keep up on both sides. I've had a lot of messages going back and forth today. Curtis says we have a flawed state constitution. We do because it was unlawfully installed. We only had one tenth of one percent. And that's how they put it in place. That was not following the law. And he also said, have Daniel read our constitution and look at how they removed the judicial branch of government from the township under the guise of streamlining and consolidation. He's absolutely right, and Minnesota and Michigan both have their own problems. The original Thirteen gets you to original intent. What you find after that is a lot of deviation from that because we're dealing with flawed human beings, drunk with power, because it starts from the very beginning, right? Patrick Henry and George Mason in Virginia, if you go and study the Virginia ratification debate, refused to sign the U.S. Constitution. They did not vote, excuse me, they did not vote yes. They said that the Constitution as written would ultimately, the federal government was, they had made, the Constitution made the Articles of Confederation, it abolished the Articles of Confederation, it made the federal government too powerful to that ultimately this new federal government under the new U.S. Constitution would ultimately be consumed, would consume the sovereignty of the states and what has happened. That's exactly what's happened. And that's my party words. Okay. That's fantastic. Well, guys, let's go to that part of the show right now. Let's see. Let's go to ding, ding, ding, ding. Go to brandenburgforgovernor.com because I'm the best non-consider, resolver, non-consider in the history of the United States of America. And I'd like to have a discussion with the rightful president of the United States President Donald J. Trump wearing cowboy boots. Who wears them better? I win because I wear them every day. And then we talk about real stuff. So at any rate, that's my twenty twenty two protest for the stolen elections on that have been ongoing for a very long time. We just know about it now, which is really good. And so with that said, guys, you have a great day. God bless you all. God bless all this whom you love and God bless America. Make it a great day. Study something new. Find something that you're not good at and focus on that. Challenge yourself to step out of your comfort zone a little bit and challenge your beliefs, challenge what you think you know, and find the proof that either proves it so or not. That's a continual process of learning. And thanks for all the people that are Curtis. Thanks for posting, Denise, Lab. There's a whole bunch of people here that have been posting today. And thank you all. Share. Thanks for the corrections. I really appreciate it. Have a great day, and we'll see you tomorrow.