Published July 14, 2025, 9:01 a.m.
9am Vicky Davis Technocratic Communism The United Nations as an organization is world communism. The strategy to impose world communism on the people of the United States (and the other countries in this hemisphere) has been economic rather than military as the people were led to believe it would be. It's our own leaders who were the Pied Pipers leading us to this demise of the U.S. I'm working on a timeline that shows the who, when and what. 10am Daniel Richard - Daniel Richard, a constitutional scholar from New Hampshire has brought a case against the state, which claims that N.H. election laws have been illegally altered by the executive and legislative branches of the state government over the years, without the consent of the voters, thereby making the legislature’s actions unconstitutional. On Monday, October 30, 2023, the New Hampshire Supreme Court, on their own initiative, scheduled oral arguments for November 29th, 2023 at 9am, in a highly-anticipated election law case of Daniel Richard vs. Governor Chris Sununu, et al. involving the executive and legislature branches of government repeatedly violating the voting rights of Mr. Richard, and the people of this State, by altering the mandatory election provisions of the Constitution of New Hampshire established by the people by legislative fiat. This case poses the following questions. Who is qualified to voter in New Hampshire? Who is qualified to vote absentee in this State? Who is required to “sort,” “count” and certify the votes in the towns and cities? Are voting machines constitutional in N.H? Can the legislature delegate its law-making power under the State and U.S. Constitutions to an unelected body of bureaucrats (the NH Ballot Law Commission) to make election laws (including voting machine laws), and the ability to suspend State and Federal election laws? The use of vote tabulation equipment to conceal the counting of un-verified and uncertified absentee ballots and the illegal certification of the elections results. X/Twitter: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1vAxRDkrlzYGl Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/636616148890812/videos/708283925379879 Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6w5n38-7142025-technocratic-tyranny-and-daniel-richard-pro-se.html https://rumble.com/v6w5lt4-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-7142025-technocratic-tyranny-and-daniel-richar.html Odysee: https://odysee.com/@BrandenburgNewsNetwork:d/bnn-2025-07-14-technocratic-tyranny-and-daniel-richard-pro-se:2 BNN Live: https://Live.BrandenburgNewsNetwork.com Guests: Donna Brandenburg, Vicky Davis, Daniel Richard
Good morning. Welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg and it's the fourteenth day of July twenty twenty five. Welcome to our show today. I'm going to start out with Vicki Davis from the Technocratic Tyranny and then at ten o'clock it will be Daniel Richard. We're going to be talking about pro se once again. Good morning, Vicki. How are you doing? Good morning. Fine. Thank you. Oh, just I did finally get that up. OK, well, I have the kpmg epstein stuff sometimes it's a really hard start to the morning I'm going to tell you what on monday mornings and today is one of those days for me that's just a little bit uh how do I say a little bit of a slow start to the day had a busy weekend a wonderful weekend just got back from washington dc and I went right into the stephanie lambert and Stephanie Scott trial. I was there to record it. And it's been very interesting. Jonathan Brader, the director of the Bureau of Elections, in fact, perjured himself in this trial. They would not let me record it, which was odd because the last time I was there, they said, just submit a paper. We'll give you permission to record. My question is, why in the hell Are they granting permission to us to sit in and either watch a hearing like that, a cross-examination? Why is it that everyone in there cannot... The only ones that they allow to record are fake news like Fox News, which is fake news. And the Detroit News, Craig Marger was there, fake news and that sort of thing. But the average person, the Americans, real Americans cannot. We're like second class citizens. So I sat in there and I took lots of notes and read. was able to see what was going on. Stephanie gave me a statement afterwards talking about the fact that it was, in fact, perjury. So it was kind of an interesting, you know, it was an interesting day. Yeah, sounds like it. Yeah, you said we're second-class citizens. We're not even citizens. We are just workers and residents of a territory. slaves you know we're supposed to be actually we're supposed to be um how do I say it uh the uh our actual function I'm trying to see where I'm at here hang on just one minute there's that's not where I want to be I want to be over here um the the actual uh the actual residence or citizenship we have is within our state. And we talk about that with Daniel Richard. He's going to be on in a little bit. Once we get that figured out, everything else becomes easy. And when we look at it, I got to tell you, I did this tour of the Capitol. We should be ashamed of what we had there. I was trying to be very diplomatic when I made my TikTok video about it. But the entire tour of the Capitol, I had two of them. The first one was a communist tour. The second one was an actual tour through the state of Utah. The one that our rep, John Molinar, sent us to was a public tour, and it sucked. I got done with that, and I was just like, all right, fire Mallory. She gave the tour, and the entirety of it was, oh, the failings of the United States. Look at here. We've got every victim that they've made up under some sort of protected class that you could think of. But they never talked about what America was about. It just went to the failings. And in my video, I said, too, America is not about our failings. Every society has failings. Every person has failings. What defines us are those moments to be proud of that we stand for something against all odds. It was very disappointing because the entire thing was about the slavery in the eighteen hundreds as well as I'm not saying it didn't exist. I'm not saying that at all. But what it was really about was about taking away states rights and going in and collectivism into the federal government, collecting up the power and putting it there. That was more of what it was like. But they had to have something that pulled at our heartstrings. So I, you know, then the next thing that we went into was, oh, Epstein's Island, release the list. I'm like, wait a minute. This isn't what it appears to be. So why don't we do some actual investigation? I started posting on it this morning the relationship between him, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Robert Maxwell. And who was Robert Maxwell? Robert Maxwell came from Czechoslovakia. It wasn't even his real name, which is exactly the same strategy that the Bushes made. They changed their names, went to Britain, and basically took over the monarchy in Britain, which led to Maxwell being there, which wasn't his name. His name was Jan Ludwig something or other. It's a long name. And he started Pergamon Press. Pergamon is a name in the Bible, satanic. They were one of the main producers of textbooks for in the United States and that in Macmillan. He owned Macmillan Press and sold it for billions of dollars. There's a picture I posted too. And all of a sudden, stuff started clicking. He looked an awful lot like Samuel Bankman Freed. the FTX guy that money laundered the crypto and such. So I started digging into that. And quite honestly, when he came up missing, it was about the exact same amount of money as what Samuel Bankman Freed had. There's just too many coincidences there. And it's a bad look when you have him changing his name, going over to Britain, being part of the parliament. You have the Bushes, which were the, I think it's the Sher family. They came over. They took on the name Windsor. They changed their name. And, you know, Maxwell was in Parliament. Then he starts doing all these high dollar trades and such. Where in the heck did a refugee get the billions of dollars to invest in this? It doesn't. Tax shelters. There you go. So which brings us to our next our next inconvenient truth. Right. So which one do you want me to start with? The PDF? Yeah. Well, let me explain a little bit about this first. And it all has to do with deregulation of our economy in order to accommodate the Automation of our government with the integration of government functions. You know, computer systems, when you're talking about corporations and government, they manage functions and processes and data. Okay, so you might think of a computer system at the government level as a totalitarian dictatorship. OK, because that's what it is, because they control every aspect of your life, everything you do, everything you see. Health. Look at Palantir health and all of these networks that I completely agree with you. Yeah. Well, and one thing that I've been working on is a timeline for the changes to our health care system. Because that is probably, at this point in our history, the most important timeline to understand. Because in the course of putting together the timeline, I found a really important article from a, in the Washington Post. And if you look at that page that I gave you, it should be listed there, that Washington Post article. Let's see if we can find it. It's called... Oh, for crying out loud. I didn't... Okay. There's the, I don't see it. We've got independent C-SPAN. That irritates me. Technology is great when it works, right? Yeah. Well, or the operator. In this case, it's operator error. There you go. I found an article in the Washington Post from And what that article, the article is titled The Visible Body. And it is at the point when medical science merged with computer science. And what I'm saying, what I'm thinking is that those two things together created a breakaway society, a breakaway civilization. And the reason why is because Let me see. Okay. All right. I found the article. The Visible Human Project. Is that what it is? The Visible Human Project. Yes. Okay. They want me to sign into this. Oh, well, don't do it here. You don't need to sign. I'm not going to do that. Here. Here's the article from the Wayback Machine. Don't you love that? I love the Wayback Machine. I do too, because a lot of older articles, the news people put up paywalls, but when they first started out, they didn't have paywalls. Okay, so what this article is about is the merger of computer science with medical science. And in describing the history, they described a project that the NIH did slicing a human body. You know, that's how they create three D images on the computer is through slicing. I remember that. Slicing images. Okay. And then they put the images together. Well, I'm not a religious person, but to me, that is a complete desecration of a body to do something like that. And you can argue on the side that it's for medical science, so there's a good purpose for doing it. But you can also say that the people that did that, that they were able to do that, they became I think in my opinion a breakaway civilization they were no the the computer scientists and the medical scientists who did that became separate and apart from the human race of which we belong and when you have that kind of a situation to those people that the only value of a human body is for medical science. So whatever they do to you, it can be justified as for the good of society, right? Oh, yeah. And that becomes a critical point when you're talking about a nationalized healthcare system. where they have a national database of medical records of everybody in the country. They globalized that system. And so you have a global system of medical records all tied together. And since these people, they have no respect for humanity whatsoever. You're just an object like a bug under a microscope. They designed a system where they can use anybody, anywhere, anytime as a subject for medical research. Well, look at that monster Yuval Harari that worked with Klaus Schwab, you know, Klaus Schwab. And he said, we can hack human beings. Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about. Yep. And I see it. Just in case anybody doesn't understand or if there's somebody out there that doesn't understand, they froze these bodies and they sliced them. And, you know, they sliced and they sliced and they sliced. So they literally turned it into just, I don't even know what to say, human chips. Let's put it that way. So that they could come up with a three-D image of a human body, which I will say has to be a great teaching tool. But I don't think that you can dismiss the morality, the lack of morality involved in slicing up a body for food. medical science that and that's what I mean they they created a breakaway civilization the people who are involved in this merger of medical science and technology they're not part of our human race anymore they're part of an inhuman race I think I I would agree with you it's like and you look at the attack on humanity the sanctity of life the amputation of young children's body parts, because that's what it is. It's not gender reassignment surgery, it's amputation. I think there's a real problem that, or killing children before a certain age. I really do believe, and I think there's a lot of evidence that supports this, that that late term abortion was all about delivering children alive and having an excuse for saying, no, we killed them, but trafficking those kids. Well, trafficking the body parts plus the stem cells plus my children. Yes, and that's why the people involved in that stuff, they're not part of humanity. I don't believe you could be a human and do that sort of thing to children, to babies. And, you know, I'm not a moralist. in the sense of religion. I'm just telling you what, when you merge computer science and medical science, you've created monsters. Well, hey, you know, this is one of those things, too, that I want everybody to understand. Welcome to Brandenburg News Network. We're just going to start right off with a bang here, right? This is where that kind of went to, to your point, that there was a museum exhibit where they posed cadavers. And they showed the slices and that sort of thing, body rolls and bodies on exhibit and such to make an exhibit out of these cadavers that they sliced up. Look at this one right here, sliced this way. We've got different cadavers. They were real, real cadavers and preserved cadavers. And it was, it's kind of like, oh my gosh, this is, this is horrific. Yeah, the slices are about the thickness of a dime. Yeah. So I mean, yeah, this is I think it's called the one I remember was our bodies. that I remember hearing about it going, this is just like unbelievable. I mean, look at this. This is unbelievable. And posed dead bodies and such. I mean, I go back to that and say, let's look at what happened with, and we'll go back to the John Podesta and such, having the Jeffrey Dahmer victim statue hanging in his stairwell. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. There you go. There's a German doctor, you know, collection of corpses. What the hell? Yeah. Sectioning the human body. There you go. There it is. Which is different than an autopsy. An autopsy, you're trying to find out what caused a single person to die. You know, and most of the time the family has to give permission unless they're um doing a crime investigation but that's one person and they're looking at organs and things for for the cause of death which is an entirely different thing than this sort of thing where they're just slicing up bodies so you know for um display on a computer system. Well, look at this one. I mean, they're literally posing cadavers in like sports poses and such. And you're like, what in the world, you know, what, what, what are we actually doing here? This is, this is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Well, and, and consider that they've globalized. Medicine, the World Health Organization, right? Yeah. Now with this COVID scandemic that they came up with, what they were trying, when they started messing with our medical system here in the United States, they did it through the public health system, not the medical system. And the difference is that public health is environmental health. You know, the public health department, they're the ones that inspect restaurants, you know, for mouse droppings and, you know, that sort of thing. Or the free clinics and that sort of thing. I've always been like... Well, those community clinics are really important because... They that became part of the community plan. And I was I was looking up a law having to do with community health. Turns out those community health clinics were supposed to be for migrant health. So here, you know, we're kicking all the illegals out of the country. But there's this community health network that was designed for migratory people. And so I haven't researched this yet, but I'm sure it has to do also with refugee resettlement. They are importing clients for community health. Makes sense. It makes all the sense in the world. Yeah, and so, yeah, and I even have one article. There's one group of, they call them VOLEGs, Voluntary Resettlement Organizations or something. But they were bringing, importing people that were medically needy. So we don't even take care of our own damn population in terms of medical care. But these freaks are importing refugees that are medically needy. And you know what the really sad thing about it is that a lot of the churches were involved in that, but they didn't pay for it. They literally brought them in and said, here, we're going to put you, get you on this government program and this government program and this government program. You know, if you're, if you're going to take responsibility for, for something like that, I think they should pay for their choices, not dump it on the backs of the rest of us where they were making lots, I think it was seventy five thousand dollars per person. was one of the numbers I heard. I'm sure there's a wide variety. I think that goes, probably goes down to depending on whether they thought they were doing the right thing or not. Um, but I'm sure that the vast majority of them were making lots of money from the government programs to get them to, to, to import meaty, um, And it was illegals. They just brought them in here and dumped them on the system. Right. Illegals and refugees. Yeah. When I went and people. Well, this is this is something that's so funny because the subject comes up all the time. Oh, Brandenburg. She's just a rich person. Has anybody ever seen what we're actually worth? Which just like, you know, it's like making a. a class or something to go after people's ridiculous but when we adopted our daughter she came in legally and not only did she come in legally we pay for her we didn't put her on put her on all sorts of public assistance people make that assumption right away that oh they're making money off of her adopted daughter no we don't make money off of our daughter we it costs us about a hundred thousand dollars a year to provide for her because her care is so complicated Well, and that's one of the interesting things about the tax shelters, to go back to that for a second. What I figured out they were doing, it's an extortion racket with a third-party beneficiary. Okay, so if you extort someone under our definition of law, if you extort someone for something of value, that's a crime. If you extort a person and just tell them to fund this small business or pay this amount of money to somebody, some third party unrelated to the extortion or do this person a favor, By the legal definition of extortion, it doesn't count because there is no one-for-one relationship between the person being extorted and the extorter, the victim and the extortionist. Well, they did the same thing with jobs. When they were posting jobs over to India and Pakistan, they were posting jobs for two hundred thousand dollars, brought them over here for these jobs. And then basically they had to work in those those environments for, say, like four or five years. They couldn't get out. So they were in debt and dungeon servants. And these people were getting paid about forty thousand dollars. And whoever placed them scammed the rest of it. Yes, they did. Yes, and those are the people that took the jobs that I had been doing my career, which is being a contractor. What a contractor did is that companies almost never developed systems using their regular staff because the regular staff has their job to do And when you're doing a project, it's extra work on top of that. So they bring in contractors to do that work. That's what I did for a living. You go in, you do the project, you get out and go on to the next contract. But when they started massively importing foreigners, especially from India, they stopped hiring Americans. Because I'm sure there were kickback schemes involved, you know, with the price of the IT person through the broker. You know, the broker makes a deal with the employer for a kickback. And so they hire the Indian, the imported foreign worker at a much lower rate. than you can pay Americans, you know? So it's a racket. And it was, that's really when the whole shortage shouting started. And it, well, started actually in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, uh, in the, Farm Workers Union. It worked out so well for the California farms that the Chamber of Commerce made a partnership. They hired that immigration lawyer. It was the ITAA, Information Technology something Associates. Anyway, and that's when they started shortage shouting for IT people, but then they spread not only to IT people, but to teachers, to engineers, you know, all of them. And look at all the money that's gone into these developments. It's not that we don't have a housing shortage. People keep screaming that there are neighborhoods of million dollar houses that they can't sell. It's the same thing that happened in China. It's just a movement so the developers can keep grabbing more land, more land, and build. That's how they make their money with all of the – it's money laundry. It is a tax shelter. It is a tax shelter money laundry. Here we are again, getting back to the tax shelter. Right. Do you remember the subprime mortgage – Yes. Meltdown. Okay. How that happened to be is that they began allowing mortgages to be packaged into securities. And embedded within those securities were bad loans. And they knew they were bad loans when they made them. And so when that whole thing blew up, it put a lot of people out of work, number one. And it melted down the stock market. And it cost our government a hell of a lot of money. And that was because of Fannie Mae. allowing the packaging of mortgages into securities. Prior to that time, all the loans were like one-on-one, you know? And then what the bastards did in the government is they collateralized all of our homes at a twenty to one ratio. So if they default on it, well, guess what? They just own our houses. Yeah. Well, that was one of the tax changes was that corporations could buy something now, but they could project the future earnings on that. Setting the values. Yeah. Yeah. So all of this goes back to tax fraud. and manipulation of our economy. I started watching this in about, uh, two thousand four because there were hearings on the state of our economy. And one thing that came out was that, um, the revenue to our government for this one year was the lowest it had been since nineteen fifty nine or nineteen fifty. OK, so we're in two thousand and four and they're they're saying the income to the government is at its lowest point since the nineteen fifties. Well, and it was Treasury Secretary Jon Snow, who was the Treasury secretary at the time. He gave a speech on that and he said they took seven trillion dollars out of our economy. in two thousand and four, from the time they began this financial fraud, which was in the nineteen nineties, I would say from nineteen ninety five, but could be before that to two thousand and four when we had that economic meltdown, they took out seven trillion dollars out of our economy. they only keep three trillion uh cash in the system the rest of it's all fiat it's all fake which is crazy to me um yeah but they they weren't using those kinds of numbers back in those days um because because I've thought about that pretty often you know when did they jump from billions to trillions talking about trillions and and I think it was because of that um Fraud, Wall Street fraud, insurance fraud, mortgage fraud that occurred from about nineteen ninety five till two thousand and four, where it all fell apart and they had to start doing hearings on it. Let me see if I can find that article. It's organized crime. It is organized crime. And they're running the nation. They're running the globe. It's organized crime. You look going back to this Maxwell nonsense going on right now. and how much money he paid for, let me, let me see if I can pull this up here because it is kind of, it's just crazy. I can't, I don't understand how anybody can look at this and with any seriousness on, on, anything that he did, because it's an it was in the billions that he paid. And he took out of their pensions, as well as what he paid for these child textbook post producing propaganda machines that he was part of. Just it's crazy. It's crazy. Yeah. See if I can find my notes here. I've got so many notes saved off on this because I have honestly been doing quite a bit of research on this. Let's see. Why was he giving such incredible access? Let's see. Let me. The SEC missed actual fraud being committed in crypto because it had no bureaucratic hack in the Gary Gensler hyper-focus on implementing a political agenda set by his master, Elizabeth Warren. Let's not forget Gensler met with Bernie Madoff of crypto SBF FTX multiple times. This goes back, SBF Samuel Bankman Freed also met with Maxine Waters and was allowed to testify before Congress. Why was he given so much access? He paid for it. Testimony of his trial paid ten million dollars to the Biden administration, in addition to seventy million to Democrats in the midterms in twenty twenty two. Now, why is this important? Because it all ties back to Maxwell and who the people around him were. So Epstein was a honeypot. Yes. But he was also involved in tax shelters. Yes. So the way I look at it is, yeah, he was a pervert. He was just a disgusting human being. Disgusting human beings. But they all are. But the real story about Epstein is the tax shelters. That's the real story. And they don't want people going into that. I guarantee you, because once people connect all this tax fraud and the tax shelters and the way they've structured our economy, supposedly for globalization, you can see. And I want to say one thing about people Ronald Reagan gave a speech to the UN in nineteen eighty seven, and he's talking about the magic of the marketplace. Well, let me dispel any any illusion that people have that corporate leaders are humanitarians at their heart. Right. Right. They are cold-blooded, hard-nosed businessmen. Killers. Gangsters and killers. So here's a connection. I'm going to work backwards from Jeffrey Epstein so that everybody can see. Here's a connection. So Epstein had his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, Robert Maxwell, who was in Parliament in Britain, change his name, and we go back to Czechoslovakia. So we're going to go back there. So Ghislaine Maxwell's father is Robert Maxwell. Robert Maxwell's lawyer was Samuel Peaser. And he is, and guess who his stepson is? Who? Anthony Blinken. Oh, God, it's like it's like you can't make this stuff up. And when you look at that, what was the country of origin that the Balfour Declaration established? Oh, well, you know, come after me now. But you can't get away from these connections, the connections. They're indisputable. And it's not that I am ever after the people, the people of America, the people of China, the people of Israel, the people of whatever. People aren't the problem. It's the organized crime networks, which include ADL. That is the problem. Yes. Yeah, there should be no such thing as dual citizenship. Right. Anthony Blinken, U.S. Secretary of State under who? And there shouldn't be any lobbyists representing foreign governments that lobby our Congress. They are our Congress. They're supposed to represent us. But you have, you know, like India, India PAC. India PAC, you know, provided tremendous funding to the Congress to represent India, for Christ's sakes. And look at what happened with the programming that came out of India for the Middle East. They had a backdoor straight to Israel. Anybody that travels to the Middle East, all of their information went right straight to Israeli intelligence. That's interesting. Unbelievable. Oh, yeah. That just came out like within the last week or so that the that the India programming that went to all of the country's. in the Middle East, had a backdoor into Israel. So do we have two sides fighting? Hell no, we don't. It's like the Uniparty. We've got the Uniparty and we've got the crime syndicate that runs the globe, which goes under the guise of intelligence agencies, GCAQ, CIA, Mossad, all of them. Yeah, well, you know, that super secret squirrel group that they have called the intelligence... sector that they created. They created that as a result of the AIG meltdown, which is American Insurance Group. And what the American Insurance Group was involved in is financial products that are not connected to assets. And they were credit derivatives or credit default swaps, derivatives, and hedge funds. Those three things move money, but there are no assets involved, no physical assets between the parties. So they're basically are able to bet against industries or companies in our country without a stake in the game other than that they're bringing down a segment of our economy. Yeah, they destroy it for themselves. Then you go right to public-private partnerships. Yeah. Okay, now if you scroll down on that, I have a section on hearings that were held in Congress about our economy. And How far down do I go? There's a press conference. Yeah, just go down to where you see Rumsfeld Berry's admission of missing two trillion dollars. Oh, I remember that. I remember that. Okay. And then a little bit farther down there, I have a link to a hearing that was on October six to discuss options for changing the US taxation system. Okay. And the quote from a guy named John Linder, he said there has been eight quarters in a row of declining revenues in two thousand and one. John Linder said there is six trillion dollars offshore. The Rumsfeld press conference right there. Did you want me to play that? Or the addition of trillions of dollars at the nine, ten. Oh, yeah, that would be good if you did. Yeah. See if we can get that one up. Here's that. Here is the nine eleven research. And I'm not seeing the I'm not seeing the video, but here it is. Missing trillions. Rumpfstead Barry's admission of missing two trillion dollars in nine on nine ten oh one. And guess what? And the towers come down the next day. Isn't that isn't that amazing? Then you have the dancing Israelis. You've got these. that were dancing off to the side and such. And you've got Silverman who bought the tower and you've got all of this crazy crap. I don't understand how people believe this stuff. Yeah, I don't either. And they had pictures of planes allegedly flying into the World Trade Center. Well, one of the images that they captured showed the wings of this airplane. Well, you know damn good and well that the wings of an airplane, they would have just folded. They would not go through the steel that the World Trade Center was built from. It was like Wile E. Coyote running through a boulder in a cartoon. It was so ridiculous. It was. Okay. To hear the audio on that Crimes Against Reality, under the picture of John Snow, there is a click here for audio. And that's where you can hear what he had to say. Today's hearing of the Federal Financial Management Subcommittee of the Government Affairs and Homeland Security will come to order. I want to thank all our witnesses for being here. Oh, wait, that's a different... Let me see if I can go back here. You know what? It's in the article, Crimes Against Reality. Okay. It's going to take me just a minute. Let me talk amongst yourself. Those other clips are really worth listening to also because they... What they were doing is trying to figure out federal revenue options since the government revenue throughout the whole damn country had been reduced to the levels that it was in nineteen fifty. Okay, let's listen. I don't know any time in modern economic history that I'm aware of where we've had so many shocks to the system, so many blows, so many body blows absorbed in so compact and short a period of time. Beginning, starting in March, two thousand with the beginning of the bursting of the bubble that, you know, that took seven trillion dollars, that bursting of the bubble, seven trillion dollars out of the economy of the United States. Seven trillion. Seven trillion is an awful lot. of wealth uh it's the size of the economy to put it in perspective of uh of spain and italy and france and the uk that's the amount of wealth that came out of this economy and then we had the the recession the president of course inherited an economy in pretty steep decline uh I knew it was in decline when he took office. I knew it because being a transportation executive, transportation being a leading indicator, I could see the decline in our car loads, container loads, barge loads, logistics, warehousing activities, truck loads. In the summer, in the summer, of two thousand. I remember being invited to Austin and asked by some of the president's advisers to offer some comments at this gathering. And and I said to him, and this was president elect in January of two thousand and one, Mr. President, you're inheriting a recession. Well, of course, the National Bureau of Economic Research documented that fact just a couple of months later. So we had the collapse of the equity markets, huge effects. I think we're still having some after-effects from that. We had the recession. Then we had nine-eleven. Nine-eleven didn't just hurt the economy of New York. It hurt the economy of this country. It affected many industries. I was out in Ohio last week talking to a congressman who said, you know, nine eleven had a dramatically adverse effect on my district because we have airline industry suppliers in this district and their orders just just fell through, fell, fell, fell out completely. And then, of course, the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq and so on. And perhaps in some ways as devastating as anything else, those wretched corporate scandals which breached trust with the American people on the part of our corporate leaders and our accounting industry leaders. uh boards of directors were shown not to be as faithful to their duties as they should have been ceos and cfos were shown not to be as faithful as they should be to their responsibilities to shareholders the accounting profession the legal profession came up wanting and then we had sarbanes-oxley and this effort to repair the damage of those wretched corporate scandals all of that's hit the american economy and when I meet with uh when I meet with business leaders from other parts of the world, when I meet with counterparts, finance leaders, central bankers, invariably they get around to one question. How could it be that the American economy has weathered all these storms the way it has and continued, even in the face of these extraordinary headwinds, to continue to move to uh job creation higher levels of growth and now of course leading the recovery in the world economy yeah the answer to that is statistical fraud and um our government uh well that what economists do is that they are using models and they can prove any damn thing they want to prove with their statistical model. Now, back in the early two thousands, when I'm watching all of this stuff, I got sick and tired of hearing how great the economy was doing because I was, you know, reading news stories from around the country. eight thousand people applying for four hundred walmart jobs in the san francisco bay area and and that kind of thing so there was a debate going on in the wall street journal and so I uh you know the economy is booming or the economy isn't booming well I had done a an analysis looking at social security actual receipts You know, they should have actual numbers for Social Security, right? The deduction from employees and the matching payment from employers. There's no reason to model that data whatsoever beyond maybe one quarter or two quarters. They should have actual numbers. What I found out is that the Social Security Administration was modeling social security tax receipts well that is just absolute fraud no way around it and what they're doing it everywhere they're doing fake ids in our election systems I just had something come across my my uh desk this morning about the fake ids that they're using yeah we're a nation where where um computer fraud is It's rampant. When they started converting our government, that was done during the Clinton administration, Clinton and Gore. They quote, reinvented our government. Well, the reinvention was the consolidation and integration of computer systems in government. They didn't think about security. And they partnered with corporations because the government for the most part wasn't involved in markets like the healthcare system. They had to partner with like hospitals and things like that in order to implement this healthcare system. But the government itself Oh, wait, let me take that back because we did have the medical system for the DOD and the VA health system. But the government itself, the administrative layer of government was not really involved. So they empowered all these outside entities. to implement computer systems for the government. Well, that's like opening your front door and inviting in all of the bad guys in your town. You know, invite in the thieves, invite in the rapists, invite in the everybody. Everybody. Disruptors. Well, you can call them disruptors. Yeah, criminals are disruptors. Criminal disruptors invited them all in. Yeah, but apparently there are more people that will compromise their principles for money than there are people who will say no. Well, here, I've got a... This is kind of interesting that came across because of how much infiltration there is. Have you ever looked into Susie Wiles? You know, as a function of what I was looking at with Jeffrey Epstein and the tax shelters, I did read a few paragraphs on her. Well, I think this is kind of an important thing. Brian Lanza. Senior advisor, Trump, twenty four deputy communications director for Trump, sixteen partner in Mercury. This is also something that Susie Wiles was involved in. And here's a good question. Did former Trump campaign advisor Brian Lanza, who is now a lobbyist for the CCP owned Goshen Inc., facilitate a meeting with Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Trump? He co-chairs Mercury Consulting and President Trump's chief of staff. Susie Wiles is the former co-chair of Mercury. You can't make this stuff up. You just you just can't. You think you got things nailed down and it just keeps the criminality and the complicity and the connections just keep growing. Unbelievable that Mercury is. is poisonous. I did a huge, uh, research project on Susie and I'm, I'm a little concerned. Just, just saying, I'm a little concerned, a lot concerned. Yeah. Once they started reinventing our government and they did not take into account any constitutional, uh, issues at all it was just like a corporate you know we're going to automate this whole damn thing we don't care about your privacy we don't care whether you have a job we don't care about anything but integrating these systems of government And the medical system is a good example where the government is providing facilitation to build these systems. They're charging you, the taxpayer, to pay for it. And not only do you not benefit from it, it turns you into just a damn nothing. You know, you're just, you're no better than... It is a slave system. At an eighty-five percent tax rate, that's what we're paying when you start adding up all of these discretionary taxes is as much as about eighty-five percent. Yeah. Well, being a tax slave is one thing if you have a job. But you remember when they did the TARP, the first, the troubled asset relief thing? Well, that was related to the meltdown of AIG, the insurance group, which was related to the financial fraud on Wall Street and all of that. Well, and then we had... TARP and then QE one and QE two and QE three. And the time after that, they gave it a different name. All of it, pumping money into the economy, keeping it on life support until they can build it back. Well, I think this whole thing that's going on right now is one aspect of another bailout because they never did recover our economy, not the way that it was. And this whole idea that small businesses can carry the economy, well, that is just total BS. And what those small businesses are, the government or a corporation will fund them They hire ten people. They turn out to be like training venues, not real jobs, not generating income. They live on subsidies and then they go out. When there's government money involved, there's always a hidden agenda. I don't care what it is. Now, I'm not saying that to either to impugn small business owners. Small business owners that make it themselves and don't expect somebody to fund their effort. You know, that is something I hear all the time. Where do you get the money to do business? X, Y, Z, who knows what it is, right? Or ABC. Where do you get the money to do that? You start small and you build. That's what small business was all about historically. Well, yeah, but that's the old fashioned way. That's the way we did it, which is it boggles my mind that somebody would go to SBA and have them tell you exactly what to do and how to do it. We've got a friend that's selling a business right now. And the SBA got involved in it as well as the banks. And instead of just selling, they weren't selling the business. They were selling equipment. They turned it into a selling the business so that when it failed, that they could come back and sue the original people who built the business in the first place. Not kidding you. Yep. I read it. I read what they had put together and I'm like, I wouldn't sign this in a million years. They're literally changed the terms of this instead of an equipment purchase. They are sneaking in here that they're buying the business and then putting in a non-compete with them, which they weren't selling the business. They were selling the equipment. It would have shut their business right down. Yeah, with contracts these days, you have to read every word. And don't trust the freaking attorneys because they're all barred attorneys. Even if what they're giving you is a boilerplate contract. You better read it. Because they're sneaking stuff into it. It doesn't matter. I mean, it is the craziest thing. When they were putting some fiber optics in near one of our places, we have a person who is an expert at being a pain in the neck to people who write contracts. Every single thing that was in this contract gave them the ability to take and own all your data. Yeah. Yep. They owned it all. You had no rights. You couldn't copyright. If you'd worked on something and set it across the lines to somebody else to review, they just now own it. Uh-huh. Like, are you out of your freaking mind? Sign that. Not a chance. Not a snowball's chance in hell. Bad idea. But all of these large providers like Comcast and some of the other smaller ones that want to look like they're actually competing, they're not. They're just writing contracts to steal your data in another way. Because we are literally slaves to the system. Don't believe any of it. And our government, in partnership with these corporations, is so corrupt it's almost unbelievable you know the the difference from the time when I was growing up young adult you know government I'm sure there was some corruption but it was remote but this whole reinvention of government that began in uh george herbert walker bush new world order um it it changed everything. And our government is just nothing but a corrupt syndicate. Yeah. Oh, you're going to love what I'm going to have on tomorrow because guess what? I've been beaten up to X my tax because it's like, this is absolutely, why is this, why is this even existing? Well, I'm going to throw you a bone. It's going to be real interesting tomorrow because it looks like there's a connection to a law firm in California. Yeah. Oh, interesting. Okay. And this was Ask My Tax. For Michigan. So I've been saying it for a long time and they've come out, asked my tax, don't ever vote for Donna Brandenburg because she's rich. What the hell does that have to do with anything? And am I? Does anybody ever seen any records or do they know anything? It's absurd. And so we got to gaslight everybody. They have to gaslight everybody because there is a lot bigger connections than what the village idiots who are following this thing Because it's a headline. And what happened at the last election? Oh, we lost parental rights over proposition. You know, the last proposition on the, I'm just like, this could give you a headache. You know, just looking at the idiocy of all of this and people not looking into things. But this is going to be a fun day tomorrow. Yeah. Well, they destroyed our media. Not that our media was great. anyway, you know, because it was all basically run out of New York City. But in the nineteen nineties and two thousand, they allowed consolidation of our media to about six gigantic media companies. And of course, CNN won, Disney won. ABC. Yes, the networks. But they allowed further consolidation after that. So all of our news really comes from just a couple of sources. And they're working together against us. I don't know if you've ever seen that video of the local news people reading a story. And they're all saying the same damn thing, you know. Sinclair Media Group. That's what it was. I remember that. Yeah. So so people really aren't getting information like they should be getting it. And unfortunately, when when you're having just regular people do the research and writing, you get an awful lot of disinformation that is intentional. Well, look at USAID. USAID was funding five thousand alternative media outlets. Yeah. Yes. I'm like I'm like and so now we're going to believe another media outlet that's being funded by the same people that were funding the mainstream media. Alt media, if they've taken money, has turned into mainstream media. Yes. The grassroots groups. Who is funding this stuff? Well, let's just start picking them apart and find out if there's connections to, oh, I don't know, like law firms in California or law firms in Detroit that are in with the planning commissions for stealing our land or any of this nonsense. Right. Or George Soros. George Soros was funding a lot of them. He's the one I think that funded moveon.org out of San Francisco. Yeah. It is crazy. And, you know, whenever they come up with a headline and they want you to stab a sign in your yard or something, you probably should be asking questions. Now, they're going to go after anybody that's worth anything. They're going to be attacked. They're going to be attacked. They're going to... create something to slander that person, which has nothing to substantiate. It's just people talking, Oh, this person that, Oh, this person that if they don't come with the receipts to prove what they're saying, can right there. The sad part is, is that the vast majority of people in the country are not on the internet dedicated like we are. They're not involved in this whole discussion about media and falsehood and corrupt governments and all of that stuff. They're just living their life as if they, you know, as if this were the nineteen sixties. They're useful idiots. And that's what they want. They want them to be captured so that they will parrot the narrative. That's exactly what's going on. It's just just let's just turn into little parrots and parrot the narrative so that we can they can use our time, which is our treasure, our money. First of all, to make us look like idiots, you know, and such. You can't parrot these things. You've got to go back to the source and find out what's actually happening. Really, really the deal. Oh, Daniel came on and he said, please give me ten minutes. There's breaking news. There's a lot of breaking news out there. I'm going to stop my – I want to show you something that I was – well, let's see. Oh, wrong one. Hang on a minute. I'm going to show you something on that Stephanie Lambert case with Stephanie Scott that I think is so important for people To understand what's happening here. Jonathan Brader admitted to, well, he perjured himself, but he admitted to destroying evidence without the authority to do so. And I mean, it was a really good, it was, I was glad to be there. I'm really glad to be there. It was completely, it was, it's completely broken. Let me bring this over here. Is he the deputy secretary in DOJ? He is the director of the Bureau of Elections in Michigan. The one who I'm going to say hit eleven thousand of my signatures or was behind it. Somebody was, but the plausible die and I ability was there because they They found them after he valiantly directed his employees after I sued in circuit court. Then in the Supreme Court, they found them in another room under a counter where they never keep signatures after I sued in the Supreme Court. and told them that I had two complete sets of just some silly guys made a mistake oh they just made a mistake come on mildred you know this is this fine it's fine oh my god here we go work here with stephanie lambert and we were here to get a testimony from jonathan brader can you give a statement sure thank you donna jonathan brader testified again today and he perjured himself before the grand jury in oakland county causing me and Matt DiPerno to be indicted. He specifically lied about what the statute nine thirty two said and what his authority was. Today, we learned that that's a lie. We expect him to be charged. Beautiful. It's happening. Thank you, Stephanie. So I think I think that was that was outstanding. I was on three hours sleep getting there. It was so funny coming back from Washington, D.C. I'm going to show you some pictures. And you'll think that you'll think this is funny. I'm just going to throw these things up a minute while we're waiting for Daniel to come on, if you don't mind. I could sit here. I could literally sit here and talk with you all day because we're very similar in the fact that we like to research. We are research nerds. If I would rather do that than. almost anything except for shoveling horse manure, you know, as, as, as billionaires do. I'm sarcastic. So these are a few things that I posted. This was a post that, that I made when I was in DC, I was at the Kennedy center and going to see La Mez. It was really amazing. These are very, some very good friends, some people that I don't know very well. And I'm going to say that because there's going to be something that's going to come out shortly on, You've got to really know. I talk to everyone. You've got to understand I talk to everyone. Does that mean that I agree or stand with everyone? Absolutely not. There's usually a mix of good people and bad people, and we just sort through them. However, very, very good friends right here. Very good friends, Erlina and Danny, of course, and Holly. And then some other people that I think might be good friends, but some people that I don't know and certain things that came out over the weekend, that was a little disturbing to me. Okay. Just so you know. So anyhow, Strother White set up all of the wonderful charcuterie stuff and the, the, the beautiful, it was, it was wonderful. Anyhow, Strother White was there. He is a choreographer and, And he helps with events and such. And we just had a great time and the chocolates were fantastic and such. But the consistent references to President Kennedy in here. And what did President Kennedy say? He said it was all about the intelligence apparatus. He was warning us of what was going on back in sixty three. And they took his life for it. Uh huh. Yeah, some stuff about James Jesus Angleton came out. He was the head of counterintelligence. And the articles that I saw, now I haven't looked at this in depth, but the implication is that it was Angleton who arranged for Kennedy to be murdered. It's amazing. We may never truly know because they're all playing the shell game there. Thank you to anyone. Robert Maxwell dies in bizarre circumstances. Looted fortune. Remember, it's not his real name. Looted fortune goes missing and Epstein signs a bizarre POA over the Ohio Billionaires Estate. The fortune surfaces in his hands. Epstein dies. In bizarre circumstances, just as fortune reappears. And so this was, you know, you go on and you read things and it sends you down a rabbit trail. But I want you to look at this and how similar these guys look right here. This could be his freaking grandson. They, you know, just like, just like Zucker, Zuckerbucks, Zuckerberg. He's a, he's not a Rothschild. He's a rock. He's a Rockefeller. And so, you know, trace it back. They keep the money in the family. This looks like Maxwell's grandson. Look at how similar they look. Uh-huh. I agree. They do. And so let's go on. And here's Maxwell. There's his name, Jan Ludwig Hyman Benjamin Hoke. And what was he? A fraudster. And where was, where's his, his, uh, let's just say genetic connections, not to the people of Israel, not to the Jews, though they claim it, but it is probably... Good morning, Donna Brandenburg, Brandenburg News Network. Guess what we're going to be talking about? I wanted to go down further, but we're going to have to dig around on this a little bit more. And let's see, let's get rid of that and go back to the fact that we really need to look behind the scenes on these things, though. because what they're telling us is completely and utterly fake, fake news and a lie. Alternative media, if they've taken the money, it's a lie. They're just as bad. So don't get sucked into this nonsense, guys. I'm going to be posting on my Telegram channel all the links that we talked about with Vicki this morning. Also, all of the supporting research. And you will be shocked at how much research I actually have on the connections with Maxwell, where it goes, how it goes. And I'm going to bring Daniel on here because we've got breaking news also today. Thank you so much, my friend, for coming on. I just love you to pieces. And I enjoy the segment with you more than I can possibly tell you. All of the research you've done over the years is just shocking, fantastic. And you bring the receipts. You don't just sit there and spew. You actually bring receipts. Thank you so much. Well, thank you. Thank you for having me. And I'll be listening because I want to hear what Daniel has to say about the breaking news. So I'll talk to you later. Do you want me to just leave you backstage or are you going to, because I can do that. Yeah, just, okay. Yeah. Leave me backstage. Yeah, you can listen to it here. I want to hear that. If you want to come back on, just send me a text or put it back on then. How's that? Okay. All right. One minute break and I'll be right on with Daniel. Daniel Richard. Good morning. Welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg. It is the fourteenth day of July, twenty twenty five. And we're going to jump right in with Daniel Richards. How are you doing, Daniel? Doing all right. How are you? I'm doing great. So what's the breaking news? This sounds pretty exciting. I was reading your New Hampshire Supreme Court case here that you sent over and to disqualify Attorney General John Formella. It's fabulous. How is that going and what's the breaking news? Breaking news is this court just sent me notice this morning that I have to brief. The appeal portion of the Supreme Court process moves forward, and they've just given me notice that I've got thirty days to file my ninety five hundred word brief. Boom. That's it. So now now they're going to also have to address. They've given themselves thirty days to address whether who the opposing counsel is going to be, because the attorney general is clearly conflicted. He was conflicted from the beginning. But being a pro se litigant, I knew I was fighting Goliath. and that I would be wasting my breath trying to get them to recuse. And so I let them proceed until the AG hung himself recently with another case. And that's what my motion to disqualify addresses at the very end as the fifth item. So I've asked them to recute to disqualify them for five reasons. And the fifth reason I'll start with the, with the breaking news there is that, um, If you saw my oral arguments before the Supreme Court in November of twenty ninth of twenty twenty three, you'll probably realize that I embarrass the state in a major way. They're lawyers. You're very, very good at that because you know your subject matter. So what ended up happening is that they left the hearing realizing they were in big trouble. And so four months would go by. And so from April twenty ninth, all the way to April fourth, the Supreme Court of the state of New Hampshire would do something it's never done before, which is reopen the case for amicus solicitation. And I was thinking to myself, why are they doing this? This case has already been briefed. The court, if it's going to ask for a MICA solicitation, does so in the preliminary stages so that any outside briefs can be considered as part of rendering their opinion on a case. But in this situation, what happened was the state defendants did argue that I lack standing in the trial court and the judge didn't render, uh, an opinion on standing. And so the, the state raised the standing question again, uh, And so the chief judge went after them. And so he said, are you raising standing now? And he said, yes, your honor, under the rules of civil procedure and established precedent, we can go ahead and do so. And so they used that as the reasoning that was given as to why they were reopening the case. But here's where it gets really funny. A few days later, One of the justices, the female judge, Hans Marconi, Bobby Hans Marconi, they went after her husband. They put him on administrative leave. See, he's the harbormaster because we have a seaport. We have a small section of shoreline on the Atlantic Ocean, the state of New Hampshire does. And so he's been their harbormaster for years. And so they put him on administrative leave, which caused her to have to recuse herself. So shortly after that, and I says, hold on, something smells funny here. Because why would they reopen the case and then go after him? Well, by virtue of going after him, they compelled her to recuse herself, reducing the Supreme Court from four judges to three, because we had one who retired. So now they're going to get her to recuse. Now, if you looked at the oral arguments, you would notice that she asked a lot of really good questions. She was a potentially sympathetic jurist who was likely, in my opinion, that's just my opinion. But again, either way, she was a potential sympathetic vote. And she ends up having to recuse after oral arguments. So they've eliminated her from rendering her opinion, reducing the tribunal down to three. Now, they're all Sununu appointees at this time. Excuse me. They reduce three Sununu appointees down to two and leaving one who, by the way, just retired last month early. So, but back up a second. So after they put her husband on administrative leave, she would notify me that she's got to recuse herself because she's actually doing the proper thing because the attorney general is prosecuting her husband. She can't be an impartial arbiter of the, of the attorney general's office in anything related to the AG's office. Nevermind that the AG himself is a named defendant in my case. So she does that. And then she would, I found it fascinating that she recused herself from my case first. Then she would file notice to everybody else. And I said, huh, what's going on here? Why did she give me a heads up that she's got to recuse and then have to recuse herself from the rest of the cases involving the attorney general's office? Well, I did some background on this. Come to find out, it appears, unless they're hiding something, it appears that I am the only case before the New Hampshire Supreme Court where the attorney general and the governor are both co-defendants. along with the Secretary of State for voter fraud. So they've been implicated in this voter fraud scheme using the various tactics they used to modify the election process. And so, gee, isn't that a wake-up call, that they're all named defendants, and now you're going after one of the judges. You also did something else by going after one of the judges. You scared the others. You scared the others, which was, if you don't rule in my favor and dismiss Mr. Richard's case, then I'll go after you too. I'll use my little pit bull, who used to be my lawyer. Oh, no conflict there. See, the current sitting attorney general was Chris Sununu's lawyer for several years, almost four years, I believe, before he gets promoted to become the new attorney general, when the existing attorney general becomes who? The chief justice of the state Supreme Court. who is one of the named parties in this entire ongoing racket that's going on. Oh, my gosh. So all of this is going on. And so, and by the way, the chief judge, nice enough man, I don't know him very well. He gave me a decent opinion. In my case, he was the one who wrote the majority opinion, giving me standing. But the problem is, is that he's still conflicted. And so now he's really conflicted because we'll get into the second part of what happened here in a moment. But that's kind of the backstory of what went on and how they went after a sitting judge. So I know you've got to have a question over all that. I don't. I'm just sitting here. I mean, there's no, I can't even come up with a question because it seems like it's just so blatant. Right. To anyone, even without a law degree. This is so crazy. We were going after, you know, everybody's been screaming, you know, publish the Epstein list, publish the Epstein list. Okay. First of all, we're talking organized crime here. I'm pretty sure that they don't have like a little list that they're keeping tabs on. It's decentralized. That would be the dumbest, most absurd thing to go after. They're all connected. And so I connected Epstein back to Tony Blinken. Right, right. And these people are all connected. And so when you see the conflict of interest there, you can assume that's the same for every other state there too. So here's how much risk they took at going after a sitting judge. So in twenty twenty one, just to go in a chronological order in twenty twenty one. the governor, Chris Sununu, instructed the attorney general, John Formella, to go ahead and establish a set of internal rules for his office to only prosecute public officials when there is a sworn statement. In other words, there's a victim. Someone's alleging wrongdoing. They have standing to bring the case because we have an injured party. It's all about personal. That's what they've gone to is that you have to prove like, a material damage to yourself in some form or another to have standing to make any changes to the government, which is wrong. We have standing because we're Americans. We're citizens of the state of, say, you know, New Hampshire or Michigan. We have standing. Exactly, exactly. So here's where it gets really wonky. So he writes this internal memo in twenty twenty one. In other words, that he can't proceed against the public official unless there's a sworn statement alleging a wrongdoing. So he would go on to violate his own rule. So in this case, what ends up happening, it appears from. from the official record. What happened is there, she hired a good legal team. They were headed to trial in August. And so they moved for discovery. So I knew something was rotten from the beginning because the first interview with Governor Sununu was he claimed he didn't know anything. He has no idea what's going on. And so he either was telling the truth or he's lying through his teeth. Either way, the official record, the court record now indicates, based on media releases last week, that he actually called the attorney general and said, hey, and by the way, Judge Marconi came to see me. Well, his ears perked up and said, oh, really? Was she talking about me? And so they proceed to have a private conversation. Instead of saying, hey, I'm the attorney general. This is inappropriate. This isn't protocol. If you're going to allege any wrongdoing, I need to send an investigator to question you because I can't be a fact witness in this case. But he didn't. so sununu would proceed to have a conversation with him and then so fermella would violate his own internal rules again over how to conduct a proper inquiry So he would then question Sununu, question his lawyer, and they both said on the record that she did nothing wrong. She didn't ask us for any favors. She didn't ask us to stop the investigation as a favor to her or anything that's being implied here at all. And so that would be reflected in his own notes because he would end up taking notes about his questioning of these two individuals, as well as the third member, who was a man named Mr. Dupree, who was the member of the board for the Port Authority. So he would have been a third person she was seeking a favor from if indeed they were going to prove their case. But here's the funny part. There's no witness. There's no sworn statement. They went after her with no alleged victim. How do you do that? So here's where the circle, I'll let you finish in the last word there. The circle comes around this way. We now know that Chris Sununu called the attorney general. He also called the chief judge and had words with him and told him a different story. He told the chief judge that she said three things. One, that he was, to complain about him. Two, that he was weak. And three, that he was politically motivated to prosecute her and her husband. And so this would be his claim. And also she had claimed that she went to the chief judge and sought his permission to speak to the governor to make sure she didn't violate any unknown protocol or rules of procedure. Again, she didn't want to get jammed up. So he now claims that didn't happen. So now we have three people. So we know for a fact based on the court record that the governor, the attorney general, and the chief judge are all having private conversations about removing a sitting judge in my case. You can't make this stuff up. There's not even a question. They're all fact witnesses now. They're all conflicted. Yeah. Where do you go from here right now then? Right. Right. So that's the back story on what's going on. So I filed this motion to disqualify. It's rather damning. I read it, and I was kind of like laughing the entire time that I read it, only because you nailed them. Yeah, yeah. It got caught between a rock and a hard place here. You did. So would you like me to scroll down and go to something that we can show people what you wrote here? What I'm going to need to do is I need to let you go. I'll talk to you afterwards as to cutting this interview short. Okay. And please do review this with your audience and we'll catch up on the next go around. I will. It sounds like there's a lot of pressing things going on. Thank you so much for coming on, Daniel. And we'll have you on again next week. And hopefully we can really motor through this a little bit. Amen. Absolutely. I understand. All right. You're welcome. Bye-bye. Bye-bye. Well, Daniel had to leave. I think that there were some things that happened just before he got on and he just wanted to cover this before he had to run. And yeah, there's all sorts of things we should be thinking about, like staying out of small airplanes and such. So at any rate, this has really been a fun show for me. And I loved both Daniel and Vicki so very much. And The amount of research and work that they're actually doing is amazing. When I look at what happened with the Stephanie Lambert statement, the Stephanie Scott cross-examination that they did, it was with Kurt Olson did the cross-examination. It was amazing. He's brilliant. And I was able to go out for lunch with everybody afterwards and have some more, I don't know, just thoughts that came on after that cross-examination. There is a lot going on behind the scenes. I have a lawsuit out there against Jonathan Brader also, and they don't even know what to do with it. They're at dead ends when you have people such as myself and Daniel, Troy Smocks, and some of the other people out there that are working on these pro se cases. They don't know what to do with us. And it's fun. It's really fun. And one of them builds on another. So with Brader perjuring himself, and then we have another lawsuit, mine, that's just sitting there waiting for the judge to do something. They don't even know what to do on this. There's another one that I have out there on Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and it's the same way. They don't know what to do with the pro se cases, which is why I've been focusing on it. So I'm assuming that he got word that there was some more motion there that he had to leave quickly for. So you know what? We're just going to go ahead and end the broadcast right now and hope everybody has a great day. So with that said, I'm going to say a prayer and we will turn our attention to God Almighty and know that he's in charge. It's kind of fun to see bad guys maybe having more problems than what they actually intended to have. And I'm going to leave it at that. Dear Heavenly Father, thank you so very much for this day. What a wonderful day with good news all around and that we are seeing justice. It's not the way that the news or the fake news or alternative news is always presenting it. But when we search and ask you for answers... You're always good and faithful and you give them to us. And we're thankful for your leading in all situations. We thank you for the path that you've put ahead of us. We're not asking for an easy path. We're asking you to give us the feet to walk the path that you're asking us to walk. And we know that you're good and righteous and you give us everything we need, our provision, our leading, wisdom, discernment, all of those things that you give us when the world seems to be in chaos. So we thank you for that. And I thank you for every single person that's watching. We ask that you give them strength and positivity and peace in times that seem to be out of control. Because you know what? We know you're in control. You're always in control of the situation and we're learning. We have learned so much coming out of this system of captivity, this satanic system where you've got people like Robert Maxwell publishing textbooks. We're focusing right now on all of those things in our local school districts. It's pretty timely to come out and see that Pergamon Press, Satanic Press, is actually run and has been running by these people behind the scenes. And thank you for showing us and leading us down paths so that we can see truth. You've been a great friend to us, and we want to be a great friend to you. It's a wonderful, wonderful day to be alive, and we thank you for that gift. In the name of Jesus Christ, we pray. Amen. Thank you, everybody, for being here. I will be on tomorrow with John Tater in the morning and Mike Bambus. We're going to be looking into further into X My Tax and see why they keep attacking me for telling the truth. And it's going to keep going. We're going to tell the truth on all situations. I don't take any money. Nobody here takes any money for what we're doing here. This is because we believe in this. We're not in here to for corruption or grift or anything. We're in here because we're patriots. We are on a mission from God, shall I say, to right this nation that he's given to us. It just needs a little maintenance and a few good strategic moves by God Almighty, not by us. It's going to bring things back into order. and justice is going to be served. Just wait, just wait. This is going to be fun. And being able to look at it as an adventure where we know who's in control and who to trust, it's God Almighty, makes it a lot more fun. Have a wonderful day today, and I'll be seeing you tomorrow.