Published Feb. 16, 2026, 9 a.m.
9am Vicky Davis - The Technocratic Tyranny The United Nations as an organization is world communism. The strategy to impose world communism on the people of the United States (and the other countries in this hemisphere) has been economic rather than military as the people were led to believe it would be. It's our own leaders who were the Pied Pipers leading us to this demise of the U.S. I'm working on a timeline that shows the who, when and what. 10am David Leskowski - Alberta Secession Referendum, Canada and US Relations -Alumina Mining in Saskatchewan -Hong Kong and Chinese protesters as Canadian Liberals open security data to the Chinese Communist Party -USMCA President Trump answered prayers to call out the Climate Change Hoax -Gordie Howe and the bridge David Leskowski has worked for provincial and federal Services in Alberta, Saskatchewan, BC and Yukon Territories under Conservative, Liberal and NDP governments. He has been a Conservation Officer and Federal Fisheries Officer, a Chartered Insurance Professional, and a Risk Management Consultant. David has been active in political campaigns since 1982. He was an Area Coordinator with the Reform Party, and was the National Vice President of the Canadian Alliance Party. He was on the Interim Joint Council of the Conservative Party of Canada, and as co-chair of the Constitution Committee, David authored the first Constitution of the new Party. He is active in Alberta provincial politics, seeking to bring "Unity of Purpose" among like-minded, freedom loving Albertans. X/Twitter: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1yoKMPPEaqlxQ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/636616148890812/videos/1275015787809025 Rumble: https://rumble.com/v75ttea-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-2182026-technocratic-tyranny-and-alberta-indep.html https://rumble.com/v75ttik-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-2182026-technocratic-tyranny-and-alberta-indep.html BNN Live: https://Live.BrandenburgNewsNetwork.com Guests: Donna Brandenburg, Vicky Davis, David Leskowski
Good morning and welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg. And it's the sixteenth day of February twenty twenty six. And welcome to our show. First off, we're going to be starting out with Vicki Davis and the technocratic tyranny. And then at ten o'clock, David Laskowski is going to be back on again. He's part of the independence movement in Alberta. And we were we were talking. We've been kind of back and forth a little bit on the involvement and. Truly the kind of usurpation that we're seeing with China in Canada. And I think that we need to be concerned about that as Americans because, you know, they're our upstairs neighbor. So what affects them is eventually going to affect us if it already hasn't. Anyhow, morning, Vicki. How are you doing? Good morning. Just fine. Thank you. Awesome. Awesome. So you had a good weekend? Yeah, I did. Actually, I've kind of started on a new project to organize all the material I have on public health. Oh, that's awesome. Because the public health system, there's a lot that people don't know about it. I mean, if they know about it in their town, they think their only job is really to inspect restaurants to make sure there aren't any mouse droppings and stuff like that. But there's a lot more to the public health system. The public health system is not a function of your state government. It's actually federal. And when you track it back, it's become international. So it's kind of like an insurgency. behind a domestic function. Well, it's like invasion through infiltration. That's been going on for decades, I believe. And I think that's why it's so important to look at all these treaties and agreements that the criminals in the seats have made with outside organizations in order to truly, through commerce and through agreements, have taken over the United States. But you know, we can look at it. We're going to, we're going to get it back. I believe that we are absolutely taking the United States back. It doesn't look good in some areas. I give you that. But, but if we're a little patient, I think we're going to see what's happening. What I thought, something that I thought was really interesting last week is that I put a demand out for, for the names of the Epstein list to be put out in, in the, you know, unredacted. And the next day, I believe it was the next day, the list was released. And I thought that was really interesting. I'm sure there was a lot of us yelling for it, but I thought it was really interesting. And the most interesting thing was that how people handled this. For me, when I said this, I said, when names come out like that, that's not an investigation. We don't know who's who or who's been where with someone at some time and what they did, blah, blah, blah. If you don't have the receipts on the actions, you're only running off an opinion. And that doesn't mean that they're guilty. And so I know that there's a lot of investigations going on behind the scenes. They put the names out. And I kind of think it was a test on the people that were yelling and screaming for these names, the test on people of America and such to see where that they were going to be responsible enough to handle this. Or if they were going to jump right into they're all guilty, you know, hang them all kind of thing. Get your torches and pitchforks right. Well. I really do believe that we have to we can know these things and go, well, well, well, that's interesting. It's interesting to see these names in here. But that doesn't mean that, you know, that any more guilty. There's a lot of people that have been blackmailed. There's a lot of people I've been to a ton of events like at Mar-a-Lago. And I've been to D.C. and they people thought I was guilty when I took a picture with Adam Schiff. I sprinted across the Senate building when I saw him because I wasn't going to miss a chance to get a picture with this guy, either innocent or guilty. It doesn't look good is what I can say. But I wanted to be able to actually just get a picture with him. And I threw it out there to see if the morons out there were going to be like, oh, no, she's gone to the evil side. I'm like going, just stop it. No, that's not possible. I'm way too ornery for that. But I thought it was interesting. And I'm kind of wondering if it was a little bit of a test to see how people reacted because they're watching everything. If people automatically jump to, they're guilty, they're all guilty, that person is not and should never be in a position of power because they're only there to react out of their anger and vengeance instead of finding out, Well, what actually happened in making a good decision? And I think that might've been what's going on, but you know, I don't really know. That's my own opinions on it. Yeah. Well, there. The story of Leo Frank. Pardon me? Have you ever seen or been acquainted with a story of Leo Frank? No. Huh? Well, he was, he was a Jewish man who married a woman from the South and, And he went down there at a manufacturing company and they found, it's a true story. They found a young girl from the community dead in the basement of his office building. And they tried to pin it on him. Well, it turned out that they acquitted him. And as he sat in jail waiting to be released the next day, and he was really excited about it, a group of the people from the town came in dragged him out and hung him because they didn't believe that he was actually innocent. And they did. They took him out and they hung him. Even though he was supposed to be released the next day. Well, it turns out that he was innocent. And all of those people acted out of vengeance and revenge and their own anger and such. And they killed an innocent man. It's a really good lesson for so many people to just... Wait a little bit. Put down your anger, your torches, your pitchforks. Pray to God. Let God take this situation and make sure that that real justice is served rather than it coming out of our confirmation bias. That's what a lot of people make decisions on, not on a lawful process. It's not going to be perfect. There is no perfect system here on this planet. In this area, this time, this planet, nothing's perfect. We're going to have to deal with that. But give it a little time, give it to God, and I think we'll see true accountability. And then last week also, before we get into anything else, something that was very interesting to me was that there was a decision made, a criminal conviction on the signature gatherers in Michigan. Now you're not gonna find that anywhere in the fake news because that's actual real news. The two that committed the crimes and the signature fraud, not just upon myself, but against many, many other candidates In other states, too, which is not being talked about, as well as every single American who had their ability to vote for who they wanted to destroy. And not only that, I have more to talk about this, but we can wait to another time because I know you want to go to something else. But I can tell you that Dana Nessel and her wife, Elena McGuire, Dana started an NGO called passed it to Elena. Dana's brother Ariel loaned that NGO Fair and Equal Michigan a million dollars, which they turned around and paid the signature gatherers over a million dollars for signatures for one of their initiatives never turned in the signatures. I don't believe they got a refund for what they, what they did, which was in my contract with the signature gatherers. I don't think they got a, a, a refund on that, which means that looks like an awful convenient way to move money around. Not saying the two words I want to say, you know, It's just really, really crazy. And she admonished us for not checking out the signature gatherers, but they hired them. They hired the same ones. And I had called in to the Board of Elections, and they gave them an applied endorsement that they were okay. So I did check. And I checked with the state and the state gave an implied endorsement. So I think this is going to actually become a much bigger issue In the coming time. I'm just kind of shocked. As how this is rolling out. But we don't know everything. So even myself. I'm just sitting back. Eating some popcorn. Going to see how this thing rolls. But I just don't know. Oh by the way. It looks like posts aren't loading on Twitter again. Which is interesting. AXE. So let me see if I can get this to come up because it looks like it might be down. Twitter is down. X is down. It says posts aren't loading because I was looking. I usually have quite a few people that are following on the dashboard here that I can see, but it's like, no, posts are not loading right now. Try again. Let me check and see if the download detector says anything. Let people know that it's down on X right now is down. might want to be silent and seeing what's being said a little bit here. We'll see. Cause you can't, you really don't, they really just don't want the truth to get out there. They don't, they really don't. Oh yeah. It's exit acts. Amazon web cloud fair Monday, Verizon, AT&T, Facebook, Instagram, Microsoft Outlook, OpenAI, Reddit, Infinity, all of them are having issues right now. So this is a huge, this is huge. Let me see where the user reports Twitter's with X. Posting, yep. So we'll see what happens with X. Let me grab the map and see what we have here. Usually you can look at the map and see where the biggest problems are. fifty-three percent reported posts on the oh yeah it's going right through Chicago so all of the all the main hubs are having problems this morning very interesting yeah so let our ex friends know So what I just posted in the chat is an image of what are going to be the fusion centers. And I think that's what the big tech guys are beginning to roll out. And it'll be control of our entire infrastructure, which means control of our country. yeah that's a that's a very concerning it's a very very concerning thing we really needed to stop this collectivism nonsense and go back to local local ownership action and such but okay here is the ibm's vision of the smart city for prisoners that's right they don't want us out of these cities they're prisoners right did you see where in california they're starting to tax your mileage No, I didn't. But I don't think that's a new idea. They're going to be taxing everything because our government is being run by profit-making corporations. And so they're making a profit on everything. Profit to them, but a cost to us. I mean, it's Oh, that's interesting. The Carlisle group, not a fan, not a fan, just so everybody knows. Yeah. Well, these look like great, great resources. Huh? Well, that looks, that's amazing. Ultimately, when you follow those links, it's about the globalization of government. You can't really call it government per se. but it is governance meaning that we're not in control of our country any more than uh european countries are in control of their governments you know they overlaid the european governments with the european commission and the european commission is a communist organization And that's kind of what I've been working on this week is there was a guy. Did you watch the interview between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein? No, I really didn't. It's like I've met Steve Bannon, and I have some opinions on that, I would say. But I didn't watch it. Yeah, well, it was very interesting. And from that interview, I... You're coming and going right now. You're coming in and you're fading away. He was the British ambassador to the United States between February tenth, twenty twenty five and September eleventh, twenty twenty five. Who is that? You just you just kind of came in and out a little bit. His name is Peter Mandelson. as the British ambassador to the US. Okay. Yeah, I couldn't hear the name here. It kind of like glitched. Well, turns out that he is a homosexual pedophile also, which I thought was most interesting. So I started searching on his name. Google or YouTube presented me with an option for a link on the UK New Labour Party. And Peter Mandelson was a part of that. Tony Blair was also a member of the New Labour Party. And it's important to say New Labour Party because Britain always had a Labour Party. but this was the new Labor Party. And they're actually communists, although they call themselves socialists. So it didn't used to be that way, where there was no distinction between socialist and communist, but socialist is just a redefinition. of communist? I actually had somebody who was the head of the Green Party answer a question I gave them and I said, Are you a socialist or a communist? Because I was just talking, you know, I talked to everybody. And the person said, Well, I'm a communist, but he said, I only say socialist because it's communism has got such a bad perception. I was like, okay, well, at least he was honest. You know, I mean, I thought it was, I'll give him, I'll give him points for being honest, but he came right out and said that he was a communist, but he always calls himself a socialist. Well, um, yeah, I, I figured as much, I mean, it becomes pretty obvious as you trace this down. Anyway, Tony Blair was also part of the New Labor Party. And he took over as a leader. And he became the absolute at the top leader of the New Labor Party in nineteen ninety four. And I found a conference, an international conference that he was a part of. And on the podium, there was the logo of a red rose, and the red rose is the logo of the Socialist International, which really is the Communist International. Bill Clinton came into office at the same time, and he was part of the dlc the democratic leadership conference and they came in as new democrats and when you uh you know follow those leads the new democrats third way um they are communists as well masquerading as socialists and It was the five leaders of the G-seven countries, including Clinton and Blair and Massimo de Lima from Italy that formed this core group. And they're the ones that led the globalization of our governments. through this organization and system of third way. Well, third way is communism. And that really began the conversion of our country. I don't know whether you followed any of this or discovered any of it, but the President's Council on Sustainable Development, basically they did like a redesign of our government. And they're the ones that implemented a lot of these collectivist systems. Pardon me, you're fading in and out. So do you have an article on that? Oh yeah. Yeah. Most definitely. Yeah. Um, yeah, I got to post an article there too. Um, I think that I've been trying to search around to see if we're, if we have any connectivity to Twitter to X right now, I, I'm never going to get over calling, not calling it Twitter. You know, it is what it is, but yeah, yeah. We're still not loading. This is interesting, but, um, Yeah, the structure is what we really need to be talking about, not individual people. I see a lot of people that they want to fight with each other and call names and blame and such. And it's like, you're doing exactly what they want you to do, okay, guys, is go after people around the situation, but never really hit the bullseye on where the problems are. And the problems are these systems and how they use them to basically infiltrate and take over. Yeah. Okay, here it is. Let's see if we can get it to come up. There's all kinds of areas out right now and affected because it looks like the major hubs are the ones that I can see. It looks like the major hubs that are being hit. I wish I could get it up here. When I tried to put a down detector up, let's see if it blinks me out here again, okay? Okay. Because that way, that's I think what screwed me up last time was I pulled up down detector and all of a sudden, Uh, things started going poorly. Let me see if we can. Yeah, here. Yeah. I look at it. It's flat. It's flat lining all over the place. Look at, here we go. Spike, spike, spike. Everybody's here. Everybody's having problems. Cloudflare, Verizon, Instagram, T-Mobile, AT&T, Facebook. Outlook, Xfinity, OpenAI, Microsoft, TikTok, Cox, Claude, Microsoft Teams, Gmail, Microsoft, Spotify, Twitch, Blue Sky, Azure. Well, that's weird. It must not be in your region because I have access to all these things. Now, let me see. Let's go in and check one of them. I'm going to try X right now because I'm curious. Because X is down. So let's see where X is down at. So I reported an outage here. And then nine a.m. Look at it. Spiked at nine a.m. And Ted asked, we've got a fifty three percent reported problems on the app. And let's check out the map here. Yeah, it's just... There you go. It's just in your area because I can get to x. So considering I am approximately right here between Chicago and Detroit, a little north of that. You've got the major hubs there. But they're all there. They're having problems in the hubs. Very interesting, isn't it? Yeah. So anyhow, well, that explains a lot. Yep, nine a.m. Starting to resolve some of them, but we'll see. I actually like this site a lot, so. Oh, maybe I can give you a link to my X. Well, I think the problem is that anybody that's watching this on X right now is screwed because the live stream on X won't be working. Okay, let's go to this minute. Oh, okay. Yeah, I see. Yeah. Okay, so that's the same length, the think one. Let's see. Let's see what happened here. Let me try that one more time. All right, boys and girls, we endeavor to persevere. Ta-da. Oh, there we go. Okay, it decided to cooperate. There we go. Global Fascism for Sustainable Global Communism. How many books do you read a month? You must read a ton of books too. No, I don't. Not so much. Because what I'm trying to do is to get the big picture of the global system that they've implemented, that they've been using to eliminate or reduce or gradually disintegrate our sovereignty. And so I don't really want to spend time on one aspect of it when I'm trying to grasp a big picture of it. Okay. So where do you want to go? I'm going to just let you talk on this a minute. Okay. Yeah. The president, it's really important to take a look at the President's Council on Sustainable Development because they took their operating instructions from a think tank in Switzerland in a kind of a small booklet called The Agenda for Change. And that book in Switzerland was being run by or was affiliated with Gro Harlem Brundtland. And Gro Harlem Brundtland was the, she was a doctor, first of all. And then she became the, what was it? The head of the Socialist International. And so that's how they coordinated policy. And that actually was the source of Agenda XXI. A guy named Lloyd Timberlake is the one, and I assume he's related to Justin Timberlake, but he's the guy that really wrote the books, the instruction books for agenda. Wow. You're kidding. Isn't it amazing how all their families are kind of tied into this nonsense. Yeah. They have a kid. All of a sudden the kid goes into some, you know, weird Holly weird type position. And then they do crazy things like, like what he did at the super bowl. It's like, I, you know, it's like, they're all tied in. They're all a bunch of criminal Satanists in my opinion. Well, there's an awful lot of fiction that we see in the media and in our government. It's all theater. Exactly. That's exactly right. We're looking at political theater. We're looking at policy theater because they just put their policies in whatever they want and we aren't part of the process. They do a great job of isolating us you know, from outside of what they're, what they're really doing in their little parallel system. Yeah. Well, and a lot of what we see that we think, um, is like a real news event is actually a dialectic being played out so that they can, uh, make changes to our government that wouldn't otherwise be possible or to, um, Well, to give us the impression that we need to do something like the global war on terror. I have two people that are saying that they've got outages on Mississippi down to and Grand Rapids mobile signal was out at some point yesterday. Don't know what his brother's carrier is. Interesting. Yep. So there's there's something going on. Oh, yeah. Well, one of the things I forgot to tell you was that the big tech firms are opening up their big data centers. And I'm positive that those are for the management of the smart grid. And if you go back and look at that picture of IBM's fusion centers, you'll see if you look at the functions on that map, those are functions in the management of our infrastructure that they will control. And through the control of that infrastructure, they will control us. I think that's their plan. I have great hope that there's enough of us people out here who are stubborn resolve that we'll just like say, fine, we're done with this. and protest enough where perhaps their levers of control become null and void. But I think this is exactly what you said. That's what they were planning for us. Yes. I'm not sure that it's going to be that way. So somebody this morning that I know who's fairly in the know about things, contacted me and said, I think they're going to be doing power plants within the AI. And he's not a person that looks for notoriety or who would lie. He said, I think that they're planning on putting power plants in these AI centers because I was beaten up on the AI data centers. I don't like anything about them that I've seen, right? He said, well, I've heard, he said, I've heard that they're putting power plants inside those data centers and And they're going to sell that back to the people. So I'm like sitting there going, okay, that's a new one for me. I hadn't heard that one. But let's just go there a minute and say, is this possible? Because my bias is I want to hate all the data centers, right? Uh-huh. And so I'm like, okay, I got to lay my biases down and think this thing through a minute and maybe do a little bit of research on this to see if this is actually a thing because it might be. And so I'm going to, I'm probably going to call him after I get off the broadcast today and ask him what else he knows or where I can go for actual information. Because if that's the case, it may be something that the decentralization process, But at this point in time, I haven't seen anything to support that. I'm more concerned than anything about it, but I could be wrong. And so it's just like, you know, digging into the, digging into the, I don't know, digging into the, the Epstein files. We can see the names, but we might be wrong. That's all the information we have. But if we have more information, then you have to change your, your trajectory on where you think this is going. Yeah. Yeah. Well, those data centers that they're putting in, they will suck up a lot of electricity. Right. And there might actually be a problem, you know, with keeping the flow of electricity steady throughout the rest of the country if these data centers are sucking it all up. Mm-hmm. um what they did uh um oh i forget what year it was but they made a decision to um they took away power generation for local areas away from your local power plant Well, the water, that's what the problems are with the dams in Michigan, is that they're getting rid of all of the hydroelectric dams and they sold it for like a dollar a piece. They were selling it for like a dollar a piece. Yes. Yes. And that's what I mean. They are essentially shutting down government of, by, and for people to turning over control of our country to to these tech companies. And that's the significance of that smart city diagram. Those are essentially private corporations that will be running our infrastructure. And if they capture your infrastructure, they've captured you. And that's why we've been talking so heavily about the monopolies that they've created. the corporate monopolies. They're everywhere. The top four are BlackRock, Vanguard, Arabella, and State Street Capital. They kind of own all of each other, right? But they've also got energy monopolies within the state of Michigan, consumers and DTE. And by the way, DTE did have a part in moving money around in the elections here, which is a real concern. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, you know, we still vote. We still elect people to office. But for the most part, most of the people that we elect are, they're really working for the tech corporations. They're not working for us. Otherwise, if they were working for us, there would be a movement to get them out of office as quickly as possible. Well, the resources that we have need to have a dividend for the people, in my opinion, instead of just going to the corporations and pilfering whatever they can get their grubby little paws on, right? And that's really – the whole thing, the globalist agenda, is just crap. I just got another – a text in from my friend this morning that said something to me about the data centers. Ukraine upheaval. This is from Jeffrey Epstein in twenty fourteen to Ariane de Rothschild. Ukraine upheaval should provide many opportunities, many. And the screenshot is the information contained in the communication is confidential and is the property of Jeffrey Epstein. And that came through. It got a screenshot of it. And so, well, thank you for sharing that with me this morning. I'm sure you're listening. So I sure wish we could get X to come up consistently because normally I have a whole bunch of people watching me on X. So we'll see. They might've gotten disenfranchised by the power outage, but they'll come back eventually or go to one of the other sites. Yeah. I really think that if people understood what has been done with our country, at least I hope they would be up in arms. I don't really have a lot of confidence in that, even though I hope for it so much, because most people just don't even want to look at it. They don't want to think about it. The picture of it, I mean, I tried to, inform my dad, you know, years ago. And I got just for a flash of a second, he understood what I was saying. And but the look on his face. And, and then he almost immediately shut down. I mean, he, I've never seen anything like that. And I resolved to never try to explain it to anybody again, unless they ask me first. I see. Yeah. You know, we were, I got a different situation that I think you'll find really interesting. Okay. So I go to a Tanner because I like their red, the red light therapy. It's wonderful for mitochondria, your skin, everything. And we were in there. Well, they decided to change their policies last week and require a fingerprint to in order for you to use their services as a tanner. I'm like, oh, hell no, I'm not doing this. There's no way. So we ended up having a discussion and they made an exception in their policies because I was like, I'm done. I'm not cancel. I'm canceling right now. And they decided to make an exception. which I thought was cool. But what was really shocking was how many people just went ahead and said, OK, here's my fingerprint. Go ahead and take it. And I looked at them and I happened to have Ralph, the IT guy, was there with me because we were debating the situation. And the fact that there is no way that they have security to keep that private or protect it. And it's like, it's like anybody that agrees to that is a freaking idiot. Because you can change passwords, you can change, you know, phone numbers, you can change things, if there's a security breach, if they have your biologic, you know, information, your thumbprints, blood, DNA, whatever, you have absolutely no ability to change that. And I think it is a huge threat. So we were talking to a couple of the gals there, and I said, do you understand what a large... problem this is, what a threat this is, or a problem this is. And the one gal kind of looked like a deer in the headlights, which told me she had no clue whatsoever. But we carefully explained it to them so that they could understand why this is such a problem. And I said, how many people quit? They said, well, there was a few that quit. And the rest of them were just like, yeah, this is a lot easier just to come in here, thumbprint, fingerprint, whatever it is, and just go in for services. My whole thing was like, you are literally giving a fingerprint to a freaking Tanner. Are you kidding me? Yeah. So I was, I was kind of shocked. I honestly, you know what my plan was really? My plan was, is if they didn't make an exception, I was going to start a Tanner. I was going to say, fine, I'm just going to start a Tanner with red light therapy and have all these healing therapies in there. And I'll put their sorry butts out of business. Yeah. Most people will, when they figure out, when they find out what's going on, they say, well, I've got nothing to hide, you know? So, but actually everybody not has something, not necessarily to hide, but to protect, you need your, to protect, you need your privacy. Well, Dana is going to be coming on here and talking about the data leak that went straight to Canada. to the Chinese Communist Party because they've now got troops and people up in Alberta guarding their mines, which they bought near their military bases and such, which is the same thing they did here. That's literally enabling an invasion. And they took their data. Well, the same thing happened here in one of the last elections where all the election workers had their information shipped. There was a data leak through a law firm in Grand Rapids that went through. In fact, I know this. and went directly to China. And they had the information on every person who worked in the elections, including their children's information. Yeah. That sounds like a nice little identity theft blackmail package if you ask me. Oh, yeah. And I think it's worse than that, if I remember correctly. And I'd have to go find where I wrote about this. an Israeli company, I think it was an Israeli company that was working with the communist Chinese. And what they were doing was they found a way to map our electric systems. I mean, they had software that could traverse the electrical systems of like a state government. And find out all of the locations of the government office and ultimately to the people that work there and everything. And there was a case in Colorado about that. And it's so long ago, I don't remember. But anyway, it's the The ability to use the electrical system as computerized signals that can go both ways. Go out and find a device that's connected to the electricity and then come back with the information and tell you what kind of device it was and which device it was. Because apparently all electrical devices have unique signatures. And so, you know, they could map your whole operation just by traversing the electrical wires. Well, you know, they track people with facial recognition, license plate recognition, all that kind of thing. You know what's one of the most reliable ways to track people? How? Gate analysis. Yeah, I find that really very interesting. Incredibly interesting. And they do it by third party so they can sell it to all the spook organizations. Did you see too, I think that the, what is it? One of the Homeland Security DHS got defunded this week? No, which one? I think, let me look it up a minute. But yeah, let me go ahead and talk amongst yourself a minute and I'm going to check it out. Yeah, I remember when they started collecting this kind of information. And of course, you know, you have people that start consulting firms to sell that kind of information. Of course, the information is king. You know, they can sell that information on us, make a lot of money. Right. You've heard of total information awareness, right? Nope. Not probably the way you're saying it. Okay. Well, it was a project started by a military guy named Poindexter. Oh, okay. Alex Poindexter. Anyway, that might not be right, but it is Poindexter. And their objective was a national database of everything, database of databases. And the Congress found out about it, understood what was happening, and they shut it down. So what the people within government did was to break up the project and distribute it out. And then I assumed that outside of government, the information comes back together. So what we have in terms of information collection, in terms of total information awareness, is a distributed system of total information awareness. AT&T is, you know, they had that go across the border into Canada so they could capture all of the AT&T information. And then, you know, buy it back, you know, five ice type of stuff. So this is what it said. The Department of Homeland Security itself experienced a funding lapse started around midnight on February, fourteen, fifteen, leading to a partial shutdown. It occurred because Senate Democrats blocked or held support for a full year. DHS appropriations bill demanding reforms to immigration enforcement practices and agencies like ICE. It isn't fully funding, but it could disrupt areas like airport security, TSA, disaster response, FEMA, Coast Guard, cybersecurity, CISA, and secret service functions. So it's a partial, so it's DHS. I think there's others too, but that was the one that I heard, which is kind of interesting to watch exactly what's going on. But anyhow. Yeah, but they never fully explain it to people, what's going on. But when they were right in the middle of converting our systems of government, they moved to a new paradigm of preventative defense, meaning that they had enough information that they could not only go after people based on what they've done, but based on what they might have done, or they can use that information to set up people. Well, and everybody, I don't know if everybody realized that everyone is at risk right now because they can get into your computer and plant things and get out and you'll never know that they were there. Right, right, right. There was a big to-do about... porn being planted on people's machines and people were arrested and went to jail for things they didn't do you know well they do this they've done the same thing with drugs you know i've heard of situations where a cop will stop a car and throw a bag of drugs in the back seat and then you know i mean we've all heard stories like that there's nothing out there that's that's totally clean You have to have law enforcement, but the people need to clean their own houses out. If they're good cops out there, you got to start blowing the whistle and clean them out. I don't care. I hate to say it, but I don't care if we lose our jobs, losing our integrity by standing there and watching this happen and doing nothing is as bad as somebody who's doing the crime. Yeah, I agree. Although I do... understand a family man, a cop, that can't afford to lose his job i don't understand it at all because and and i i guess i don't understand it at all it's just like the the nurses that were giving the the shots out and such and they said well i need my job it's like you know what god provides a way and if you get into a job that you're this is one of the best pieces advice i ever had in in college when i was in college and i think it's a great a great thing for all of us to ponder is never get yourself in a position you can't get out of. So the one professor that was talking about it said you should always, always have at least enough resources at hand for six months. So if you have to leave because someone has tried to blackmail you or get you to do something that you know has no integrity or that is criminal or whatever, that you turn around and you walk out that door and you start prosecuting. But if you don't think ahead that this might be possible and prepare for it, you're gonna be like a sitting duck for somebody who is evil. You have to be more or less independent so that you can have those opportunities to, you know, to get away. And I'm going to tell you what, I was working three jobs at the time to get through college. I had no help. I mean, it wasn't like I had, you know, my parents didn't have any money. We were very, very poor. And so to go into this, I really took this to heart because, you know, I didn't know at the time how much damage could be done, you know, as somebody who was in my late teens, early twenties, you know, how bad the world really was. It was kind of a wake up call for me. But it was a good piece of advice. If all of us, you know, make sure that we have an out plan, whether we have a network of friends or we have that that are like minded and such that we can help each other. That's the biggest thing that you could do is make sure you have people around you that you know who if you got in trouble, you could reach out to that would stand with you. Maybe have a little extra food on on hand. And it's one of those things that if you do a little bit at a time, it's not so overwhelming. I mean, there's tons of ways to prepare for the future. I didn't take one dime out of one of my companies for sixteen years. I put it right back into that company to grow and reinvest in it. And it was tough. I'm going to tell you, it was really, really tough. Everybody laughed because for ten years, I had one pair of tennis shoes for ten years. I didn't have the wardrobe that I have now, you know, right now I've got a pretty good wardrobe, but it's taken me, it's taken me four years to build that. And it doesn't come overnight. You can't just wake up one day and say, Oh damn, the world's a bad place. I guess I better get in the game. You know, it's like, it's something that has to happen over time. You, you build over time and put those safety nets in place right now. Did you, do you want to hear something that's really interesting? So did a comparison. of earnings and minimum wage with the whole focus being on silver going up and gold going up, they haven't really gone up. It's the value of the dollar that's gone down. Minimum wage in the seventies, if you compare what we have right now to what it was in the seventies, the studies that we were looking at and evaluating was that somebody making minimum wage in the seventies had nine thousand dollars a week buying power. Think about that compared to what we have right now. It's not that gold or silver went up. It's that the dollar is complete and utter garbage, and there's no buying power. So when we look at things, they want us to look at it in a certain way, and I'll give you that. A lot of people, because of public education, don't have the education or capacity to understand what's really happened. but it's the dollar that's worth nothing. And it continues to go down. I just read something else that from a person I follow on X this morning that I thought was fairly, I thought it was fairly interesting, quite honestly about, let me see if I can find it. It's from the prophet. And I'm going to, I'm going to read this because I thought this was, phenomenal. The analysis was phenomenal. So this is site bringer the profit on X. A thirty six percent tax on unrealized gains is a desperation signal. And this came out of the fact that Dutch lawmakers approved a thirty six percent tax on unrealized crypto stock and bond gains. I want you to think about this. So they're taxing you on the potential of what could happen, okay, in simple terms. It tells you that the state is running out of clean revenue sources and is now reaching directly into balance sheets. It is an admission that growth is insufficient to cover obligations. This is what late-stage fiscal stress looks like. That means collapses in income, okay, in very simple terms. When a government takes income, it shares in production. When it takes consumption, it shares in spending. When it taxes unrealized gains, it shares in ownership itself. That is a structural escalation. Ownership stops being a stable store of accumulated risk-taking. It becomes a reoccurring liability even when nothing is sold. And this nonsense started when they started taxing inventory back in the seventies. It becomes a reoccurring liability even when nothing is sold. That changes the incentive structure of long-term capital formation. Capital formation is fragile. It depends on confidence that the rules of compounding will not shift midstream. Once the state proves it is willing to tax paper value annually, the rational response is defensive positioning. Defensive positioning means mobility. Wealth moves, founders relocate, funds restructure, assets migrate into jurisdictions with clearer property guarantees. Even if only a minority leaves, the signal is enough to alter forward investment decisions. The deeper truth is this. Advanced economies are colliding with demographic gravity, entitlement communities, and debt service burdens that exceed organic growth capacity. Political systems struggle to cut spending. Raising broad taxes is unpopular, so policymakers look for concentrated proofs of accumulated capital. Unrealized gains are visible and politically inconvenient. The risk is reflexive. If capital begins to anticipate periodic balance sheet extractions, long horizon investment compresses. Can you send me a link to that article? I'd really like to read it. This is really, it's really entering into a loop where fiscal pressure leads to aggressive taxation. It's more and more taxation. And it And from what I'm seeing, quite honestly, what I'm seeing with the financials and the silver, when you do an evaluation like like we did this weekend, myself and another friend, we were looking into this because we research all the time. It's that in the seventies, if you were minimum wage, you had a buying capability of nine thousand dollars a week. Well, you know what? It sounds like the inverse of what they did with capital gains. Once they started building out the internet, building out the telecommunications system, they were not going to get profit on that for a long, long time. And so what they did is that they allowed the wealthy people, the investors, to exclude capital gains, no tax on capital gains. And so anytime you change tax law, people change their behavior. There's nothing better than the tax law to affect behavior. they did something with capital gains to allow these big corporations to exclude income through capital gains taxes and so that what you read sounds like an inverse of that which you know things can go either way you know it can benefit some and hurt others and vice versa Well, I guess the best thing that I can tell people is that if our buying power has gone to absolute garbage to zero, which it really has really gotten much worse in a lot of ways, when you just look at that tax structure, you can only really make a couple of conclusions. And who is in charge? Is it a necessary correction that we are in the middle of a transition? Or is everything just going completely off the rails? I personally think that we are going in a good direction and all of us are going to feel a little pain from this. But there are corrections that need to be happening. The housing is the next one I expect we're going to see is that the housing has to be corrected. And there's so much fraud and mortgage fraud right now. It's not even funny with these big corporations anymore. We are going to have to course correct on these things, and everybody's going to participate in some of the pain from this. Yeah. Well, they're going to have to shut down. It'll be okay, you know? They're going to have to shut down those real estate trusts, the REITs. And developers that are getting all the corporate welfare in the past with the development and foreign ownership of our land and resources. It's like, I don't know if you know this, but Singapore owns five percent of our Upper Peninsula. That is insanity because that is all resource rich. That's a resource rich area. That's what they're after. They're after the mining, the copper and such. Sure. When they signed the NAFTA agreement, NAFTA Chapter Eleven of the original NAFTA agreement authorized foreign investment in our country. And what they did is to set it up in such a way that if a foreign corporation was not allowed to do business in our country for whatever reason, they could sue under the NAFTA tribunal to get the money for what they expected to make. Not what they would have made, but what they expected to make. Well, that's like opening the doors to the bank vault. They did it with parking in Chicago, the paid parking in Chicago. They sold that out from the city to a company. And now if they have a road closure, they have to pay the company for expected revenues that they would have gotten from parking. Yes, that's it. It's like exactly what they did. And so that's under NAFTA. I never connected that, so I appreciate that. Well, guys, this is the part of the show where we're going to go to a quick break here. David Laskowski is going to be on in a minute. We're going to talk about everything, Canada, China, mining, all this stuff, and Alberta independence. I'm really proud of these guys. I very much am proud of them for taking a stand to protect their area. They saw the problem. They saw where they were being taken. used and exploited and they're doing something about it. It's pretty amazing. So do you have any last words here? Except to say that the plan for Alberta was put together in nineteen ninety one. Same with the Pacific Northwest Economic Region. They have just been working towards that and breaking our country up into regions. Right. And I think the independence movement is breaking their broken plan to make us into a large economic region. I mean, that's really what they're fighting, is they're fighting to get out of these systems that have just exploited them. and taking things away from Alberta. And I just applaud them. I'd love to see every single state in the United States tell these corporate parasites to go pound sand. I mean, I think that's- Well, our government should be protecting us from those corporate parasites. And their government is in partnership with those corporate parasites. They're working for them. They get money in the elections to run for office. Yeah, yeah. And so that's really the significance of what Jesse Ventura said a few weeks ago about he thought Minnesota should join Canada. Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether Alberta joins the United States or Minnesota joins Canada. It's all part of the same strategic plan to break up the United States into regions. Well, the world, you know, I think the whole world is in that right now. So I think secession from everything is not a bad idea because it's these big systems that suck. So thanks for being on, Vicki. We'll talk next week. And I'm going to go to an exactly fifty seven second little break here and I'll be right back. Thank you. Have a great week. Thank you. Good morning and welcome to the second hour of Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg. It is the sixteenth day of February, twenty twenty six, and I'm on with my buddy David Laskowski. How are you doing today, David? I'm good. I'm good. How's my sound today? It's pretty good. You got a little clicking, but it's better. Oh, good. Yeah. You never know what you're going to get. Yeah. Kind of like the box of chocolates. Yeah. There you go. How's your weekend? Well, pretty crappy. Thank you. Well, I've been having this dental problem and I'm a guinea pig. I volunteered to be part of the Alberta University Dental School. So they need a lot of people to work on. And so they worked on a tooth for me. I think they tried the root canal nine times. So I had nine appointments. And then finally they gave up and pulled it out. And I got a little bit of chipmunk thing going on here. Oh, man. Yeah, I was really out of it this weekend. Like, it's surprising how much a tooth can wreck your whole day, well, your whole weekend, basically. So, you know, we're getting breakdowns just like a car, and it's my time to get a little bit of a repair shop time. And so I'm back on the road, but well, it's good to see, I'm glad you're here today. So I read, read down a list of topics that you texted me that, and I think we should just go right down the list. I mean, there's a lot with, you know, with, with, uh, Alberta and I'm so proud of you guys for. standing up for this. I would actually love to see states secede from these federal. I mean, there's two ways to do it in the United States. A governor can literally kick anybody out that is encroached in your borders. That would be one of the first things that I would do is protect our borders. And from government employees that are federal that decided that they're going to come in and push their programs here. I mean, that's what needs to be happening as well as nullification. And just say, no, we're not doing this, this, this, this, or this. You're not going to steal from us anymore. But what you guys are doing up there is just so interesting to me. Yeah, it's maybe a pattern for the future. And we don't have too many of them. We have what Kosovo did. Of course, we have the Donbass region and Ukraine voted. And there's various times there have been breakaways. And that gives you sort of a reset in a good way. And I'm just going to ask you, have you ever heard the term WDW? WDW, in what context? Go ahead. Well, governance-wise, in Ontario, when I was elected in a regional county position there, the Conservative government came in and said, intrusions and cash flow and whatever, so they set up a panel called a Who Does What? Oh. And became kind of famous, and I really enjoyed it. You know, it's kind of strange in a way when, you know, when I started working, my first real good paid job was with the socialist government in Saskatchewan. And then I worked for a socialist federal government, liberal government in BC and in the Yukon. And then I became involved in the Conservative Party in Saskatchewan after that. And then, you know, my brother-in-law was a liberal member of parliament and You know, you, you, you have contact on a daily basis with government services. I was kind of shocked the first time I ran for federal office, people would ask me on my campaign, well, where do you stand on this issue? And I'd have to say, well, that's municipal. I'm running for a federal office. That's municipal. Then someone else would bring up an issue. What are you gonna do about this? Well, that's entirely within the province. They're independent. They're sovereign in that area, as far as the province is concerned. And you realize that we don't teach civics in our high school anymore. nobody has a clue who does what nobody has a clue. They don't know that even if we become independent, there's a whole list of things that are not ever going to change because in our sort of a scab together constitution that we didn't agree to, but we've consented to, it's a kind way to put it. Yeah, it wasn't, it wasn't passed legitimately in my opinion, but you know, you go along with it because you got to wake up in the morning, put your pants on and get to work and, to get decided if you're going to pay your taxes or if they're automatically happening, you got to decide, am I going to stop it? And then start fighting instead of going to work and making money and feeding my kids. I mean, it's called consent. So they govern with consent for a large part and in a common law country where we're not strictly Napoleonic code, that's just what happens. You know, you consent to things. And you hope that someday, like Alberta's picked that day, someday you're going to have a chance to say, okay, time out. We're not just going to go along with this without questioning it anymore. So, you know, thank you for saying you're proud of us because it's a really big job. You know, you have to stop getting up, putting on your pants and just earning money to feed your family. You have to say for the next, let's say, four years, you can do nothing except challenge the governance model that you have and it's really tough. But You know, when I work for the federal government and I learn people don't know who does what, you know, it's a big education program for people to learn that, you know, in Alberta, as independent as they think we're going to be and as much as things are going to change, there's a list of services, like you mentioned for a governor, that we're in charge of all our own health care. We're in charge of all our own educations. You know, we handle all the licensing. There's a certain list of things that should never change. So there's that short list and you say, well, who's been handling this and that and the other thing. And people understand, well, there's military. So the province doesn't really have the ability to declare war, but we have occasionally set up trade offices somewhere, which isn't really an office of diplomacy, but you know, we don't do a whole lot of foreign affairs. And then we can't tell other provinces what to do. So if we want to ship something from province to province to province, well, we kind of agree. We can't tell another sovereign region what to do. That's in the bailiwick of the federal government. So that's fine. But now as you know, we're going through the independence of it. Now's our chance to delineate all this. And we're finding out that the money that we send to our federal government to do federal services is a black hole. We know where our money goes municipally. Absolutely. We know where our money goes provincially. We don't have a clue where our money goes federally. As much as we try to set up watchdogs and whatever, we're finding corruption everywhere. And, you know, we argue about millions of dollars programs. And then right out of the blue, we have an MP leave, go to Ukraine and say, oh, by the way, our deputy prime minister is now working for the country of Ukraine. And we just gave them three point five billion dollars. Well, for what did it come up in the House of Commons? Did we have a chance to vote on that? Well, no, they just take it upon themselves. Well, we're going to give them three and a half billion dollars. And then one of our MPs, she just quits. And now she's going to work either for Oxford University or for the country of Ukraine and Is she there to spend the money that we gave her out of my tax dollars? We don't know. So this reset is really good because I think where we're going at the end of the day is to define what we can do independently and sovereignly. And then we're going to generate a list of things that we agree to have a federation do on our behalf together. You know, in my list, it's something like an air air pilot. If you want to fly an airplane, You need a federal license. There is no provincial license for a pilot, I don't think. So, you know, we have to agree on what does the government do. But then when we're making this list, it does give us a chance to zero out the bank account too. Like I'm anxious to know in our country, I think every Canadian citizen is federally in debt by twenty six thousand dollars. So they they've also stolen from us. a lot of money in equalization and transfer payments and other things. So in our pension plan, we've over contributed to a pension plan. So, you know, we think they owe us six hundred billion dollars and we're like a trillion dollars in debt. So it's a time for us to say it's not all good news. Like we want the money back that you've taken from us that we can prove that didn't go into that black hole. But we're also going to pay our share of the debt. So the good news for you other provinces that are maybe sad to see us leave is the fact that upon our leaving, you don't have to go into debt anymore. And we're going to pay our national debt because we're Westerners. We don't like having a national debt hanging over our head. We like to pay our way as we go. We like to balance the books every year. So now we have a chance to reset the bank account, reset the list of who does what, Ask them, well, exactly how much does it cost to run an army? And we'll pay per capita towards that. How much does it cost to manage a pilot's license that's recognized across all our regional areas? Okay, well, we'll give you our portion of that. And we have a chance now to define the cost of all of these programs. And then we can go to bed at night and thinking, yeah, we've agreed to the services we have. We're paying our fair share. And we're not seeing our money go down a black hole anymore. So I think that kind of a stop, like just a break, like the Bible says, maybe it's like a Jubilee or a Sabbath. Okay, everything stops, but it doesn't restart again until we have a chance to review and maybe take care of some of the big problems we have. And I think that's a really big part of what Alberta independence is all about, is I don't believe that independence means isolation. And that's what a lot of people are afraid of that are, you know, voting against us, that they don't want to be isolated. They don't want to be, you know, without certain services. But that's not going to happen because, you know, as much as we want to continue getting licenses for our pilots, you know, and our carpenters who have this, I don't know if you have it there called a Red Seal certification. I mean, you're certified in your trade. to work anywhere in the country. So you have a certification that's not just in your own province, but other regions. We have national codes. We have building codes and that sort of thing. Right, right. Yeah, so the tradesman certification is one step above that. It's the individual now has a certification. And we don't want to ignore the certification of people who live around us that have taken the exact same training. Of course, we want to recognize them. If you want to come here, of your company and do work in the mine or work you know in a building construction site we'll recognize your credentials and we expect you'll recognize our credentials when we come to your region on a job that happens to be in more than one region so this is going to happen for sure but we'd like to identify it and we'd like everybody to learn who does what and we'd like to learn what the cost of these services are and that's the only way we're going to identify the fraud and plug that black hole off. Because I know with me having to communicate with EGLE, which is part of the DNR, the Department of Natural Resources, EGLE, which is engaged in public-private partnerships, et cetera, giving out fraudulent permits based on fraudulent information. and such, because it is, I mean, the whole thing is just kind of rigged from what I can see. You end up calling so many people to get to anyone that can make a decision because you'll call one person. Well, this is not my department. Well, who do I call? Well, I don't know. Okay. Well, let's see if I get to the next layer. So then you get past somebody else. Well, this is the problem. What do I do? I don't know. It's not my department. And it's like, it's a crazy thing. They don't even, besides the fact that the citizens don't know what the services are, the people we're paying to do the jobs don't know what the services are or who does what or who's responsible. You can't get into, you can't talk to anyone that has the ability to make a decision. And I think silo building is intentional so that they can steer everything anywhere they want. Yeah, obfuscation, it's just like a magic act, right? It's like three shells. It's like, what card do I have in my hand? You know, they distract you. Yeah. They've got the game going and they know how to hide things so they can pick it up later. and waste your time. Oh my gosh. The FOIA laws here, Freedom of Information Act, it's a joke. It's absolutely a joke. You can't get the information unless you, well, you can if you go in and state you're an observer, but you can't get anything in writing or in your hand unless you pay them. And I've heard people that were charged six to four thousand dollars for information that this is how bad it is. And this is what we've already paid for. And now they're charging us for what we already paid for through our taxes. Every single one of these people involved in this need to be, need to be tried for treason. I'm even more, I'm probably even more, you know, savage than you are on the way that you're approaching it because I think so much of it just needs to be gone. Nullify, nullify, nullify. The Michigan Constitution needs to be nullified. It was only installed by one-tenth of one percent. It's illegal. And so it needs to be struck from the books. It was illegally, unlawfully installed. So I guess we just roll it back until we stop, you know, stubbing our toes into rocks or something here. I don't know. It's crazy. Yeah. Yeah. In our so-called constitutional development, Like we really don't have the constitution. We have what we call the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, British North America Act that England put together for Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Ontario, Quebec. So it was a call in a colonial governance document for four provinces for Eastern region of Canada. And actually in, in my opinion, it worked really well. It, it, it described everything that happened. It sort of, gave those four areas a pattern to follow that was being followed in England. Of course, they bastardized it quite a bit. You know, like in England, I think they did something good by saying their division of power, they had a monarch who actually had some power. They had courts of chancery, which, you know, didn't always go strictly by common law. They also had a Senate, what they called the House of Lords, but the Lords were spiritual and temporal, right? So in their upper house, They said half of this, or I don't know the percentage wise, sorry, but a percentage of this is going to be people who actually have managed properties and managed businesses, which some people could take as, you know, elitist, but you know, I'll, I'll say it might've been fair because these people did govern. They did know their, their lands, they governed it, but the other part were just spiritual. So there were people from clergy that had nothing to do with business. They're just there to make sure that they were following biblical principles, that they were doing things morally. So that was their upper house. They had a reason for that. So when you come to Canada, they said, well, we have to add something here because you're remote. So we'll add the office of a governor general, which kind of makes sense. You need somebody to be a go-between. It's more than a diplomatic post. But they said, well, let's have an upper house. Well, my goodness, like what was the purpose of having an upper house? It was to divide the powers, right? It was to keep one house separate. uh, one, one authority at bay. Well, they said, no, I tell you what, once we elect the parliament, we'll just appoint the senators at our whim. So now the senators are just appointed by the house. Well, of course they're going to do what they're told by the people who pay their, pay their wages every day. And then when England said, we don't want you anymore, you're gone. Well, why did we need a governor general? So we kept a governor general, but the governor general is appointed by the same parliament that appointed all the senators. So where's the division of power there? So we had this phony system where we have a phony governor general that gives the appearance of giving us a division of powers, but really they're hired by the prime minister, by the party who's governing in the parliament, and then they've decided to appoint the senators And provinces have said, well, at least make it regionally fair. And we've never been able to do that, which is a really big reason we're wanting to declare independence by the way, reform of the Senate has been a real irritant to people for a long time. But you know, this whole house of cards has been set up and then know we're disenfranchised by the whole process you know it just doesn't make any sense after you go from four provinces to ten and three territories it just doesn't make sense it didn't expand fairly across but the only group that was treated fairly you might you might laugh when you hear this is england said okay you can just use the eighteen sixty seven british north america act as your constitution if you want just go ahead but We're, we're going to be really, really fair to one group here to make sure that you have a say in your own constitution, which is Aboriginal people. So our, our, in, they said, you can just change a name. They call it repatriation. You could change your name, but you have to have a constitutional conference, invite all of the leaders who signed treaties. All the leaders are recognized first nations groups. You have to have a conference and get their input and get their consent. in one year. You cannot use this document until you treat these people fairly and they get their lawyers and their scholars and their historians and you get them all at a constitutional conference to make sure they're happy. Like in our area, they ceded land in return for money and services. So you have to make sure they're happy with that. Well, they weren't happy with it. They changed the terms and said, okay, we'll even have a second conference. We really want to be thorough that you guys have got everything that you want. We're not inviting Eastern European immigrants like my family who actually homesteaded land and we're breaking our backs, you know, homesteading, making the land productive. We didn't get invited. None of the provincial government leaders got invited. No municipal leaders got invited. Only First Nations people had the chance to talk to the British authorities and the federal Canadian government and say, we're here with two constitutional conferences. Finally, they agreed. Now, here we are, twenty twenty five. They're saying, well, now we're ignoring everything that you did. We signed this document called UNDRIP. You signed it like BC signed it. So they're saying now. Okay, forget everything we agreed to before. We're telling you now that we used to use this plot of land historically. So now the government has said, yeah, you actually have shared title. So the fee simple title of these people in BC is now shared with the First Nation. They cannot sell their property. They can't renew their mortgages. They can't do anything. The whole title to their land is up in arms. So, I mean, I think that's totally illegitimate. you know, in our constitution, in our process, you guys have had every opportunity to say no. And you agreed to everything because the money you got, like it's the only budget in Canada that's never been reduced is the Indian Act where we make our treaty payments, we make our obligations, we provide, you know, the schooling and whatever that we agreed to. It's all there. So I don't think, you know, I don't think that's legitimate. Well, I think most of this nonsense that has to do with Indigenous people, my question is, is who did they take the land from? Because everybody did. I mean, go back further, and you're going to find another group of people that moved in, and there's been a lot of motion here, you know, for a very long time. One of my friends who is who is Native American in Michigan here, she said, too, she said, this is so much crap. She said, you are a Native American. You were born here. And so so, you know, it's like this is so what do we are? We just like floating dust on the world. You know, this is just crap. All of this. And the problem that we have in Michigan is that anyone that that is part of the the Native American lands or such, they've got freaking casinos going up all over the state like popcorn. And what I do know is that there's a ton of money laundering and child trafficking associated with them. And where's the money going? Most of it probably back to Las Vegas, etc. But the whole thing is a shell game. The entirety of it is just wrong. It is morally wrong. And, you know, for anyone to look at another human being, no matter who they are, and just say, you know, well, guess what? You don't matter because we say so. You know, it's not okay. So if I was born here, I'm a Native American. If I'm not, then what the heck am I? That's your word to use is indigenous. Indigenous means born there. Well, that means I'm an indigenous American. I'm a native American. I was born and born here. We talked about Dr. Jensen and his. Oh, okay. I can grab a book here, but yeah, he's written two books. One of them is called, they had names and the other book is called traced. So he is a geneticist. So what he's done is he's put together an assessment of two ways of identifying people groups. And one of them is by what they call haplogroups, where he studied their language structure and loosely their customs. And then the other way is by tracing their Y chromosome DNA on the father's side and mitochondrial DNA on the mother's side. He's focused on the Y chromosome. So, you know, you know, this twenty three and me business is only a collection of basic DNA so the Chinese can can target certain racial groups with their viruses. That whole thing was a scam. You don't learn anything. And or what else they're doing with that DNA. I'm concerned. Yeah, you don't get anything about your lineage there because it's such a mess. There's so many shared genomes. But if you trace the Y chromosome or the mitochondrial chromosome, they've learned that there's three genes that change every generation. So by looking at how many of the Y chromosome similarities they are, they can tell how many generations you are away from another person and trace back the area. But you can also strongly identify groups that are related by DNA. It just so happens that he has seen that the Y chromosome proof of relation matches the haplogroup, the language development, and the customs. They match perfectly. And then somebody in Kentucky had discovered this book called the Wollum Ollum. In English, it's the red record. And it's like their Bible and their history book all wrapped into one. And this record goes back to Europe when they came across the ocean on the land bridge from Siberia to Alaska. And there were peoples moving back and forth. And it describes all of their movement. It even describes the name of their chief, their ten or twelve leaders that were involved in the movement from Eastern Europe down through Alaska, down into where I live, and then into the rest of the United States. So the hilarious part of it is the haplogroup that came from that part of Russia into this part of the country is my haplogroup. So, you know, it really begs the question, if we have genetic evidence that the people, not just the northern Inuit, because visually you can see that they're the same, visually. I mean, they have the same height, the same skin color, same facial features. That's fairly easy to see. But the Eastern Europeans that moved, they moved east and they occupied, you know, Alaska, came down into Alberta and then down through, you know, central of the United States and then over to the Great Lakes where you are, the movement of it all has all been traced now. And the fact of the matter is we're all related. We are all related. It is so ridiculous. Yeah. Did you ever hear of the redheaded? There was a redheaded group of people in the United States that you can trace way, way, way, way back. And they were redheaded and they spoke Welsh. in the United States before the Pilgrims, before the discovery of America. There's also an Italian ship that sunk down off of, I think it is Brazil. And the other thing is that the copper in Michigan is a very specific type of copper. They have found that copper all over the world, dated thousands and thousands and thousands of years ago. And it's like it's like so this whole, you know, stake a claim on a certain area because, you know, my last name is it sounds like it's from the Netherlands or Poland or wherever the heck it is or Russia is nonsense. Because people have moved, crops have moved, animals have moved for such a long time that we don't even know our history anymore. They've got it so screwed up and hidden. Have you ever looked at the precision around the pyramids and the tombs in Egypt? Yeah, there's no way. There's no way that people that had chisels and hammers made that. It's impossible. Absolutely impossible. So we don't know anything. Except I can tell everybody out there, and don't start calling me Pocahontas because that's a total insult to me. But I'm a Native American. I was born here. I'm an indigenous Michigan person. Sure. I didn't just like float out of the air, like, you know, like a dandelion seeds or something. It's like, no, it's ridiculous. Yeah. I don't think you can ever come up with a, let's say basis for ownership. I don't think worldwide, if you've heard of it, I have never heard of it. What is an actual fair point where you can say, okay, that is my land because, you know, I don't, I don't, I've never heard of it. I've never heard of that. Usually it goes, okay, we've been here for hundreds or thousands of years. Okay, well, you take that into consideration. At some point, though, you say, but if you voluntarily left it, and when we got here, there was no sign of you for a hundred years. Is it fair for you to come back after a hundred years and say, what are you doing here? This is my land. Right. I don't think so. I don't think so. I don't think so. Well, and that's I think that's part of the psyop to have to have us identify from our roots where we came from. You know, it's so absurd. It's so absurd. You know, if we went back to the like, like my grandparents were all born here. You know, I didn't, we've, we've been here for, you know, my family's been here for generations. And so, you know, but I know some of them, one of my, my grandma's family, they were French Huguenots. So what do you do with that? Do you go to the Netherlands or you go to France? How far back are we going to go to try to make things fair as fair and stake a claim? You know, it's a, you know, there's not even an animal on the planet that is that dumb. You know, they will move to another area where the resources are and nobody says, well, you can't be here. I know. It's ridiculous. The West Coast bothered me the most when I met various people groups with fisheries. That's a real way to meet people. You get to be a fisheries officer, go up and down the coast and deal with native fishery. And you meet people of a particular tribe. And you recognize this is their settlement. And they've been there for two or three generations for sure. And then you start socializing with them and ask them questions. you know, what's your culture, whatever. Well, some of them are fishermen and they're very peaceful and other ones are warrior culture. So generally the warrior culture won out and you ask them about their, you know, history and they say, yep, we came here three generations ago. The XXX people were here. We killed them all as warriors and we ate their dogs. I mean, I don't know why this thing about eating their dogs always comes up in the West Coast, but yeah, we killed them all. We took their land, we conquered, and they're really damn proud of it. Like we killed them all and we ate their dogs and we conquered. We are very powerful. Okay. So you need enough of these people and you realize some of them, it's only two generations ago that they, they took that piece of land by murdering, killing everybody there, and then established, you know, ownership over that own land. Well, now you have to question. So you're, wait a minute. So you're establishing a land claim. And you're claiming it as historical ownership because you are so-called, uh, you know, Aboriginal, but when we agree that, okay, the original, we call them first nations. So if we want to make a treaty with the first nations, what you've just told me means at best, you're a second nation, right? You're a conqueror for it. Exactly. So we're here now and. You know, we'd like to develop this property, put in some roads and, you know, get you some clean drinking water and things. So you'll take all the services that we give you. But you're saying historically this is your land and we call you a First Nation. But from what you just told me, you're at best a Second Nation. We don't know if the people that you disposed also disposed a nation before that. But you've identified a group. that I know still exists, maybe it's better for me to say, screw you, I'm going to find that First Nation that you murdered and pillaged and give them the good news that we're going to set up a treaty with them and put them back on their ancestral land. How about that? Yeah, right. I mean, this is a great discussion because it doesn't make any sense to me. It's like, okay, how far back are we going to go? It was so funny. I homeschooled my kids, right? And I'm not a person who fits any mold very well. Let's just put it that way. We started homeschooling and all of a sudden I realized that everybody's stuck in the little house on the prairie. time you know we've got the everybody's got the long denim skirts and they've got you know the bit the long hair and ponytails and i mean and if you didn't dress that way or whatever you were a bit ostracized which of course i was ostracized because i don't fit molds real well i'm just myself and i'm like so we're gonna go back to schooling and we're gonna put little house on the prairie as the best time that ever lived in the whole world and we're into i'm like that is insane you it's you're living in a world now that there are values from that time you know i know how to do all the canning preserving food i grew up on a farm i learned that as part of what we did but i sure as heck didn't dress like little house on the prairie because i'd have boots on jeans and be able to jump on top of a freaking hay wagon or run a tractor or something you know it's a The whole thing is just kind of funny. It is funny, but it shows the psychological instability of human beings who take advantage, any advantage they have, instead of having a mindset of service, which brings me back to another topic of competition. They engineered competition into us, and I think school sports are stupid, okay? I'm just going to say it. We pawn our kids off to school sports to teach them to be total competitors, but they never really learn to work together because the guy that is, you know, the big guy on the team is the one that gets all of the accolades, goes to college for free, and everybody else was used for him to have the notoriety. Sure. I just said it, didn't I? And it's like and parents are not getting time with their kids, you know, and and I don't I don't understand this. I just don't understand that. It's like the whole capture of our school systems. The states are taking ownership of your children. If you don't fall in line, they call CPS to take your children. If you decide to do something different and teaching people to have that type of a competition that instead of service. And that's exactly what I see from a lot of these these government welfare and, you know, racial plans or whatever you want to see your gender gender affirming stuff or nonsense is. out there it's a competition to see who gets the most for free and works the least and serves the least it doesn't make sense it is totally set against anybody that actually thinks about it for a little bit you know sorry yeah kind of rant over it is the way it is yeah yeah you wonder what do you need except the three r's like for public education they should make sure you have a baseline offered If you want to take up the offer, go for it. If you want to do it at home, go for it. It should be understood that once you learn how to read for yourself, once you can do mathematics, once you're introduced to things, you should decide which is the best model for you, your children to move forward with from there. But that's not really a good model for those who want to indoctrinate children. I mean, we have to recognize a big part of what is done under social services or public good is basic indoctrination. That's what it is. Human beings is what it is. Yeah. Yeah. No, it's like I watched one of my friends had had a very gifted child in gymnastics. the family was going every single week and it was breaking the family to go to all these gymnastics meet. And she was in training six days a week for four to six hours. She got into high school and she had a total breakdown. And, and it's like, you know, you wonder, is this for the, for the kids or is this for the parents? Mm-hmm, mm-hmm, mm-hmm. Yeah, crazy business. It is not. So anyhow, well, we can move on to another subject. I can, you know, be annoyed all day long. Yeah. I want to talk about the answered prayer that I have. I've been studying climate change since the beginning of my life. Since the beginning of my life. Since the beginning of my life. Since the beginning of my life. Since the beginning of my life. Since the beginning of my life. Since the beginning of my life. Fact I recognize is public perception is everything. People don't have time to learn the details of anything. How do you, how do you get people to learn a lie and how do you maintain a hoax, a scam? How do you, how do you do it? A big part of it is people's perception comes from somebody in power. They don't have to like that person in power, but when a leader makes a statement, And then you ask them later on what they believe on that topic. It's amazing how much sway that statement by that leader has on their beliefs. So the thing that's been missing from this whole climate change hoax, because it is a hundred percent hoax. It was designed as a scam. It's a financial wealth exchange. People that weren't making money in the old way couldn't, couldn't beat the Rothschilds or whoever, you know, from, from their grip, they created a new economy. Like Al Gore said, I'm the first climate change billionaire. Like he's right there. It's a hoax. It's a scam. You know, it's all about population control and it's about moving money to people like my prime minister here. Like he's got big investments in green technology. Okay. It's a scam. It's sucking money out of good programs and it's pushing it into programs. or they benefit from it. But nobody except for President Trump has actually said the word hoax, climate hoax. And I really got to honor him for doing that. That's awesome, isn't it? Really have to, like, you can put aside everything else that you don't like or like about Donald Trump, but President Trump actually standing at a podium and saying those words together is a leadership role that I hope other leaders will finally get to, because we need every single leader who's funneling money in large amounts, like the amount of money that's gone into this scam is unfathomable. I mean, it may be more than war that black hole that is the hoax of climate change is probably the worst disease that our society has, has faced to try to get out of this thing. We'll never know where the money went. will absolutely have no trace of it people have become trillionaires over this and it's still hurting us today and what president trump has done is the beginning of it and i'm just encouraging him to share that with everybody he knows and tell other people i mean that has to be a basis like fighting communism you know like right like fighting artificial intelligence taking over our jobs i mean it's something that needs to be done by all of our leaders and What he said was really, really good, but I do want him to expand on it at some point because at some point a leader making a statement like that has to back up his words with something because people are so brainwashed into believing that their planet that they live on is in distress and demonizing people like Donald Trump for not continuing to funnel funds into protecting their precious planet. They are, how can I say, innocently scared. They're not part of the evil conspiracy, but they're totally brainwashed by it. And there's certain things that, you know, you can tell people to wake up. And I think now people are at the wake up stage. So at some point, it would be good to hear him do more on this issue and actually make three or four statements. You know, at one point in time, I think in his first term, he had William Happer on board in some science capacity. William Happer is the world leading expert on the molecule of carbon dioxide. And he had developed carbon dioxide military lasers. And there isn't anything about carbon dioxide he doesn't know. He was on the climate change side studying it for a while until they found out that it has a limited effect as a greenhouse gas. And he started to advise president Trump in the first year. And I think he quit in frustration because president Trump in the first term wasn't totally on side with it. I think people that advised him said, look, most Americans believe we have to do something about climate change. Wouldn't be good for you to come out and say it's a scam. So I think certain people just kind of left and stopped advising him, which was a real shame. So now I'm sure William Happer in Princeton, well, he's retired, but I'm sure he's smiling his face off hearing President Trump make the statement he did now. Time to bring William Happer back. I think President Trump could say, well, this has gone on a long time, but we now know that at four hundred parts per billion where we are today, the carbon dioxide has saturated the upper atmosphere to the point that it can't be responsible for any more warming. It just can't. And William Happer has a really elegant way of putting it. He said, carbon dioxide is kind of like putting paint on a barn. You get a barn, you paint it red. It looks red. Well, put a second coat on. To some people, it may look a little bit more red. But once you've got it covered with two good thick coats of red paint, putting a third and a fourth and a fifth coat, It doesn't reflect any more red light back into your eyes. It doesn't get any redder. It's already red. The point they missed too is that growing things, plants and such have got to have carbon dioxide. And if we take that down, you kill the planet by taking the carbon dioxide down. It's part of the growth cycle. It's necessary. And when I look at this whole thing with the green energy nonsense and the global warming, really, if you just look at what they did with windmills, and I did extensive research into that, It is such a stupid thing. It's not even funny. They have got a coolant in the nose cone that is more damaging than Freon, and they can't seal it. But we're just going to overlook those actual environmental things that could be a problem because it's green energy. We'll just slap a label on it, and we're good to go. Yeah. Yeah, the green energy, especially windmills, is about taking land. And because they didn't – besides the fact that the blades lose like, like, twenty percent of their efficiency in a year and a half from grit in the air, they lose thirty percent in the gathering lines, you know, of what it produces. They've got a lifespan that has – they have to be removed or changed, right? And – The companies that made the contracts, I don't believe most of them ever put a remediation clause in there. So now the farmers that decided to participate in this are responsible for removing these windmills. They aren't going to be able to pay it. So guess what? Who gets the land? Yeah, exactly. Yeah, it's a big scam. President Trump did point out the stupidity of windmills. They kill birds. They're more expensive to make. You know, they pollute more than other forms of energy. They make the land look ugly. Uh, you know, they're, they're too far away from where you need to use the energy. You have to transmit it somewhere. It's a bad business decision, nevermind environmental. The fact that it occupies land, that it, you know, it's comes from China. They have to mine the minerals. They have to forge it. They have to manufacture it. It all, all of that production and the short lifespan, it actually causes more pollution. than if they just fired up a natural gas plant. Or, you know, gasified coal is actually less polluting than putting a windmill or solar panels up. Because it goes directly to energy. You can put it right where you want it. You don't have to produce the power when people are not needing the power. It's very efficient that way. And, you know, President Trump hit one nail right on the head, pointing that out. But the other side of it is he can also add to it the fact that That carbon dioxide is a beautiful plant food. Eighty-five percent of the plants on Earth are of a C-one variety where they want a thousand parts per million, and we're only at four hundred. Because we've seen the carbon dioxide go from one eighty to four hundred, the planet has greened crops and forests by fifteen percent during the industrial age, while our carbon dioxide just went up from one eighty to four hundred. So we can be relaxed up until a thousand parts per million. It's been a benefit to society, a benefit that we've actually seen it happen. And it's historical. The trends of carbon dioxide have been up and down like you wouldn't believe. And it's a good thing for us. It's not a bad thing. I agree. And that's the problem when somebody controls the narrative and spits out false information to make everybody go hysterical over stuff that's not true. I have proposed I have proposed for farmers in our independence movement, I propose that we actually initiate a carbon tax and that is every farmer that produces CO₂, whether it's cow farts or diesel fuel, gets money from the government in order to produce carbon dioxide. Oh, that's funny. That is really funny. You are my hero. This is fantastic. Yeah. I mean, I think, I think we should, I honestly think we should. I mean, I did this biodigester project where I captured the methane and the CO two from cow manure and made really nice fertilizer of it. And the day I got it running, I had people from greenhouses coming by saying, we'll buy the carbon dioxide from you. And that's, I didn't really know that much about greenhouse one, but yeah, They want twelve hundred parts per million in the greenhouse at night. The carbon dioxide is the same value as propane. It's expensive. So they said, if I can get a cheap supply of carbon dioxide, I want all I can get. I realize pokey smokes. Here we are. We're giving credits for people to not produce it and to bury it in the ground and whatever. And here people want to buy it. And then you do these studies where, you know, you do the measurement of CO, too, whether it's corn crops. And every bit of carbon dioxide, as you know, is heavier. The gas is heavier than, than other gases, right? It's a heavy gas. So it stays in low lying areas. So if you're growing corn and you've got a bunch of cows farting over there and running diesel generators and you're running backhoes and whatever. Any carbon dioxide that gets produced, it takes a while to mix. It settles into a corn crop. You can measure carbon, the CO two, you know, at four hundred, five hundred parts per million until the sun comes up. Those those plants suck up all that carbon dioxide. It goes to like one hundred because the plants are just going to gobble it up. So if you're a farmer and you're producing heavy gas like carbon dioxide and making your plants grow better, I think the government should pay you a tax after you calculate how much carbon dioxide you've produced and give you a plant fertilizer bonus. And at least you offset the tax you've been paying, thinking it was harming things. You're actually helping the world. You're fertilizing your plants. You're growing more crops, feeding more people, whatever it is. I think we should, we should counter it and say at this point, We're going to give you money if you could prove that you produced a whole lot of carbon dioxide because you're helping our planet. There you go. Sean just popped up and said it's a building block of life. It is. Absolutely. We're carbon-based life forms. Think about how detached that we have become with a poor education system. with distractions and such that we don't even know the mechanisms of life itself and they have tried to teach us that the building blocks of life is a danger to life i know yeah yeah i have a i have a slideshow that i do and climate change presentations and i i don't know about much about alf that alien but there was a tv series about alf the alien And I said, the only way you can describe this whole thing is there's aliens out there somewhere watching us, okay? And they're recognizing that we're really stupid. So they say, these people here are really, really stupid. And the other alien says, oh, I don't know. They seem to have the ability to reason. And ALF says, no, no, they're really, really stupid. So let's make a bet. How can we prove how stupid they really are? So he said, this earth here, it's a carbon-based life form. Everything is based on carbon. Carbon's in the air, carbon's on the ground. Their bodies are made mostly out of carbon and other elements, but it's a carbon-based life form. He says, I bet you I can convince them that carbon is a pollutant. And the other alien would say, nobody could be that stupid. Like you can't go to a world which is silicon-based and say, oh, by the way, silicon, the very thing that your whole planet is made out of is a pollutant. They would never buy that. But Alpha would say, oh, yeah, these people are really, really stupid. I bet you we can come up with a way to make these people believe that carbon is a pollutant. Well, he's right. He won the bet. Oh, that's funny. There's no way to explain it, how stupid it really is. I mean, if you just take ten minutes to say, well, what is carbon in our world? what does carbon dioxide do? Like, it just makes no sense that you would think of it in any way, shape, or form as a pollutant. You know, and if you look at- Here's another hoax that I think is absolutely hilarious, okay? So I work in gas and oil, partly, not always. But, you know, it's sort of like I move back and forth between lots of different things. But at any rate, I ask people about this, you know, they've been trying to make us afraid that, you know, the law of scarcity, everything's always scarce all the time, right? The law of scarcity is that the planet, how many times, and I'm sixty-one years old, right? How many times have we been told over and over since the moment I was born, we're going to run out of gas and oil, oh my gosh, it's going to be two years. Every two years, you hear, we're going to be running out of gas and oil in two years. Okay, it's ten years down the line. Okay, now it's back to two years. It's back and forth, back and forth. So I'd like to ask everybody a very simple question. What is the basis for gas and oil? People will usually say, oh, it's a fossil fuel. Oh, really? Really? Where did that come from? Sorry to burst your bubble on that, but that was a Rockefeller move to teach everybody of the law of scarcity. But when you think about this, and there's lots of books written on this, the Deep Hot Biosphere is one of my favorites. Right. Where in Siberia, where do they get their petroleum products? Ten thousand feet underground, like under the bedrock where no dinosaur in this place was here. Billions and billions of you has ever, ever, ever walked. Well, that kind of shoots at all the all the pieces. How freaking many dinosaurs and vegetation would have had to die and be compressed down into an area? Just all of a sudden, we turned it all to sludge and we compressed it down into smaller sludge, smaller, smaller. But we're still pulling millions and millions of gallons of oil out of the ground every single day. So there had to be like gazillions of them all die at one time. And then magically, they got compressed down into something and rock covered them magically. So that we've got oil. It is ridiculous. It is so ridiculous. It's not dinosaurs. It is not fossils. There's no chance we're going to run out of it. They capped a bunch of natural gas wells over in Colorado years ago. They can't get natural gas. It's all gone. We've run out. OK, they uncapped them. They took the wax seals of them ten years later and they were completely full again. It's like just take a breath. Yeah, yeah. There was a movement at some point to actually call natural gas renewable energy, not a non-renewable, but renewable, because so many times they they completely evacuated a natural gas well. and then it comes back and they're finding out that it's actually the result of certain mineral and biological activity. It's being formed under the earth. It hits a certain point where it's under so much pressures, it doesn't reform, but when you remove the pressure, it starts all over again. It's a renewable resource coming from underground. So, yeah, I know. Deep ocean bacteria produces the same thing. For sure. Yeah, for sure. It should be called Rockefeller's Folly and then go take all of his stuff for lying to us and making us buy into and subsidize his theft of our resources. Yeah. Before I die, I'd like, I'd like to see people get checks for producing carbon dioxide too. I really would like to see. Yeah. Yeah. We'll tax somebody and we'll give the money to the farmers and the industrial and the, you know, and commuters for producing carbon dioxide that's good for our planet. Yeah. I think it would be a win if everybody just got a little smarter and we didn't have to tax any of this stuff, quite honestly, but until we get to that point. How do you educate people? Like I find it so hard in politics to catch people's attention and, If you were to say, look, we know you've driven back and forth to work these many times and you burn this much gasoline. So by the way, here's fifteen bucks. They go, what for? Well, for producing carbon dioxide, because it's really good for the earth that you've done that. So good for you for going to work and feeding your kids and driving your car. And you're a hero today. Here's your fifteen dollars. I might have to go in that direction if I decide to run for governor again. Why not? Why not? I really think it's the best way to catch people's attention in a good way, create a little bit of chatter and make them dig into it a little bit. How moronic this nonsense is. I know. Or even an IOU. I mean, come up with an IOU. Ask people, have you done your calculations on what your carbon footprint is? Good. We'll give it to me because I'll write you up an IOU. And at some point the government should be paying you to do that. It's such a great thing. Oh, that's fun. This is fun. Yeah. For president Trump though, he's got to stay in the, in the upper limits. There's only so much he has time to say with all the issues going on. Another thing I find astounding on the metrics is the, the sinking continent, the sinking planet, you know, the fact is that the shoreline, is growing by fifteen percent as well. So if you look at maps back a hundred years ago and then look at the continents right now, the actual length of shoreline during this whole climate change has actually increased. So it doesn't matter that let's say a small island, they're saying that they're sinking, but at the same time waves are placing sediment onto their shores by the same degree that underneath is a millimeter every ten years dropping, there's more deposition of dirt on their land than they're losing by sinking. So if the shoreline is increasing, you can just stop worrying about all these sinking planets and sinking regions. That's an actual fact. And the one thing that really I found interesting, there's a scientist, just give me a second if I can find it here. I find all of this stuff that's just cyclical amusing how people get panicked about it. There's cycles. The Earth has always had cycles. Right. So there's a scientist called Paul Burgess. So Paul Burgess is involved in satellite measurement of temperature of the surface of the Earth. So as you know, the scam that they've been doing so far is by placing temperature sensors in places where they're not really accurate and they're, they're skewed in order to give certain results. That's another whole story. I've done a wonderful job at, you know, analyzing where these sensors are and whether they're usable or not. And they're not like if, If you know there's going to be an airport or an expansion in the city, you can place the temperature sensor in the middle of the field where it's working, and then people come and build things all the way around it and create a heat island. Well, that land temperature sensor has been compromised. It's no good anymore. Right. A lot of it goes that way. And then they've also taken upon themselves the fact that only thirty percent of the Earth is land. So they're using estimates. So they take two compromised temperature sensors and they say, we don't have one in the middle. So we're going, we are going to decide that knowing that the temperature is rising from carbon dioxide, we're going to tell you what the thing would read if it was there. The whole thing is a scam. Right. seventy percent of the earth is water and I think most scientists agree that if the oceans warm up eventually that warms up the whole planet right so if you are taking satellite measurements you're not affected by any spot or island you're taking measurements of the whole earth's surface so he's generated since from nineteen eighty three to twenty twenty five he's he's got a graph that relates together the activity of the Sun and the temperature of the earth without any estimations, without any faulty measurement potential. He's simply taken readings and they're exactly the same. Like from eighty three to twenty twenty five, every time the sun shines a little bit more, the temperature of the water in the earth goes up exactly the same amount. And when the sun's effectiveness goes down a wee little bit, the temperature drops. he's actually got a challenge out to people that the correlation that he's got is so exact that he himself doesn't even believe his own results. But the data is there. The Milankovitch cycles explain our epochs in time, why we have little ice ages and big ice ages. It's the sun. It's really, there's no other way to put it. It's the sun. So, you know, if you actually have anything as far as data is concerned, you know, Get the statement on carbon dioxide that it's a benefit. It's a wonderful thing. And the cycles of the earth goes through a hundred percent natural and you can measure the intensity of the sun and you know what you're going to get right after that from what you get on the earth. It's a one-to-one relationship without any blips. It's proven it's, it's absolutely there. And you don't have to send money to some Island that's apparently sinking because we have images and we have pictures of their shoreline and you know, there's deposition happening all the time. It's called pro grading happening all the time. So geologists are watching this kind of a thing. If you hit all the big points and then, you know, at this point, all of the predictions of doom, I've already passed us by. You remember when they started saying there's going to be no more snow in the United States, oh yeah by the year two thousand you know people not remember what snow even looked like you know and all of these doom and gloom predictions they've expired now i think it'd be really cool to have president trump make fun of them great just great like come on you guys predicted all of this like i've been watching intensely since Really bad things are supposed to happen for sure by the year, two thousand for sure by the year two ten and then twenty twenty. Well, that's definitely the absolute end of it. Well, here we are heading into twenty thirty and the world's actually getting better. We've got more land than we had. We have better crops that we had. We get fewer people dying of cold. Right. I mean, everything, the metrics, everything is better than it was. So all of these people who predicted doom and gloom shut up. It's just shut up. You know, somebody told me, yeah, somebody told me once for educational sense, I should read books by Paul Ehrlich. Remember he wrote the book, uh, I think as a boom and bust or population explosion. Paul Ehrlich is a remarkable man. He made, he made a lot of predictions about, you know, the ability of the earth to grow crops and feed ourselves. And, uh, he's a very noteworthy scientist because he's had a long career. He's written a lot of books. Every single thing he wrote is wrong. Yeah, I know when people go through the book and I'm not, I'm not the expert, so don't sue me for saying it, but people are recommended. They say, if you read his books and you say, this is how much, you know, the crops that we're going to have in, this is the population. I run out of food here. You know, this temperature will go crazy. Every single thing you predicted did not happen. Nothing to put together as a scientist and said, because we do this, this is going to happen. That didn't happen. Like it's all expired now. So, but he's still a tenured professor at a university. Of course he is. Cause that's where we can indoctrinate more people into things that are untrue. yeah yeah it's remarkable like you would expect half of what he said to happen I mean common sense indicates that if you have enough education and observe enough such systems happening sooner or later you have to be right well apparently not You know, this is funny that you bring this subject up. We may not get to China today and the Chinese infiltration of Alberta that's going on right now. Let's do that next Monday. So I've been watching and researching into old ancient methods of not only heating your house, but to be totally independent of a grid, as well as doing things to stop the need for heating. irrigation and how you, how you can do that. And also the plants that we buy in nurseries, how they really were engineered for non productivity and the original crops were that, that nobody sells that are, you can get for free anywhere. That they're actually a better food source. So I've been having a good time with that lately in looking at more of the old ways, especially for engineering heat systems. And, you know, from the Vikings and that sort of thing, how they can serve their heat, what they did to stay warm. and how poorly our modern day homes are designed. When you really start looking at the, they've really put us into a subscription into their system lifestyle. You have a house and all of a sudden you have to pay a subscription for electric, gas, water, sewer. because it's a subscription, you pay it every month, right? And they can decide what the subscription rate is. You have no way to alter that. So I've been kind of interested. It's like, okay, so how do we get away from the subscription rate and continue on food, water, as well as heating. So I've been having a lot of fun studying this and different ways to store thermal mass and how to use the earth instead of working against it. Everything our society does works against the earth. And there are ways of doing things that are independent that you wouldn't have to ever pay for heat. You wouldn't have to ever pay for any of this stuff. You know, if we got taxation gone, we'd have actually freedom. And I love that. I would love that if we never had any taxes, that would be amazing. And that, you know, we owned the land and we made contracts with each other and, you know, cut all this nonsense out and send the parasites packing because they don't produce anything. Because they're so beholden to the psychology of having to have things or be things or accomplish things to be valid, they chase after these material things instead of what real wealth is. It's interesting to me at any rate, but I've been doing quite a bit of study into this just because I think people need to learn these things. Well, good for you because you're involved in government and Just imagine if the government had focused on allowing people to retain the wealth they had by using everything historically we're aware of and all of the common sense basic means of heating our homes and generating electricity and purifying our own water, then scamming us with climate change or constantly being at war with somebody and building better bombs, the government could really be helping us to retain our own wealth. and making us more self-sufficient and less dependent on grids. That's a big shame in our modern age. Why hasn't the government helped us and focused energy to help us in our daily lives? That's exactly right. I mean, they know historically things that have worked. And I'll give you an example myself. In Ontario, I met a guy who used to be in charge of all of the remote cabins, like all of the ministry had various buildings and garages and whatever. And he was just spinning mad one day. He said the last year before he retired, all the water pipes were bursting and they're having all these nasty things happening with their buildings from freezing and thawing and heaving and everything. And he said, what happened was these young guys get there and see that all the old buildings that they originally put up, they used to dig a four foot crawl space and then they would use brick or preserved wood and then put the building above rock, just right on the rock, four feet down. And the building was sitting on top of a crawl space. So all the young engineers came along and said, well, you can't do that. Everybody knows you have to pour a slab and then, you know, we'll do this and that and the other thing. Then, well, the very next year after they replaced a whole bunch of buildings the old way, so they're sitting on slabs, all their pipes froze. First time the electricity went down, all their pipes froze. Well, now you've got flooding and all their buildings are water damaged. They never stopped to ask, well, why did you old timers make all your buildings in the remote area of Ontario in the north on over a four foot open crawl space, you know, with installation around, why did you do that? And he said, well, there's constant warmth coming up out of the ground. Right. And you never calculated anywhere in your calculations. The fact that you only have to go down four feet to have enough warmth to be one, one degree above zero Celsius or, you know, That's all you need to do is go down four feet, put your pipes down there in the ground where they stay warm. And you may have things freeze above if it goes off, but you've got check valves and everything. So we never had a frozen pipe because, you know, we used, you know, some geoengineering. And they just totally missed that. But he said for a whole year before he retired, he tried to get them to stop and he failed. They just said, no, we're going to do it this way. We're going to fill in all those crawl spaces. It gets dusty under there and there's spiders. Dusty, right? Think about it. When you build houses where they are so exposed in like the neighborhoods and such, and you're basically sitting right up on the ground. Well, now you got to have a furnace and you also have to, all the other things to keep it above the ground. You're not using anything in the earth to, to, you know, help yourself. And even the earth, the earth itself, if we did more berming, and I'm not even talking about like a bermed house, though, that's not a bad way to go. And I know people that have done that. But even if you did things like that, if they really wanted to be energy efficient, that would save probably sixty to seventy percent of our heat costs and our energy costs. our energy consumption. We could make our energy consumption go down incredibly. And you know, what's really interesting is you talked about being in fisheries. I really would like to, I want to learn, this is one of my goals. I want to learn how to, how to fish farm. So that, that is on my, that is on my bucket list is to do farming. Because there's so many ways that we can feed our own people. It's incredible. We don't need to depend on other countries. We don't need to depend on any of this. And if the government did it correctly, let's just say we had somebody with an entrepreneurial bent in their system in there, this country could work for we the people. That's management. A manager is supposed to make the asset work for the owner. For sure. A manager, a governor, a great entrepreneurial governor, wink, wink, would be fantastic at restructuring so that the state literally paid the people that own the state. Now, I'm not even talking not taxing. I'm talking about the taxes that are unconstitutional anyway. But what if it paid dividends? How come Nestle gets to walk out with all of our water? How come these companies get to just take whatever they want and we still have to pay taxes on it or buy it back? This is insane. I know. I know. I know. I want to talk to you because you and I are old school farm people that I think we just have way too much common sense to fit in with their nonsense. But maybe I'm biased or something. But anyway, well, this is a wonderful, this has been a wonderful discussion this morning. I always like talking to you. So let's do this again next Monday. You want to be my Monday regular at ten? Well, until I run out of topics, you're I don't think that's going to happen. I just got there. I just got, we can dig up more crap that they're doing and expose it. And maybe, maybe that's one of the biggest services that we can do is expose this, continue to expose this stuff and let people see what a, what a joke it is. It's a not, it's not funny, but it kind of, if it weren't so serious, it, you know, it would be really funny. But the reality is that we got to come up to speed with this stuff and say, we're done with it. You know, yeah and in our experience you know this independence movement we are sort of turning over the rocks so a lot of people are being confronted with situations they they had no idea were happening behind the scenes So, yeah, we can keep in touch. We can talk about MKUltra sometime. Oh, I love that subject. Here's another one that I love. So the criminal Republican Party in the state of Michigan, which is nothing more than a money laundering organization, who has taken foreign money in our elections so it should be abolished and everyone prosecuted that when it was involved in this, has decided that their new darling is Perry Johnson. So we started looking up things in Perry Johnson's background and why he is a he is a millionaire and what he's done with ISO nine thousand. I'm just going to be the first one to blow the whistle on this. If y'all think you're getting a Republican, you're getting somebody that has been entrenched in globalist regulatory capture. If you think he's going to cut things back. I got a windmill to sell you because you don't. OK, I mean, you don't if you believe that, because he's got this thing registered from what we saw all over the freaking globe. And this is all about regulation and increasing regulation so that they profit off of it. I am really concerned. I would like to debate him because I think that could be really, really fun. Their last tutor, Nixon, you know, she was like, oh, we come from a family in Muskegon County. Yeah. One that destroyed the foundry industry. They're part of it. And then not only that, they were her family was involved in a company that was from down in Naples in global information selling. if you think the republican party is not all about this those are the only ones that they promote so they're getting a kickback somewhere somehow they're getting a kickback so yeah there you go interesting talk and and just before i go i'll just tell you find americans there to keep your eye on a project called thor in tisdale saskatchewan just north of saskatoon where i was educated um they have discovered alumina deposit. Now there's bauxite in the rest of the world that comes from tropical places. Bauxite is refined into aluminum, you know, structural aluminum. But they have a very highly polluting, high energy intensity process to go through to get bauxite into aluminum. It's called red mud technology. It's really tough to stop the pollution from that. The alumina deposit in Tisdale is actually alumina. It's not bauxite. So they don't have to have that expensive polluting refining process. It's more easily converted directly into aluminum products. The discovery they made in Tisdale would equal thirty percent of the global production of aluminum. Wow. OK, so it's it's a privately owned company right now. I think the headquarters of the company is here where I live in Edmonton. And the mine is totally within Saskatchewan. So, you know, we're the two provinces most closely connected. The next point for them will be to go to the stock exchange and get people involved in the mining of it. So at that point, I think that would be a really good investment. Please, Americans, before the Chinese jump into this, you know, get involved. I mean, because Canada, United States, we can use all of that aluminum and it will have a very low cost of production because they're right next to highways. They're right next to the rail yards. It's a product that's right below the surface. You know, it's very accessible and it's ready to go. I mean, it's a very reliable source of aluminum. And I think that's where everything's happening now. We're building all our rail cars out of aluminum and, you know, everything that's energy efficient is made out of aluminum these days. So, Let's not let the rest of the world dominate that. Let's do something as Americans and Canadians. And I can just see the Chinese salivating over getting involved there. So just make you aware of that and, you know, watch the stock market, see if something comes out of that Thor project in Tisdale. Watch your borders too. Keep your eye on that. Yeah. Watch your borders. Watch the borders. So anyhow, let's have a quick prayer. Let's have a quick prayer and we'll go on to our day. Dear Heavenly Father, thank you so much for David and Vicki and all the wonderful people out there. We are so thankful for you and we want to be your friend. We don't just want to be, you know, somebody who treats you like Ben to God that we ask for things and expect and we really want to grow. We are desiring of the spiritual things and the spiritual gifts in life that really grow us up. Thank you for guiding us and showing us better ways to do things and also to follow you. The desire to have a close relationship with you and the rest of the stuff kind of goes away. We thank you for everything. In the name of Jesus Christ, we pray. Amen. Ding, ding, ding, ding. Go to brandbirthforgovernor.com. It's the best non-conceder who's ever not conceded in the history of the United States of America. And I'd like to have a discussion with the rightful president of the United States, President Donald J. Trump. Cowboy boots that weren't better. We talked about this, that, the other thing. Then we start fixing things. And we include Alberta in. We invite David in and everybody else. It'd be fantastic. You'd love it. So anyhow, God bless. Take care. God bless all the people you love and God bless America. Have a great day today. God bless you. Be on the line for one second.